暂无摘要。

This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to compare perioperative and oncologic outcomes in patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) treated with robotic-assisted surgery versus open laparotomy. The study followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and cohort studies up to June 15, 2024, were identified using PubMed, EMBASE, and Google Scholar. Additionally, reference lists of included studies, relevant review articles, and clinical guidelines were manually searched. The primary outcomes evaluated were length of stay, 90-day mortality, postoperative pancreatic fistula (POPF), and Post-pancreatectomy haemorrhage (PPH). Secondary outcomes included estimated blood loss, reoperation rate, lymph node yield, and operative time. The final analysis included 10 retrospective cohort studies involving 23,272 patients (2,179 robotic-assisted and 21,093 open surgery). There were no significant differences between the two procedures in terms of postoperative pancreatic fistula, Post-pancreatectomy haemorrhage, lymph node yield, and operative time. However, patients undergoing robotic-assisted surgery had shorter lengths of stay, lower 90-day mortality, and less estimated blood loss compared to those undergoing open surgery. The reoperation rate was higher for the robotic-assisted group. Robotic-assisted surgery for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma is safe and feasible. Compared to open surgery, it offers better perioperative and short-term oncologic outcomes, but with a higher risk of reoperation.

BACKGROUND: Postoperative pancreatic fistula (POPF) remains one of the most severe complications after pancreatic surgery. The methods for predicting pancreatic fistula are limited. We aimed to investigate the predictive value of body composition parameters measured by preoperative bioelectrical impedance analysis (BIA) on the development of POPF.
METHODS: A total of 168 consecutive patients undergoing pancreatic surgery from March 2022 to December 2022 at our institution were included in the study and randomly assigned at a 3:2 ratio to the training group and the validation group. All data, including previously reported risk factors for POPF and parameters measured by BIA, were collected. Risk factors were analyzed by univariable and multivariable logistic regression analysis. A prediction model was established to predict the development of POPF based on these parameters.
RESULTS: POPF occurred in 41 of 168 (24.4%) patients. In the training group of 101 enrolled patients, visceral fat area (VFA) (odds ratio [OR] = 1.077, P = 0.001) and fat mass index (FMI) (OR = 0.628, P = 0.027) were found to be independently associated with POPF according to multivariable analysis. A prediction model including VFA and FMI was established to predict the development of POPF with an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) of 0.753. The efficacy of the prediction model was also confirmed in the internal validation group (AUC 0.785, 95% CI 0.659-0.911).
CONCLUSIONS: Preoperative assessment of body fat distribution by BIA can predict the risk of POPF after pancreatic surgery.

BACKGROUND: The advancement of laparoscopic technology has broadened the application of laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy (LPD) for treating pancreatic head and ampullary tumors. Despite its benefits, postoperative pancreatic fistula (POPF) and postpancreatectomy hemorrhage (PPH) remain significant complications. Ligamentum teres hepatis wrapping around the gastroduodenal artery (GDA) stump show limitations in reducing POPF and PPH.
METHODS: This study retrospectively analyzed patients undergoing LPD from January 2016 to October 2023, We compared the effectiveness of the two-parts wrapping (the ligamentum teres hepatis wrapping of the gastroduodenal artery stump and the omentum flap wrapping of the pancreatojejunal anastomosis) and ligamentum teres hepatis wrapping around the gastroduodenal artery (GDA) in reducing postoperative pancreatic fistula (POPF) and postpancreatectomy hemorrhage (PPH), using propensity score matching for the analysis.
RESULTS: A total of 172 patients were analyzed, showing that the two-parts wrapping group significantly reduced the rates of overall and severe complications, POPF, and PPH compared to ligamentum teres hepatis wrapping around the GDA group. Specifically, the study found lower rates of grade B/C POPF and no instances of PPH in the two-parts wrapping group, alongside shorter postoperative hospital stays and drainage removal times. These benefits were particularly notable in patients with soft pancreatic textures and pancreatic duct diameters of < 3 mm.
CONCLUSIONS: The two-parts wrapping technique significantly reduce the risks of POPF and PPH in LPD, offering a promising approach for patients with soft pancreas and pancreatic duct diameter of < 3 mm.

BACKGROUND: Laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy (LPD) is a surgical procedure for treating pancreatic cancer; however, the risk of complications remains high owing to the wide range of organs involved during the surgery and the difficulty of anastomosis. Pancreatic fistula (PF) is a major complication that not only increases the risk of postoperative infection and abdominal hemorrhage but may also cause multi-organ failure, which is a serious threat to the patient\'s life. This study hypothesized the risk factors for PF after LPD.
OBJECTIVE: To identify the risk factors for PF after laparoscopic pancreatoduodenectomy in patients with pancreatic cancer.
METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed the data of 201 patients admitted to the Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center between August 2022 and August 2023 who underwent LPD for pancreatic cancer. On the basis of the PF\'s incidence (grades B and C), patients were categorized into the PF (n = 15) and non-PF groups (n = 186). Differences in general data, preoperative laboratory indicators, and surgery-related factors between the two groups were compared and analyzed using multifactorial logistic regression and receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) curve analyses.
RESULTS: The proportions of males, combined hypertension, soft pancreatic texture, and pancreatic duct diameter ≤ 3 mm; surgery time; body mass index (BMI); and amylase (Am) level in the drainage fluid on the first postoperative day (Am > 1069 U/L) were greater in the PF group than in the non-PF group (P < 0.05), whereas the preoperative monocyte count in the PF group was lower than that in the non-PF group (all P < 0.05). The logistic regression analysis revealed that BMI > 24.91 kg/m² [odds ratio (OR) =13.978, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.886-103.581], hypertension (OR = 8.484, 95%CI: 1.22-58.994), soft pancreatic texture (OR = 42.015, 95%CI: 5.698-309.782), and operation time > 414 min (OR = 15.41, 95%CI: 1.63-145.674) were risk factors for the development of PF after LPD for pancreatic cancer (all P < 0.05). The areas under the ROC curve for BMI, hypertension, soft pancreatic texture, and time prediction of PF surgery were 0.655, 0.661, 0.873, and 0.758, respectively.
CONCLUSIONS: BMI (> 24.91 kg/m²), hypertension, soft pancreatic texture, and operation time (> 414 min) are considered to be the risk factors for postoperative PF.

BACKGROUND: Central pancreatectomy is a surgical procedure for benign and low-grade malignant tumors which located in the neck and proximal body of the pancreas that facilitates the preservation of pancreatic endocrine and exocrine functions but has a high morbidity rate, especially postoperative pancreatic fistula (POPF). The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to evaluate the safety and effectiveness between minimally invasive central pancreatectomy (MICP) and open central pancreatectomy (OCP) basing on perioperative outcomes.
METHODS: An extensive literature search to compare MICP and OCP was conducted from October 2003 to October 2023 on PubMed, Medline, Embase, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library. Fixed-effect models or random effects were selected based on heterogeneity, and pooled odds ratios (ORs) or mean differences (MDs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated.
RESULTS: A total of 10 studies with a total of 510 patients were included. There was no significant difference in POPF between MICP and OCP (OR = 0.95; 95% CI [0.64, 1.43]; P = 0.82), whereas intraoperative blood loss (MD = - 125.13; 95% CI [- 194.77, -55.49]; P < 0.001) and length of hospital stay (MD = - 2.86; 95% CI [- 5.00, - 0.72]; P = 0.009) were in favor of MICP compared to OCP, and there was a strong trend toward a lower intraoperative transfusion rate in MICP than in OCP (MD = 0.34; 95% CI [0.11, 1.00]; P = 0.05). There was no significant difference in other outcomes between the two groups.
CONCLUSIONS: MICP was as safe and effective as OCP and had less intraoperative blood loss and a shorter length of hospital stay. However, further studies are needed to confirm the results.

Objective: To investigate pertinent risk factors for postoperative pancreatic fistula(POPF) after robotic-assisted distal pancreatectomy(RDP). Methods: This is a retrospective cohort study. Clinical data of 1 211 patients who underwent various methods of distal pancreatectomy at the Department of General Surgery,Ruijin Hospital,Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine,between January 2021 and December 2023 were retrospectively collected. Among the 1 211 patients,440 cases were in the robot-assisted group(173 males and 267 females),with an age(M(IQR)) of 55(29)years;720 cases were in the open surgery group (390 males and 330 females),with an age of 64(15)years;and 51 cases were in the laparoscopic group(17 males and 34 females),with an age of 56(25)years. These 440 patients who underwent RDP were divided into two cohorts based on the presence of clinically relevant pancreatic fistulas(grades B and C). Univariate and multivariate analysis were performed on 27 factors related to POPF. Univariate analysis methods included independent sample t-test,Mann-Whitney U test,and χ2 test,while multivariate analysis utilized binary logistic regression. Results: After stratification by pathological type,there was no significant difference in the incidence of pancreatic fistula between the robot-assisted group and the open surgery group(benign tumor:χ2=1.200,P=0.952;malignant tumor:χ2=0.391,P=0.532). The surgical duration of the RDP group (Z1=15.113,P1<0.01; Z2=4.232, P2<0.01) was significantly shorter than that of the open surgery and laparoscopic groups,so as the intraoperative blood loss (Z1=12.530,P1<0.01;Z2=2.550,P2=0.032). Postoperative hospital stay in the RDP group was significantly shorter than that in the open surgery group (Z1=10.947, P1<0.01), but not different from that in the laparoscopic group (P2>0.05). All 440 patients underwent successful surgery,of which there was only 1 case who underwent a conversion to open surgery. A total of 104 patients(23.6%) developed clinically relevant pancreatic fistulas,and no perioperative mortality was observed. Univariate analysis revealed that 6 factors were associated with POPF after RDP: gender(χ2=12.048,P=0.001),history of smoking (χ2=6.327,P=0.012),history of alcohol consumption (χ2=17.597,P<0.01),manual pancreas division (χ2=9.839,P=0.002),early elevation of amylase in drainage fluid (Z=5.187,P<0.01),and delayed gastric emptying (χ2=4.485,P=0.034). No statistically significant association with POPF was found for the remaining factors(all P>0.05).The cut-off value for the early amylase level in the drainage fluid was determined to be 7 719.5 IU/ml,with an area under curve of 0.676 determined by receiver operating characteristic curve analysis. Binary logistic regression analysis identified a history of alcohol consumption(P=0.002,95%CI: 0.112 to 0.623), manual pancreas division(P=0.001,95%CI:1.446 to 4.082),early amylase level of drainage fluid ≥7 719.5 IU/ml(P<0.01,95%CI:0.151 to 0.438),and delayed gastric emptying (P=0.020, 95%CI: 1.131 to 4.233) as independent risk factors for POPF of RDP. Conclusion: Patients with pancreatic body and tail tumors who receive RDP therapy are at increased risk of developing a pancreatic fistula if they have a history of alcohol consumption,manual pancreas division,early elevation of amylase in drainage fluid to ≥7 719.5 IU/ml, or delayed gastric emptying.
目的： 探讨机器人辅助胰体尾切除术（RDP）术后发生胰瘘的相关因素。 方法： 本研究为回顾性队列研究。回顾性收集2021年1月至2023年12月于上海交通大学医学院附属瑞金医院胰腺外科接受不同方式胰体尾切除术的1 211例胰体尾部肿瘤患者的临床资料。其中机器人辅助组（RDP组）440例，男性173例，女性267例，年龄［M（IQR）］55（29）岁；开腹组720例，男性390例，女性330例，年龄64（15）岁；腹腔镜组51例，男性17例，女性34例，年龄56（25）岁。根据是否发生临床相关胰瘘（B、C级）将440例RDP组患者分为胰瘘组和无胰瘘组，对围手术期与术后胰瘘发生相关的27个因素进行单因素和多因素分析，单因素分析采用独立样本t检验、Mann-Whitney U检验或χ2检验，多因素分析采用二元Logistic回归。 结果： 按病理学类型分层后，RDP组与开腹组胰瘘发生率的差异无统计学意义（良性：χ2=1.200，P=0.952；恶性：χ2=0.391，P=0.532）。RDP组的手术时间（Z1=15.113，P1<0.01；Z2=4.232，P2<0.01）、术中出血量（Z1=12.530，P1<0.01，Z2=2.550，P2=0.032）均低于开腹组及腹腔镜组，术后住院时间短于开腹组（Z1=10.947，P1<0.01），而与腹腔镜组无差异（P2>0.05）。440例RDP组患者均顺利完成手术，中转开腹1例，104例（23.6%）患者发生临床相关胰瘘，无围手术期死亡。单因素分析结果显示，性别（χ2=12.048，P=0.001）、吸烟史（χ2=6.327，P=0.012）、饮酒史（χ2=17.597，P<0.01）、胰腺离断方法（χ2=9.839，P=0.002）、早期淀粉酶水平（Z=5.187，P<0.01）和排气恢复时间（χ2=4.485，P=0.034）与RDP术后胰瘘发生相关。通过受试者工作特征曲线得到早期引流液淀粉酶的最佳截断值为7 719.5 IU/ml，曲线下面积为0.676。二元Logistic回归分析结果显示，有饮酒史（P=0.002，95%CI：0.112~0.623）、手工法离断胰腺（P=0.001，95%CI：1.446~4.082）、早期引流液淀粉酶浓度≥7 719.5 IU/ml（P<0.01，95%CI：0.151~0.438）和延迟排气（P=0.020，95%CI：1.131~4.233）为RDP术后发生胰瘘的独立危险因素。 结论： 接受RDP治疗的胰体尾部肿瘤患者有饮酒史、手工法离断胰腺、早期引流液淀粉酶浓度≥7 719.5 IU/ml和延迟排气时，更易发生胰瘘。.

BACKGROUND: Delayed gastric emptying (DGE) commonly occurs after pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD). Risk factors for DGE have been reported in open PD but are rarely reported in laparoscopic PD (LPD). This study was designed to evaluate the perioperative risk factors for DGE and secondary DGE after LPD in a single center.
METHODS: This retrospective cohort study included patients who underwent LPD between October 2014 and April 2023. Demographic data, preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative data were collected. The risk factors for DGE and secondary DGE were analyzed.
RESULTS: A total of 827 consecutive patients underwent LPD. One hundred and forty-two patients (17.2%) developed DGE of any type. Sixty-five patients (7.9%) had type A, 62 (7.5%) had type B, and the remaining 15 (1.8%) had type C DGE. Preoperative biliary drainage (p = 0.032), blood loss (p = 0.014), and 90-day any major complication with Dindo-Clavien score ≥ III (p < 0.001) were independent significant risk factors for DGE. Seventy-six (53.5%) patients were diagnosed with primary DGE, whereas 66 (46.5%) patients had DGE secondary to concomitant complications. Higher body mass index, soft pancreatic texture, and perioperative transfusion were independent risk factors for secondary DGE. Hospital stay and drainage tube removal time were significantly longer in the DGE and secondary DGE groups.
CONCLUSIONS: Identifying patients at an increased risk of DGE and secondary DGE can be used to intervene earlier, avoid potential risk factors, and make more informed clinical decisions to shorten the duration of perioperative management.

暂无摘要。

UNASSIGNED: The five-needle pancreato-intestinal anastomosis method is used in laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy (LPD). The aim of this study was to explore the clinical efficacy and adverse reactions of this new surgical method and to provide a scientific reference for promoting this new surgical method in the future.
UNASSIGNED: A single-centre observational study was conducted to evaluate the safety and practicality of the five-needle method for pancreatojejunostomy in LPD surgeries. The clinical data of 78 patients who were diagnosed with periampullary malignancies and underwent LPD were collected from the 1st of August 2020 to the 31st of June 2023 at Lanzhou University First Hospital. Forty-three patients were treated with the \'Five-Needle\' method (test groups), and 35 patients were treated with the \'Duct-to-Mucosa\' method (control group) for pancreatojejunostomy. These two methods are the most commonly used and highly preferred pancreatointestinal anastomosis methods worldwide. The primary outcome was pancreatic fistula, and the incidence of which was compared between the two groups.
UNASSIGNED: The incidence of pancreatic fistula in the five-needle method group and the duct-to-mucosa method group was not significantly different (25.6% vs. 28.6%, p=0.767). Additionally, there were no significant differences between the two groups in terms of intraoperative blood loss (Z=-1.330, p=0.183), postoperative haemorrhage rates (p=0.998), length of postoperative hospital stay (Z=-0.714, p=0.475), bile leakage rate (p=0.745), or perioperative mortality rate (p=0.999). However, the operative time in the \'Five-Needle\' method group was significantly shorter than that in the \'Duct-to-Mucosa\' method group (270 ± 170 mins vs. 300 ± 210 mins, Z=-2.336, p=0.019). Further analysis revealed that in patients with pancreatic ducts smaller than 3 mm, the incidence of pancreatic fistula was lower for the \'Five-Needle\' method than for the \'Duct-to-Mucosa\' method (12.5% vs. 53.8%, p=0.007).
UNASSIGNED: The five-needle method is safe and efficient for pancreatojejunostomy in LPD, and is particularly suitable for anastomosis in nondilated pancreatic ducts. It is a promising, valuable, and recommendable surgical method worthy of wider adoption.