Pan-Immune-Inflammation Value

泛免疫炎症值
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    本研究旨在探讨泛免疫-炎症值(PIV)联合PILE评分对晚期非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)患者免疫治疗的预测价值,并构建列线图预测模型,为临床工作提供参考。
    选择2019年1月至2021年12月在青岛市市立医院接受ICIs治疗的晚期非小细胞肺癌患者作为研究对象。卡方检验,Kaplan-Meier生存分析,采用Cox比例风险回归分析评估预后。结果通过列线图可视化,并通过受试者工作特性曲线下面积(AUC)和C指数等指标判断模型的性能。根据PILE评分将患者分为高危组和低危组,评估不同风险组患者的预后。
    多因素Cox回归分析显示,免疫相关不良事件(irAEs)是总生存期(OS)改善的预后因素,ECOGPS评分≥2分,治疗前骨转移,高PIV表达是OS的独立危险因素。通过列线图模型预测的OS的C指数为0.750(95%CI:0.677-0.823),标定曲线和ROC曲线表明该模型具有良好的预测性能。与低风险组相比,PILE高危人群的患者与较高的炎症状态和较差的身体状况相关,这通常导致预后较差。
    PIV可作为ICIs治疗晚期NSCLC患者的预后指标,并且可以构建一个列线图预测模型来评估患者的生存预测,从而有助于更好的临床决策和预后评估。
    UNASSIGNED: The purpose of this study was to investigate the predictive value of Pan-Immune-Inflammation Value (PIV) combined with the PILE score for immunotherapy in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and to construct a nomogram prediction model to provide reference for clinical work.
    UNASSIGNED: Patients with advanced NSCLC who received ICIs treatment in Qingdao Municipal Hospital from January 2019 to December 2021 were selected as the study subjects. The chi-square test, Kaplan-Meier survival analysis, and Cox proportional risk regression analysis were used to evaluate the prognosis. The results were visualized by a nomogram, and the performance of the model was judged by indicators such as the area under the subject operating characteristic curve (AUC) and C-index. The patients were divided into high- and low-risk groups by PILE score, and the prognosis of patients in different risk groups was evaluated.
    UNASSIGNED: Multivariate Cox regression analysis showed that immune-related adverse events (irAEs) were prognostic factors for overall survival (OS) improvement, and ECOG PS score ≥2, bone metastases before treatment, and high PIV expression were independent risk factors for OS. The C index of OS predicted by the nomogram model is 0.750 (95% CI: 0.677-0.823), and the Calibration and ROC curves show that the model has good prediction performance. Compared with the low-risk group, patients in the high-risk group of PILE were associated with a higher inflammatory state and poorer physical condition, which often resulted in a poorer prognosis.
    UNASSIGNED: PIV can be used as a prognostic indicator for patients with advanced NSCLC treated with ICIs, and a nomogram prediction model can be constructed to evaluate the survival prediction of patients, thus contributing to better clinical decision-making and prognosis assessment.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    泛免疫炎症值(PIV)作为一种新型的炎症指标最近受到了更多的关注。我们旨在评估PIV与脓毒症患者预后之间的关系。数据是从重症监护医学信息集市IV数据库中提取的。主要和次要结局是28天和90天死亡率。通过Kaplan-Meier曲线评估PIV与结果之间的关联,Cox回归分析,限制三次样条曲线和子群分析。共纳入11,331例脓毒症患者。Kaplan-Meier曲线显示PIV较高的脓毒症患者28天生存率较低。在多变量Cox回归分析中,log2-PIV与28天死亡风险呈正相关[HR(95%CI)1.06(1.03,1.09),P<0.001]。log2-PIV与28天死亡率之间的关系是非线性的,预测拐点为8。在拐点的右边,高log2-PIV与28天死亡风险增加相关[HR(95%CI)1.13(1.09,1.18),P<0.001]。然而,在这一点的左边,此关联无显著意义[HR(95%CI)1.01(0.94,1.08),P=0.791]。对于90天死亡率也发现了类似的结果。我们的研究表明PIV与脓毒症患者28天和90天死亡风险之间存在非线性关系。
    Pan-Immune-Inflammation Value (PIV) has recently received more attention as a novel indicator of inflammation. We aimed to evaluate the association between PIV and prognosis in septic patients. Data were extracted from the Medical Information Mart for Intensive Care IV database. The primary and secondary outcomes were 28-day and 90-day mortality. The association between PIV and outcomes was assessed by Kaplan-Meier curves, Cox regression analysis, restricted cubic spline curves and subgroup analysis. A total of 11,331 septic patients were included. Kaplan-Meier curves showed that septic patients with higher PIV had lower 28-day survival rate. In multivariable Cox regression analysis, log2-PIV was positively associated with the risk of 28-day mortality [HR (95% CI) 1.06 (1.03, 1.09), P < 0.001]. The relationship between log2-PIV and 28-day mortality was non-linear with a predicted inflection point at 8. To the right of the inflection point, high log2-PIV was associated with an increased 28-day mortality risk [HR (95% CI) 1.13 (1.09, 1.18), P < 0.001]. However, to the left of this point, this association was non-significant [HR (95% CI) 1.01 (0.94, 1.08), P = 0.791]. Similar results were found for 90-day mortality. Our study showed a non-linear relationship between PIV and 28-day and 90-day mortality risk in septic patients.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    有效生物标志物的预后价值,泛免疫炎症值(PIV),对于头颈部鳞状细胞癌(HNSCC)患者,在根治性手术或放化疗后尚未得到很好的探索。本研究旨在构建和验证基于PIV的列线图,以预测HNSCC患者的生存结果。
    共有161例接受根治性手术的HNSCC患者被纳入回顾性研究队列。使用最大选择的秩统计方法确定PIV的截止值。进行了多变量Cox回归和最小绝对收缩和选择算子(LASSO)回归分析,以开发两个预测无病生存(DFS)的列线图(模型A和模型B)。一致性指数,接收机工作特性曲线,校正曲线,和决策曲线分析用于评估列线图。由50例仅接受放疗或放化疗(RT/CRT)的患者组成的队列用于PIV和列线图的一般性测试。
    PIV较高(≥123.3)的患者DFS较差(HR,5.01;95%CI,3.25-7.72;p<0.0001)和总生存期(OS)(HR,与发展队列中PIV较低(<123.3)的患者相比,5.23;95%CI,3.34-8.18;p<0.0001)。模型A的预测因素包括年龄,TNM阶段,中性粒细胞与淋巴细胞比率(NLR),还有PIV,模型B包括TNM阶段,淋巴细胞与单核细胞比率(LMR),和PIV。与单独的TNM阶段相比,这两个列线图显示出良好的校准和鉴别,并在内部验证中显示出令人满意的临床效用.一般性测试结果表明,在RT/CRT队列中,较高的PIV也与较差的生存结果相关,并且两个列线图可能对接受不同治疗的患者具有普遍适用性。
    基于PIV的列线图,一个简单但有用的指标,可以为根治性手术后的单个HNSCC患者提供预后预测,可广泛应用于单纯RT/CRT术后的患者。
    UNASSIGNED: The prognostic value of an effective biomarker, pan-immune-inflammation value (PIV), for head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) patients after radical surgery or chemoradiotherapy has not been well explored. This study aimed to construct and validate nomograms based on PIV to predict survival outcomes of HNSCC patients.
    UNASSIGNED: A total of 161 HNSCC patients who underwent radical surgery were enrolled retrospectively for development cohort. The cutoff of PIV was determined using the maximally selected rank statistics method. Multivariable Cox regression and least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) regression analyses were performed to develop two nomograms (Model A and Model B) that predict disease-free survival (DFS). The concordance index, receiver operating characteristic curves, calibration curves, and decision curve analysis were used to evaluate the nomograms. A cohort composed of 50 patients who received radiotherapy or chemoradiotherapy (RT/CRT) alone was applied for generality testing of PIV and nomograms.
    UNASSIGNED: Patients with higher PIV (≥123.3) experienced a worse DFS (HR, 5.01; 95% CI, 3.25-7.72; p<0.0001) and overall survival (OS) (HR, 5.23; 95% CI, 3.34-8.18; p<0.0001) compared to patients with lower PIV (<123.3) in the development cohort. Predictors of Model A included age, TNM stage, neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), and PIV, and that of Model B included TNM stage, lymphocyte-to-monocyte ratio (LMR), and PIV. In comparison with TNM stage alone, the two nomograms demonstrated good calibration and discrimination and showed satisfactory clinical utility in internal validation. The generality testing results showed that higher PIV was also associated with worse survival outcomes in the RT/CRT cohort and the possibility that the two nomograms may have a universal applicability for patients with different treatments.
    UNASSIGNED: The nomograms based on PIV, a simple but useful indicator, can provide prognosis prediction of individual HNSCC patients after radical surgery and may be broadly applicated for patients after RT/CRT alone.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:使用术前泛免疫-炎症值(PIV)和单核细胞与高密度脂蛋白比值(MHR)来反映炎症,豁免权,和胆固醇代谢,我们旨在开发并可视化一种新的列线图模型,用于预测结直肠癌(CRC)患者的生存结局.
    方法:对172例接受根治性切除术的CRC患者进行回顾性分析。根据PIV和MHR的最佳临界值对患者进行分组后进行生存分析。使用Cox比例风险回归进行单变量和多变量分析以筛选独立的预后因素。基于这些因素,构建并验证了列线图.
    结果:PIV与肿瘤位置显著相关(P<0.001),肿瘤最大直径(P=0.008),和T阶段(P=0.019)。MHR与性别密切相关(P=0.016),肿瘤最大直径(P=0.002),和T阶段(P=0.038)。多因素分析结果显示,PIV(危险比(HR)=2.476,95%置信区间(CI)=1.410-4.348,P=0.002),MHR(HR=3.803,95CI=1.609-8.989,P=0.002),CEA(HR=1.977,95CI=1.121-3.485,P=0.019),和TNM分期(HR=1.759,95CI=1.010-3.063,P=0.046)是总生存期(OS)的独立预后指标。开发了包含这些变量的列线图,证明了操作系统的强大预测准确性。预测模型的曲线下面积(AUC)值1-,2-,和3年分别为0.791,0.768,0.811。在1-,2-,和3年提出了很高的可信度。此外,在1-,2-,和3年证明了预测生存结果的重要临床效用。
    结论:术前PIV和MHR是影响CRC预后的独立危险因素。新开发的列线图展示了强大的预测能力,在促进临床决策过程中提供了实质性的效用。
    OBJECTIVE: Using the preoperative pan-immune-inflammation value (PIV) and the monocyte to high-density lipoprotein ratio (MHR) to reflect inflammation, immunity, and cholesterol metabolism, we aim to develop and visualize a novel nomogram model for predicting the survival outcomes in patients with colorectal cancer (CRC).
    METHODS: A total of 172 patients with CRC who underwent radical resection were retrospectively analyzed. Survival analysis was conducted after patients were grouped according to the optimal cut-off values of PIV and MHR. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed using Cox proportional hazards regression to screen the independent prognostic factors. Based on these factors, a nomogram was constructed and validated.
    RESULTS: The PIV was significantly associated with tumor location (P < 0.001), tumor maximum diameter (P = 0.008), and T stage (P = 0.019). The MHR was closely related to gender (P = 0.016), tumor maximum diameter (P = 0.002), and T stage (P = 0.038). Multivariate analysis results showed that PIV (Hazard Ratio (HR) = 2.476, 95% Confidence Interval (CI) = 1.410-4.348, P = 0.002), MHR (HR = 3.803, 95%CI = 1.609-8.989, P = 0.002), CEA (HR = 1.977, 95%CI = 1.121-3.485, P = 0.019), and TNM stage (HR = 1.759, 95%CI = 1.010-3.063, P = 0.046) were independent prognostic indicators for overall survival (OS). A nomogram incorporating these variables was developed, demonstrating robust predictive accuracy for OS. The area under the curve (AUC) values of the predictive model for 1-, 2-, and 3- year are 0.791,0.768,0.811, respectively. The calibration curves for the probability of survival at 1-, 2-, and 3- year presented a high degree of credibility. Furthermore, Decision curve analysis (DCA) for the probability of survival at 1-, 2-, and 3- year demonstrate the significant clinical utility in predicting survival outcomes.
    CONCLUSIONS: Preoperative PIV and MHR are independent risk factors for CRC prognosis. The novel developed nomogram demonstrates a robust predictive ability, offering substantial utility in facilitating the clinical decision-making process.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:本研究旨在进一步评估泛免疫-炎症值(PIV)作为喉部和咽部肿瘤患者预后标志物的潜在价值。
    方法:选择在山东大学齐鲁医院接受手术治疗的喉咽部肿瘤患者545例。我们确定了PIV的最佳截止值,并将患者分为两组。通过卡方检验和Mann-WhitneyU检验探讨PIV与临床病理特征之间的关系。采用生存分析和Cox回归分析评价PIV与总生存期(OS)和无病生存期(DFS)的关系。我们还比较了PIV与其他炎症相关标志物的预后预测价值。最后,我们基于几个独立的预后参数建立了一个简单的评分预测模型.
    结果:我们发现PIV与临床病理特征如肿瘤分期有统计学关联(p<0.001),节点阶段(p=0.001),术后化疗(p=0.026),血管血栓形成(p=0.027)。生存分析显示PIV升高与OS和DFS降低之间存在显著相关性(p<0.0001)。多因素Cox回归分析进一步证实PIV是预后指标(HR2.507;95%CI1.343-4.681;p=0.004),优于SII,NLR,MLR和PLR。通过多变量Cox回归分析筛选出的独立预后因素中的三个被选择用于创建一致指数为0.756的评分系统。
    结论:喉部和咽部肿瘤患者PIV升高与预后不良相关,提示PIV可能是评估患者预后的重要辅助指标。
    注册号:KYLL-202307-001,日期:2023年7月。
    OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to further evaluate the potential value of Pan-Immune-Inflammation Value (PIV) as a prognostic marker in patients with laryngeal and pharyngeal tumors.
    METHODS: A total of 545 patients with laryngeal and pharyngeal tumors who underwent surgery at Qilu Hospital of Shandong University were included. We determined the optimal cutoff of PIV and divided the patients into two groups. The relationship between PIV and clinicopathological features was explored by the chi-square test and the Mann-Whitney U test. Survival analysis and Cox regression analysis were used to evaluate the relationship between PIV and overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS). We also compared the prognostic predictive value of PIV with other inflammation-related markers. Finally, we developed a simple scoring prediction model based on several independent prognostic parameters.
    RESULTS: We found that PIV was statistically associated with clinicopathological features such as tumor stage (p < 0.001), node stage (p = 0.001), postoperative chemotherapy (p = 0.026), and vascular thrombosis (p = 0.027). Survival analysis demonstrated a significant correlation between elevated PIV and reduced OS and DFS (p < 0.0001). Multivariate Cox regression analysis further confirmed PIV as a prognostic indicator (HR 2.507; 95% CI 1.343-4.681; p = 0.004), which is superior to SII, NLR, MLR and PLR. Three of the independent prognostic factors screened by multivariate Cox regression analysis were selected to be used to create a scoring system with a concordance index of 0.756.
    CONCLUSIONS: Elevated PIV is associated with poor prognosis in patients with laryngeal and pharyngeal tumors, suggesting that PIV may be an important adjunctive indicator for assessing patient prognosis.
    UNASSIGNED: Registration number: KYLL-202307-001, date: July 2023.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    本研究旨在探讨泛免疫炎症值(PIV)的预后作用,并开发一种新的风险模型,以指导射频消融(RFA)治疗早期肝细胞癌(HCC)。
    接受RFA治疗的早期HCC患者随机分为训练队列A(n=65)和测试队列B(n=68)。在队列A中筛选各种免疫炎症生物标志物(IIB)。在队列B和C中评估和验证了PIV的预后作用。分别。在队列C中建立列线图风险模型,并在合并队列D中进行验证。在低和高风险组中评估RFA后辅助抗血管生成疗法加免疫检查点抑制剂(AA-ICI)的临床益处。
    PIV的截止点是120。高PIV是不利的无复发生存率(RFS)和总生存率(OS)的独立预测因子。在队列B(PRFS=0.016,POS=0.011)和C(PRFS<0.001,POS<0.001)中,高PIV患者的RFS和OS率均明显低于低PIV患者。基于PIV的列线图模型,在外部验证队列C中,肿瘤数量和BCLC分期在风险分层中表现良好。AA-ICI辅助治疗对高危患者的OS有额外益处(p=0.011).
    PIV是接受治愈性RFA的早期HCC患者RFS和OS的可行独立预后因素。提出的基于PIV的列线图风险模型可以帮助临床医生识别高危患者,并制定辅助系统治疗和疾病随访方案。
    关键发现高泛免疫炎症值(PIV)是接受根治性射频消融(RFA)的早期肝细胞癌(HCC)患者的不良无复发生存期(RFS)和总生存期(OS)的独立指标。佐剂抗血管生成靶向治疗加免疫检查点抑制剂(AA-ICI)治疗显示,对于基于PIV的列线图风险模型定义的高危患者,OS有额外的益处。肿瘤数量和BCLC分期。什么是已知的,什么是新的?炎症和宿主免疫力受损与肝癌的发生和进展有关。越来越多的证据表明,免疫炎症生物标志物(IIB)在接受RFA的早期HCC患者中具有预后作用。然而,在这种情况下,尚未确定PIV的预后潜力。在这里,首次报道,在接受根治性RFA治疗的早期HCC患者中,高PIV是导致RFS和OS不良的独立危险因素,并有助于区分低危和高危患者.RFA后辅助AA-ICI治疗有利于高危患者的OS。这意味着什么,现在应该改变什么?对于具有高风险因素的早期肝癌(高PIV,多个肿瘤病灶和更晚期的BCLC分期),有必要在治愈性RFA后进行强化随访和系统辅助治疗.
    UNASSIGNED: This study aimed to explore the prognostic role of pan-immune-inflammation value (PIV) and develop a new risk model to guide individualized adjuvant systemic treatment following radiofrequency ablation (RFA) for early-stage hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC).
    UNASSIGNED: Patients with early-stage HCC treated by RFA were randomly divided into training cohort A (n = 65) and testing cohort B (n = 68). Another 265 counterparts were enrolled into external validating cohort C. Various immune-inflammatory biomarkers (IIBs) were screened in cohort A. Prognostic role of PIV was evaluated and validated in cohort B and C, respectively. A nomogram risk model was built in cohort C and validated in pooled cohort D. Clinical benefits of adjuvant anti-angiogenesis therapy plus immune checkpoint inhibitor (AA-ICI) following RFA was assessed in low- and high-risk groups.
    UNASSIGNED: The cutoff point of PIV was 120. High PIV was an independent predictor of unfavorable recurrence-free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS). RFS and OS rates of patients with high PIV were significantly lower than those with low PIV both in cohort B (PRFS=0.016, POS=0.011) and C (PRFS<0.001, POS<0.001). The nomogram model based on PIV, tumor number and BCLC staging performed well in risk stratification in external validating cohort C. Adjuvant AA-ICI treatment showed an added benefit in OS (p = 0.011) for high-risk patients.
    UNASSIGNED: PIV is a feasible independent prognostic factor for RFS and OS in early-stage HCC patients who received curative RFA. The proposed PIV-based nomogram risk model could help clinicians identify high-risk patients and tailor adjuvant systemic treatment and disease follow-up scheme.
    Key findingsHigh pan-immune-inflammation value (PIV) is an independent indicator of unfavorable recurrence-free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS) for early-stage hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) patients who received curative radiofrequency ablation (RFA).Adjuvant anti-angiogenesis target therapy plus immune checkpoint inhibitor (AA-ICI) treatment showed added benefit in OS for the high-risk patients defined by a nomogram risk model based on PIV, tumor number and BCLC staging.What is known and what is new?Inflammation and impaired host immunity are associated with carcinogenesis and progression of HCC. Increasing evidences showed that immune-inflammatory biomarkers (IIBs) had prognostic roles in early-stage HCC patients who received RFA. However, prognostic potential of PIV has not been determined in this setting.Herein, high PIV was first reported to be an independent risk factor of poor RFS and OS in early-stage HCC patients treated by curative RFA and helped to discriminate patients between low- and high-risk groups. Adjuvant AA-ICI treatment following RFA was beneficial to OS of patients in the high-risk group.What is the implication, and what should change now?For early-stage HCC with high-risk factors (high PIV, multiple tumor foci and more advanced BCLC stage), intensive follow-up and adjuvant systemic therapy following curative RFA were warranted.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    泛免疫炎症值(PIV)是整合不同外周血细胞亚群的综合生物标志物。本研究旨在评估接受放化疗的鼻咽癌(NPC)患者的PIV预后能力。使用以下等式评估PIV:(中性粒细胞计数×血小板计数×单核细胞计数)/淋巴细胞计数。使用Kaplan-Meier方法和Cox风险回归模型进行生存分析。使用受试者工作特征分析确定PIV和全身免疫炎症指数(SII)的最佳临界值分别为428.0和1032.7。共招募了319名患者。低基线PIV患者(≤428.0)占69.9%(n=223),高基线PIV患者(>428.0)占30.1%(n=96)。与低PIV患者相比,高PIV患者的5年无进展生存期显著恶化[PFS;66.8vs.77.1%;危险比(HR),1.97;95%置信区间(CI),1.22-3.23);P=0.005]和5年总生存率(OS;68.7vs.86.9%,HR,2.71;95%CI,1.45-5.03;P=0.001)。PIV也是OS的重要独立预后指标(HR,2.19;95%CI,1.16-4.12;P=0.016)和PFS(HR,1.86;95%CI,1.14-3.04;P=0.013),在多变量分析中优于SII。总之,在接受放化疗的NPC患者中,PIV是生存结局的有力预测因子,优于SII.应进行PIV的前瞻性验证,以更好地对NPC患者的根治性治疗进行分层。
    The pan-immune-inflammation-value (PIV) is a comprehensive biomarker that integrates different peripheral blood cell subsets. The present study aimed to evaluate the prognostic ability of PIV in patients with nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) undergoing chemoradiotherapy. PIV was assessed using the following equation: (Neutrophil count × platelet count × monocyte count)/lymphocyte count. The Kaplan-Meier method and Cox hazards regression models were used for survival analyses. The optimal cut-off values for PIV and systemic immune-inflammation index (SII) were determined using receiver operating characteristic analysis to be 428.0 and 1032.7, respectively. A total of 319 patients were recruited. Patients with a low baseline PIV (≤428.0) accounted for 69.9% (n=223) and patients with a high baseline PIV (>428.0) accounted for 30.1% (n=96). Compared with patients with low PIV, patients with a high PIV had significantly worse 5-year progression-free survival [PFS; 66.8 vs. 77.1%; hazard ratio (HR), 1.97; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.22-3.23); P=0.005] and 5-year overall survival (OS; 68.7 vs. 86.9%, HR, 2.71; 95% CI, 1.45-5.03; P=0.001). PIV was also a significant independent prognostic indicator for OS (HR, 2.19; 95% CI, 1.16-4.12; P=0.016) and PFS (HR, 1.86; 95% CI, 1.14-3.04; P=0.013) and outperformed the SII in multivariate analysis. In conclusion, the PIV was a powerful predictor of survival outcomes and outperformed the SII in patients with NPC treated with chemoradiotherapy. Prospective validation of the PIV should be performed to better stratify radical treatment of patients with NPC.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    基于血液的免疫炎症指标已被广泛用于预测各种癌症的生存率。在这项研究中,我们寻求评估一种新的免疫-炎症标志物,称为泛免疫炎症值(PIV),在接受确定性放疗的鼻咽癌(NPC)患者中。
    对一组377例鼻咽癌患者进行回顾性分析。收集临床数据和实验室数据。进行接收器工作特征(ROC)曲线分析以确定最佳PIV截止值。生存曲线采用Kaplan-Meier法估算,并使用Cox回归模型确定预后变量。此外,我们绘制了列线图,并使用一致性指数(C指数)和校准曲线评估了其准确性.
    根据ROC分析,最佳PIV截止值为146.24。高PIV与较差的东部肿瘤协作组表现状态(ECOGPS)评分相关(p=0.017),更晚期T(p<0.001)和临床分期(p=0.024)。在单变量分析中,年龄较大,较差的ECOGPS,较高的爱泼斯坦-巴尔病毒DNA(EBV-DNA),高级T,N和临床分期,和较高的PIV水平与患者较差的总生存期(OS)相关。较差的ECOGPS,更高的EBV-DNA,稍后的T阶段,晚期临床阶段,较高的PIV与患者无进展生存期(PFS)较差相关。男性和晚期T分期与患者较差的局部无复发生存率(LRFS)相关。较差的ECOGPS,更高的EBV-DNA,稍后的T阶段,晚期临床阶段,较高的PIV与患者无远处转移生存率(DMFS)较差相关。多因素分析表明,PIV是OS的独立预后指标(HR2.231,95%CI1.241-4.011,P=0.007)。PFS(HR1.664,95%CI1.003-2.760,P=0.049),和DMFS(HR2.081,95%CI1.071-4.044,P=0.031)。OS的列线图C指数分别为0.684和PFS为0.62。根据校准曲线,生存预测和实际生存是一致的。
    治疗前PIV是预测NPC患者生存的有希望的生物标志物。
    UNASSIGNED: Blood-based immune-inflammation indexes have been widely used to predict survival in a variety of cancers. In this research, we seeked to evaluate a novel immune-inflammation marker, named the pan-immune-inflammation value (PIV), in patients with nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) undergoing definitive radiotherapy.
    UNASSIGNED: A group of 377 patients with NPC was retrospectived analyzed. Clinical data and laboratory data were collected. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis was performed in order to determine the optimal PIV cut-off value. Survival curves were estimated by Kaplan-Meier method, and prognostic variables were identified using a Cox regression model. Additionally, we developed a nomogram and assessed its acuracy using the concordance index (C-index) and a calibration curve.
    UNASSIGNED: The optimal PIV cut-off value was 146.24 according to ROC analysis. High PIV was related to poorer Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status (ECOG PS) score (p = 0.017), more advanced T (p<0.001) and clinical stages (p = 0.024). In univariate analysis, older Age, poorer ECOG PS, higher Epstein-Barr virus DNA (EBV-DNA), advanced T, N and clinical stage, and higher PIV levels were related to patients\' poorer overall survival (OS). Poorer ECOG PS, higher EBV-DNA, later T stage, later clinical stage, and higher PIV were associated with patients\' poorer progression free survival (PFS). Male sex and later T stage were associated with patients\' poorer locoregional recurrence free survival (LRRFS). Poorer ECOG PS, higher EBV-DNA, later T stage, later clinical stage, and higher PIV were associated with patients\' poorer distant metastasis free survival (DMFS). Multivariate analysis demonstrated that PIV was an independent prognostic index for OS (HR 2.231, 95 % CI 1.241-4.011, P = 0.007), PFS (HR 1.664, 95 % CI 1.003-2.760, P = 0.049), and DMFS(HR 2.081, 95 % CI 1.071-4.044, P = 0.031). Nomogram C-indexes for the nomogram of OS were 0.684, and PFS were 0.62, respectively. Survival predictions and actual survival were consistent according to the calibration curve.
    UNASSIGNED: Pre-treatment PIV is a promising biomarker for predicting survival in patients with NPC.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    脑肿瘤,尤其是神经胶质瘤,以高杀伤力而闻名。目前了解到肿瘤与凝血和炎症的相关性已经逐渐被揭示。
    本研究旨在尽可能全面地探索几种已报告的外周血参数的潜在价值,术前诊断和识别脑肿瘤(重点是胶质瘤)。
    中枢神经系统肿瘤患者(颅咽管瘤,室管膜瘤,脊髓脑膜瘤,听神经瘤,脑转移瘤,脑膜瘤,和神经胶质瘤)或原发性三叉神经痛入院进行回顾性分析。常规凝血因子试验结果,血清白蛋白试验,并在入院时记录各组患者的外周血中的血细胞检测。中性粒细胞-淋巴细胞比率(NLR),派生NLR(dNLR),血小板-淋巴细胞比率(PLR),淋巴细胞-单核细胞比率(LMR),预后营养指数(PNI),全身免疫炎症指数(SII),泛免疫炎症值(PIV),并计算了它们的配对。分析了他们识别脑肿瘤的能力及其与胶质瘤分级的相关性。
    本回顾性病例对照研究共纳入698例患者。胶质瘤患者有较高的NLR,SII,和PIV,但LMR较低。脑转移组的NLR低于对照组,脑膜瘤,和听神经瘤组,但SII和PIV高于室管膜瘤组。纤维蛋白原,白细胞计数,中性粒细胞计数,NLR,SII,GBM组PIV高于对照组。在所有比较中,NLR和NLR+dNLR显示出最大的准确性,曲线下面积(AUC)为0.7490(0.6482-0.8498)和0.7481(0.6457-0.8505),分别。PIV,dNLR+PIV,LMR+PIV排名第二,AUC为0.7200(0.6551-0.7849),0.7200(0.6526-0.7874),0.7204(0.6530-0.7878)和0.7206(0.6536-0.7875),分别。
    NLR,PIV,它们的组合在脑肿瘤的诊断中显示出很高的敏感性和特异性,尤其是神经胶质瘤.总的来说,我们的结果为这些方便可靠的外周血标志物提供了证据.
    UNASSIGNED: Brain tumors, especially gliomas, are known for high lethality. It is currently understood that the correlations of tumors with coagulation and inflammation have been gradually revealed.
    UNASSIGNED: This study aimed to explore the potential value of several reported peripheral blood parameters as comprehensively as possible, with preoperative diagnosis and identification of brain tumors (focus on gliomas).
    UNASSIGNED: Patients with central nervous system tumors (craniopharyngioma, ependymoma, spinal meningioma, acoustic neuroma, brain metastases, meningioma, and glioma) or primary trigeminal neuralgia admitted to our hospital were retrospectively analyzed. The results of the routine coagulation factor test, serum albumin test, and blood cell test in peripheral blood were recorded for each group of patients on admission. Neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), derived NLR (dNLR), platelet-lymphocyte ratio (PLR), lymphocyte-monocyte ratio (LMR), prognostic nutritional index (PNI), the systemic immune-inflammation index (SII), pan-immune-inflammation value (PIV), and their pairings were calculated. Their ability to identify brain tumors and their correlation with glioma grade were analyzed.
    UNASSIGNED: A total of 698 patients were included in this retrospective case-control study. Glioma patients had higher NLR, SII, and PIV but lower LMR. The NLR in the brain metastasis group was lower than that in the control, meningioma, and acoustic neuroma groups, but the SII and PIV were higher than those in the ependymoma group. Fibrinogen, white blood cell count, neutrophil count, NLR, SII, and PIV in the GBM group were higher than those in the control group. In all comparisons, NLR and NLR + dNLR showed the greatest accuracy, with areas under the curve (AUCs) of 0.7490 (0.6482-0.8498) and 0.7481 (0.6457-0.8505), respectively. PIV, dNLR + PIV, and LMR + PIV ranked second, with AUCs of 0.7200 (0.6551-0.7849), 0.7200 (0.6526-0.7874), 0.7204 (0.6530-0.7878) and 0.7206 (0.6536-0.7875), respectively.
    UNASSIGNED: NLR, PIV, and their combinations show high sensitivity and specificity in the diagnosis of brain tumors, especially gliomas. Overall, our results provide evidence for these convenient and reliable peripheral blood markers.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:免疫和炎症反应在卒中的临床结局中起重要作用。本研究旨在探讨新的炎症指标泛免疫-炎症值(PIV)在急性缺血性脑卒中(AIS)患者静脉溶栓(IVT)后的临床意义。
    方法:收集了苏州大学附属第一医院接受IVT的717例患者的数据。在静脉溶栓前收集基线数据。采用多因素logistic回归分析评估PIV与静脉溶栓后3个月临床结局之间的关系。我们还使用受试者工作特征(ROC)曲线分析来评估PIV的辨别能力,血小板与淋巴细胞比率(PLR),中性粒细胞与淋巴细胞比率(NLR),和全身免疫炎症指数(SII)预测3个月的不良结局。
    结果:在717名患者中,182例(25.4%)患者在3个月时预后较差。与具有良好结局的患者相比,具有3个月不良结局的患者的PIV水平明显更高[316.32(187.42-585.67)vs.223.80(131.76-394.97),p<0.001)。在调整了潜在的混杂因素后,PIV在第3四分位数(244.21~434.49)和第4四分位数(>434.49)下降的患者中,3个月不良结局的风险显著高于第1四分位数(<139.93)(OR=1.905,95%CI:1.040~3.489;OR=2.229,95CI:1.229~4.044).PIV预测3个月不良预后的ROC曲线下面积为0.607(95CI:0.560-0.653;p<0.001)。PIV的最佳临界值为283.84(59%的灵敏度和62%的特异性)。
    结论:在接受IVT的AIS患者中,较高的PIV水平与3个月的不良预后独立相关。PIV像其他炎症因子(PLR,NLR,andSII),还可以预测AIS患者IVT后的不良结局。
    OBJECTIVE: Immune and inflammatory response plays a central role in the clinical outcomes of stroke. This study is aimed to explore the clinical significance of the new inflammation index named pan-immune-inflammation value (PIV) in patients with acute ischemic stroke (AIS) after intravenous thrombolysis therapy (IVT).
    METHODS: Data were collected from 717 patients who received IVT at the First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University. Baseline data were collected before intravenous thrombolysis. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was used to assess the association between PIV and 3 months clinical outcome after intravenous thrombolysis. We also used receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves analysis to assess the discriminative ability of PIV, platelet to lymphocyte ratio (PLR), neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio (NLR), and systemic immune-inflammation index (SII) in predicting 3 months poor outcome.
    RESULTS: Of 717 patients, 182 (25.4%) patients had poor outcomes at 3 months. Patients with 3 months of poor outcome had significantly higher PIV levels compared to those with favorable outcomes [316.32 (187.42-585.67) vs. 223.80 (131.76-394.97), p < 0.001)]. After adjusting for potential confounders, the risk of 3 months of poor outcome was significantly higher among patients whose PIV fell in the third quartile (244.21-434.49) and the fourth quartile (> 434.49) than those in the first quartile (< 139.93) (OR = 1.905, 95% CI: 1.040-3.489; OR = 2.229, 95%CI: 1.229-4.044). The area under the ROC curve of PIV to predict 3 months of poor outcome was 0.607 (95%CI: 0.560-0.654; p < 0.001). The optimal cut-off values of PIV were 283.84 (59% sensitivity and 62% specificity).
    CONCLUSIONS: The higher levels of PIV were independently associated with 3 months of poor outcomes in AIS patients receiving IVT. PIV like other inflammatory factors (PLR, NLR, and SII), can also predict adverse outcomes after IVT in AIS patients.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

公众号