OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the feasibility of single-site laparoscopic orchiopexy for palpable undescended testes in children.
METHODS: We prospectively studied patients with undescended testes between July 2021 and June 2022. In total, 223 patients were included in our study: 105 underwent single-site laparoscopic orchiopexy and 118 underwent conventional laparoscopic orchiopexy. During single-site laparoscopic orchiopexy, 3 ports were inserted within the umbilicus.
RESULTS: No differences were observed between the groups in terms of age and laterality. For unilateral undescended testes, the operating time was longer in the single site group than in the conventional group at the early stages (55.31 ± 12.04 min vs. 48.14 ± 14.39 min, P = 0.007), but it was similar to the conventional group at the later stages (48.82 ± 13.49 min vs. 48.14 ± 14.39 min, P = 0.78). Testicular ascent occurred in one patient from each group. There was no significant difference in the success rate between the single-site group and the conventional group (99.0% vs. 99.2%, P = 0.93). In the single-site group, no visible abdominal scarring was observed, while in the conventional group, there were two noticeable scars on the abdomen.
CONCLUSIONS: Single-site laparoscopic orchiopexy offers superior cosmetic results and comparable success rates compared to conventional laparoscopic orchiopexy for palpable undescended testes.

Background: Laparoscopic orchiopexy (LO) has become a standard procedure for the treatment of nonpalpable undescended testes (UDT). LO for palpable UDT is still controversial. The aim of this study is to explore the method and effect of LO procedure for palpable UDT in children suffering from cryptorchidism. Methods: A retrospective study was performed for LO and traditional inguinal incision orchiopexy (TIO) for palpable UDT. A total of 291 children were enrolled, and they were aged 9-96 months with either left- or right-side palpable inguinal canalicular testes. Patients with testes that were nonpalpable, ectopic, and retractable were excluded. One hundred seventy patients received LO and 121 patients received TIO. Patient age, operative time, and clinical outcomes were reviewed. Independent t-test and Fisher\'s exact test were performed by SPSS 25.0 software. Results: The mean operative time (30.77 ± 6.02 minutes versus 44.76 ± 6.70 minutes) and postoperative normal activity time (1.25 ± 0.43 days versus 2.48 ± 0.68 days) of LO were significantly shorter than those of TIO group (P < .05). Forty-seven of 49 cases (95.9%) aged <1 year successfully achieved LO. Conclusion: LO is an appropriate choice for palpable UDT, especially in younger children aged <2 years. The success rate of LO decreased with age.

Discuss the superiority of laparoscopic orchiopexy in the treatment of inguinal palpable undescended testes.
Inclusion criteria: Preoperative examination and color Doppler ultrasound examination confirmed that the testes were located in the inguinal canal and could not be pulled into the scrotum, except for retractive and ectopic testes. The surgical steps were depicted as follow. The retroperitoneal wall was carved by ultrasonic scalpels, separates the spermatic vessels closed to the inferior pole of the kidney if necessary, dissects the peritoneum of vas deferens, cuts the testicular gubernaculum, and pulls back the testicle into the abdominal cavity. Besides, protect the vas deferens, and descend the testes to the scrotum and fix them without tension.
There were 773 patients with 869 inguinal undescended palpable testes, 218 cases on the left side, 459 cases on the right side and 96 cases with bilateral undescended testes, whose age ranged from 6 months to 8 years, with an average of 20 months. All testes were successfully operated, no converted to open surgery. The average operation time was (34.8 ± 5.4) min. There were 692 testes have an ipsilateral patent processus vaginalis (89.5%); In 677 cases of unilateral cryptorchidism, 233 cases (34.4%) have a contralateral patent processus vaginalis, and laparoscopic percutaneous extraperitoneal closure the hernia sac carry out during the surgery. There was no subcutaneous emphysema during the operation, no vomiting, no abdominal distension, no wound bleeding and obvious pain after surgery, especially wound infection is rarely. Doppler ultrasound was evaluated regularly after surgery. The patients were followed up for 6 to 18 months. All the testes were located in the scrotum without testicular retraction and atrophy. No inguinal hernia or hydrocele was found in follow-up examination.
Laparoscopic orchiopexy manage inguinal palpable cryptorchidism is safe and effective, and there are obvious minimally invasive advantages. Furthermore, It could discover a contralateral patent processus vaginalis, and treat at the same time, which avoid the occurrence of metachronous inguinal hernia.

Background: Can laparoscopic orchiopexy achieve a better testicular position and a higher success rate than open orchiopexy for palpable undescended testis in children? We conducted a prospective comparison study with a large volume of cases to answer this question. Methods: A total of 256 patients with palpable undescended testis who were admitted between January 1, 2017 and December 31, 2017 were included in this study. Among them, 124 patients underwent laparoscopic orchiopexy and 132 patients underwent open inguinal orchiopexy. The outcome evaluated index included final testicular position, success rate, and complications. Results: Of 256 patients, the mean age was 2.4 years; 218 patients had unilateral palpable testis, and the other 38 patients had bilateral palpable testis. There were no significant differences between laparoscopic orchiopexy group and open orchiopexy group with respect to age, side, preoperative testicular position, and testicular volume. The final testicular position in laparoscopic group was better than that in open group (lower position rate: 89.3% versus 77.9%, P = .01). There was no significant difference in success rate (laparoscopic group: 100%; and open group: 98.5%). There were 3 complications in the laparoscopic group and 6 complications in open group (P > .05). No testicular atrophy was found in either group. No testicular ascent occurred in laparoscopic group while there were 2 cases in open group, which required additional surgery for correction. Of patients who underwent surgery at the age of 3 years or older (n = 75), laparoscopic surgery was associated with markedly better testicular position than open surgery (lower position rate: 88.1% versus 69.6%, P = .03). Conclusions: Laparoscopic orchiopexy is associated with better testicular position and comparable success rate comparing to open orchiopexy for palpable undescended testis in children. This procedure could be recommended for palpable undescended testis, especially in older children.