UNASSIGNED: Post-transplantation cyclophosphamide (PT-Cy) use is a recent graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) prophylaxis strategy for patients undergoing allogeneic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT). PT-Cy combined with two immunosuppressants is now widely used after haplo-identical (haplo) and HLA-matched peripheral blood stem cell (PBSC) transplantations with promising GVHD and relapsefree survival (GRFS) probabilities. Although appealing, these results may benefit from improvement notably outside matched sibling donor transplantation, and should be investigated in various ethnic populations.
UNASSIGNED: Therefore, we report our experience of GVHD prophylaxis regimen combining PT-Cy and tacrolimus with addition of post-engraftment low-dose anti-thymocyte globulin (ATG) in allogeneic stem cell transplantation from haplo-identical donors (Haplo). Sixtyseven patients were included in the analysis. All patients received myeloablative or intensified sequential conditioning regimen.
UNASSIGNED: The median follow-up was 521 (range, 10~991) days. The cumulative incidences of 100-day grade II-IV acute GVHD was 14.9±4.4%, and no case of grade III-IV acute GVHD was documented. The cumulative incidences of 2-yearchronic GVHD and moderate-to-severe chronic GVHD were 25.4±5.4% and 11.9±4%, respectively. The non-relapse mortality at day+100 and 2year were 7.5±3.2% and 9.0±3.5%, respectively. The cumulative incidence of relapse at 2year was 16±6.4%. The 2-year probability of DFS and OS were 73.8% (95%CI, 61.5~88.4%) and 72.5% (95% CI, 57.1~92.1%), respectively. The 2-year GRFS was estimated as 63.6% (95%CI, 50.6~80%).
UNASSIGNED: Our results suggested that a combination of PT-Cy, tacrolimus, and low-dose post-engraftment ATG was a promising GVHD prophylaxis with low incidence of acute GVHD in the haplo-transplantation setting.

BACKGROUND: The two most noteworthy strategies for haploidentical stem cell transplantation (haplo-HSCT) are posttransplantation cyclophosphamide (PTCy) with or without thymoglobulin (ATG) and granulocyte colony stimulating factor-primed bone marrow plus peripheral blood stem cells (GIAC). We aimed to compare these approaches in patients with hematological malignancies.
METHODS: We enrolled 178 patients undergoing haplo-HSCT, including modified GIAC (mGIAC), PTCy without ATG, and PTCy with ATG.
RESULTS: The patients in the mGIAC group had the most favorable platelet and neutrophil engraftment kinetics. Although the grade III-IV acute graft-versus-host-disease (GvHD) rates were similar, those receiving mGIAC had a significantly higher extensive chronic GvHD rate. The patients receiving mGIAC had a similar cumulative incidence of relapse (CIR) to that in the patients receiving PTCy with ATG, but this was lower than that in the patients receiving PTCy without ATG. The patients receiving mGIAC had the lowest nonrelapse mortality (NRM) and the highest overall survival (OS) rates. The differences in CIR, NRM, and OS remained significant when focusing on patients with low/intermediate-risk diseases before haplo-HSCT. Intriguingly, among patients with high/very-high-risk diseases before haplo-HSCT, no differences were observed in the CIR, NRM, OS, or GvHD/relapse-free survival.
CONCLUSIONS: the mGIAC approach may yield a better outcome in Taiwanese patients with hematologic malignancies, especially for those with low/intermediate-risk diseases.