Prothrombin time (PT) and PT-INR are independent predictors of mortality in patients with cancer. The PT and PT-INR of cancer patients are independent predictive variables of mortality. However, whether the PT or PT-INR is related to in-hospital mortality in severely ill patients with tumors remains unknown.
This was a case-control study based on a multicenter public database.
This study is a secondary analysis of data extracted from 2014 to 2015 from the Electronic Intensive Care Unit Collaborative Research Database.
The data relevant to seriously ill patients with tumors were obtained from 208 hospitals spread throughout the USA. This research included a total of 200,859 participants. After the samples were screened for patients with combination malignancies and prolonged PT-INR or PT, the remaining 1745 and 1764 participants, respectively, were included in the final data analysis.
The key evaluation methodology was the PT count and PT-INR, and the main outcome was the in-hospital mortality rate.
After controlling for confounding variables, we found a curvilinear connection between PT-INR and in-hospital mortality (p < 0.001), and the inflection point was 2.5. When PT-INR was less than 2.5, an increase in PT-INR was positively associated with in-hospital mortality (OR 1.62, 95% CI 1.24 to 2.13), whereas when PT-INR was greater than 2.5, in-hospital mortality was relatively stable and higher than the baseline before the inflection point. Similarly, our study indicated that the PT exhibited a curvilinear connection with in-hospital mortality. On the left side of the inflection point (PT <22), a rise in the PT was positively linked with in-hospital mortality (OR 1.08, 95% CI 1.04 to 1.13, p < 0.001). On the right side of the inflection point, the baseline PT was above 22, and the in-hospital mortality was stable and higher than the PT count in the prior range (OR 1.01, 95% CI 0.97 to 1.04, 0.7056).
Our findings revealed that there is a curved rather than a linear link between the PT or PT-INR and in-hospital mortality in critically ill cancer patients. When these two laboratory results are below the inflection point, comprehensive therapy should be employed to reduce the count; when these two laboratory results are above the inflection point, every effort should be made to reduce the numerical value to a value below the inflection point.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the treatment and long-term outcome of portal vein thrombosis (PVT) after partial splenic embolization (PSE).
METHODS: From January 2006 to December 2011, 145 patients with hypersplenism caused by cirrhotic portal hypertension underwent PSE. In 11 cases, PVT was detected 13-42 days after PSE. Among the 11 patients, 5 underwent anticoagulant therapy because of clinical symptoms, and 6 did not receive anticoagulation because they were symptom-free (4 patients) or experienced variceal bleeding (2 patients). The long-term follow-up data from these 11 patients were analyzed retrospectively.
RESULTS: The 11 patients with PVT had a mean splenic infarction ratio of 71.5%. The mean duration of follow-up was 37.6 months. During the follow-up period, none of the 5 patients who underwent anticoagulation developed variceal hemorrhage despite presenting with large esophagogastric varices. Four of the five patients achieved complete resolution of thrombosis, and one did not develop thrombus progression. However, among the 6 patients who did not undergo anticoagulation, 2 developed esophagogastric variceal hemorrhage secondary to thrombus progression, 3 developed cavernous transformation of the portal vein and variceal progression, and 1 had partial calcification of the thrombus. Two patients who had variceal bleeding or rebleeding underwent a transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt. Complete recanalization of the portal vein was achieved after the procedures.
CONCLUSIONS: PVT is a severe, potentially fatal complication of PSE. Early detection of PVT and prompt anticoagulation are effective to avoid serious consequences of PVT.