Outcome assessment

成果评估
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:关于上尿路尿路上皮癌围手术期辅助化疗和个性化监测策略的证据有限。
    目的:评估含有吉西他滨的辅助化疗是否会影响晚期上尿路尿路上皮癌(UTUC)的肿瘤预后。
    方法:CROES-UTUC注册是一种观察,国际,诊断为UTUC患者的多中心研究。收集2380例UTUC患者的患者和疾病特征,最终738例患者纳入本分析.这项研究的主要结果是无复发生存率。进行倾向评分匹配。通过根据辅助化疗的治疗对患者进行分层,进行Kaplan-Meier和多变量Cox回归分析。
    结果:本分析共纳入738例患者,59例患者接受了辅助化疗(AC),包括接受吉西他滨治疗的50例患者。进行了倾向评分匹配,包括50例接受含吉西他滨治疗的患者和50例未接受辅助化疗的患者。34.0%的患者发生疾病复发。AC组复发率为22.0%,显著低于非AC组(46.0%)。Kaplan-Meier分析还显示AC与较低的肿瘤复发可能性相关(p=0.047)。然而,AC与较高的总生存率(OS)(p=0.908)和癌症特异性生存率(CSS)(p=0.979)没有显着相关。在多变量Cox回归分析中,AC与较低的肿瘤复发风险相关(HR=0.297,p=0.028)。
    结论:本研究证实,含有吉西他滨的辅助化疗可降低局部晚期UTUC患者在肾输尿管切除术后的肿瘤复发风险。然而,更多的研究需要绘制更清晰的图像来说明这种治疗方法的价值。
    BACKGROUND: The evidence regarding perioperative adjuvant chemotherapy and personalized surveillance strategies for upper tract urothelial carcinoma is limited.
    OBJECTIVE: To evaluate whether adjuvant gemcitabine containing chemotherapy affects the oncological outcomes of advanced upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC).
    METHODS: The CROES-UTUC registry is an observational, international, multi-center study on patients diagnosed with UTUC. Patient and disease characteristics from 2380 patients with UTUC were collected, and finally 738 patients were included in this analysis. The primary outcome of this study was recurrence-free survival. Propensity score matching was performed. Kaplan-Meier and multivariate Cox regression analyses were performed by stratifying patients according to the treatment of adjuvant chemotherapy.
    RESULTS: A total of 738 patients were included in this analysis, and 59 patients received adjuvant chemotherapy (AC), including 50 patients who received gemcitabine. A propensity score matching was performed, including 50 patients who received gemcitabine containing treatment and 50 patients without adjuvant chemotherapy. Disease recurrence occurred in 34.0% of patients. The recurrence rate in the AC group was 22.0%, which was significantly lower than the non-AC group (46.0%). Kaplan-Meier analyses also showed that AC was associated with a lower likelihood of tumor recurrence (p = 0.047). However, AC was not significantly associated with a higher overall survival (OS) (p = 0.908) and cancer-specific survival (CSS) (p = 0.979). Upon multivariate Cox regression analysis, AC was associated with a lower risk of tumor recurrence (HR = 0.297, p = 0.028).
    CONCLUSIONS: The present study confirms that adjuvant gemcitabine containing chemotherapy could decrease the risk of tumor recurrence in patients with locally advanced UTUC following nephroureterectomy. However, more studies are need to draw a clearer image of the value of this treatment method.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目前的证据为M2段大脑中动脉闭塞患者的血管内血栓切除术(EVT)的优越性提供了有限的支持。我们旨在研究M2段闭塞的影像学特征是否会影响EVT的有效性。
    我们从2017年1月至2022年1月进行了一项回顾性队列研究,数据来自CASEII注册(基于计算机的急性卒中患者在线数据库,用于卒中管理质量评估),这特别记录了急性缺血性卒中患者出现M2段闭塞,正在接受再灌注治疗。将患者分为静脉溶栓(IVT)组(单独IVT)和EVT组(IVT加EVT或单独EVT)。主要结果是90天时修改的Rankin量表评分0至2。次要结果包括附加阈值和改良Rankin量表评分的分布,24小时再通,早期神经退化,住院期间的相关并发症。安全性结果包括24小时颅内出血事件和90天死亡。使用具有倾向评分匹配的二元逻辑回归分析。根据闭塞的解剖部位进行亚组分析,包括右与左,近端与远端,显性/共显性与非显性,单分支与双/三分支(ES),和前支与中央/后支。
    在734例患者中(43.3%为女性;中位年龄,73年),M2段闭塞,EVT组342例(46.6%)。倾向得分匹配分析显示主要结局没有统计学差异(比值比,EVT组和IVT组之间为0.860[95%CI,0.611-1.209];P=0.385)。然而,EVT与蛛网膜下腔出血的发生率较高相关(比值比,6.655[95%CI,1.487-29.788];P=0.004)和肺炎(赔率比,2.015[95%CI,1.364-2.977];P<0.001)。亚组分析表明,IVT组的患者在正确的情况下取得了更好的结果,远端,或非显性分支闭塞(Pall相互作用<0.05)。
    我们的研究表明,在急性M2段大脑中动脉闭塞中,EVT与单独IVT的效率相似。这表明,只有特定的患者亚群可能比单独的IVT具有潜在的更高的EVT益处。
    URL:https://clinicaltrials.gov;唯一标识符:NCT04487340。
    UNASSIGNED: Current evidence provides limited support for the superiority of endovascular thrombectomy (EVT) in patients with M2 segment middle cerebral artery occlusion. We aim to investigate whether imaging features of M2 segment occlusion impact the effectiveness of EVT.
    UNASSIGNED: We conducted a retrospective cohort study from January 2017 to January 2022, drawing data from the CASE II registry (Computer-Based Online Database of Acute Stroke Patients for Stroke Management Quality Evaluation), which specifically documented patients with acute ischemic stroke presenting with M2 segment occlusion undergoing reperfusion therapy. Patients were stratified into the intravenous thrombolysis (IVT) group (IVT alone) and EVT group (IVT plus EVT or EVT alone). The primary outcome was a modified Rankin Scale score 0 to 2 at 90 days. Secondary outcomes included additional thresholds and distribution of modified Rankin Scale scores, 24-hour recanalization, early neurological deterioration, and relevant complications during hospitalization. Safety outcomes encompassed intracranial hemorrhagic events at 24 hours and mortality at 90 days. Binary logistic regression analyses with propensity score matching were used. Subgroup analyses were performed based on the anatomic site of occlusion, including right versus left, proximal versus distal, dominant/co-dominant versus nondominant, single versus double/triple branch(es), and anterior versus central/posterior branch.
    UNASSIGNED: Among 734 patients (43.3% were females; median age, 73 years) with M2 segment occlusion, 342 (46.6%) were in the EVT group. Propensity score matching analysis revealed no statistical difference in the primary outcome (odds ratio, 0.860 [95% CI, 0.611-1.209]; P=0.385) between the EVT group and IVT group. However, EVT was associated with a higher incidence of subarachnoid hemorrhage (odds ratio, 6.655 [95% CI, 1.487-29.788]; P=0.004) and pneumonia (odds ratio, 2.015 [95% CI, 1.364-2.977]; P<0.001). Subgroup analyses indicated that patients in the IVT group achieved better outcomes when presenting with right, distal, or nondominant branch occlusion (Pall interaction<0.05).
    UNASSIGNED: Our study showed similar efficiency of EVT versus IVT alone in acute M2 segment middle cerebral artery occlusion. This suggested that only specific patient subpopulations might have a potentially higher benefit of EVT over IVT alone.
    UNASSIGNED: URL: https://clinicaltrials.gov; Unique identifier: NCT04487340.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:运动认知风险综合征(MCR)是一种新提出的痴呆前综合征,其特征是主观认知不适(SCC)和缓慢步态(SG)。越来越多的证据将MCR与几种不良健康结果联系起来,但是MCR和脆弱风险之间的具体关系,阿尔茨海默病(AD)和血管性痴呆(VaD)仍不清楚。此外,文献缺乏对MCR的组成部分和相关健康结果的分析,复杂的风险识别。本系统评价和荟萃分析旨在全面概述MCR对不良健康结局的预测价值。
    方法:相关横截面,队列,研究MCR与不良健康结局之间关联的纵向研究来自7个电子数据库.在纳入分析的研究中,使用纽卡斯尔渥太华量表(NOS)和改良的NOS评估偏倚风险。将与MCR相关的结果的相对比率(RR)和95%置信区间(CI)汇总。
    结果:最终分析包括28项纵向或队列研究和4项横断面研究,其中1,224,569名参与者。在所有纳入的研究中,偏倚风险被评为低或中等。RR的集合分析表明,MCR有更大的概率增加痴呆的风险(调整后的RR=2.02;95CI=1.94-2.11),认知障碍(调整后RR=1.72;95CI=1.49-1.99),下跌(调整后的RR=1.32;95CI=1.17-1.50),死亡率(校正RR=1.66;95CI=1.32-2.10);与VaD(校正RR=3.78;95CI=0.49-28.95)相比,MCR对AD的预测功效(校正RR=2.23;95CI=1.81-2.76)更为显著,同时排除了使用定时起跑测试和单腿站立评估步态速度的研究分析。一项研究检查了MCR与残疾(HR=1.69;95CI=1.08-2.02)和虚弱(OR=5.53;95CI=1.46-20.89)之间的关系。SG比SCC更能预测痴呆和跌倒的风险(调整后RR=1.22;95CI=1.11-1.34vs.调整后的RR=1.19;95CI=1.03-1.38)。
    结论:MCR增加了发生任何讨论的不良健康结局的风险,对AD的预测价值优于VaD。此外,SG比SCC更能预测痴呆和跌倒。因此,应在成人中常规评估MCR,以防止预后不良。并提供证据支持未来有针对性的干预措施。
    Motoric cognitive risk syndrome (MCR) is a newly proposed pre-dementia syndrome characterized by subjective cognitive complaints (SCCs) and slow gait (SG). Increasing evidence links MCR to several adverse health outcomes, but the specific relationship between MCR and the risk of frailty, Alzheimer\'s disease (AD), and vascular dementia (VaD) remains unclear. Additionally, literature lacks analysis of MCR\'s components and associated health outcomes, complicating risk identification. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to provide a comprehensive overview of MCR\'s predictive value for adverse health outcomes.
    Relevant cross-sectional, cohort, and longitudinal studies examining the association between MCR and adverse health outcomes were extracted from ten electronic databases. The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) and modified NOS were used to assess the risk of bias in studies included in the analysis. Relative ratios (RRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were pooled for outcomes associated with MCR.
    Twenty-eight longitudinal or cohort studies and four cross-sectional studies with 1,224,569 participants were included in the final analysis. The risk of bias in all included studies was rated as low or moderate. Pooled analysis of RR indicated that MCR had a greater probability of increased the risk of dementia (adjusted RR = 2.02; 95% CI = 1.94-2.11), cognitive impairment (adjusted RR = 1.72; 95% CI = 1.49-1.99), falls (adjusted RR = 1.32; 95% CI = 1.17-1.50), mortality (adjusted RR = 1.66; 95% CI = 1.32-2.10), and hospitalization (adjusted RR = 1.46; 95% CI = 1.16-1.84); MCR had more prominent predictive efficacy for AD (adjusted RR = 2.23; 95% CI = 1.81-2.76) compared to VaD (adjusted RR = 3.78; 95% CI = 0.49-28.95), while excluding analyses from the study that utilized the timed-up-and-go test and one-leg-standing to evaluate gait speed. One study examined the association between MCR and disability (hazard ratios [HR] = 1.69; 95% CI = 1.08-2.02) and frailty (OR = 5.53; 95% CI = 1.46-20.89). SG was a stronger predictor of the risk for dementia and falls than SCC (adjusted RR = 1.22; 95% CI = 1.11-1.34 vs. adjusted RR = 1.19; 95% CI = 1.03-1.38).
    MCR increases the risk of developing any discussed adverse health outcomes, and the predictive value for AD is superior to VaD. Additionally, SG is a stronger predictor of dementia and falls than SCC. Therefore, MCR should be routinely assessed among adults to prevent poor prognosis and provide evidence to support future targeted interventions.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Multicenter Study
    背景:大多数患有神经危重病的儿童有身体风险,神经认知,和社会心理后遗症,需要集中的早期康复护理。
    目的:探讨集中式早期康复护理对重症获得性脑损伤患儿的有效性和安全性。
    方法:这是一项混合方法研究-实施研究和具有历史对照的单中心回顾性队列研究。纳入2016年9月至2020年8月在综合性三级儿科医院的专业康复中心住院的所有严重获得性脑损伤儿童。将在集中式早期康复病房接受治疗的患者与分散在普通住院康复病房中的历史对照进行比较。通过小儿脑功能分类(PCPC)量表和新发合并症的发生率来衡量有效性结果。安全性结果由死亡率和意外转诊的发生率指示。
    结果:纳入了一百七十五名患者。干预组住院康复前4周的deltaPCPC评分明显低于对照组(Z=-2.395,p=0.017)。与对照组相比,干预组1年的PCPC评分显着降低(Z=-3.337,p=0.001)。干预组的新发肺炎/支气管炎的发生率也降低(χ2=4.517,p=0.034)。没有患者死亡的记录,两组患者的意外转诊率差异无统计学意义(χ2=0.374,p=0.541)。
    结论:集中式儿科早期康复单元对重度获得性脑损伤患儿是安全有效的。关于有效性的进一步多中心前瞻性实施研究,安全,需要进行经济评价。
    BACKGROUND: Most children with neurocritical illness are at risk of physical, neurocognitive, and psychosocial sequelae and need centralized early rehabilitation care.
    OBJECTIVE: To identify the effectiveness and safety of centralized early rehabilitation care for children with severe acquired brain injury.
    METHODS: This is a mixed methods study-an implementation study and single-center retrospective cohort study with historical control. All children with severe acquired brain injury hospitalized in a specialized rehabilitation center in a comprehensive tertiary pediatric hospital between September 2016 and August 2020 were included. Patients treated in the centralized early rehabilitation unit were compared to historical controls dispersed in the normal inpatient rehabilitation ward. The effectiveness outcomes were measured by the Pediatric Cerebral Performance Category (PCPC) scale and the incidence of newly onset comorbidities. The safety outcomes were indicated by the mortality rate and the incidence of unexpected referrals.
    RESULTS: One hundred seventy-five patients were included. The delta PCPC scores of the first 4 weeks of inpatient rehabilitation in the intervention group were significantly lower than the control group (Z = -2.395, p = 0.017). The PCPC scores at 1 year in the intervention group were significantly reduced as compared to the control group (Z = -3.337, p = 0.001). The incidence of newly onset pneumonia/bronchitis was also decreased in the intervention group (χ2 = 4.517, p = 0.034). No death of patients was recorded, and there was no significant difference in unexpected referral rate between the two groups (χ2 = 0.374, p = 0.541).
    CONCLUSIONS: The centralized pediatrics early rehabilitation unit is effective and safe for children with severe acquired brain injury. Further multicenter prospective implementation studies on effectiveness, safety, and economic evaluation are needed.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:皮肌炎(DM)是一种罕见的特发性炎症性肌病亚组,其特征是不同的皮肤病变。然而,高度异质性使得DM的临床诊断和治疗具有很大的挑战性。
    目的:DM患者的无监督分类和与临床结局相关的关键因素分析。
    方法:这项回顾性研究于2017年至2022年在风湿病科进行,湘雅医院,中南大学.162名DM患者进行无监督分层聚类分析。此外,我们将DM患者的临床结局分为四个亚组:稳定,加重,和死亡,并比较了亚组之间的临床概况。
    结果:在162名DM患者中,定义了三个集群。第1组(n=40)主要由肌肉受累和轻度间质性肺病(ILD)的患者分组。第2组(n=72)将皮疹患者分组,抗黑色素瘤分化相关蛋白5阳性(抗MDA5+),和快速进展性间质性肺病(RP-ILD)。第3组(n=50)将症状最轻微的患者分组。死亡的比例在三个集群中增加(集群3<集群1<集群2)。
    结论:后续构建和验证预测模型的病例数有限。我们没有详细检查所有皮肤症状或病理变化。
    结论:我们根据不同的临床概况,将DM重新分为三组,不同的不良预后风险。临床血清学检测和聚类分析是必要的,以帮助临床医生在随访期间评估患者,并在DM中进行基于表型的个性化护理。
    BACKGROUND: Dermatomyositis (DM) is an infrequent disease subgroup of idiopathic inflammatory myopathies characterized by distinct skin lesions. However, high heterogeneity makes clinical diagnosis and treatment of DM very challenging.
    OBJECTIVE: Unsupervised classification in DM patients and analysis of key factors related to clinical outcomes.
    METHODS: This retrospective study was conducted between 2017 and 2022 at the Department of Rheumatology, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University. 162 DM patients were enrolled for unsupervised hierarchical cluster analysis. In addition, we divided the clinical outcomes of DM patients into four subgroups: withdrawal, stabilization, aggravation, and death, and compared the clinical profiles amongst the subgroups.
    RESULTS: Out of 162 DM patients, three clusters were defined. Cluster 1 (n = 40) was mainly grouped by patients with prominent muscular involvement and mild Interstitial Lung Disease (ILD). Cluster 2 (n = 72) grouped patients with skin rash, anti-Melanoma Differentiation Associated protein 5 positive (anti-MDA5+), and Rapid Progressive Interstitial Lung Disease (RP-ILD). Cluster 3 (n = 50) grouped patients with the mildest symptoms. The proportion of death increased across the three clusters (cluster 3 < cluster 1 < cluster 2).
    CONCLUSIONS: The number of cases was limited for the subsequent construction and validation of predictive models. We did not review all skin symptoms or pathological changes in detail.
    CONCLUSIONS: We reclassified DM into three clusters with different risks for poor outcome based on diverse clinical profiles. Clinical serological testing and cluster analysis are necessary to help clinicians evaluate patients during follow-up and conduct phenotype-based personalized care in DM.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:Aquafilling被用作一种流行的乳房填充剂,由于并发症的报道越来越多,因此被禁止使用。清创手术是治疗由凝胶填充剂引起的并发症的唯一可用方法,但往往会导致乳房畸形和皮肤松弛。这项研究旨在提出一种新的手术策略,以在Aquafilling切除后立即重塑乳房。
    方法:纳入了在我们机构接受Aquafilling切除的12名患者,第一组有5例患者接受了垂直乳房固定术,第二组有7例患者仅接受了Aquafilling切除术。手术数据,比较两组患者的并发症及满意度。在手术后至少6个月使用BREAST-Q评估满意度。
    结果:12例患者的年龄范围为41-56岁。虽然I组的手术时间长于II组(p=0.011),两组引流时间和术后住院时间具有可比性.所有患者恢复良好。疤痕是第一组中唯一的并发症,但与II组相比没有差异(p=0.711)。II组术后抑郁畸形的发生率明显高于I组(p=0.008)。关于满意度,I组患者对乳房的满意度得分明显较高,心理社会幸福感和性幸福感高于第二组。
    结论:将Aquafilling去除与垂直乳房固定术相结合是重塑上胸乳房形状的有效方法,在不延迟术后恢复或增加并发症风险的情况下提供优越的美学结果。
    方法:本期刊要求作者为每篇文章分配一定程度的证据。对于这些循证医学评级的完整描述,请参阅目录或在线作者说明www。springer.com/00266.
    BACKGROUND: Aquafilling was used to be a popular breast filler and was banned due to increasing reports of complications. Debridement surgery is the only available approach to treat complications caused by gel fillers, but it often leads to breast deformity and skin laxity. This study aims to present a new surgical strategy to reshape the breast immediately after Aquafilling removal.
    METHODS: Twelve patients who underwent Aquafilling removal at our institution were included, with five patients receiving the combined vertical mastopexy in group I and seven patients receiving Aquafilling removal alone in group II. Surgical data, complications and satisfaction were compared between the two groups. Satisfaction was assessed by using the BREAST-Q at least 6 months after surgery.
    RESULTS: The age range of the 12 patients was 41-56 years. Although the duration of surgery in group I was longer than that in group II (p = 0.011), the drainage duration and postoperative hospitalization between the two groups were comparable. All patients recovered well. Scarring was the only complication in group I, but there was no difference compared to group II (p = 0.711). Group II had a significantly higher incidence of postoperative depression deformity than group I (p = 0.008). Regarding satisfaction, patients in group I had significantly higher scores in satisfaction with breasts, psychosocial well-being and sexual well-being than those in group II.
    CONCLUSIONS: Combining Aquafilling removal with vertical mastopexy is an effective method of reshaping the shape of the ptotic breasts, offering superior esthetic outcomes without delaying postoperative recovery or increasing the risk of complications.
    METHODS: This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:在这项研究中,我们旨在探讨急性缺血性卒中(AIS)患者血管内血栓切除术(EVT)后卒中后肺炎(PSP)的危险因素及其对死亡率和功能结局的影响.
    方法:这是一项前瞻性随机试验的事后分析(直接动脉内血栓切除术以在中国三级医院有效地重建大血管闭塞的AIS患者:一项多中心随机临床试验)。完成EVT的AIS患者在住院期间评估PSP的发生情况,并在AIS后90天评估其改良的Rankin量表(mRS)评分。采用Logistic回归分析探讨PSP的独立预测因子。使用逻辑回归分析产生的协变量对PSP组和非PSP组进行倾向评分匹配。分析PSP与结果之间的关联。结果包括90天不良功能结局(mRS评分>2),90天死亡率,早期2周死亡率。
    结果:共纳入639例患者,其中29.58%(189人)开发了PSP。Logistic回归分析显示慢性心力衰竭病史(未调整比值比[OR]2.011,95%置信区间[CI]1.026-3.941;P=0.042),初始数字减影血管造影的血栓切除术前再灌注(OR0.394,95%CI0.161-0.964;P=0.041),入院时的肌酐水平(OR1.008,95%CI1.000-1.016;P=0.049),24h美国国立卫生研究院卒中量表(OR1.023,95%CI1.007-1.039;P=0.004)是PSP的独立危险因素。通过倾向评分匹配,PSP患者的功能预后不良(mRS>2)比无PSP患者更常见(81.03%vs.71.83%,P=0.043)在EVT后90天。PSP患者的早期2周死亡率较低(5.74%vs.12.07%,P=0.038)。但PSP组和非PSP组90天死亡率差异无统计学意义(22.41%vs.14.94%,P=0.074)。两组之间的生存曲线也没有统计学意义(P=0.088)。
    结论:近三分之一的AIS和EVT患者发生PSP。心力衰竭,更高的肌酐水平,血栓切除术前再灌注,24h时美国国立卫生研究院卒中量表与这些患者的PSP相关。PSP与接受EVT治疗的AIS患者90天功能预后不良相关。
    BACKGROUND: In this study, we aimed to investigate the risk factors and impact of poststroke pneumonia (PSP) on mortality and functional outcome in patients with acute ischemic stroke (AIS) after endovascular thrombectomy (EVT).
    METHODS: This was a post hoc analysis of a prospective randomized trial (Direct intraarterial thrombectomy in order to revascularize AIS patients with large-vessel occlusion efficiently in Chinese tertiary hospitals: a multicenter randomized clinical trial). Patients with AIS who completed EVT were evaluated for the occurrence of PSP during the hospitalization period and their modified Rankin Scale (mRS) scores at 90 days after AIS. Logistic regression analysis was conducted to investigate the independent predictors of PSP. Propensity score matching was conducted for the PSP and non-PSP groups by using the covariates resulting from the logistic regression analysis. The associations between PSP and outcomes were analyzed. The outcomes included 90-day poor functional outcome (mRS scores > 2), 90-day mortality, and early 2-week mortality.
    RESULTS: A total of 639 patients were enrolled, of whom 29.58% (189) developed PSP. Logistic regression analysis revealed that history of chronic heart failure (unadjusted odds ratio [OR] 2.011, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.026-3.941; P = 0.042), prethrombectomy reperfusion on initial digital subtraction angiography (OR 0.394, 95% CI 0.161-0.964; P = 0.041), creatinine levels at admission (OR 1.008, 95% CI 1.000-1.016; P = 0.049), and National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale at 24 h (OR 1.023, 95% CI 1.007-1.039; P = 0.004) were independent risk factors for PSP. With propensity scoring matching, poor functional outcome (mRS > 2) was more common in patients with PSP than in patients without PSP (81.03% vs. 71.83%, P = 0.043) at 90 days after EVT. The early 2-week mortality of patients with PSP was lower (5.74% vs. 12.07%, P = 0.038). But there was no statistically significant difference in 90-day mortality between the PSP group and non-PSP group (22.41% vs. 14.94%, P = 0.074). The survivorship curve also shows no statistical significance (P = 0.088) between the two groups.
    CONCLUSIONS: Nearly one third of patients with AIS and EVT developed PSP. Heart failure, higher creatinine levels, prethrombectomy reperfusion, and National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale at 24 h were associated with PSP in these patients. PSP was associated with poor 90-day functional outcomes in patients with AIS treated with EVT.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:肺癌围手术期运动试验的结果评估是异质的,经常忽略那些重要的和患者相关的。这种异质性阻碍了证据的综合。为了解决这个问题,核心结果集,一套商定的标准化成果来衡量和报告,需要减少结果测量之间的异质性。本研究方案描述了方法论,旨在为临床实践中肺癌围手术期运动干预试验开发核心结果集。
    方法:该项目将遵循有效性试验中的核心结果措施(COMET)倡议建议的标准方法,分为四个步骤。第一阶段:对临床试验和方案中报告的结果进行范围审查,以制定潜在结果领域列表。第二阶段:进行半结构化访谈,以获得患者的重要结果。第三阶段:通过进行两轮Delphi练习来选择最重要的结果。第四阶段:在面对面会议上达成共识,讨论最终核心成果集。
    结论:这是为肺癌围手术期运动试验的核心结果集确定的第一个项目,这将提高质量,可比性,和可用性的未来试验和积极影响围手术期运动和肺癌患者的护理。
    背景:有效性试验(COMET)计划数据库注册的核心结果测量:https://www.comet-initiative.org/Studies/Details/2091。
    BACKGROUND: Outcome assessment in perioperative exercise trials for lung cancer is heterogeneous, often omitting those that are important and patient-relevant. This heterogeneity hinders the synthesis of evidence. To address this issue, a core outcome set, an agreed-upon standardized set of outcomes to be measured and reported, is required to reduce heterogeneity among outcome measurements. This study protocol describes the methodology, aiming to develop a core outcome set for perioperative exercise intervention trials for lung cancer in clinical practice.
    METHODS: The project will follow the standard methodology recommended by the Core Outcome Measures in Effectiveness Trials (COMET) initiative, which is divided into four steps. Stage I: Conducting a scoping review of outcomes reported in clinical trials and protocols to develop a list of potential outcome domains. Stage II: Conducting semi-structured interviews to obtain important outcomes for patients. Stage III: Choosing the most important outcomes by conducting two rounds of the Delphi exercise. Stage IV: Achieving a consensus in a face-to-face meeting to discuss the final core outcome set.
    CONCLUSIONS: This is the first project identified for the core outcome set of perioperative exercise trials in lung cancer, which will enhance the quality, comparability, and usability of future trials and positively impact perioperative exercise and the care of patients with lung cancer.
    BACKGROUND: Core Outcome Measurement in Effectiveness Trials (COMET) Initiative database registration: https://www.comet-initiative.org/Studies/Details/2091.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:关于老年患者中受感染的心脏植入式电子设备(CIED)的经静脉引线提取(TLE)的安全性的真实数据尚未得到充分证实。本研究旨在评估因感染CIED而接受TLE的不同年龄组患者的医院预后。
    方法:使用全国再招生数据库,我们的研究纳入了年龄≥18岁、在2017年至2020年期间因感染性CIED接受TLE治疗的患者.我们将患者分为四组:A组(<50岁),B组年轻中间(50-69岁),C组中老年(70-79岁),D组(≥80岁)。然后,我们分析了这些年龄组之间的住院结局和30天的再入院。
    结果:本研究共纳入10,928例因感染CIED而入院的患者:A组982例(9.0%)患者,B组4,234例(38.7%)患者,C组3,204例(29.3%)患者和D组2,508例(23.0%)患者。我们的研究表明,随着年龄的增长,早期死亡的风险增加(B组与A组:OR:1.92,95%CI:1.19-3.09,p<.01;C组vs.A组:OR:2.47,95%CI:1.51-4.04,p<0.01;D组vs.A组:OR:2.82,95%CI:1.69-4.72,p<0.01)。老年组的非家庭出院风险也增加(B组vs.A组:OR:1.89;95%CI:1.52-2.36;p<.01;C组vs.A组:OR:2.82;95%CI2.24-3.56;p<.01;D组vs.A组:OR:4.16;95%CI:3.28-5.28;p<0.01)。不同年龄组的住院时间和30天再入院时间差异无统计学意义。A组除了心脏直视手术率较高,这些年龄组的手术并发症具有可比性.
    结论:老年患者在TLE感染CIED后的早期死亡率和非家庭出院方面的住院结局较差。老年组和非老年组之间在住院时间延长和30天再入院方面没有显着差异。老年患者没有更高的手术并发症风险。
    The real-world data on the safety profile of transvenous lead extraction (TLE) for infected cardiac implantable electronic devices (CIED) among elderly patients is not well-established. This study aimed to evaluate the hospital outcomes between patients of different age groups who underwent TLE for infected CIED.
    Using the Nationwide Readmissions Database, our study included patients aged ≥18 years who underwent TLE for infected CIED between 2017 and 2020. We divided the patients into four groups: Group A. Young (<50 years), Group B. Young intermediate (50-69 years old), Group C. Older intermediate (70-79 years old), and Group D. Octogenarian (≥80 years old). We then analyzed the in-hospital outcome and 30-day readmission between these age groups.
    A total of 10,928 patients who were admitted for TLE of infected CIED were included in this study: 982 (9.0%) patients in group A, 4,234 (38.7%) patients in group B, 3,204 (29.3%) patients in group C and 2,508 (23.0%) of patients in group D. Our study demonstrated that the risk of early mortality increased with older age (Group B vs. Group A: OR: 1.92, 95% CI: 1.19-3.09, p < .01; Group C vs. Group A: OR: 2.47, 95% CI: 1.51-4.04, p < .01; Group D vs. Group A: OR: 2.82, 95% CI: 1.69-4.72, p < .01). The risk of non-home discharge also increased in elderly groups (Group B vs. Group A: OR: 1.89; 95% CI: 1.52-2.36; p < .01; Group C vs. Group A: OR: 2.82; 95% CI 2.24-3.56; p < .01; Group D vs. Group A: OR: 4.16; 95% CI: 3.28-5.28; p < .01). There was no significant difference in hospitalization length and 30-day readmission between different age groups. Apart from a higher rate of open heart surgery in group A, the procedural complications were comparable between these age groups.
    Elderly patients had worse in-hospital outcomes in early mortality and non-home discharge following the TLE for infected CIED. There was no significant difference between elderly and non-elderly groups in prolonged hospital stay and 30-day readmission. Elderly patients did not have a higher risk of procedural complications.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Multicenter Study
    慢性血栓栓塞性肺动脉高压(CTEPH)的发病机制是多因素的,越来越多的证据表明涉及血液病。最近,具有不确定潜力(CHIP)的克隆造血与血液恶性肿瘤和心血管疾病的风险增加有关。然而,CHIP在CTEPH患者中的患病率和临床意义尚不清楚.
    使用逐步调用2006年10月至2021年12月期间转诊至3个中心的499名CTEPH患者的下一代测序数据,确定了CHIP突变。我们将CHIP与CTEPH患者的全因死亡率相关联。为了提供对潜在机制的见解,还确定了CHIP与炎症标志物之间的关联.
    总共,47例(9.4%)CTEPH患者在变异等位基因频率≥2%时携带至少1个CHIP突变。最常见的突变是DNMT3A,TET2、RUNX1和ASXL1。在随访期间(平均,55个月),CHIP和非CHIP组22例(46.8%)和104例(23.0%)患者死亡,分别为(P<0.001,对数秩检验)。在完全调整的模型中,CHIP与死亡率的关联仍然稳健(风险比,2.190[95%CI,1.257-3.816];P=0.006)。此外,CHIP突变患者的循环白细胞介素-1β和白细胞介素-6水平较高,白细胞介素-4和IgG半乳糖基化水平较低.
    这是第一项研究,表明9.4%的CTEPH患者发生CHIP突变与严重的炎症状态有关,并且在长期随访中预后较差。
    UNASSIGNED: The pathogenesis of chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension (CTEPH) is multifactorial and growing evidence has indicated that hematological disorders are involved. Clonal hematopoiesis of indeterminate potential (CHIP) has recently been associated with an increased risk of both hematological malignancies and cardiovascular diseases. However, the prevalence and clinical relevance of CHIP in patients with CTEPH remains unclear.
    UNASSIGNED: Using stepwise calling on next-generation sequencing data from 499 patients with CTEPH referred to 3 centers between October 2006 and December 2021, CHIP mutations were identified. We associated CHIP with all-cause mortality in patients with CTEPH. To provide insights into potential mechanisms, the associations between CHIP and inflammatory markers were also determined.
    UNASSIGNED: In total, 47 (9.4%) patients with CTEPH carried at least 1 CHIP mutation at a variant allele frequency of ≥2%. The most common mutations were in DNMT3A, TET2, RUNX1, and ASXL1. During follow-up (mean, 55 months), deaths occurred in 22 (46.8%) and 104 (23.0%) patients in the CHIP and non-CHIP groups, respectively (P<0.001, log-rank test). The association of CHIP with mortality remained robust in the fully adjusted model (hazard ratio, 2.190 [95% CI, 1.257-3.816]; P=0.006). Moreover, patients with CHIP mutations showed higher circulating interleukin-1β and interleukin-6 and lower interleukin-4 and IgG galactosylation levels.
    UNASSIGNED: This is the first study to show that CHIP mutations occurred in 9.4% of patients with CTEPH are associated with a severe inflammatory state and confer a poorer prognosis in long-term follow-up.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

公众号