目的:本研究致力于对磨牙远距进行文献计量学分析,为了阐明其进化轨迹,当前状态,并预测未来的研究热点和趋势。
方法:通过在香港大学电子图书馆的WebofScience(WOS)核心数据库中进行搜索,对有关磨牙远距的文献进行了全面探索。使用的主题词搜索包括“磨牙远离,“\”磨牙扩张,\"\"向远端移动磨牙,“磨牙远端运动,“和”摩尔向后。搜索结果随后使用CiteSpace软件进行了细致的分析。此分析涵盖了各个方面,例如引文计数;国家的地理分布,机构,和期刊负责发表文章;作者的分布;文章中关键词的利用;以及参考文献的分析。
结果:共516篇文章纳入分析。发表论文数量排名前5位的国家是美国,韩国,土耳其,意大利,德国,发表论文数量排名前5位的机构是庆熙大学,A.T.Still健康科学大学,韩国天主教大学,首尔圣玛丽医院,和圣保罗大学。就发表论文数量而言,排名前5位的作者是Park,Kook,Bayome,詹森,和李。总体上几乎没有合作。在发表的相关文章中,排名前3位的期刊均为正畸相关期刊。磨牙远离和锚定后,最常用的关键词是远端化,运动,和摆锤设备。KinzingerGSM是参考文献中引用频率最高的作者,他的一篇文章在参考文献中的中心性得分也最高。
结论:随着时移的浪潮和学者们对解开这种治疗方式的复杂性表现出越来越多的奉献精神,磨牙远距领域经历了显著的技术进步。最初,传统器具存在审美缺陷和不适。然而,该设备的当代迭代已经超越了这些限制,吹嘘增强了优雅和便利,同时提高了它们的功效。然而,当前电器的局限性,包括它们的持久性和治疗后复发的倾向,继续需要进一步推进。因此,正在进行的科学调查旨在更深入地研究完善治疗方式和在这个领域制造尖端设备。
结论:这项研究有可能显着提高正畸医生制定治疗方案的能力,并提供最先进的临床建议。从而使他们能够提供先进和完善的正畸干预。
OBJECTIVE: The study endeavors to undertake a bibliometric analysis on molar distalization, with the objective of illuminating its evolutionary trajectory, current status, and prognosticating future research hotspots and trends.
METHODS: A comprehensive exploration of the literature on molar distalization was carried out by conducting a search in the Web of Science (WOS) core database of the University of Hong Kong Electronic Library. The search for topic terms employed included \"molar distalization,\" \"molar distalisation,\" \"move molar distally,\" \"molar distal movement,\" and \"molar backwards.\" The search results were subsequently subjected to meticulous analysis using CiteSpace software. This analysis encompassed various facets such as the citation count; the geographical distribution of the countries, institutions, and journals responsible for publishing the articles; the distribution of the authors; the utilization of keywords within the articles; and the analysis of references.
RESULTS: A total of 516 articles were included in the analysis. The top 5 countries in terms of the number of published papers were the United States (USA), South Korea, Turkey, Italy, and Germany, and the top 5 institutions in terms of the number of published papers were Kyung Hee University, A.T. Still University of Health Sciences, Catholic University of Korea, Seoul St. Mary\'s Hospital, and Universidade de Sao Paulo. The top 5 authors in terms of the number of published papers were Park, Kook, Bayome, Janson, and Lee. There was little cooperation overall. The top 3 journals in terms of the most published related articles were all orthodontic-related journals. After molar distalization and anchorage, the most frequently used keywords were distalization, movement, and pendulum appliance. Kinzinger GSM is the most frequently cited author in references, and one of his articles also has the highest centrality score in references.
CONCLUSIONS: As the tides of time shift and scholars display an ever-growing dedication to unraveling the intricacies of this therapeutic modality, the realm of molar distalization has undergone notable advancements in technology. Initially, the traditional appliance suffered from aesthetic drawbacks and discomfort. However, contemporary iterations of the appliance have transcended these limitations, boasting enhanced elegance and convenience while concurrently elevating their efficacy. Nevertheless, limitations of current appliances, including their durability and propensity for recurrence post-treatment, continue to necessitate further advancement. Hence, the ongoing scientific inquiry aims to delve deeper into refining treatment modalities and fabricating cutting-edge appliances within this realm.
CONCLUSIONS: This study holds the potential to significantly enhance the ability of orthodontists to devise treatment protocols and offer state-of-the-art clinical recommendations, thereby empowering them to deliver advanced and refined orthodontic interventions.