OBJECTIVE: This study aims to investigate the optimal dose of metformin for controlling the transition to diabetes in patients diagnosed with prediabetes.
METHODS: We systematically searched randomized controlled trials (RCTs) in CNKI, Wanfang, VIP, SinoMed, Scopus, PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, and Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL) from inception to February 2024. Meta-analysis was conducted using RevMan 5.4 software.
RESULTS: We included 25 randomized controlled trials comprising 2437 patients. The results of the meta-analysis revealed that compared to dose groups of 500 mg/d, 850 mg/d, 1000 mg/d, 1500 mg/d, 1700 mg/d, and 2000 mg/d, a dosage of 750 mg/d of metformin significantly reduced the incidence of diabetes in patients (risk ratio [RR] = 0.21, 95 % confidence interval [CI]: 0.11, 0.41; p < 0.00001), lowered Postprandial Blood Glucose (PBG) (mean difference[MD] = -2.60, 95 % CI: -4.34, -0.86; p = 0.003), and promoted the normalization of blood glucose levels (RR = 2.13, 95 % CI: 1.68, 2.71; p < 0.00001). Regarding safety evaluation, no significant differences were identified among the various dose groups. In contrast, the cohort receiving a daily dosage of 750 mg demonstrated the most pronounced decrease in the incidence of adverse reactions.
CONCLUSIONS: Based on the efficacy and safety evaluation results, our findings suggest that a daily dosage of 750 mg of metformin may represent the optimal dose for controlling the progression from pre-diabetes to diabetes.
BACKGROUND: PROSPERO registration ID: CRD42024538322.

The purpose of this study was to review the literature on the clinical use of voriconazole (VRC) in pediatric patients. MEDLINE, Embase, PubMed, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library were searched from January 1, 2000, to August 15, 2023 for relevant clinical studies on VRC use in pediatric patients. Data were collected based on inclusion and exclusion criteria, and a systematic review was performed on recent research related to the use of VRC in pediatric patients. This systematic review included a total of 35 observational studies among which there were 16 studies investigating factors influencing VRC plasma trough concentrations (Ctrough) in pediatric patients, 14 studies exploring VRC maintenance doses required to achieve target range of Ctrough, and 11 studies focusing on population pharmacokinetic (PPK) research of VRC in pediatric patients. Our study found that the Ctrough of VRC were influenced by both genetic and non-genetic factors. The optimal dosing of VRC was correlated with age in pediatric patients, and younger children usually required higher VRC doses to achieve target Ctrough compared to older children. Establishing a PPK model for VRC can assist in achieving more precise individualized dosing in children.

BACKGROUND: The existing literature indicates that repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) can potentially enhance the prognosis of poststroke aphasia (PSA). Nevertheless, these investigations did not identify the most effective parameters or settings for achieving optimal treatment outcomes. This study involved a meta-analysis aimed to identify the optimal variables for rTMS in treating post-infarction aphasia to guide the use of rTMS in rehabilitating PSA.
METHODS: PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases were searched from inception to May 2023, and articles were reviewed manually using subject words and free words and supplemented with references from the included literature to obtain additional relevant literature. The search terms included \"poststroke aphasia\" and \"repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS)\" repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation. Additionally, a review of the reference lists of previously published systematic reviews identified through the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews (search terms: poststroke aphasia, rTMS; restrictions: none) and PubMed (search terms: poststroke aphasia, rTMSs; restrictions: systematic review or meta-analysis) was performed. Information from studies involving different doses of rTMS in PSA was independently screened and extracted by 2 researchers.
RESULTS: This meta-analysis included 387 participants with PSA across 18 randomized controlled trials. The results showed that the total pulse had a trend toward a significant correlation with the treatment effect (P = 0.088), while all other variables did not correlate significantly. When rTMS was not grouped by stimulus parameter and location, our nonlinear results showed that when the total pulses were 40,000 (standardized mean difference (SMD):1.86, 95% credible interval (CrI) 0.50 to 3.33), the pulse/session was 1000 (SMD:1.05, 95% CrI 0.55-1.57), and an RMT of 80% (SMD:1.08, 95% CrI 0.60-1.57) had the best treatment effect. When rTMS was grouped by stimulus parameters and location, our nonlinear results showed that when the total low-frequency (LF)-rTMS-right inferior frontal gyrus (RIFG) pulse was 40,000 (SMD:1.76, 95% CrI:0.36-3.29), the pulse/session was 1000 (SMD:1.06, 95% CrI:0.54-1.59). Optimal results were obtained with an RMT of 80% (SMD:1.14, 95% CrI 0.54 - 1.76).
CONCLUSIONS: The optimal treatment effects of rTMS for PSA may be obtained with a total pulse of 40,000, a pulse/session of 1000, and an RMT of 80%. Further rigorous randomized controlled studies are required to substantiate the validity of these results.

The primary objective of an oncology dose-finding trial for novel therapies, such as molecularly targeted agents and immune-oncology therapies, is to identify the optimal dose (OD) that is tolerable and therapeutically beneficial for subjects in subsequent clinical trials. Pharmacokinetic (PK) information is considered an appropriate indicator for evaluating the level of drug intervention in humans from a pharmacological perspective. Several novel anticancer agents have been shown to have significant exposure-efficacy relationships, and some PK information has been considered an important predictor of efficacy. This paper proposes a Bayesian optimal interval design for dose optimization with a randomization scheme based on PK outcomes in oncology. A simulation study shows that the proposed design has advantages compared to the other designs in the percentage of correct OD selection and the average number of patients allocated to OD in various realistic settings.

UNASSIGNED: Over the past few decades, advances in traumatic brain injury (TBI) pathology research have dynamically enriched our knowledge. Therefore, we aimed to systematically elucidate the safety and efficacy of erythropoietin (EPO) dosing regimens in patients with TBI.
UNASSIGNED: Data search included PubMed, the Cochrane Library, Embase, Web of Science, and ClinicalTrials.gov for related research published before July 2022. The network meta-analysis was conducted using ADDIS 1.16.8, and the CINeMA tool was used to assess the quality level of evidence.
UNASSIGNED: A total of six RCTs involving 981 patients were included in the network meta-analysis. EPO did not significantly reduce mortality in patients with TBI, but its risk of death decreased with increasing dosage (odds ratio (OR) of 12,000u vs. placebo = 0.98, 95% CI: 0.03-40.34; OR of group 30,000u vs. placebo = 0.56, 95% CI: 0.06-5.88; OR of 40,000u vs. placebo = 0.35, 95% CI: 0.01-9.43; OR of 70,000u vs. placebo = 0.29, 95% CI: 0.01-9.26; OR of group 80,000u vs. placebo = 0.22, 95% CI: 0.00-7.45). A total of three studies involving 739 patients showed that EPO did not increase the incidence of deep vein thrombosis in patients with TBI. However, the risk tended to rise as the dosage increased. Another two studies demonstrated that EPO did not increase the incidence of pulmonary embolism. The quality of evidence for all outcomes was low to moderate.
UNASSIGNED: Although the efficacy of EPO was not statistically demonstrated, we found a trend toward an association between EPO dosage and reduced mortality and increased embolic events in patients with TBI. More high-quality original studies should be conducted to obtain strong evidence on the optimal dosage of EPO.
UNASSIGNED: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/display_record.php?RecordID=272500. The study protocol was registered with PROSPERO (CRD42021272500).

UNASSIGNED: Intravenous recombinant tissue plasminogen activator (r-tPA) with 0.9 mg/kg is the standard treatment for acute ischemic stroke, but it remains unclear whether it is optimal for all patients. We aimed to determine the optimal dose of r-tPA for Chinese stroke based on the data from the INTRECIS study.
UNASSIGNED: From the INTRECIS cohort, patients receiving intravenous r-tPA within 4.5 h of onset were included. According to r-tPA dose, patients were assigned into seven groups (from 0.60 to 0.90 mg/kg). The primary outcomes were the proportion of excellent functional outcomes and symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage.
UNASSIGNED: Overall, 2,666 patients were included: 156 in 0.60 mg/kg group, 117 in 0.65 mg/kg group, 127 in 0.70 mg/kg group, 188 in 0.75 mg/kg group, 154 in 0.80 mg/kg group, 359 in 0.85 mg/kg group, and 1,565 in 0.90 mg/kg group. After adjustment for baseline characteristics, only 0.65 mg/kg group had significantly higher proportion of excellent functional outcome than 0.90 mg/kg group (79.5 vs. 71.4%, odds ratio = 1.833, 95% CI = 1.006-3.341, adjusted p = 0.048). The subgroup analysis showed no evidence of differences in the odds of having a primary outcome between the two groups by age, admission NIHSS, onset to thrombolysis time, and TOAST classification. There was no significant difference in symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage between groups.
UNASSIGNED: Our study presented the first evidence that intravenous thrombolysis with 0.65 mg/kg r-tPA may be optimal for Chinese mild-to-moderate stroke.
UNASSIGNED: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov, identifier: NCT02854592.

UNASSIGNED: Dexmedetomidine (DEX) administration decreases post-operative nausea and vomiting (PONV), but it is a lack of large-scale retrospective cohort study and is unclear whether there is a dose-relationship and optimal dose for antiemetic effects between DEX and PONV. We performed a large-scale retrospective cohort study to explore the optimal dose of intraoperative DEX for antiemetic effects of PONV.
UNASSIGNED: A total of 5,310 patients aged ≥18 who underwent elective thoracic surgery from January 2016 to March 2020 under total intravenous anesthesia (TIVA) or combined intravenous and inhalation anesthesia in Henan Provincial People\'s Hospital. Patients were divided into two groups, those who received DEX intraoperatively and those who did not receive DEX. Patients who received DEX after surgery were excluded. Our primary outcomes were the association, the dose-response relationship, and the optimal dose for antiemetic effects between intraoperative DEX and PONV.
UNASSIGNED: Among the 3,878 patients enrolled, 2,553 patients received DEX and 1,325 patients did not receive DEX. The incidence of PONV in patients who received DEX was 21.3%, and the incidence of PONV in patients who did not receive DEX was 46.5% (P = 0.001). After the matched-pairs cohort consisted of 1,325 patients, the incidence of PONV in patients who received DEX was 23.6%, and the incidence of PONV in patients who did not receive DEX was 46.5% (P = 0.001). We analyzed three different models after propensity matching to validate the stability of the prediction model between intraoperative DEX and PONV. A dose-response relationship between intraoperative DEX and PONV was observed. The optimal dose range of intraoperative DEX for antiemetic effects of PONV is 50-100 μg in elective thoracic surgery.
UNASSIGNED: Intraoperative DEX was associated with a decreased incidence of PONV in the large-scale retrospective cohort study. A dose-response relationship between intraoperative DEX and PONV was observed. The optimal dose range of intraoperative DEX for antiemetic effects of PONV is 50-100 μg in elective thoracic surgery.

Background: Obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) is a common chronic mental disorder with a high disability rate. Serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SRIs), including selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) and tricyclic antidepressants, such as clomipramine, are the most common choices for the pharmacological treatment of OCD. Optimizing their use is pivotal in guiding clinical practice of OCD. However, there are few studies on the optimal dose of SRIs and there is controversy about their dose-response relationship and optimal target dose. Therefore, the objective of this study was to summarize the relationship between the dose and effect of SRIs, as well as the optimal dose of SRIs for OCD, as to propose future research directions. Methods: Medline, Embase, Biosis, PsycINFO, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), Web of Science, and CINAHL were searched for relevant publications, and the search was up to February 22, 2020. We used a one-stage, robust error meta-regression (REMR) model to deal with the correlated dose-response data for SRIs from different studies. Doses of SRIs were converted to fluoxetine equivalents when performing dose-response analysis. Review Manager Program Version 5.3 and STATA software package (version 15.1) were applied to analyze data. The study protocol was registered with PROSPERO (number CRD42020168344). Results: Eleven studies involving 2,322 participants were included in final analysis. For SRIs, the dose-efficacy curve showed a gradual increase trend in the 0-40-mg dose range and then had a decreased trend in doses up to 100 mg fluoxetine equivalent. Dropouts due to adverse effects gradually increased throughout the inspected dose slope. The curve of dose of all-cause dropouts suggested no relationship between them. Sensitivity analysis proved that these results were robust. Conclusion: The systematic review found that the optimal dose for efficacy was about 40mg fluoxetine equivalent. Tolerability decreased with increased doses, and there was no significant correlation between acceptability and doses of SRIs. Therefore, the optimal dose of SRIs needs to consider effectiveness and tolerability. Systematic Review Registration: [PROSPERO], identifier [CRD42020168344].

Post-stroke spasticity impedes patients\' rehabilitation progress. Contradictory evidence has been reported in using Botulinum Neurotoxin type A (BoNT-A) to manage post-stroke lower extremity spasticity (PLES); furthermore, an optimum dose of BoNT-A for PLES has not yet been established. Therefore, we conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) to identify the efficacy and optimal dose of BoNT-A on PLES. \"Meta\" and \"Metafor\" packages in R were used to analyze the data. Hedges\' g statistic and random effect model were used to calculate and pool effect sizes. Twelve RCTs met the eligibility criteria. Muscle tone significantly improved in week four, week eight, and maintained to week twelve after BoNT-A injection. Improvements in functional outcomes were found, some inconsistencies among included studies were noticed. Dosage analysis from eight studies using Botox® and three studies using Dysport® indicated that the optimum dose for the commonest pattern of PLES (spastic plantar flexors) is medium-dose (approximately 300U Botox® or 1000 U Dysport®). BoNT-A should be regarded as part of a rehabilitation program for PLES. Furthermore, an optimal rehabilitation program combined with BoNT-A management needs to be established. Further studies should also focus on functional improvement by BoNT-A management in the early stage of stroke.

Intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG) has been proposed as an adjunctive therapy for sepsis. Related systematic reviews and meta-analyses of IVIG in sepsis indicate that IVIG can reduce the mortality of sepsis in adults. However, the effective dose of IVIG has not been clearly determined to date. We aimed to conduct an updated meta-analysis and use a network meta-analysis to elucidate the efficacy of IVIG dosing regimens in sepsis treatment.
We searched PubMed, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), and EMBASE for articles published on or before February 14, 2019. We performed a direct meta-analysis to update a previous meta-analysis of the effects of IVIG therapy on mortality in adult patients with septic shock and a network meta-analysis to evaluate the efficacy of IVIG dosing regimens in sepsis treatment.
Compared with the control treatment, the IVIG treatment reduced the all-cause mortality of patients with sepsis (odds ratio = 0.61; 95% CI, 0.41-0.92; P = 0.018), but significant heterogeneity was found across the studies (I2 = 45.0%; P = 0.04). Regarding the IVIG dosage regimens, the highest total dose range (1.5-2 g/kg) was the optimal dose of administration (surface under the cumulative ranking curve = 84.7%).
On the basis of the available data, IVIG treatment is likely to reduce the all-cause mortality of patients with sepsis, and the highest total dose range (1.5-2 g/kg) is likely the optimal dose of administration.