Neuropsychiatric inventory

神经精神量表
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:评估机器学习(ML)在识别痴呆和轻度认知障碍的关键因素中的作用。
    方法:371名老年人最终纳入ML分析。人口统计信息(包括性别,年龄,奇偶校验,视敏度,听觉功能,移动性,和用药史)和10个评估量表中的35个特征用于建模。使用五个机器学习分类器进行评估,采用涉及特征提取的过程,选择,模型训练,和绩效评估,以确定关键的指示性因素。
    结果:随机森林模型,数据预处理后,信息增益,和荟萃分析,利用了三个训练特征和四个元特征,曲线下面积为0.961,准确度为0.894,显示出识别痴呆症和轻度认知障碍的非凡准确度。
    结论:ML可作为痴呆和轻度认知障碍的识别工具。使用信息增益和元特征分析,临床痴呆评级(CDR)和神经精神量表(NPI)量表信息对于训练随机森林模型至关重要。
    OBJECTIVE: To assess the role of Machine Learning (ML) in identification critical factors of dementia and mild cognitive impairment.
    METHODS: 371 elderly individuals were ultimately included in the ML analysis. Demographic information (including gender, age, parity, visual acuity, auditory function, mobility, and medication history) and 35 features from 10 assessment scales were used for modeling. Five machine learning classifiers were used for evaluation, employing a procedure involving feature extraction, selection, model training, and performance assessment to identify key indicative factors.
    RESULTS: The Random Forest model, after data preprocessing, Information Gain, and Meta-analysis, utilized three training features and four meta-features, achieving an area under the curve of 0.961 and a accuracy of 0.894, showcasing exceptional accuracy for the identification of dementia and mild cognitive impairment.
    CONCLUSIONS: ML serves as a identification tool for dementia and mild cognitive impairment. Using Information Gain and Meta-feature analysis, Clinical Dementia Rating (CDR) and Neuropsychiatric Inventory (NPI) scale information emerged as crucial for training the Random Forest model.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    比较路易体轻度认知障碍(MCI-LB)患者与阿尔茨海默病轻度认知障碍(MCI-AD)患者的神经精神症状(NPS)。
    可能具有MCI-LB(n=53)的受试者,MCI-AD(n=60),纳入路易体痴呆(DLB)(n=97)和AD(n=202).所有人都超过60岁。通过神经精神量表(NPI)评估神经精神概况。路易体神经精神支持性症状计数(LBNSSC)用于评估DLB的支持性临床特征(系统化妄想,非视觉形态的幻觉,冷漠,焦虑,和抑郁症)。
    与MCI-AD相比,MCI-LB患者在患病率和严重程度方面的总NPI评分较高,视力幻觉和快速眼动睡眠行为障碍(RBD)的患病率和严重程度也是如此。MCI-LB组的LBNSSC高于MCI-AD组。与MCI-AD患者的20%相比,41.5%的MCI-LB患者有两个或两个以上的支持性NPS,(似然比=2.08,p=0.013)。MCI-LB受试者在冷漠中表现出很高的患病率,抑郁症,和食欲/饮食失调项目。
    NPI是检测具有MCI-LB的NPS的有用工具。与MCI-AD组相比,MCI-LB组的核心特征(视觉幻觉和RBD)患病率更高,LBNSSC更高。这些特征可以帮助区分MCI-LB和MCI-AD。
    To compare the neuropsychiatric symptoms (NPS) of patients with mild cognitive impairment with Lewy bodies (MCI-LB) with those with mild cognitive impairment due to Alzheimer\'s disease (MCI-AD).
    Subjects with probable MCI-LB (n = 53), MCI-AD (n = 60), dementia with Lewy bodies (DLB) (n = 97) and AD (n = 202) were recruited. All were older than 60 years. Neuropsychiatric profiles were evaluated by the Neuropsychiatric Inventory (NPI). The Lewy Body Neuropsychiatric Supportive Symptom Count (LBNSSC) was used to assess give supportive clinical features of DLB (systematized delusions, hallucinations in non-visual modalities, apathy, anxiety, and depression).
    Compared with MCI-AD, those with MCI-LB had higher total NPI scores on prevalence and severity, as were prevalence and severity in visual hallucinations and rapid eye movement sleep behavior disorder (RBD). The MCI-LB group had a higher LBNSSC than did the MCI-AD group. Compared with 20% of those with MCI-AD, 41.5% of those with MCI-LB had two or more supportive NPS, (likelihood ratio = 2.08, p = 0.013). MCI-LB subjects showed a high prevalence in apathy, depression, and appetite/eating disorders items.
    The NPI is a useful tool to detect NPS in those with MCI-LB. The MCI-LB group had a higher prevalence of core features (visual hallucinations and RBD) and a higher LBNSSC than the MCI-AD group. These features could help to differentiate MCI-LB and MCI-AD.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Sci-hub)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    暂无摘要。
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Sci-hub)

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    Cerebral small vessel disease (SVD) and neuropsychiatric symptoms (NPS) independently increase the risk of cognitive decline. While their co-existence has been reported in the preclinical stage of dementia, longitudinal data establishing the prognosis of their associations, especially in an Asian context remains limited.
    This study investigated the role of SVD and NPS progressions on cognitive outcomes over 2 years in a dementia-free elderly cohort.
    170 dementia-free elderly with baseline and 2-year neuropsychological assessments and MRI scans were included in this study. White matter hyperintensities (WMH), lacunes, and microbleeds (CMBs) were graded as markers of SVD. The Neuropsychiatric Inventory (NPI) was used to measure NPS. Generalized estimating equations modelling evaluated the relationship between NPI change and SVD progression. Logistic regression evaluated the risk of incident cognitive decline with both SVD and NPS. All models were adjusted for demographics, baseline cerebrovascular diease, and medial temporal lobe atrophy.
    Higher NPI scores were associated with higher SVD burden at baseline. Subjects with WMH progression had greater increase in total NPI (β[SE] = 0.46[0.19], p = 0.016), driven by hyperactivity subsyndrome (β[SE] = 0.88[0.34], p = 0.007). Subjects with incident CMBs had greater increase in psychosis subsyndrome (β[SE] = 0.89[0.30], p < 0.001). Subjects with progressions in both SVD and NPS were more likely to develop cognitive decline over 2 years (OR[95% CI] = 4.17[1.06-16.40], p < 0.05).
    Our findings support worsening of NPS as a clinical indicator of SVD progression and are associated with cognitive decline over 2 years. Early detection of NPS and targeted interventions on SVD burden may improve NPS outcomes.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Sci-hub)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:随着中国痴呆患者数量的增加,迫切需要一种可靠且有效的中国仪器,可以测量住院痴呆症患者的神经精神症状。这项研究检查了中文版神经精神量表的信度和结构效度,疗养院版(NPI-NH),在中国住院痴呆症患者的样本中。
    方法:共有112名患有痴呆的居民(临床痴呆等级=1:10.7%;临床痴呆等级=2:39.3%;临床痴呆等级=3:50.0%)和30名参与者参加了这项横断面研究。使用Cronbachα和类内相关系数测试了可靠性。采用主成分分析法对存货的因素结构进行评价。
    结果:在患者中,92.9%有至少一种神经精神症状。冷漠(57%)是最常见的症状。中文版的神经精神量表,疗养院版,显示出可接受的内部一致性(Cronbach'sα为总量表,频率,严重程度,和干扰子量表分别为0.64、0.70、0.73和0.80)和重测信度(总量表的类内相关系数,频率,严重程度,和干扰分量表分别为0.93、0.92、0.89和0.91)。五个因素-精神运动行为,情感症状,精神病,睡眠障碍,和饮食失调-被确定为总规模。群集症状攻击性和易怒,抑郁和焦虑,妄想和幻觉是三个最稳定的症状组。
    结论:这项研究表明,中文版的神经精神量表,疗养院版,是评估制度化痴呆患者神经精神症状的有效和可靠的工具。
    BACKGROUND: With the increasing number of dementia patients in China, there is a pressing need for a reliable and valid Chinese instrument that can measure neuropsychiatric symptoms in institutionalized dementia patients. This study examined the reliability and structural validity of the Chinese version of the Neuropsychiatric Inventory, Nursing Home version (NPI-NH), in a sample of institutionalized dementia patients in China.
    METHODS: A total of 112 residents with dementia (Clinical Dementia Rating = 1: 10.7%; Clinical Dementia Rating = 2: 39.3%; Clinical Dementia Rating = 3: 50.0%) and 30 informants participated in this cross-sectional study. Reliability was tested using Cronbach\'s α and intra-class correlation coefficient. Principal component analysis was used to evaluate the factor structure of the inventory.
    RESULTS: Of the patients, 92.9% had at least one neuropsychiatric symptom. Apathy (57%) was the most common symptom. The Chinese version of the Neuropsychiatric Inventory, Nursing Home version, showed acceptable internal consistency (Cronbach\'s α for the total scale, frequency, severity, and disturbance subscales were 0.64, 0.70, 0.73, and 0.80, respectively) and test-retest reliability (intra-class correlation coefficient for the total scale, frequency, severity, and disturbance subscales were 0.93, 0.92, 0.89, and 0.91, respectively). Five factors-psychomotor behaviour, affective symptoms, psychosis, sleep disorders, and eating disorders-were identified for the total scale. The cluster symptoms aggression and irritability, depression and anxiety, and delusions and hallucinations were three of the optimally stable groups of symptoms.
    CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrated that the Chinese version of the Neuropsychiatric Inventory, Nursing Home version, is a valid and reliable instrument for evaluating neuropsychiatric symptoms in institutionalized dementia patients.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:神经精神缺陷可导致痴呆患者明显的残疾,并增加照顾者的痛苦。多项研究发现,神经精神症状在阿尔茨海默病(AD)和血管性痴呆(VaD)患者中都很常见。然而,对来自中国大陆的混合(皮质-皮质下)VaD患者的大量临床样本中的神经精神紊乱的研究很少。本研究旨在调查中国大陆VaD患者的神经精神症状。
    方法:80例混合VaD患者,持续时间超过6个月,和他们的照顾者(VaD组),在武汉大学中南医院面试,2010年6月至2012年6月。同时采访了80名年龄和性别匹配的正常志愿者(对照组)。对VaD患者进行了简易精神状态检查(MMSE)和神经精神量表(NPI),他们的照顾者,正常的志愿者使用非配对t检验分析组差异。
    结果:VaD组的NPI总分高于对照组(P<0.01)。NPI的子量表得分,包括妄想,幻觉,抑郁症,冷漠,烦躁,激动,异常运动行为,VaD组食欲变化明显高于对照组(P<0.05~0.01)。与轻度VaD亚组相比,冷漠的NPI子量表得分,在中度VaD亚组中,易怒性和总分显著增高(P<0.05-0.01);在NPI亚表中,冷漠,烦躁,重度VaD亚组总分明显高于重度VaD亚组(P<0.01)。与中度VaD亚组相比,严重VaD亚组的焦虑和冷漠的NPI子量表评分明显高于重度VaD亚组(P<0.05-0.01)。
    结论:神经精神症状,比如幻觉,焦虑,冷漠,易怒和异常行为,在来自中国大陆的混合型VaD患者中很常见;在重度VaD患者亚组中,焦虑和冷漠更为明显。
    BACKGROUND: Neuropsychiatric deficits can induce marked disability in patients with dementia and increase caregiver distress. Several studies have found that neuropsychiatric symptoms are common both in patients with Alzheimer\'s disease (AD) and patients with vascular dementia (VaD). However, there are few studies of the neuropsychiatric disturbances in large clinical samples of patients with mixed (cortical - subcortical) VaD from mainland China. This study aimed to investigate the neuropsychiatric symptoms in VaD patients in mainland China.
    METHODS: Eighty patients with mixed VaD for over 6 months duration, and their caregivers (VaD group), were recruited for interview in Zhongnan Hospital of Wuhan University, from June 2010 to June 2012. Eighty age- and sex-matched normal volunteers (control group) were interviewed at the same time. The Mini Mental State Examination (MMSE) and the Neuropsychiatric Inventory (NPI) were administered to the VaD patients, their caregivers, and normal volunteers. Group differences were analyzed using the unpaired t-test.
    RESULTS: The total mean scores of the NPI in the VaD group were higher than in the control group (P < 0.01). The subscale scores of NPI, including delusions, hallucinations, depression, apathy, irritability, agitation, aberrant motor behavior, and change in appetite were significantly higher in the VaD group than in the control group (P < 0.05-0.01). Compared with the mild VaD subgroup, the NPI subscale scores of apathy, irritability and total scores were significantly higher in the moderate VaD subgroup (P < 0.05-0.01); the NPI subscale scores of anxiety, apathy, irritability, and total scores were significantly higher in the severe VaD subgroup (P < 0.01). Compared with the moderate VaD subgroup, the NPI subscale scores of anxiety and apathy were significantly higher in the severe VaD subgroup (P < 0.05-0.01).
    CONCLUSIONS: Neuropsychiatric symptoms, such as hallucination, anxiety, apathy, irritability and aberrant action behavior, are common in patients with mixed VaD from mainland China; anxiety and apathy were more pronounced in the subgroup of severe VaD patients.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Sci-hub)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:许多研究报告说,物理治疗干预措施可用于治疗阿尔茨海默病(AD),但疗效仍不确定。
    目的:评价理疗干预对AD的疗效。
    方法:从文献数据库中检索数据源,期刊,以及1990年1月1日至2014年4月1日的参考清单。我们的荟萃分析包括了采用物理治疗干预的随机和非随机对照试验。采用Jadad评分和纽卡斯尔-渥太华量表评价纳入试验的质量。结果测量是认知功能,物理功能,日常生活活动(ADL)和神经精神量表(NPI)。
    结果:23项试验最终符合纳入标准。认知功能显着变化:迷你精神状态检查得分(加权平均差(WMD):1.84,95%置信区间(CI):[0.76,至,2.93],p<0.0001),和言语流畅性(标准平均差(SMD):0.34,95%CI:[0.01to0.66],p=0.04)。其他结果也很重要,他们被定时并进行测试(SMD:0.56,95%CI:[0.30至0.83],p<0.0001),伯格功能平衡量表(SMD:1.11,95%CI:[0.37至1.84],p=0.003),6分钟步行距离测试(SMD:141.45,95%CI:[11.72至271.18],p=0.03),ADL(SMD:0.78,95%CI:[0.33至1.23],p=0.0007)和NPI(SMD:-0.69,95%CI:[-1.31至-0.07],p=0.03)。
    结论:现有数据表明物理治疗干预可能对AD有益处。然而,目前的数据尚不明确;需要更仔细地设计和进行观察性研究,以明确确定物理治疗干预是否能有效缓解AD症状.
    BACKGROUND: Many studies reported that physiotherapy interventions are available to treat Alzheimer\'s disease (AD), but the efficacy remains uncertain.
    OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effectiveness of physiotherapy intervention on AD.
    METHODS: The data sources were searched from literature databases, journals, and reference lists from 1 January 1990 to the end of 1 April 2014. Randomized and non-randomized controlled trials with physiotherapy intervention were included in our meta-analysis. Jadad score and Newcastle-Ottawa scale were used to assess the quality of included trials. Outcome measures were cognition function, physical function, activity of daily life (ADL) and neuropsychiatric inventory (NPI).
    RESULTS: 23 trials met the inclusion standard finally. Significant changes were seen in cognitive function: Mini-Mental State Examination score (weighted mean difference (WMD): 1.84, 95% confidence interval (CI): [0.76, to, 2.93], p < 0.0001), and verbal fluency (standard mean difference (SMD): 0.34, 95% CI: [0.01 to 0.66], p = 0.04). Other outcomes are also significant, they were timed up and go test (SMD: 0.56, 95% CI: [0.30 to 0.83], p < 0.0001), berg functional balance scale (SMD: 1.11, 95% CI: [0.37 to 1.84], p = 0.003), 6-min walk distance test (SMD: 141.45, 95% CI: [11.72 to 271.18], p = 0.03), ADL (SMD: 0.78, 95% CI: [0.33 to 1.23], p = 0.0007) and NPI (SMD: -0.69, 95% CI: [-1.31 to -0.07], p = 0.03).
    CONCLUSIONS: The available data indicate that physiotherapy intervention may have benefits in AD. However, current data are not definitive; more carefully designed and conducted observational studies are needed to definitively establish that whether physiotherapy intervention can effectively alleviate symptoms of AD.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

公众号