OBJECTIVE: To three-dimensionally assess differences in craniomaxillofacial skeletal development in patients with operated unilateral cleft lip and palate (UCLP) treated with/without presurgical nasoalveolar molding (PNAM) with a mean age of 5 years.
METHODS: Cone-beam CT radiographs of 30 patients with UCLP who had undergone PNAM and 34 patients with UCLP who did not receive PNAM were analyzed. The data were stored in DICOM file format and were imported into the Dolphin Imaging program for 3D image reconstruction and landmark identification. 33 landmarks, 17 linear and three angular variables representing craniofacial morphology were analyzed and compared by using the Mann-Whitney U tests.
RESULTS: The vast majority of linear variables and 3D coordinates of landmark points reflecting craniofacial skeletal symmetry were not significantly different between the two groups. In terms of craniofacial skeletal development, the PNAM group had a significantly smaller anterior nasal spine offset in the midsagittal plane and a greater maxillary length compared to the non-PNAM group.
CONCLUSIONS: Evaluations performed in early childhood showed that treatment with/without PNAM in the neonatal period was not a major factor influencing craniomaxillofacial hard tissue development in patients with UCLP; moreover, PNAM treatment showed significant correction of skeletal deviation at the base of the nose.
CONCLUSIONS: Follow-up in early childhood has shown that PNAM treatment administered during the neonatal stage does not impede maxillary development and has benefits in correcting nasal floor deviation. It is a viable option for improving nasal deformity in children with unilateral cleft lip and palate.

Unilateral complete cleft lip and palate (UCCLP) is one of the most severe clinical subphenotypes among nonsyndromic cleft lip and/or palate (NSCL/P), that complicates surgical repair operations. Presurgical nasoalveolar molding (PNAM) is a technique used to reshape the nose, lip and alveolar bone of infants with UCCLP before surgery (the modified Mohler rotation advancement cheiloplasty and two flap palatoplasty), with the potential to facilitate surgical repair. However, the effectiveness of PNAM treatment is still a matter of debate. In this paper, the 3Shape scanning system and 3dMD stereophotography were used to assess the short-term and long-term effects of PNAM treatment on the dental arch morphology and nasolabial features of patients with UCCLP, respectively. The findings indicated that PNAM treatment negatively affects both short-term and long-term dental arch shape compared to the treatment without PNAM, particularly in terms of limiting the transverse width of the maxillary canine-to-midline. Regarding the nasal and labial symmetry, PNAM improves the symmetry of the nasal alae in patients over 7 years old and the symmetry of the lip in patients under 7 years old. Moreover, UCCLP patients who received PNAM treatment exhibited a shorter and wider shape of the nostril on the cleft side compared to those without PNAM treatment. In clinical practice, the multidisciplinary team should carefully consider the advantages and disadvantages of the outcomes of PNAM treatment when treating infants with cleft lip and palate.

OBJECTIVE: To develop a modified presurgical nasoalveolar molding (MPNAM) with a premaxillary appliance, connected with two stainless steel wires and evaluate its therapeutic efficacy in newborns with complete bilateral cleft lip and palate (BCLP).
METHODS: A total of 41 patients with neonatal complete BCLP having a severely protruded and deviated premaxilla were retrospectively selected from January 2017 to November 2019. All patients received the MPNAM device with a premaxillary appliance which was worn until cheilorrhaphy. Plaster casts from pre- and post-MPNAM treatments were scanned using a three-dimensional laser scanner, and the changes were recorded. Facial photographs of patients were taken during the treatment.
RESULTS: The average MPNAM treatment duration was 59.8 days. In all cases, the protrusive and deviated premaxilla was rapidly retracted and set into a suitable position after MPNAM treatment. The relative deviation distance and alveolar cleft width were significantly reduced. Both mid-palatal arch width and posterior arch width were increased. In addition, none of the patients developed any complications during the MPNAM treatment.
CONCLUSIONS: Our MPNAM device was able to rapidly centralize the malpositioned premaxilla and reduce the alveolar cleft defect. This device can be applied in presurgical orthodontic treatments for patients with complete BCLP having a severely protruded and deviated premaxilla.

BACKGROUND: Presurgical nasoalveolar molding (NAM) is the most common preoperative treatment for cleft lip and palate. However, NAM may have some limitations such as requiring high technical sensitivity and frequent visits. To simplify the device, some scholars have changed the traditional NAM into a split-NAM consisting of a alveolar molding plate and a nasal hook. This study compared the shaping effect of split NAM and traditional NAM on nasolabial soft tissue using three-dimensional (3D) measurement.
METHODS: A total of 39 patients with unilateral cleft lip and palate (UCLP) were enrolled and divided into 2 groups. 13 patients were treated with split-NAM while the other 26 patients were treated with traditional NAM. 3D images of all patients\' craniofacial soft tissue before and after NAM treatment were recorded and measured by three-dimensional software. Statistical analysis of measurements in both groups was performed using SPSS software.
RESULTS: After treatment, nasal soft tissue symmetry in the split-NAM group was better improved than that in the NAM group in vertical and anterior-posterior direction, but was worse improved in transverse direction. There was no significant difference in labial soft tissue symmetry between two groups.
CONCLUSIONS: The split NAM can better elevate the alar and nostrils of the cleft side, and have a better forward effect on alar outer edge, nasal base, and nostrils. However, the traditional NAM can better reduce the width of nasal base.