NSCLC, Non-small-cell lung cancer

NSCLC,非小细胞肺癌
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    RNA中的转录后修饰调节其生物学行为和功能。N1-甲基腺苷(m1A),由作者动态调节,橡皮擦和阅读器,已被发现是tRNA的可逆修饰,mRNArRNA和长链非编码RNA(lncRNA)。m1A修饰对RNA加工有影响,目标的结构和功能。越来越多的研究揭示了m1A修饰及其调节因子在肿瘤发生中的关键作用。由于m1A与癌症发展之间的正相关性,针对m1A修饰和与m1A相关的调节因子一直受到关注。在这次审查中,我们总结了目前对RNA中m1A的理解,涵盖了癌症生物学中m1A修饰的调制,以及靶向m1A修饰作为癌症诊断和治疗的潜在靶标的可能性。
    Post-transcriptional modifications in RNAs regulate their biological behaviors and functions. N1-methyladenosine (m1A), which is dynamically regulated by writers, erasers and readers, has been found as a reversible modification in tRNA, mRNA, rRNA and long non-coding RNA (lncRNA). m1A modification has impacts on the RNA processing, structure and functions of targets. Increasing studies reveal the critical roles of m1A modification and its regulators in tumorigenesis. Due to the positive relevance between m1A and cancer development, targeting m1A modification and m1A-related regulators has been of attention. In this review, we summarized the current understanding of m1A in RNAs, covering the modulation of m1A modification in cancer biology, as well as the possibility of targeting m1A modification as a potential target for cancer diagnosis and therapy.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    我们先前的研究表明,静脉内维生素C(IVC)治疗与调制热疗(mEHT)同时使用是安全的,并改善了非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)患者的生活质量(QoL)。该试验的目的是进一步验证上述联合疗法在先前治疗的难治性晚期(IIIb或IV期)NSCLC患者中的疗效。共有97例患者随机接受IVC和mEHT加最佳支持治疗(BSC)(n=49,在活动臂中,同时接受1g/kg*dIVC和mEHT,每周三次,共25次治疗)或单独使用BSC(对照组中n=48)。经过24个月的中位随访,与单独使用BSC相比,联合治疗的无进展生存期(PFS)和总生存期(OS)显着延长(PFS:3个月vs1.85个月,P<0.05;OS:9.4个月vs5.6个月,P<0.05)。尽管疾病处于晚期,但活动臂的QoL显着增加。治疗后3个月疾病控制率主动臂为42.9%,对照臂为16.7%(P<0.05)。总的来说,IVC和mEHT可能具有改善晚期NSCLC患者预后的能力。
    Our previous study indicated that intravenous vitamin C (IVC) treatment concurrent with modulated electrohyperthermia (mEHT) was safe and improved the quality of life (QoL) of non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients. The aim of this trial was to further verify the efficacy of the above combination therapy in previously treated patients with refractory advanced (stage IIIb or IV) NSCLC. A total of 97 patients were randomized to receive IVC and mEHT plus best supportive care (BSC) (n = 49 in the active arm, receiving 1 g/kg * d IVC concurrently with mEHT, three times a week for 25 treatments in total) or BSC alone (n = 48 in the control arm). After a median follow-up of 24 months, progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were significantly prolonged by combination therapy compared to BSC alone (PFS: 3 months vs 1.85 months, P < 0.05; OS: 9.4 months vs 5.6 months, P < 0.05). QoL was significantly increased in the active arm despite the advanced stage of disease. The 3-month disease control rate after treatment was 42.9% in the active arm and 16.7% in the control arm (P < 0.05). Overall, IVC and mEHT may have the ability to improve the prognosis of patients with advanced NSCLC.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Sci-hub)

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    循环微小RNA(miRNA)是用于癌症检测的有前景的生物标志物。然而,缺乏非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)的多种族和多中心研究.我们招募了221名NSCLC患者,来自中国和美国的161个对照和56个良性结节。使用TaqMan低密度阵列进行初始miRNA筛选,然后通过RT-qPCR在中国队列中单独确认。最后,我们进行了一项来自美国队列的盲试验,以验证我们的发现.RT-qPCR证实miR-483-5p,miR-193a-3p,与对照组相比,患者的miR-25、miR-214和miR-7显著升高。这五个血清miRNA组的ROC曲线的曲线下面积(AUC)为0.976(95%CI,0.939-1.0;P<0.0001)和0.823(95%CI,0.75-0.896;P<0.0001),分别。在盲目的审判中,该小组对美国队列中95%的NSCLC病例和84%的对照进行了正确分类.最重要的是,该小组能够区分NSCLC和良性结节,在美国队列中AUC为0.979(95%CI,0.959-1.0),并允许正确预测中国和美国队列中86%和95%的I-II期肿瘤,分别。该血清miRNA组具有诊断种族不同的NSCLC患者的潜力。
    Circulating microRNAs (miRNAs) are promising biomarkers for cancer detection. However, multiethnic and multicentric studies of non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) are lacking. We recruited 221 NSCLC patients, 161 controls and 56 benign nodules from both China and America. Initial miRNA screening was performed using the TaqMan Low Density Array followed by confirming individually by RT-qPCR in Chinese cohorts. Finally, we performed a blind trial from an American cohort to validate our findings. RT-qPCR confirmed that miR-483-5p, miR-193a-3p, miR-25, miR-214 and miR-7 were significantly elevated in patients compared to controls. The areas under the curve (AUCs) of the ROC curve of this five-serum miRNA panel were 0.976 (95% CI, 0.939-1.0; P < 0.0001) and 0.823 (95% CI, 0.75-0.896; P < 0.0001) for the two confirmation sets, respectively. In the blind trial, the panel correctly classified 95% NSCLC cases and 84% controls from the American cohort. Most importantly, the panel was capable of distinguishing NSCLC from benign nodules with an AUC of 0.979 (95% CI, 0.959-1.0) in the American cohort and allowed correct prediction of 86% and 95% stage I-II tumors in the Chinese and American cohorts, respectively. This serum miRNA panel holds the potential for diagnosing ethnically diverse NSCLC patients.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Sci-hub)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    表皮生长因子受体(EGFR)的突变使其具有组成活性,是转移性非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)的主要原因之一。利用酪氨酸激酶抑制剂(TKIs)的EGFR靶向治疗通常在临床上用作一线治疗。但是大约一半的非小细胞肺癌患者对这些疗法产生了耐药性,其中MET原癌基因通过缺氧诱导因子(HIF)-1α被EGFR扩增。在这里,我们报道了含有内皮PAS结构域的蛋白1(EPAS1),与HIF-1α具有48%的序列同一性,特异性结合TKI耐药的T790MEGFR,但不是野生型EGFR,在NSCLC细胞系中。当与T790MEGFR同时表达但与野生型EGFR不同时表达时,EPAS1的表达增强了MET的扩增,并且这种增强独立于EGFR的配体结合域。MET扩增需要EPAS1,因为EPAS1敲低降低了MET水平。当表达T790MEGFR的NSCLC细胞用TKIs处理时,降低EPAS1水平显着增强药物效果,而EPAS1的过表达增加了耐药效应。这种依赖EPAS1的TKI抗性通过击倒MET被废除,这表明EPAS1本身不会引起TKI耐药,而是起桥接EGFR和MET相互作用的作用。我们的研究结果表明,EPAS1是EGFR-MET串扰的关键因素,在NSCLC病例中赋予TKI耐药。并可作为TKI耐药NSCLC患者的潜在治疗靶点。
    Mutations in epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) rendering it constitutively active is one of the major causes for metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC), and EGFR-targeted therapies utilizing tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) are often used clinically as the first-line treatment. But approximately half of NSCLC patients develop resistance to these therapies, where the MET proto-oncogene is amplified by EGFR through the hypoxia-inducible factor (HIF)-1α. Here we report that endothelial PAS domain-containing protein 1 (EPAS1), with 48% sequence identity to HIF-1α, specifically binds to TKI-resistant T790M EGFR, but not to wild-type EGFR, in NSCLC cell lines. Expression of EPAS1 enhances amplification of MET when simultaneously expressed with T790M EGFR but not with wild-type EGFR, and this enhancement is independent of ligand binding domain of EGFR. MET amplification requires EPAS1, since EPAS1 knock-down reduced MET levels. When NSCLC cells expressing T790M EGFR were treated with TKIs, reduced EPAS1 levels significantly enhanced the drug effect, whereas over-expression of EPAS1 increased the drug resistant effect. This EPAS1-dependent TKI-resistance was abolished by knocking-down MET, suggesting that EPAS1 does not cause TKI-resistance itself but functions to bridge EGFR and MET interactions. Our findings suggest that EPAS1 is a key factor in the EGFR-MET crosstalk in conferring TKI-resistance in NSCLC cases, and could be used as a potential therapeutic target in TKI-resistant NSCLC patients.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

公众号