UNASSIGNED: To assess whether mechanical circulatory support (MCS), including intra-aortic balloon pump (IABP) or veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO), can help improve neurological outcomes in patients with out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA).
UNASSIGNED: This is a retrospective observational cohort study performed in China Medical University Hospital, Taichung, Taiwan. Adult patients with OHCA admitted between January 2015 and June 2023. Quantitative score of vasoactive-inotropic agents and qualitative interventions of MCS, including IABP and ECMO after OHCA. Multivariate regression evaluated the efficacy of each MCS approach in patients stratified by the vasoactive-inotropic score (VIS).
UNASSIGNED: A total of 334 patients were included and analyzed, 122 (36.5%) had favorable neurological outcomes and 215 (64.4%) survived ≥90 days. These patients were stratified by VIS: 0-25, 26-100, 101-250, and >250. In patients with a VIS > 100, ECMO with or without IABP ensured favorable neurological outcomes and survival after OHCA compared to non-MCS interventions (p < 0.001). For patients with a VIS ≤ 100, IABP alone was beneficial, with no significant outcome difference from non-MCS interventions (p > 0.05).
UNASSIGNED: ECMO with or without IABP therapy may improve post-OHCA neurological outcomes and survival in patients with an expected VIS-24 h > 100 (e.g., epinephrine dose reaches 3 mg during CPR).

Sepsis-induced cardiomyopathy (SIC) is generally characterized by decreased cardiac ejection fraction (EF) reversibility, less cardiac response to fluid resuscitation and catecholamine, and rarely complicated with refractory ventricular fibrillation (RVF). Once RVF is induced, the mortality rate of sepsis patients will be greatly increased. In this case, we reported a 26-year-old female patient who was diagnosed sepsis-induced cardiomyopathy (SIC), presented with RVF for 36 hours. The patient was maintained by the mechanical circulatory support (MCS) devices and experienced twice defibrillation. Finally, the patient was discharged without intracardial thrombosis and severe craniocerebral complications. This case suggested that early application of MCS and appropriate frequency of defibrillation may help the prognosis of SIC with RVF.

Fulminant myocarditis (FM) is a rare but serious clinical syndrome which can be characterized by the rapid deterioration of cardiac function, with cardiogenic shock (CS) and arrhythmic electrical storms being common presentations, often requiring adjunctive support with mechanical circulatory devices. With the development of mechanical circulatory support (MCS) devices, there are now more and more studies investigating the application of MCS in FM patients, and the use of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) to treat FM has shown good survival rates. This review elucidates the treatment of FM, and the application and clinical outcomes associated with ECMO intervention.

Fulminant giant cell myocarditis is a fatal form of acute myocarditis leading to a rapid-onset clinical presentation with lethal arrhythmias, acute heart failure, or cardiogenic shock requiring mechanical circulatory support. We report the case of a 52-year-old female diagnosed with fulminant myocarditis requiring veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (V-A ECMO) and intra-aortic balloon pump(IABP) support. Due to hemodynamic instability, she was transferred to our hospital by helicopter on day 4. On arrival at our hospital, she underwent percutaneous balloon atrial septostomy to decompress the left ventricle. Although the left ventricular distension and pulmonary edema improved after atrial septostomy, no signs of biventricular function recovery were identified on day 14. On day 23, V-A ECMO and IABP were switched to a durable left ventricular assist device(LVAD) system and a right ventricular assist device(RVAD) with ECMO (RVAD-ECMO) under median sternotomy. On day 37, RVAD-ECMO was eventually removed and rehabilitation was started with the remaining LVAD support as destination therapy. On day 78, the patient was finally discharged with LVAD support to follow-up as an outpatient. This case underscores the importance of a multidisciplinary approach and rigorous monitoring to optimize outcomes in the treatment of fulminant giant cell myocarditis.

OBJECTIVE: Although cardiogenic shock requiring extracorporeal life support after cardiac surgery is associated with high mortality, the impact of sex on outcomes of postcardiotomy extracorporeal life support remains unclear with conflicting results in the literature. We compare patient characteristics, in-hospital outcomes, and overall survival between females and males requiring postcardiotomy extracorporeal life support.
METHODS: This retrospective, multicenter (34 centers), observational study included adults requiring postcardiotomy extracorporeal life support between 2000 and 2020. Preoperative, procedural, and extracorporeal life support characteristics, complications, and survival were compared between females and males. Association between sex and in-hospital survival was investigated through mixed Cox proportional hazard models.
RESULTS: This analysis included 1823 patients (female: 40.8%; median age: 66.0 years [interquartile range, 56.2-73.0 years]). Females underwent more mitral valve surgery (females: 38.4%, males: 33.1%, P = .019) and tricuspid valve surgery (feamales: 18%, males: 12.4%, P < .001), whereas males underwent more coronary artery surgery (females: 45.9%, males: 52.4%, P = .007). Extracorporeal life support implantation was more common intraoperatively in feamales (females: 64.1%, females: 59.1%) and postoperatively in males (females: 35.9%, males: 40.9%, P = .036). Ventricular unloading (females: 25.1%, males: 36.2%, P < .001) and intra-aortic balloon pumps (females: 25.8%, males: 36.8%, P < .001) were most frequently used in males. Females had more postoperative right ventricular failure (females: 24.1%, males: 19.1%, P = .016) and limb ischemia (females: 12.3%, males: 8.8%, P = .23). In-hospital mortality was 64.9% in females and 61.9% in males (P = .199) with no differences in 5-year survival (females: 20%, 95% CI, 17-23; males: 24%, 95% CI, 21-28; P = .069). Crude hazard ratio for in-hospital mortality in females was 1.12 (95% CI, 0.99-1.27; P = .069) and did not change after adjustments.
CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates that female and male patients requiring postcardiotomy extracorporeal life support have different preoperative and extracorporeal life support characteristics, as well as complications, without a statistical difference in in-hospital and 5-year survivals.

Pulmonary hypertension (PH) with high pulmonary vascular resistance (PVR) is a very often diagnosed contraindication for orthotopic heart transplantation (OHT). It is a direct consequence of left ventricle failure characterized by high diastolic pressure obstructing the collection of blood from the pulmonary vessels. The occurrence of this situation grows with the increasing time of waiting for OHT, and with the progression of heart failure. Mechanical circulatory support (MCS) devices, particularly left ventricular assist devices (LVADs), have emerged as pivotal interventions for patients with fixed PH, offering a potential bridge to transplantation. The pathophysiological impact of PH in heart transplant candidates is profound, as it is associated with increased perioperative risk and heightened mortality post-transplantation. The selection of heart transplant candidates thus mandates a careful evaluation of PH, with an emphasis on distinguishing between reversible and fixed forms of the condition. Reversible PH can often be managed with medical therapies; however, fixed PH presents a more daunting challenge, necessitating more aggressive interventions like MCS. Patients are supported with LVADs until evidence of pulmonary afterload reversal is evident and then can be considered for heart transplantation. However, in those who are non-responders or have complications while being supported, their option for transplant is revoked. Despite these advancements, the heterogeneity of MCS devices and their mechanisms of action necessitates a nuanced understanding of their efficacy.

A ventricular assist device (VAD) is a form of mechanical circulatory support that uses a mechanical pump to partially or fully take over the function of a failed heart. In recent decades, the VAD has become a crucial option in the treatment of end-stage heart failure in adult patients. However, due to the lack of suitable devices and more complicated patient profiles, this therapeutic approach is still not widely used for pediatric populations. This article reviews the clinically available devices, adverse events, and future directions of design and implementation in pediatric VADs.

UNASSIGNED: Severe heart failure or cardiogenic shock might arise as a consequence of fulminant myocarditis if it manifests and advances swiftly. The effective implementation of an immunological modulation regimen and mechanical circulatory support has proven instrumental in preserving the lives of individuals experiencing hemodynamic disturbance.
UNASSIGNED: The current report described a severe instance of fulminant myocarditis in an 18-year-old young woman who presented with severe hypoxemia and hemodynamic instability. The patient was treated with a combination of optimal medical therapy, immunological modulation, extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO), and an intra-aortic balloon pump (IABP) to support him through his critical period of hemodynamic collapse.
UNASSIGNED: The case presented herein underscored the prompt reversal of life-threatening fulminant myocarditis subsequent to a comprehensive treatment regimen encompassing optimal medical therapy and aggressive mechanical circulatory support.

Heart transplantation is currently the most effective treatment for end-stage heart failure; however, the shortage in donor hearts constrains the undertaking of transplantation. Mechanical circulatory support (MCS) technology has made rapid progress in recent years, providing diverse therapeutic options and alleviating the dilemma of donor heart shortage. The ventricular assist device (VAD), as an important category of MCS, demonstrates promising applications in bridging heart transplantation, destination therapy, and bridge-to-decision. VADs can be categorized as durable VADs (dVADs) and temporary VADs (tVADs), according to the duration of assistance. With the technological advancement and clinical application experience accumulated, VADs have been developed in biocompatible, lightweight, bionic, and intelligent ways. In this review, we summarize the development history of VADs, focusing on the mechanism and application status of dVADs in detail, and further discuss the research progress and use of VADs in China.

Frailty is increasingly recognized as a salient condition in patients with heart failure (HF) as previous studies have determined that frailty is highly prevalent and prognostically significant, particularly in those with advanced HF. Definitions of frailty have included a variety of domains, including physical performance, sarcopenia, disability, comorbidity, and cognitive and psychological impairments, many of which are common in advanced HF. Multiple groups have recently recommended incorporating frailty assessments into clinical practice and research studies, indicating the need to standardize the definition and measurement of frailty in advanced HF. Therefore, the purpose of this consensus statement is to provide an integrated perspective on the definition of frailty in advanced HF and to generate a consensus on how to assess and manage frailty. We convened a group of HF clinicians and researchers who have expertise in frailty and related geriatric conditions in HF, and we focused on the patient with advanced HF. Herein, we provide an overview of frailty and how it has been applied in advanced HF (including potential mechanisms), present a definition of frailty, generate suggested assessments of frailty, provide guidance to differentiate frailty and related terms, and describe the assessment and management in advanced HF, including with surgical and nonsurgical interventions. We conclude by outlining critical evidence gaps, areas for future research, and clinical implementation.