BACKGROUND: To determine the optimal planning target volume (PTV) margins for adequate coverage by daily iterative cone-beam computed tomography (iCBCT)-guided online adaptive radiotherapy (oART) in postoperative treatment of endometrial and cervical cancer and the benefit of reducing PTV margins.
METHODS: Fifteen postoperative endometrial and cervical cancer patients treated with daily iCBCT-guided oART were enrolled in this prospective phase 2 study. Pre- and posttreatment iCBCT images of 125 fractions from 5 patients were obtained as a training cohort, and clinical target volumes (CTV) were contoured separately. Uniform three-dimensional expansions were applied to the PTVpre to assess the minimum margin required to encompass the CTVpost. The dosimetric advantages of the proposed online adaptive margins were compared with conventional margin plans (7-15 mm) using an oART emulator in another cohort of 125 iCBCT scans. A CTV-to-PTV expansion was verified on a validation cohort of 253 fractions from 10 patients, and further margin reduction and acute toxicity were studied.
RESULTS: The average time from pretreatment iCBCT to posttreatment iCBCT was 22 min. A uniform PTV margin of 5 mm could encompass nodal CTVpost in 100% of the fractions (175/175) and vaginal CTVpost in 98% of the fractions (172/175). The margin of 5 mm was verified in our validation cohort, and the nodal PTV margin could be further reduced to 4 mm if ≥ 95% CTV coverage was predicted to be achieved. The adapted plan with a 5 mm margin significantly improved pelvic organ-at-risk dosimetry compared with the conventional margin plan. Grade 3 toxicities were observed in only one patient with leukopenia, and no patients experienced acute urinary toxicity.
CONCLUSIONS: In the postoperative treatment of endometrial and cervical cancer, oART could reduce PTV margins to 5 mm, which significantly decrease the dose to critical organs at risk and potentially lead to a lower incidence of acute toxicity.

BACKGROUND: Sinonasal neoplasms, whether benign and malignant, pose a significant challenge to clinicians and represent a model area for multidisciplinary collaboration in order to optimize patient care. The International Consensus Statement on Allergy and Rhinology: Sinonasal Tumors (ICSNT) aims to summarize the best available evidence and presents 48 thematic and histopathology-based topics spanning the field.
METHODS: In accordance with prior International Consensus Statement on Allergy and Rhinology documents, ICSNT assigned each topic as an Evidence-Based Review with Recommendations, Evidence-Based Review, and Literature Review based on the level of evidence. An international group of multidisciplinary author teams were assembled for the topic reviews using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses format, and completed sections underwent a thorough and iterative consensus-building process. The final document underwent rigorous synthesis and review prior to publication.
RESULTS: The ICSNT document consists of four major sections: general principles, benign neoplasms and lesions, malignant neoplasms, and quality of life and surveillance. It covers 48 conceptual and/or histopathology-based topics relevant to sinonasal neoplasms and masses. Topics with a high level of evidence provided specific recommendations, while other areas summarized the current state of evidence. A final section highlights research opportunities and future directions, contributing to advancing knowledge and community intervention.
CONCLUSIONS: As an embodiment of the multidisciplinary and collaborative model of care in sinonasal neoplasms and masses, ICSNT was designed as a comprehensive, international, and multidisciplinary collaborative endeavor. Its primary objective is to summarize the existing evidence in the field of sinonasal neoplasms and masses.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the value of Wood\'s lamp examination combined with 5-aminolevulinic acid (5-ALA) photodynamic therapy (PDT) to determine positive tumor margins in patients with extramammary Paget\'s disease (EMPD) before surgery.
METHODS: We admitted 36 patients with EMPD from January 2016 to June 2019. The experimental group was the 5-ALA-PDT group, and the control group was the wide local excision (WLE) group. In the 5-ALA-PDT group, Wood\'s lamp examination combined with 5-ALA-PDT was used to trace the fluorescence range, and multipoint biopsy was performed according to the pathology to determine the final excision scope. We applied the standard partial expansion excision method for the WLE group, while frozen pathology assessment was applied to confirm the excision range. We measured the overall resection area of the WLE group and 5-ALA-PDT group. We analyzed the overall duration of surgery, the number of frozen pathology sections, patient satisfaction with appearance and function, the rate of functional sequelae, and the recurrence rate for both groups.
RESULTS: The results suggested that the difference in final resection margin between the WLE group and the 5-ALA-PDT group was significant. The number of frozen pathology sections, overall surgery time, and recurrence rate were significantly lower in the experimental group than in the control group (p<0.05). The occurrence rate of functional sequelae in the experimental group was lower, and patient satisfaction with appearance and function was significantly higher than that of the control group (p<0.05).
CONCLUSIONS: Wood\'s lamp examination combined with 5-ALA-PDT may predict tumor margins in EMPD.

Oncological resection of primary spine tumors is associated with lower recurrence rates. However, even in the most experienced hands, the execution of a meticulously drafted plan sometimes fails. The objectives of this study were to determine how successful surgical teams are at achieving planned surgical margins and how successful surgeons are in intraoperatively assessing tumor margins. The secondary objective was to identify factors associated with successful execution of planned resection.
The Primary Tumor Research and Outcomes Network (PTRON) is a multicenter international prospective registry for the management of primary tumors of the spine. Using this registry, the authors compared 1) the planned surgical margin and 2) the intraoperative assessment of the margin by the surgeon with the postoperative assessment of the margin by the pathologist. Univariate analysis was used to assess whether factors such as histology, size, location, previous radiotherapy, and revision surgery were associated with successful execution of the planned margins.
Three hundred patients were included. The surgical plan was successfully achieved in 224 (74.7%) patients. The surgeon correctly assessed the intraoperative margins, as reported in the final assessment by the pathologist, in 239 (79.7%) patients. On univariate analysis, no factor had a statistically significant influence on successful achievement of planned margins.
In high-volume cancer centers around the world, planned surgical margins can be achieved in approximately 75% of cases. The morbidity of the proposed intervention must be balanced with the expected success rate in order to optimize patient management and surgical decision-making.

Dermatofibrosarcoma protuberans (DFSP) is a tumor with low-grade malignancy and high recurrence rates. Wide local excision (WLE) is essential for DFSP, but its surgical excision margin is controversial. This study aimed to examine whether resection margin is associated with the prognosis of patients with DFSP by systematically reviewing related literature. Studies that evaluated the relationship between excision margins and outcomes after WLE were retrieved from the Cochrane Library, PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science databases. Relative risk (RR) estimates and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were measured via a random-effect model to evaluate the subsequent outcomes: recurrence rate, mortality, and positive surgical margin rate. Sensitivity and subgroup analyses were simultaneously carried out. The meta-analysis of eight observational literatures demonstrated a significant positive correlation of ≥3 cm margin with the recurrence rate (RR = 0.17, 95% CI 0.09-0.31) and the positive surgical margin rate (RR = 0.09, 95% CI 0.02-0.46). The same result was observed in the recurrence rate in all subgroups. The stability of the above outcomes was authenticated via sensitivity analyses. Our meta-analysis illustrated that excision with <3 cm surgical margin exhibited an increased risk of poor DFSP prognosis (high recurrence rate and increasing positive margin rate).

UNASSIGNED: We sought to develop and validate a model for prediction of initial margin status during breast-conserving surgery (BCS).
UNASSIGNED: We included eligible breast cancer patients receiving BCS in Sun Yat-sen Memorial Hospital from January 2003 to December 2014. All patients received intraoperative frozen-section analysis for initial margin assessment. We used univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses to screen for predictors. A nomogram was developed in the training cohort (n=1,193) from the south branch of the hospital and externally validated in the validation cohort (n=499) from the north branch. We used the area under the receiver-operating characteristic curve and Hosmer-Lemeshow tests to assess the discrimination and accuracy of the nomogram.
UNASSIGNED: The initial margin-positivity rates were 19.5% and 25.2% in the training and validation cohorts, respectively. Preoperative tumor size, preoperative lymph-node status, suspicion of multifocality, hormone-receptor status, and HER2 status were significantly associated with margin status. The model included these five variables. The discrimination and calibration of the model were considered acceptable in both cohorts.
UNASSIGNED: The nomogram can predict the likelihood of having positive initial margins during BCS and may be useful for clinical decision-making in the surgical treatment of breast cancer patients.

During the radiotherapy process, the emergence of set-up errors is nearly inevitable. Because set-up errors were not detected and corrected daily, planned target volumes were formed by expanding the clinical target volume according to each unit\'s experience. We optimized the margins of clinical and planned target volumes during administration of intensity-modulated radiotherapy for nasopharyngeal carcinoma. A total of 72 patients newly diagnosed with non-metastatic nasopharyngeal carcinoma and treated with Tomotherapy were prospectively enrolled in the study. For each patient, one megavoltage computed tomography scan was obtained after conventional positioning, online correction, and daily tomotherapy delivery. The interfraction set-up errors were determined using a planning CT based on the registered scan. The mean interfraction errors were -2.437±2.0529 mm, 0.0652±2.3844 mm, 0.318±1.8314 mm, and 0.197±1.8721° for the medial-lateral, superior-inferior, and anterior-posterior directions, and the direction of rotation, respectively. The total MPTV in the three directions was 7.53 mm, 1.83 mm, and 2.08 mm, respectively. The 3-mm margins in the superior-inferior and anterior-posterior directions uniformly expanded from the clinical target volume should be sufficient, and the marging in the medial-lateral direction was up to 7.5 mm. These results suggest that personalized MPTV may be adopted for intensity-modulated radiotherapy planning.

The mainstay of treatment in adenoid cystic carcinoma (ACC) of the head and neck is surgical resection with negative margins. The purpose of this study was to define the margin status that associates with survival outcomes of ACC of the head and neck.
We conducted univariate and multivariate analyses of international data.
Data of 507 patients with ACC of the head and neck were analyzed; negative margins defined as ≥5 mm were detected in 253 patients (50%). On multivariate analysis, the hazard ratios (HRs) of positive margin status were 2.68 (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.2-6.2; p = .04) and 2.63 (95% CI, 1.1-6.3; p = .03) for overall survival (OS) and disease-specific survival (DSS), respectively. Close margins had no significant impact on outcome, with HRs of 1.1 (95% CI, 0.4-3.0; p = .12) and 1.07 (95% CI, 0.3-3.4; p = .23) for OS and DSS, respectively, relative with negative margins.
In head and neck ACC, positive margins are associated with the worst outcome. Negative or close margins are associated with improved outcome, regardless of the distance from the tumor. © 2017 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Head Neck 39: 1008-1014, 2017.