BACKGROUND: Neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (nCRT) and surgery have been recommended as the standard treatments for locally advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC). In addition, nodal metastases decreased in frequency and changed in distribution after neoadjuvant therapy. This study aimed to examine the optimal strategy for lymph node dissection (LND) in patients with ESCC who underwent nCRT.
METHODS: The hazard ratios (HRs) for overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) were calculated using the Cox proportional hazard model. To determine the minimal number of LNDs (n-LNS) or least station of LNDs (e-LNS), the Chow test was used.
RESULTS: In total, 333 patients were included. The estimated cut-off values for e-LNS and n-LNS were 9 and 15, respectively. A higher number of e-LNS was significantly associated with improved OS (HR: 0.90; 95% CI 0.84-0.97, P = 0.0075) and DFS (HR: 0.012; 95% CI: 0.84-0.98, P = 0.0074). The e-LNS was a significant prognostic factor in multivariate analyses. The local recurrence rate of 23.1% in high e-LNS is much lower than the results of low e-LNS (13.3%). Comparable morbidity was found in both the e-LNS and n-LND subgroups.
CONCLUSIONS: This cohort study revealed an association between the extent of LND and overall survival, suggesting the therapeutic value of extended lymphadenectomy during esophagectomy. Therefore, more lymph node stations being sampled leads to higher survival rates among patients who receive nCRT, and standard lymphadenectomy of at least 9 stations is strongly recommended.

The aim of the present study was to compare the metastatic ratio between calcified lymph node stations (CLNS) and non-CLNS (NCLNS) and to explore the impact of CLNS on surgical outcomes. Consecutive patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) scheduled to receive surgical treatment between June and December 2020 were included in the present study. Their clinical and radiological data were prospectively collected and analyzed. A total of 91 patients with NCLNS and 64 patients with CLNS were enrolled in the present study. Out of the 91 patients, 38 (24.516%) patients had 61/343 (17.784%) lymph node stations (LNS) that were metastasized. On a per-patient basis, the differences in the LNS metastatic ratio were not significant between the CLNS with NCLNS groups. However, on a per-nodal station basis, all differences in the LNS metastatic ratio between the groups were significant not only in the all-LNS group (P=0.004), but also in the LNS group which in patients with solely CLNS or NCLNS (P=0.009) and in the patients with CLNS (P=0.010). Pathology, T stage and calcification were independent predictive factors for LNS metastasis (P=0.002, P=0.021 and P=0.044, respectively). More patients with CLNS than patients with NCLNS received thoracotomy or conversion from video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery to thoracotomy (P=0.006). The operating time and blood loss were significantly higher in patients with CLNS than in those without (P<0.001 and P<0.001, respectively). Although CLNS are a risk reduction factor for metastasis and their dissection is time- and blood-consuming in patients with NSCLC, their thorough removal is advisable, since metastases were identified in ~15% of patients and 9% of CLNS.

The aim of this study was to assess the prognoses of patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) according to the current nodal (N) categories of the tumor, node and metastasis (TNM) classification and the number of involved lymph node stations.
Five hundred and seventy patients with NSCLC underwent surgery from 1 January 2005 to 31 December 2009 and were analysed retrospectively. Postoperative overall survival was analysed according to two nodal classifications: the current N0, N1, N2 and N3 categories and those based on the number of involved nodal stations: N0, N1a (single N1), N1b (multiple N1), N2a1 (single N2 without N1), N2a2 (single N2 with N1), N2b1 (multiple N2 without N1) and N2b2 (multiple N2 with N1).
Five-year survival rates were 76.1%, 53.4% and 26.3% for N0, N1 and N2, respectively (P < 0.001). When survival was analysed by the number of involved nodal stations, the groups with significant differences were maintained; otherwise, they were merged, and new codes were assigned as follows for exploratory analyses: NA (N0), NB (N1a), NC (N1b, N2a (i.e., N2a1 and N2a2) and N2b1) and ND (N2b2). Five-year survival rates were 76.1%, 60.0%, 39.1%, and 11.4% for NA, NB, NC and ND, respectively, and there were significant differences among them. This N classification was an independent prognostic factor in multivariate analyses.
Pending prospective and international validation, it is practical to merge the current N categories with the number of involved lymph node stations when evaluating the postoperative prognosis of NSCLC patients.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the diagnostic potential of intravoxel incoherent motion (IVIM) DWI for differentiating metastatic and non-metastatic lymph node stations (LNS) in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC).
METHODS: 59 LNS histologically diagnosed following surgical resection from 15 patients were included. IVIM DWI with 12 b values was added to the standard MRI protocol. Evaluation of parameters was performed pre-operatively and included the apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC), pure diffusion coefficient (D), pseudo-diffusion coefficient (D*) and perfusion fraction (f). Diagnostic performance of ADC, D, D* and f for differentiating between metastatic and non-metastatic LNS was evaluated using ROC analysis.
RESULTS: Metastatic LNS had significantly lower D, D*, f and ADC values than the non-metastatic LNS (p< 0.01). The best diagnostic performance was found in D, with an area under the ROC curve of 0.979, while the area under the ROC curve values of D*, f and ADC were 0.867, 0.855 and 0.940, respectively. The optimal cut-off values for distinguishing metastatic and non-metastatic lymph nodes were D = 1.180 × 10-3 mm2/s; D* = 14.750 × 10-3 mm2/s, f = 20.65 %, and ADC = 1.390 × 10-3 mm2/s.
CONCLUSIONS: IVIM DWI is useful for differentiating between metastatic and non-metastatic LNS in PDAC.
CONCLUSIONS: • IVIM DWI is feasible for diagnosing LN metastasis in PDAC. • Metastatic LNS has lower D, D*, f, ADC values than non-metastatic LNS. • D-value from IVIM model has best diagnostic performance, followed by ADC value. • D* has the lowest AUC value.