UNASSIGNED: The dissection of the preperitoneal space is performed using a monopolar instrument to prevent bleeding in laparoscopic transabdominal preperitoneal hernia repair (TAPP). It may also cause energy injuries and nerve damage.
UNASSIGNED: To assess the effectiveness and safety of dissection of the preperitoneal space without electrocoagulation (DPSWE) in TAPP throughout the process.
UNASSIGNED: A retrospective analysis of data of 134 patients was made. The electrocoagulation group (EG) relied on monopolar instruments. In the non-electrocoagulation group (NEG) mainly scissors were used without electrocoagulation. The patients were followed for up for 3 months. Intraoperative and postoperative conditions and other complications were observed.
UNASSIGNED: The VAS scores in the NEG were lower than those in the EG (p < 0.05). The operation time in the NEG was shorter than that in the EG (p < 0.05). Hospitalization expenses, scrotal seroma formation, and rupture of hernia sac in the NEG were lower than those in the EG (p < 0.05). The intraoperative bleeding volume above 20 ml in the NEG was higher than that in the EG. There was no significant difference in the incidence of postoperative bleeding, vas deferens injury, intestinal injury, surgical site infection, length of hospital stay, urinary retention and hernia recurrence in the NEG and the EG (p > 0.05). There was no significant difference in the incidence of surgical site infections (SSIs) in the NEG and the EG.
UNASSIGNED: DPSWE is effective and safe. DPSWE may reduce postoperative pain and have no significant increase in postoperative bleeding.

Inguinal hernia is a prevalent surgical condition in pediatric patients. Despite the efficacy of current treatment modalities, a certain recurrence rate still persists. Hence, our objective in this study is to introduce an innovative surgical technique designed to minimize surgical complications. We conducted a retrospective analysis on 809 pediatric cases that underwent laparoscopic repair with our innovative technique for inguinal hernia from June 2020 to June 2022. Demographic information, perioperative details, and postoperative follow-up outcomes were thoroughly assessed. All surgeries were conducted laparoscopically under general anesthesia. The procedure commenced by encircling the hernia sac with two sutures under laparoscopic guidance. Subsequently, the sac was exteriorized from the body using the two sutures, followed by ligation and excision of the hernia sac. The research findings demonstrate that the duration of unilateral and bilateral procedures was recorded as 15.9 ± 4.8 and 21.7 ± 3.9 min, respectively. Incision infection occurred in 7 patients (0.87%), and Male Complicated Inguinal Hernia (MCIH) was observed in 2 patients (0.23%). Notably, there were no occurrences of iatrogenic cryptorchidism, testicular atrophy, or recurrence (0%) during the follow-up period. In conclusion, our novel modification shows a notable reduction in postoperative recurrence rates and alleviates the impact of the procedure on the positioning of the testis or uterus. This modified technique is both safe and valuable, thus warranting broader adoption and promotion.

暂无摘要。

OBJECTIVE: This paper explores the causes of paediatric inguinal hernia (PIH) recurrence after single-port laparoscopic percutaneous extraperitoneal closure (SPLPEC).
METHODS: From January 2015 to December 2020, the clinical data of 3480 children with PIHs who underwent SPLPEC were retrospectively reviewed, including 644 children who underwent SPLPEC with a homemade single-hook hernia needle from January 2015 to December 2016 and 2836 children who underwent the SPLPEC with a double-hook hernia needle and hydrodissection from January 2017 to December 2020. There were 39 recurrences (including communicating hydrocele) during the 2-5 years of follow-up. The findings of redo-laparoscopy were recorded and correlated with the revised video of the first operation to analyse the causes of recurrence.
RESULTS: Thirty-three males and 6 females experienced recurrence, and 8 patients had a unilateral communicating hydrocele. The median time to recurrence was 7.1 months (0-38). There were 20 cases (3.11%) in the single-hook group and 19 cases (0.67%) in the double-hook group. Based on laparoscopic findings, recurrence most probably resulted from multiple factors, including uneven tension of the ligation (10 cases), missing part of the peritoneum (14 cases), loose ligation (8 cases), broken knot (5 cases), and knot reaction (2 cases). All children who underwent repeat SPLPEC were cured by double ligations or reinforcement with medial umbilical ligament.
CONCLUSIONS: The main cause of recurrence is improper ligation. Tension-free and complete PIH ligation are critical to the success of surgery, which requires avoiding the peritoneum skip area and the subcutaneous and muscular tissues. Redo-laparoscopic surgery was suitable for the treatment of recurrent inguinal hernia (RIH). For giant hernias, direct ligation of the internal ring incorporating the medial umbilical ligament (DIRIM) may be needed.

BACKGROUND: Laparoscopic-assisted repairs for pediatric inguinal hernia have gained gradual acceptance over the past decade. However, consensus about the optimal management is still lacking. The aim of this study is to compare outcomes of a modified laparoscope-assisted single-needle laparoscopic percutaneous extraperitoneal closure (LPEC) versus open repair of pediatric hernias/hydrocele in a single institution.
METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed the medical data of children who underwent laparoscope-assisted single-needle LPEC and open repair (OR) for inguinal hernia from 2014 to 2019. Data collection included demographics, laterality of hernia, surgical time and time to follow-up. We also reviewed and analyzed the evidence of recurrence, the incidence of metachronous contralateral inguinal hernia (MCIH), and other complications.
RESULTS: In our cohort, 961 patients in the OR group and 1098 patients in the LPEC group were analyzed retrospectively. Mean operative time was significantly shorter in the LPEC group (22.3 ± 3.5 min) than in the OR group (27.8 ± 5.9 min) for bilateral hernia repair (p < 0.001). Postoperative recurrence was 1.3% (13/1035) in the OR group and 0.5% (6/1182) in the LPEC group (p = 0.056). Iatrogenic cryptorchidism occurred statistically more frequently in the OR group than in the LPEC group (0.4% vs. 0%, p = 0.013). In addition, the incidence of MCIH was 3.7% (33/887) in the OR group and 0.3% (3/1014) in the LPEC group (p < 0.01).
CONCLUSIONS: Comparing to open technique, laparoscope-assisted single-needle LPEC provides a simple and effective option for pediatric inguinal hernia/hydrocele repair with excellent outcomes, a low incidence of recurrence, and reduced MCIH.

BACKGROUND: Inguinal hernias (IHs) are sometimes encountered incidentally in children during laparoscopic appendectomy. This study aims to evaluate the efficacy and outcomes of laparoscopic simultaneous inguinal hernia repair and appendectomy in children.
METHODS: A multicentric study was performed in patients with AA and concurrent IH who received laparoscopic simultaneous inguinal hernia repair and appendectomy (study group), compared with patients who underwent two-stage laparoscopic procedures (control group) between September 2012 and January 2020. Intraoperative data, postoperative complications, and clinical outcomes were prospectively collected and retrospectively analyzed.
RESULTS: 189 patients with AA and concurrent IH (117 children in the study group, and 72 children in the control group) were enrolled. No significant differences in preoperative characteristics were identified between the two groups. Patients in the study group had a shorter total operative time and hospital stay than those in the control group (43.2 ± 8.1 vs 53.9 ± 7.3 min, p < 0.001; 1.5 ± 0.8 vs 2.2 ± 0.9 days, p = 0.023). The study group incurred lower costs than the control group (9198.7 ± 587.6 vs 14,392.5 ± 628.6 RMB, p < 0.001). During follow-up (range 1.5-6.0 years), three children in the study group and two children in the control group experienced wound infection. One child in the study group had recurrent IH.
CONCLUSIONS: Laparoscopic simultaneous procedures do not increase the incidence of wound infection or recurrent IH. Moreover, they avoid repeat anesthesia and hospitalization. Therefore, this approach is safe, feasible and cost-effective for children with AA and concurrent IH.
METHODS: Level III.

Background: During lower abdominal marginal hernia repair, the peritoneal flap is routinely freed to facilitate mesh placement and closed to conclude the procedure. This procedure is generally called trans-abdominal partial extra-peritoneal (TAPE). However, the necessity of closing the free peritoneal flap is still controversial. This study aimed to investigate the safety and feasibility of leaving the free peritoneal flap in-situ. Methods: A retrospective review was conducted on 68 patients (16 male, 52 female) who underwent laparoscopic hernia repair between June 2014 and March 2021. Patients were diagnosed as the lower abdominal hernia and all required freeing the peritoneal flap during the operation. Patients were divided into 2 groups: one group was TAPE group with the closed free peritoneal flap, another group left the free peritoneal flap unclosed. Analyses were performed to compare both intraoperative parameters and postoperative complications. Results: There were no significant differences in demographic, comorbidity, hernia characteristics and ASA classification. The intra-operative bleeding volume, visceral injury, hospital stay, urinary retention, visual analog scale (VAS) score, dysuria, intestinal obstruction, surgical site infection, mesh infection, recurrence rate and hospital stay were similar among the two groups. Mean operative time of the flap closing procedure was higher than for patients with the free peritoneal flap left in-situ (p = 0.002). Comparisons of postoperative complications showed flap closure resulted in a higher incidence of seroma formation (p = 0.005). Conclusion: Providing a barrier-coated mesh is used during laparoscopic lower abdominal marginal hernia repair, it is safe to leave the free peritoneal flap in-situ and this approach may prevent the occurrence of seromas.

BACKGROUND: Reported recurrence rates using jumping purse-string suturing in laparoscopic hernia repair (LH) are higher than that of intact purse-string. This study aims to compare the outcomes of LH using transabdominal jumping purse-string suturing (TJS) with those using transabdominal intact purse-string suturing (TIS) and percutaneous extraperitoneal intact purse-string suturing (PEIS).
METHODS: A total of 3340 patients from three centers who have undergone laparoscopic hernia repair from January 2016 to June 2019 were retrospectively reviewed. Of these, 1460 patients received TJS, 724 patients received TIS, and 1006 patients received PEIS. One hundred and fifty patients were excluded due to the loss of follow-up. Demographic characteristics, intraoperative findings, and postoperative complications were analyzed.
RESULTS: The hernia distribution characteristics and mean length of hospital stay were similar among the three groups (p > 0.05, p > 0.05). While the overall complication rates were similar among the three groups (0.34% in TJS vs. 0.41% in TIS vs. 0.50% in PEIS, TJS & TIS p = 0.502; TJS & PEIS p = 0.813), the incidence of intraoperative hematoma in TIS group and postoperative subcutaneous knot in PEIS group was significantly higher ((0.83% in TIS and 0.34% in TJS vs. 0.2% in PEIS, TJS & TIS p = 0.018; TJS & PEIS p = 0.163), (0% in TIS and 0% in TJS vs. 0.2% in PEIS, TJS & TIS p = 0.415; TJS & PEIS p = 0.025)). There were no differences in the recurrent rate in both unilateral and bilateral cases.
CONCLUSIONS: Transabdominal jumping purse-string suturing is not associated with a higher recurrence rate and is the recommended surgical approach.

Polypropylene (PP) mesh has been used successfully for a long time in clinical practice as an impressive prosthesis for ventral hernia repair. To utilize a physical barrier for separating mesh from viscera is a general approach for preventing adhesions in clinical practice. However, a serious abdominal adhesion between the mesh and viscera can possibly occur post-hernia, especially with the small intestine; this can lead to a series of complications, such as chronic pain, intestinal obstruction, and fistula. Thus, determining how to prevent abdominal adhesions between the mesh and viscera is still an urgent clinical problem. In this study, a dopamine-functionalized polysaccharide derivative (oxidized-carboxymethylcellulose-g-dopamine, OCMC-DA) was synthesized; this was blended with carboxymethylchitosan (CMCS) to form a hydrogel (OCMC-DA/CMCS) in situ at the appropriate time. The physical and chemical properties of the hydrogel were characterized successfully, and its excellent biocompatibility was presented by the in vitro cell test. The combination of this hydrogel and PP mesh was used in laparoscopic surgery for repairing the abdominal wall defect, where the hydrogel could become fixed in situ on the PP mesh to form an anti-adhesion gel-mesh. The results showed that the gel-mesh could prevent abdominal adhesions effectively in the piglet model. Moreover, the histology and immunohistochemical staining proved that the gel-mesh could effectively alleviate the inflammation reaction and deposition of collagen around the mesh, and it did not disturb the integration between mesh and abdominal wall. Thus, the gel-mesh has superior tissue compatibility.

Background: Laparoscopic repair has been recommended as the method-of-choice of groin hernia repair among women. Whether the round ligament of uterus should be divided to facilitate mesh placement remains controversial. This study aims to review the outcomes of laparoscopic total extraperitoneal (TEP) groin hernia repair in women and to evaluate the impact of division of round ligament. Methods: Consecutive female patients with inguinal or femoral hernias who underwent elective laparoscopic TEP repair at a single institution from 2006 to 2017 were included for retrospective analysis. Primary outcomes were postoperative pain, genital prolapse, and recurrence. Outcomes of patients who had the round ligament divided were further compared with those with round ligament preserved and multivariable adjusted analysis was performed. Results: Sixty-eight patients with a total of 77 TEP repairs were included in the 12-year study period. The mean age was 45 ± 16 years old. Incidental femoral hernia was identified in 4 patients (5.9%). There was 1 (1.3%) recurrence upon mean follow-up of 42.9 ± 37.3 months. The round ligament was divided in 67.5% of patients, and upon multivariable adjusted analysis, there were no statistically significant differences in outcomes in terms of chronic pain (odds ratio [OR] = 2.210, P = .357), paresthesia (OR = 0.241, P = .149), and genital prolapse (OR = 0.327, P = .415) when compared with patients with preserved round ligament. Conclusion: Laparoscopic groin hernia repair in women is associated with low recurrence. Division of round ligament intraoperatively facilitates mesh placement and has minimal impact on clinical outcomes.