Inlet

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    微潮汐进水口的复杂性源于沿岸漂移和潮汐范围对其稳定性的共同作用。因此,理解和评估它们的稳定性构成了重大挑战。本研究旨在通过使用Delft3D模型对进口稳定性的评估提供一些见解。海洋和河口之间进水口的稳定性取决于长岸运输速率和春季潮汐棱镜之间的平衡。破坏这种平衡导致入口的关闭。冲浪区沉积物的运动主要是由长海岸速度驱动的,作为沿海漂移的驱动力,这是使用代尔夫特三维波模型估计的。通过根据获得的驱动力采用经验关系和数字代码来估算长岸运输速率。随后,基于这些估计来评估进气道的稳定性。春季潮汐棱镜是指从进水口和河口流入海洋的水的排放。使用Delft3D流动模型确定流速。波浪和洋流产生的近岸环流的输入数据主要是通过现场测量和从印度国家海洋信息服务中心(INCOIS)收集的数据来收集的。对于目前的研究,Muttukadu(北纬12°47\'13″,80°15\'01″E)进口,通过评估其季节性变化,对印度半岛东海岸的科瓦拉姆进行了调查。这项研究有助于海洋生物生态学的管理,小规模手工捕鱼的扩展,促进水上运动相关旅游,渔港发展的推进,和沿海工程项目的执行。
    The complexity of micro-tidal inlets arises from the combined action of littoral drift and tidal range on their stability. Consequently, understanding and evaluating their stability poses a significant challenge. This study aims to shed some insight on the assessment of inlet stability by employing Delft 3D model. The stability of the inlet between the ocean and estuary relies on the balance between the longshore transport rate and the spring tidal prism. Disrupting this equilibrium results in the closure of the inlets. The movement of sediments in the surf zone is primarily driven by longshore velocity, which acts as the driving force for littoral drift, which is estimated using Delft 3D wave model. The longshore transport rate is estimated by employing empirical relationships and numerical codes based on the obtained driving force. Subsequently, the stability of the inlet is assessed based on these estimations. The spring tidal prism refers to the discharge of water flowing into the ocean from inlets and estuaries. Flow velocity is determined using Delft 3D flow model. The input data for nearshore circulation resulting from waves and currents is primarily collected through field measurements and data collected from Indian National Centre for Ocean Information Services (INCOIS). For the current study, Muttukadu (12°47\'13″N, 80°15\'01″E) inlet, Kovalam along the East Coast of the Indian Peninsula is investigated by assessing its seasonal variations. This study contributes to the management of marine biological ecology, the expansion of small-scale artisanal fishing, the promotion of water sports-related tourism, the advancement of fishing harbor development, and the execution of coastal engineering projects.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Comparative Study
    狭窄是回肠袋手术后的常见并发症。这项研究的目的是评估内镜下狭窄切开术的疗效和安全性。内镜下球囊扩张术(EBD)治疗囊袋入口狭窄。
    提取了2008年至2017年在我们的介入炎症性肠病病房(i-IBD)治疗的所有诊断为袋入口或传入肢体狭窄的溃疡性结肠炎患者。主要结果是无手术生存率和术后并发症。
    本研究共纳入200名符合条件的患者,其中40例(20.0%)患者接受内镜狭窄切开术治疗,160例(80.0%)患者接受EBD治疗。记录了11例(42.3%)接受内镜狭窄切开术治疗的患者和16例(13.2%)接受EBD治疗的患者的症状改善。两组的后续手术率相当(9[22.5%]vs.33[20.6%],P=0.80)在0.6年的中位随访期间(四分位距[IQR]0.4-0.8)与3.6年(IQR1.1-6.2)在接受内镜下狭窄切开术和EBD的患者中,分别。总的无手术生存率似乎也相当(P=0.12)。狭窄切开术组的患者均未出现囊衰竭,而球囊扩张组有9例患者(5.6%)出现囊袋衰竭(P=0.17)。在接受内镜下狭窄切开术的患者中,有3次(每次手术4.7%)见手术性出血,在接受EBD的患者中,有3次(每次手术0.8%)见穿孔(P=0.02)。在多变量分析中,狭窄长度增加(风险比[HR]1.4,95%置信区间[CI]1.0~1.8)和并发囊炎(HR2.5,95%CI1.0~5.7)是需要手术的危险因素.
    内镜下狭窄切开术和EBD均可有效治疗囊袋入口或传入肢体狭窄的患者,EBD有较高的穿孔风险,而内镜下狭窄切开术有较高的出血风险。
    Strictures are common complications after ileal pouch surgery. The aim of this study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of endoscopic stricturotomy vs. endoscopic balloon dilation (EBD) in the treatment of pouch inlet strictures.
    All consecutive ulcerative colitis patients with the diagnosis of pouch inlet or afferent limb strictures treated in our Interventional Inflammatory Bowel Disease Unit (i-IBD) from 2008 to 2017 were extracted. The primary outcomes were surgery-free survival and post-procedural complications.
    A total of 200 eligible patients were included in this study, with 40 (20.0%) patients treated with endoscopic stricturotomy and 160 (80.0%) patients treated with EBD. Symptom improvement was recorded in 11 (42.3%) patients treated with endoscopic stricturotomy and 16 (13.2%) treated with EBD. Subsequent surgery rate was comparable between the two groups (9 [22.5%] vs. 33 [20.6%], P = 0.80) during a median follow-up of 0.6 years (interquartile range [IQR] 0.4-0.8) vs. 3.6 years (IQR 1.1-6.2) in patients receiving endoscopic stricturotomy and EBD, respectively. The overall surgery-free survival seems to be comparable as well (P = 0.12). None of the patients in the stricturotomy group developed pouch failure, while 9 patients (5.6%) had pouch failure in the balloon dilation group (P = 0.17). Procedural bleeding was seen in three occasions (4.7% per procedure) in patients receiving endoscopic stricturotomy and perforation was seen in three occasions (0.8% per procedure) in patients receiving EBD (P = 0.02). In multivariable analysis, an increased length of the stricture (hazard ratio [HR] 1.4, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.0-1.8) and concurrent pouchitis (HR 2.5, 95% CI 1.0-5.7) were found to be risk factors for the requirement of surgery.
    Endoscopic stricturotomy and EBD were both effective in treating patients with pouch inlet or afferent limb strictures, EBD had a higher perforation risk while endoscopic stricturotomy had a higher bleeding risk.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

公众号