Home parenteral nutrition

家庭肠外营养
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    适当的营养支持,包括补充家庭肠外营养(sHPN),可以改善营养不良癌症患者的预后和生活质量(Qol)。我们旨在从中国医疗保健的角度探讨sHPN对无法治愈的胃肠道癌症患者的成本效益。
    临床数据来自一项随机对照试验(NCT02066363)。患者被随机分为sHPN组或非sHPN组(接受最佳实践营养护理)。建立了一个周期为6周的马尔可夫模型。费用是从当地医院获得的,影响参数包括质量调整寿命年(QALY),Qol,身体质量指数,无脂质量(FFM),FFM指数,握力,和6分钟的步行测试。进行敏感性分析时,支付意愿(WTP)设定为人均国内生产总值3($29,307/QALY)。
    当将QALY视为实用程序时,增量成本-效果比(ICER)为24,289.17美元,sHPN组和非sHPN组之间的增量成本为2,051.18美元,增量QALY为0.0844美元.此外,我们从多个维度探索了sHPN的成本效益,我们分析了不同访视时的各种效应参数;结果显示,除了第2次访视时的握把参数外,sHPN组的患者具有更好的获益。敏感性分析显示了公用事业在sHPN组中的影响,但sHPN组仍然具有成本效益,WTP为2500美元/QALY。
    在中国,sHPN对于无法治愈的胃肠道癌症患者具有成本效益,建议在临床实践中的进一步应用,为临床决策和定价提供参考。
    UNASSIGNED: Appropriate nutritional support, including supplemental home parenteral nutrition (sHPN), may improve prognosis and quality of life (Qol) of malnourished cancer patients. We aimed to explore the cost-effectiveness of sHPN for incurable gastrointestinal cancer patients from the Chinese healthcare perspective.
    UNASSIGNED: Clinical data were extracted from a randomized controlled trial (NCT02066363). Patients were randomized into the sHPN group or the non-sHPN group (receiving best practice nutritional care). A Markov model was established with a 6-week cycle length. Costs were acquired from local hospitals, effect parameters included quality-adjusted life year (QALY), Qol, body mass index, fat-free mass (FFM), FFM index, handgrip strength, and a 6-min walking test. Sensitivity analyses were conducted with a willingness-to-pay (WTP) set at 3 per capita gross domestic product ($29,307/QALY).
    UNASSIGNED: When considering QALY as a utility, the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) was $24,289.17, with an incremental cost of $2,051.18 and an incremental QALY of 0.0844 between the sHPN group and the non-sHPN group. Furthermore, we explored the cost-effectiveness of sHPN from multidimensions, where we analyzed various effect parameters at different visits; the results showed a superior benefit for patients in the sHPN group except for the handgrip parameter at visit 2. Sensitivity analysis demonstrated the influence of utilities in the sHPN group, but the sHPN group was still cost-effective with a WTP of $2,500/QALY.
    UNASSIGNED: In China, sHPN was cost-effective for patients with incurable gastrointestinal cancer, which suggested further applications in clinical practice and provided references for clinical decisions and pricing.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    Patient-reported outcome (PRO) measures often address quality of life (QOL) and help improve communication and shared decision-making. The home parenteral nutrition patient-reported outcome questionnaire (HPN-PROQ) was developed for patients to self-assess factors that influence QOL. The aim of this study was to establish construct validity.
    Responses were analyzed for 77 HPN-dependent patients with chronic and prolonged acute intestinal failure. General linear modeling was conducted to describe patterns of interactions and association between items included in the HPN-PROQ.
    Most patients (78%) had chronic intestinal failure. Mean HPN duration was 3.3 ± 0.6 years. Underlying illness had a moderate or major effect on QOL for 88%; 59% reported their QOL had been negatively impacted by HPN. There was no difference in QOL among chronic patients, depending on how important they rated \"being able to do what I want to do\" (P = .1), whereas prolonged acute intestinal failure patients had significantly lower QOL if they rated \"being able to do what I want to do\" extremely vs very important (adjusted P = .02). Confidence with ability to perform HPN procedures was associated with understanding the need for HPN (P < .01). As ratings increased for emotional difficulty in coping with HPN so did HPN impact on QOL (linear trend P < .01).
    Construct validity of the HPN-PROQ was evident. The HPN-PROQ considers the unique experience of living with a complex nutrition therapy.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Sci-hub)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    Central line-associated bloodstream infection (CLABSI) is a potentially life-threatening complication in home parenteral nutrition (HPN) patients. We investigated potential predictors of CLABSI in a cohort of adult HPN patients METHODS: Patients managed by the HPN service at the Hospital of University of Pennsylvania on January 1, 2018, were included and followed through June 30, 2019, using existing medical records to collect demographic and clinical data. CLABSIs were adjudicated prospectively by infectious disease experts. Variables with P ≤ .2, when comparing patients with CLABSIs and those without, were included in logistic regression models.
    Among 114 patients, mean age was 54 ± 16 years, 78/114 were female, and BMI was 25 ± 5.6. Median experience with HPN was 516 days (range, 15-10,281), and 30 had prior CLABSI. Catheter types were peripherally inserted central catheters (83/114), tunneled (27), and implanted (4). The incidence of CLABSI was 0.89 per 1000 catheter days. One multivariate model identified ostomy/wound (odds ratio [OR], 22.0; 95% CI, 4.8-101.7), tunneled/implanted catheter (OR, 4.4; 95% CI, 1.4-13.9), and BMI < 18.5 (OR, 5.9; 95% CI, 1.4-24.2) as predictors of CLABSI. A second model identified patients with 2 potential predictors (OR, 22.9; 95% CI, 5.6-93.5) and tunneled/implanted catheter (OR, 6.7; 95% CI, 2.1-21.8) at high risk of CLABSI. Whether CLABSIrates might be reduced by more intense training in wound or catheter care (especially for those with multiple predictors), different types of catheters, or rapid treatment of malnutrition will require further study.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Sci-hub)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    Preparing the patient for home parenteral nutrition (HPN) is a collaborative effort among many different clinicians. Identifying patients who will transition home with parenteral nutrition (PN) as early as possible allows for a thoughtful and safe approach. Communication regarding the HPN goals is critical to the patient\'s success, whether the requirement for PN is temporary or permanent. Management of these complex patients is best served by a multidisciplinary team with expertise in the area of nutrition support. Adherence to available guidelines that define best practice is imperative in all aspects of care for the patient on HPN.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Sci-hub)

公众号