BACKGROUND: The survival outcomes in HER2-low versus HER2-zero breast cancer (BC) after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) remain unclear. The meta-analysis was conducted to summarize current evidence about the survival outcomes in HER2-low versus HER2-zero BC.
METHODS: We conducted a systematic search in PubMed and EMBASE databases to identify relevant studies.
RESULTS: A total of 14 studies with 53,714 patients were included. Overall, 34,037 patients (63.37%) were HER2-low, and 19,677 patients (36.63%) were HER2-zero. Patients with HER2-low tumors had a significantly lower pathological complete response (pCR) rate than patients with HER2-zero tumors, regardless of the hormone receptor status. Compared with HER2-zero breast cancer, the overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) of HER2-low BC were longer in the overall cohort (HR = 0.72; 95% CI = 0.61-0.85; P < 0.0001; HR = 0.83; 95% CI = 0.75-0.92; P = 0.0002); however, no differences were observed in terms of OS and DFS between HER2-low and HER2-zero BC in the HR-negative group. In the HR-positive group, HER2-low status had no significant impact on OS, while significantly associated with increased DFS (HR = 0.85; 95% CI = 0.76-0.96; P = 0.007).
CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest that although HER2-low BC has a poor response to NACT, it is correlated with favorable OS and DFS after NACT in the overall cohort as well as longer DFS in the HR-positive group.

Background: Recently, the classification of HER2 status evolves from binary to ternary, and HER2-low expression may exhibit prognostic significance. We aimed to investigate whether HER2-low tumor is distinct from HER2-zero or HER2-positive tumors, and then to develop a modified staging system (mNeo-Bioscore) that incorporates HER2-low status into Neo-Bioscore. Patients and Methods: This cohort study was conducted using data from the prospective database on breast cancer patients between January 2014 and February 2019. Results: Among 259 patients enrolled in the study, the HER2-low tumor exhibited significantly lower histological grade, pathological staging and Ki-67 level than the other two groups. HER2-low patients and HER2-positive patients receiving concurrent HER2-directed therapy may have similar LRFS (p = 0.531) and OS (p = 0.853), while HER2-zero peers may have significantly worse LRFS (p = 0.006) and OS (p = 0.017). In particular, a similar trend was also found in the patients without pathological complete response after surgery. Incorporation of HER2-low status made improvement in fit: 5-year OS rate estimates ranged from 33.33% to 100% for mNeo-Bioscore vs 61.36% to 100% for Neo-Bioscore. Conclusions: This study demonstrated that HER2-low tumor may exhibit prognostic significance. The innovative mNeo-Bioscore, based on a new classification of HER2 status, may serve as a prognostic staging system superior to Neo-Bioscore.

BACKGROUND: A new concept of HER2-low has emerged in recent years. However, the prognostic value and the relapse pattern of HER2-low is unclear.
METHODS: Our study included patients diagnosed with HER2-negative/hormone receptor-positive breast cancer to explore the differences in survival outcomes between the HER2-low group and the HER2-zero group. More importantly, we explored different recurrence patterns, including the comparison of metastatic sites and recurrence time curve between the two groups.
RESULTS: A total of 797 patients with hormone receptor-positive breast cancer were analyzed. Similar disease-free survival (DFS) was observed between the HER2-low group and HER2-zero group (HR 0.84, 95% CI: 0.61-1.16, p = 0.290). There was also no significant difference in OS between the HER2-low group and the HER2-zero group (HR 0.77, 95% CI: 0.46-1.28, p = 0.310). When IHC 1+ and 0 were taken as a group, the IHC 2+ group had significantly better DFS than the IHC 1+ and 0 group in some subgroups. The risk of bone metastasis in patients with HER2 IHC 1+ and 0 was significantly higher than that of patients with HER2 IHC 2+ (12.7% vs. 4.7%, p < 0.001). Compared with the HER2-zero group, we found that the HER2-low group had a more obvious peak in mortality at the time of postoperative 80th-100th month.
CONCLUSIONS: No significant difference in DFS and OS between the HER2-low group and the HER2-zero group was observed. Patients with HER2 IHC 1+ and 0 tend to develop bone metastasis. The HER2-low group had a more obvious second peak in mortality.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate potential differences in pathological complete response (pCR) rates and overall survival (OS) between HER2-low and HER2-zero patients with early-stage hormone receptor (HR)-positive and triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC), in the neoadjuvant chemotherapy setting.
METHODS: We identified early-stage invasive HER2-negative BC patients who received neoadjuvant chemotherapy diagnosed between 2010 and 2018 in the National Cancer Database. HER2-low was defined by immunohistochemistry (IHC) 1+ or 2+ with negative in situ hybridization, and HER2-zero by IHC0. All the methods were applied separately in the HR-positive and TNBC cohorts. Logistic regression was used to estimate the association of HER2 status with pCR (i.e. ypT0/Tis and ypN0). Kaplan-Meier method and Cox proportional hazards model were applied to estimate the association of HER2 status with OS. Inverse probability weighting and/or multivariable regression were applied to all analyses.
RESULTS: For HR-positive patients, 70.9% (n = 17,934) were HER2-low, whereas 51.1% (n = 10,238) of TNBC patients were HER2-low. For both HR-positive and TNBC cohorts, HER2-low status was significantly associated with lower pCR rates [HR-positive: 5.0% vs. 6.7%; weighted odds ratio (OR) = 0.81 (95% CI: 0.72-0.91), p < 0.001; TNBC: 21.6% vs. 24.4%; weighted OR = 0.91 (95% CI: 0.85-0.98), p = 0.007] and improved OS [HR-positive: weighted hazard ratio = 0.85 (95% CI: 0.79-0.91), p < 0.001; TNBC: weighted hazard ratio = 0.91 (95% CI: 0.86-0.96), p < 0.001]. HER2-low status was associated with favorable OS among patients not achieving pCR [HR-positive: adjusted hazard ratio = 0.83 (95% CI: 0.77-0.89), p < 0.001; TNBC: adjusted hazard ratio = 0.88 (95% CI 0.83-0.94), p < 0.001], while no significant difference in OS was observed in patients who achieved pCR [HR-positive: adjusted hazard ratio = 1.00 (95% CI: 0.61-1.63), p > 0.99; TNBC: adjusted hazard ratio = 1.11 (95% CI: 0.85-1.45), p = 0.44].
CONCLUSIONS: In both early-stage HR-positive and TNBC patients, HER2-low status was associated with lower pCR rates. HER2-zero status might be considered an adverse prognostic factor for OS in patients not achieving pCR.

UNASSIGNED: HER2-low expression breast cancer (BC) accounts for approximately 45%-55% of all BC cases. The purpose of this study was to investigate the prognostic difference between patients with HER2-low expression and HER2-zero BC.
UNASSIGNED: An electronic search of Pubmed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science databases was performed to screen studies that included prognostic comparisons between HER2-zero and HER2-low expression groups. A total of 14 studies involving 52106 patients were included.
UNASSIGNED: Our results indicated that HER2-low expression was associated with a significant benefit in OS among all patients with early BC (HR, 0.83; 95% CI, 0.78-0.88), patients with hormone-receptor positive BC (HR, 0.83; 95% CI, 0.77-0.89), and patients with TNBC (HR, 0.78; 95% CI, 0.70-0.87). HER2-low expression was associated with a significant benefit in DFS among all patients (HR, 0.81; 95% CI, 0.71-0.93), patients with hormone receptor-positive BC (HR, 0.81; 95% CI, 0.72-0.90), but no significant difference in DFS was found in patients with TNBC (HR, 0.87; 95% CI, 0.65-1.17). HER2-low expression was associated with a significant benefit in RFS among all patients (HR, 0.90; 95% CI, 0.85-0.95), patients with hormone receptor-positive BC (HR, 0.90; 95% CI, 0.84-0.96), but no significant difference in RFS was found in patients with TNBC (HR, 0.80; 95% CI, 0.55-1.16).
UNASSIGNED: Among patients with early-stage BC, patients with HER2-low expression BC had better OS in the overall population, hormone receptor-positive and TNBC subgroups. Besides, favorable DFS and RFS were observed in both the overall population and hormone receptor-positive subgroup.
UNASSIGNED: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/, identifier (CRD 42022349458).

UNASSIGNED: Human epidermal growth factor 2 (HER2)-low breast cancer, which is defined as HER2 1+ or 2+ in immunohistochemistry without gene amplification, accounts for a considerable part of all breast cancers. However, it remains controversial whether HER2-low breast cancer is a distinct entity. Our aim was to compare the clinicopathological features and survival outcomes between HER2-zero and HER2-low early breast cancer.
UNASSIGNED: The study was a retrospective analysis that enrolled 1,039 patients with available HER2 expression data in a single institute from 2013 to 2014, of whom 262 HER2-positive patients were excluded from the subsequent analysis. The remaining patients were divided into HER2-zero and HER2-low groups. Each group was further categorized into a hormone receptor (HR)-positive and an HR-negative subgroup. Clinicopathological characteristics were collected and compared between HER2-zero and HER2-low groups. The primary endpoint was disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS), which were analyzed using the Kaplan-Meier method with log-rank test, landmark analysis, and Cox proportional hazards model.
UNASSIGNED: A total of 777 non-HER2-positive patients were included in this analysis, of whom 126, 552, 53, and 46 patients were HR-positive/HER2-zero, HR-positive/HER2-low, HR-negative/HER2-zero, and HR-negative/HER2-low, respectively. No significant difference in DFS and OS was detected between the HER2-zero group and the HER2-low group when paired by HR status. Landmark analysis with a time point set at 5 years indicated that HR-positive/HER2-low patients had a better DFS compared with HR-positive/HER2-zero patients after 5 years (p = 0.0047). HER2-low status was an independent prognostic factor for DFS after 5 years [hazard ratio (HR) 0.31, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.13-0.75, p = 0.01].
UNASSIGNED: The clinicopathological characteristics and prognosis of HER2-zero and HER2-low breast cancer were similar regardless of HR status. Patients with HR-positive/HER2-low tumors tended to have a better DFS than their HR-positive/HER2-zero counterparts after 5 years.