En bloc resection

整体切除术
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:评价胸腰椎肿瘤整块切除和前柱重建术的围手术期临床疗效。
    方法:本研究对86例连续患者的前瞻性数据收集进行了回顾性分析,包括40名男性和46名女性,平均年龄为39岁(10至71岁)。原发性恶性肿瘤35例,42例侵袭性良性肿瘤,和9例转移。病灶主要位于胸椎65例,腰椎17例,胸腰椎4例。45名患者的肿瘤涉及一个级别,12名患者的两个水平,21名患者的三个级别,五个病人的四个级别,两名患者的五个级别,一个病人有六个级别。
    结果:根据Weinstein-Boriani-Biagini手术分期系统,所有患者都实现了整体切除,其中全脊椎整块切除74例,矢状面切除12例。平均手术时间为559分钟(210-1208分钟),平均总失血量为1528ml(260-5500ml)。62例(72.1%)患者共观察到122例并发症,其中18例(20.9%)患者出现25种主要并发症,1例(1.2%)患者死于并发症。组合方法(P=0.002),总失血量(P=0.003),分期手术(P=0.004),既往手术史(P=0.045),受累椎体数量(P=0.021)和腰椎位置(P=0.012)是主要并发症的显著危险因素。当上述所有危险因素纳入多变量分析时,只有联合治疗(P=0.052)仍然显著.
    结论:整块切除和前柱重建术伴随着较高的并发症发生率,特别是当一个联合的方法是必要的。
    OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the perioperative clinical outcomes of en bloc resection and anterior column reconstruction for thoracolumbar spinal tumors.
    METHODS: This study conducted a retrospective analysis of prospective data collection of 86 consecutive patients, including 40 males and 46 females, with an average age of 39 years (ranged from 10 to 71 years). There were 35 cases of a malignant primary tumor,42 cases of an aggressive benign tumor, and nine cases of metastases. The main lesions were located in 65 cases of thoracic spine, 17 cases of lumbar spine, and 4 cases of thoracolumbar spine. Tumors involved one level in 45 patients, two levels in 12 patients, three levels in 21 patients, four levels in five patients, five levels in two patients, and six levels in one patient.
    RESULTS: According to the Weinstein-Boriani-Biagini surgical staging system, all patients achieved en bloc resections, including 74 cases of total en bloc spondylectomy and 12 cases of sagittal resections. The mean surgical time was 559 min (210-1208 min), and the mean total blood loss was 1528 ml (260-5500 ml). A total of 122 complications were observed in 62(72.1%) patients, of which 18(20.9%) patients had 25 major complications and one patient (1.2%) died of complications. The combined approach (P = 0.002), total blood loss (P = 0.003), staged surgery (P = 0.004), previous surgical history (P = 0.045), the number of involved vertebrae (P = 0.021) and lumbar location (P = 0.012) were statistically significant risk factors for major complication. When all above risk factors were incorporated in multivariate analysis, only the combined approach (P = 0.052) still remained significant.
    CONCLUSIONS: En bloc resection and anterior column reconstruction is accompanied by a high incidence of complications, especially when a combined approach is necessary.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:脊柱肿瘤的整块切除具有挑战性,并且与并发症的高发生率相关;然而,当达到较大的幅度时,它提供了降低复发风险的潜力。本研究旨在探讨整块切除术治疗胸腰椎软骨肉瘤/脊索瘤的安全性和有效性。
    方法:来自被诊断为胸部或腰部软骨肉瘤和脊索瘤的患者的数据,在我们的机构进行了7年的整体或零碎切除,收集并定期跟进。分析围手术期总体并发症,比较两种手术方式在并发症和局部肿瘤复发方面的差异。
    结果:纳入17例患者,包括12个软骨肉瘤和5个脊索瘤。其中,5例行病灶内零碎切除术,其余12人接受了计划中的整体切除术。平均手术时间为684min(sd=287),平均估计失血量为2300ml(sd=1599)。记录了35例并发症,平均每例患者的围手术期并发症为2.06。82%的患者(14/17)经历了至少一种围手术期并发症,主要并发症发生率为64.7%(11/17)。5例患者在随访期间出现局部复发,平均复发时间为16.2个月(sd=7.2),中位复发时间为20个月(IQR=12.5)。住院,操作时间,失血,两种手术方法之间的并发症发生率没有显着差异。整块切除术后的局部复发率低于零碎切除术,虽然没有统计学意义(P=0.067)。
    结论:两种手术的并发症发生率相似。考虑到安全性和局部肿瘤控制,对于符合此治疗条件的胸腰椎软骨肉瘤/脊索瘤患者,建议首选整块切除术.
    BACKGROUND: En bloc resection of spinal tumors is challenging and associated with a high incidence of complications; however, it offers the potential to reduce the risk of recurrence when a wide margin is achieved. This research aims to investigate the safety and efficacy of en bloc resection in treating thoracic and lumbar chondrosarcoma/chordoma.
    METHODS: Data from patients diagnosed with chondrosarcoma and chordoma in the thoracic or lumbar region, who underwent total en bloc or piecemeal resection at our institution over a 7-year period, were collected and regularly followed up. The study analyzed overall perioperative complications and compared differences in complications and local tumor recurrence between the two surgical methods.
    RESULTS: Seventeen patients were included, comprising 12 with chondrosarcoma and 5 with chordoma. Among them, 5 cases underwent intralesional piecemeal resection, while the remaining 12 underwent planned en bloc resection. The average surgical time was 684 min (sd = 287), and the mean estimated blood loss was 2300 ml (sd = 1599). Thirty-five complications were recorded, with an average of 2.06 perioperative complications per patient. 82% of patients (14/17) experienced at least one perioperative complication, and major complications occurred in 64.7% (11/17). Five patients had local recurrence during the follow-up, with a mean recurrence time of 16.2 months (sd = 7.2) and a median recurrence time of 20 months (IQR = 12.5). Hospital stays, operation time, blood loss, and complication rates did not significantly differ between the two surgical methods. The local recurrence rate after en bloc resection was lower than piecemeal resection, although not statistically significant (P = 0.067).
    CONCLUSIONS: The complication rates between the two surgical procedures were similar. Considering safety and local tumor control, en bloc resection is recommended as the primary choice for patients with chondrosarcoma/chordoma in the thoracic and lumbar regions who are eligible for this treatment.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Case Reports
    炎性肌纤维母细胞瘤(IMT)是一种具有恶性潜能的罕见肿瘤。膀胱IMT更罕见,主要通过手术切除治疗。膀胱部分切除或根治性切除会影响患者的生活质量,而经典的TURBT则难以避免术中并发症,包括闭孔神经反射和出血等。因此,安全有效的手术入路选择对膀胱IMT至关重要。
    一名42岁男性患者因持续无痛性肉眼血尿10天以上而未出现高血压而入院。术前尿常规红细胞检查为7738.9/HPF(正常值≤3/HPF)。CTU提示膀胱左后壁占位(6.0cm×5.0cm),排泄期不均匀强化。MRI还显示膀胱肿瘤,膀胱左后壁T1WISI略等,T2WI混合高SI(6.0cm×5.1cm×3.5cm)。使用1470nm二极管激光对膀胱IMT进行整块切除,并结合通过切碎器系统去除去核肿瘤。术后病理检查提示膀胱IMT,IHCKi-67阳性(15-20%),CKAE1/AE3,SMA,膀胱IMT的结蛋白和膀胱IMT的ALK阴性以及ALK基因重排的FISH阴性。在6周内使用1470nm二极管激光进行第二次TUR,以降低术后复发的风险,这是由于IHC染色中Ki-67高表达(15-20%)和ALK阴性的高度恶性潜力。第二例术后病理报告示慢性炎症伴膀胱粘膜水肿,无膀胱IMT,此外,在膀胱固有肌层未观察到肿瘤。24个月随访期间无复发。
    En膀胱IMT整块切除术结合随后的第二次经尿道切除与1470nm二极管激光是一种安全有效的手术方法,具有高度恶性潜力的巨大膀胱IMT。
    UNASSIGNED: Inflammatory myofibroblastic tumor (IMT) is a rare neoplasm with malignant potential. Bladder IMT is even rarer and mainly treated by surgical resection However, partial or radical cystectomy would affect the quality of life of patients due to major surgical trauma, and classical TURBT is hard to avoid intraoperative complications including obturator nerve reflex and bleeding etc. Therefore, the safe and effective better choice of surgical approaches become critical to bladder IMT.
    UNASSIGNED: A 42-year-old male patient was admitted to the department of urology with persistent painless gross hematuria for more than 10 days without the presentation of hypertension. Preoperative routine urine examination of red blood cells was 7738.9/HPF (normal range ≤ 3/HPF). CTU indicated a space occupying lesion (6.0 cm×5.0 cm) in the left posterior wall of the bladder with heterogeneous enhancement in the excretory phase. MRI also indicated bladder tumor with slightly equal SI on T1WI and mixed high SI on T2WI (6.0 cm×5.1cm×3.5cm) in the left posterior wall of the bladder. En bloc resection of bladder IMT with 1470 nm diode laser in combination of removing the enucleated tumor by the morcellator system was performed. Postoperative pathological examination revealed bladder IMT, with IHC positive for Ki-67 (15-20%), CK AE1/AE3, SMA, and Desmin of bladder IMT and negative for ALK of bladder IMT as well as FISH negative for ALK gene rearrangement. Second TUR with 1470 nm diode laser was performed within 6 weeks to reduce postoperative risk of recurrence due to highly malignant potential for the high expression of Ki-67 (15-20%) and negative ALK in IHC staining. The second postoperative pathology report showed chronic inflammation concomitant with edema of the bladder mucosa without bladder IMT, furthermore no tumor was observed in muscularis propria layer of bladder. No recurrence occurred during the period of 24-month follow-up.
    UNASSIGNED: En bloc resection of bladder IMT in combination of the following second transurethral resection with 1470 nm diode laser is a safe and effective surgical approach for the huge bladder IMT with highly malignant potential.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    首例右半结肠切除术联合胰十二指肠切除术(RHCPD)治疗局部晚期右半结肠癌(LARCC)侵入胰腺,十二指肠,或其他器官,1953年由VanProhaska报道。右侧结肠癌侵入胰腺和十二指肠是罕见的。手术在技术上可能具有挑战性,肿瘤后果不清楚,因此,关于该患者队列的临床结局和生存相关因素的报道很少.LARCC患者是否需要新辅助化疗是有争议的。这些患者的长期生存率以及首选的治疗方案需要进行探索.本文报道了我们在右半结肠切除术和整块切除术治疗LARCC的经验。我们进行了这项研究,以分析LARCC的临床特征和手术结果。
    使用一个数据库进行了一项回顾性研究,该数据库包含19年[2003-2022年]因肿瘤直接侵入十二指肠和/或胰腺而接受RHCPD的所有患者。我们包括原发肿瘤部位为右半结肠且肿瘤切除边缘(R0)阴性的患者。此外,这些患者结肠和其他器官之间的粘连是恶性粘连。主要结果是手术后的总生存率。研究的次要终点包括术后30天死亡率,术后并发症,预后因素,和肿瘤遗传学。所有患者术后影像学随访,前3年间隔3个月,后2年间隔6个月,以及此后的年度随访。使用Kaplan-Meier分析估计存活率。将单变量分析中P值<0.05的变量输入多变量Cox比例风险回归,以确定生存的独立预测因子。
    有47例患者(男性23例,女性24例)接受了LARCC整体切除术。患者的中位年龄为61岁(范围,38-80岁)。所有病例均实现R0切除。总并发症发生率为27.7%(n=13)。两名患者在手术后30天内死亡。总生存率为80.9%,63.5%,在1年、3年和5年时为51.7%,分别。单变量生存分析确定胰腺浸润,区域淋巴结阳性,超过两个器官被侵入,没有新辅助治疗作为生存率低的预测因子(log-rankP<0.05)。多因素分析表明,区域淋巴结阳性[95%置信区间(CI):1.145-7.736;P=0.025]和两个以上器官侵犯(95%CI:1.321-26.981;P=0.020)是不良生存的预测因素。
    LARCC患者的整块切除术的临床结果相对乐观。对于LARCC患者,整块切除可以仔细考虑。
    UNASSIGNED: The first case of treatment with en bloc right hemicolectomy with pancreatoduodenectomy (RHCPD) for locally advanced right-sided colon cancer (LARCC) invading the pancreas, duodenum, or other organs, was reported in 1953 by Van Prohaska. Right-sided colon cancers invading the pancreas and duodenum are rare. Surgery can be technically challenging, with unclear oncologic consequences, hence there are few reports on the clinical outcomes and factors associated with survival in this patient cohort. The need for neoadjuvant chemotherapy in patients with LARCC is controversial, and the long-term survival of these patients as well as the preferred treatment regimen needs to be explored. This paper reports our experience in right hemicolectomy with en bloc resection for LARCC. We conducted this study to analyze the clinical features and surgical outcomes of LARCC.
    UNASSIGNED: A retrospective study was performed using a database of all patients who underwent RHCPD due to the tumour directly invading the duodenum and/or pancreas in a 19-year period [2003-2022]. We included patients whose primary tumor site was the right hemicolon and who had undergone a negative tumor resection margin (R0) resection. In addition, the adhesions between the colon and other organs in these patients were malignant adhesions. The primary outcome was the overall survival after surgery. The secondary endpoints of the study included 30-day postoperative mortality, postoperative complications, prognostic factors, and tumour genetics. All patients were followed up with postoperative imaging at an interval of 3 months for the first 3 years and at an interval of 6 months for the next 2 years, and annual follow-up thereafter. Survival was estimated using Kaplan-Meier analysis. Variables with P values <0.05 in univariate analysis were entered into multivariate Cox proportional risk regression to identify independent predictors of survival.
    UNASSIGNED: There were 47 patients (23 males and 24 females) who underwent en bloc resection for LARCC. The median age of the patients was 61 years (range, 38-80 years). R0 resection was achieved in all cases. The overall complication rate was 27.7% (n=13). Two patients died within 30 days of surgery. The overall survival was 80.9%, 63.5%, and 51.7% at 1, 3, and 5 years, respectively. Univariate survival analysis identified pancreatic invasion, regional lymph node positivity, more than two organs invaded, and no neoadjuvant treatment as predictors of poor survival (log-rank P<0.05). Multivariate analysis showed that regional lymph node positivity [95% confidence interval (CI): 1.145-7.736; P=0.025] and more than two organs invaded (95% CI: 1.321-26.981; P=0.020) were predictors of poor survival.
    UNASSIGNED: Relatively optimistic clinical outcomes from en bloc resection were demonstrated for patients with LARCC. For LARCC patients, en bloc resection can be carefully considered.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:脊柱巨细胞瘤的再切除是一项极其困难的手术。此外,采用整块切除或病灶内切除再切除的患者的预后鲜有报道.这项研究旨在比较脊柱巨细胞瘤再次切除患者的整块切除与病灶内切除的预后价值。
    方法:这项回顾性分析评估了2005年1月至2021年1月在我们中心进行脊柱巨细胞瘤复发的翻修手术的患者。局部无进展生存期代表整块切除或病灶内切除与肿瘤复发之间的持续时间。神经系统恢复,存活率,本地控制,并对并发症进行了评估。Kaplan-Meier估计用于生存分析。
    结果:共纳入22名患者(9名男性和13名女性),平均年龄为34.1岁(范围19-63岁)。整块切除和病灶内切除患者的局部肿瘤复发率差异有统计学意义(p<0.05)。整块切除组的5年和10年局部无进展生存率均为90%,而在病灶内切除组中,5年局部无进展生存率为80%,10年生存率为45.7%.整块切除组局部肿瘤复发率低于病灶内切除组(p<0.05),但前者并发症发生率较高(p=0.015)。
    结论:这项研究显示,接受巨细胞瘤整块切除术的患者局部复发率低,而围手术期并发症发生率较高。
    OBJECTIVE: Re-resection of spinal giant cell tumors is an exceedingly difficult procedure. Moreover, the prognosis of patients with en bloc resection or intralesional excision for re-resection has rarely been reported. This study aimed to compare the prognostic value of en bloc resection with that of intralesional excision in patients undergoing re-resection for giant cell tumors of the spine.
    METHODS: This retrospective analysis evaluated patients who underwent revision surgeries for relapse of giant cell tumors of the spine at our center between January 2005 and January 2021. Local progression-free survival represents the duration between en bloc resection or intralesional excision and tumor recurrence. Neurological recovery, survival rates, local control, and complications were evaluated. The Kaplan-Meier estimator was used for survival analysis.
    RESULTS: A total of 22 patients (nine men and 13 women) with a mean age of 34.1 (range 19-63) years were included. Significant statistical differences were found in the local tumor recurrence rate between patients treated with en bloc resection and those treated with intralesional excision (p < 0.05). The 5- and 10-year local progression-free survival rates were both 90% in the en bloc resection group, while in the intralesional excision group, the 5-year local progression-free survival rate was 80% with a 10-year rate of 45.7%. The en bloc resection group had a lower local tumor recurrence rate than that of the intralesional excision group (p < 0.05), but the former had a higher rate of complications (p = 0.015).
    CONCLUSIONS: This study revealed a low local recurrence rate in patients who underwent en bloc resection for giant cell tumors, while the perioperative complication rate was high.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:细胞神经鞘瘤(CS)是一种罕见的肿瘤,占所有良性神经鞘瘤的2.8-5.2%。文献中缺乏关于脊柱CS的最新信息。
    目的:本研究的目的是确定脊柱良性神经鞘瘤中CS病例的比例,描述脊柱CS的临床特征,并通过分析93例连续CS病例的数据确定局部复发的预后因素。
    方法:回顾性回顾。
    方法:我们分析了2008年至2021年间在我们研究所接受治疗的1706例脊柱CS患者中筛查的93例PSGCT。
    方法:人口统计学,射线照相,记录和分析手术和术后数据.
    方法:我们比较了颈椎脊髓CS的临床特征,胸廓,腰椎和骶骨段。通过Kaplan-Meier方法确定无局部复发生存期(RFS)的预后因素。单因素分析中p≤0.05的因素采用Cox回归分析进行多因素分析。
    结果:所有良性神经鞘瘤中脊柱CS的比例为6.7%。本研究中93例患者的平均和中位随访时间分别为92.2和91.0个月(范围为36至182个月)。11例局部复发,总复发率为11.7%,一个病人死亡。统计分析显示肿瘤大小≥5cm,病灶内切除,Ki-67≥5%是脊柱CSRFS的独立阴性预后因素。
    结论:只要有可能,脊柱CS建议整块切除。肿瘤大小≥5cm且术后病理Ki-67≥5%的患者应进行长期随访。
    BACKGROUND: Cellular schwannoma (CS) is a rare tumor that accounts for 2.8%-5.2% of all benign schwannomas. There is a dearth of up-to-date information on spinal CS in the literature.
    OBJECTIVE: The aims of this study were to identify the proportion of CS cases amongst spinal benign schwannoma, describe the clinical features of spinal CS, and identify prognostic factors for local recurrence by analyzing data from 93 consecutive CS cases.
    METHODS: Retrospective review.
    METHODS: We analyzed 93 PSGCT screened from 1,706 patients with spine CS who were treated at our institute between 2008 and 2021.
    METHODS: Demographic, radiographic, operative and postoperative data were recorded and analyzed.
    METHODS: We compared the clinical features of spinal CS from the cervical, thoracic, lumbar and sacral segments. Prognostic factors for local recurrence-free survival (RFS) were identified by the Kaplan-Meier method. Factors with p≤.05 in univariate analysis were subjected to multivariate analysis by Cox regression analysis.
    RESULTS: The proportion of spinal CS in all benign schwannomas was 6.7%. The mean and median follow-up times for the 93 patients in this study were 92.2 and 91.0 months respectively (range 36-182 months). Local recurrence was detected in 11 cases, giving an overall recurrence rate of 11.7%, with one patient death. Statistical analysis revealed that tumor size ≥5 cm, intralesional resection, and Ki-67 ≥5% were independent negative prognostic factors for RFS in spinal CS.
    CONCLUSIONS: Whenever possible, en bloc resection is recommended for spinal CS. Long-term follow-up should be carried out for patients with tumor size ≥5 cm and postoperative pathological Ki-67 ≥5%.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:使用三维(3D)打印的内置假体进行整块切除术(EBR)治疗的胸腰椎肿瘤患者的预后报道不足。
    方法:我们回顾性评估了在我们机构接受手术的胸腰椎肿瘤患者。采用Logistic回归分析确定手术并发症的潜在危险因素。构建并验证了预测并发症的列线图。
    结果:共有53例脊柱肿瘤患者在我院接受了EBR,2人失去了随访,45例接受了整体脊椎切除术,6例接受矢状面椎体切除术。前部重建材料包括10例定制的3D打印人造椎体(AVB)和41例现成的3D打印AVB,2例用现成的3D打印AVB重建的患者发生了假体不匹配。中位随访期为21个月(范围,7-57个月)。3例患者出现局部复发,5例患者在最后一次随访中死亡。29例患者共50例围手术期并发症,包括25个主要并发症和25个次要并发症。1例患者发生仪器故障,没有观察到假体沉降。使用联合手术方法是总体并发症的依赖预测指标,而Karnofsky的表现状态得分,腰椎病变,术中失血≥2000mL是主要并发症的预测因素.使用这些因素构建了总体和主要并发症的列线图,C指数分别为0.850和0.891。
    结论:EBR对于胸腰椎肿瘤的治疗至关重要;然而,EBR具有陡峭的学习曲线和较高的并发症发生率。对于接受EBR治疗的患者,3D打印的AVB是一种有效且可行的重建选择。
    BACKGROUND: The outcomes of patients with tumors of the thoracolumbar spine treated with en bloc resection (EBR) using three-dimensional (3D)-printed endoprostheses are underreported.
    METHODS: We retrospectively evaluated patients with thoracolumbar tumors who underwent surgery at our institution. Logistic regression analysis was performed to identify the potential risk factors for surgical complications. Nomograms to predict complications were constructed and validated.
    RESULTS: A total of 53 patients with spinal tumors underwent EBR at our hospital; of these, 2 were lost to follow-up, 45 underwent total en bloc spondylectomy, and 6 were treated with sagittal en bloc spondylectomy. The anterior reconstruction materials included a customized 3D-printed artificial vertebral body (AVB) in 10 cases and an off-the-shelf 3D-printed AVB in 41 cases, and prosthesis mismatch occurred in 2 patients reconstructed with the off-the-shelf 3D-printed AVB. The median follow-up period was 21 months (range, 7-57 months). Three patients experienced local recurrence, and 5 patients died at the final follow-up. A total of 50 perioperative complications were encountered in 29 patients, including 25 major and 25 minor complications. Instrumentation failure occurred in 1 patient, and no prosthesis subsidence was observed. Using a combined surgical approach was a dependent predictor of overall complications, while Karnofsky performance status score, lumbar spine lesion, and intraoperative blood loss ≥ 2000 mL were predictors of major complications. Nomograms for the overall and major complications were constructed using these factors, with C-indices of 0.850 and 0.891, respectively.
    CONCLUSIONS: EBR is essential for the management of thoracolumbar tumors; however, EBR has a steep learning curve and a high complication rate. A 3D-printed AVB is an effective and feasible reconstruction option for patients treated with EBR.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    膀胱肿瘤整块切除术(ERBT)是非肌肉浸润性膀胱癌治疗的有希望的替代方法。然而,肿瘤的特点和外科医生的经验影响其应用。因此,在这项试点研究中,我们开发了一种称为“可旋转双通道膀胱肿瘤整块切除术(RBC-ERBT)”的技术,并评估了其可行性,功效,与传统ERBT相比,安全性高。在离体猪膀胱模型中,产生了160个不同形态(外生和平坦)和大小(1和2cm)的膀胱病变,并均匀地分布在不同位置。总共进行了160次手术,ERBT和RBC-ERBT组各显示80个病灶。RBC-ERBT的技术成功率明显高于ERBT(98.8%vs.77.5%)用于大小和圆顶病变的外生和平坦病变。RBC-ERBT组手术时间明显缩短,特别是对于扁平病变,直径为2厘米的病变,和位于圆顶的病变。RBC-ERBT的零碎切除率明显低于ERBT(0%vs.18.8%)。两组之间穿孔或逼尿肌采样的发生率没有差异。与传统的ERBT相比,RBC-ERBT提供了更高的成功率,减少切除时间,和具有挑战性的病变的有效管理。
    En bloc resection of bladder tumor (ERBT) is a promising alternative for non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer management. However, the tumor characteristics and surgeon\'s experience influence its application. Therefore, in this pilot study, we developed a technique called \"rotatable bi-channel en bloc resection of bladder tumor (RBC-ERBT)\" and assessed its feasibility, efficacy, and safety compared with those of conventional ERBT. In an ex vivo porcine bladder model, 160 bladder lesions of varying morphologies (exophytic and flat) and sizes (1 and 2 cm) were created and evenly distributed across different locations. A total of 160 procedures were performed, with the ERBT and RBC-ERBT group each exhibiting 80 lesions. RBC-ERBT had a significantly higher technical success rate than ERBT (98.8% vs. 77.5%) for exophytic and flat lesions of both sizes and dome lesions. The procedure time was significantly shorter in the RBC-ERBT group, particularly for flat lesions, lesions with a 2 cm diameter, and lesions located at the dome. RBC-ERBT had a significantly lower piecemeal resection rate than ERBT (0% vs. 18.8%). The incidence of perforation or detrusor muscle sampling did not differ between the groups. Compared with conventional ERBT, RBC-ERBT offered improved success rates, reduced resection times, and effective management of challenging lesions.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:神经压迫症状和脊柱不稳定,由于脊柱转移,显著影响患者的生活质量。3D打印椎体被认为是脊柱肿瘤整块切除后重建骨缺损的有效方法。这种方法的优点在于其定制的形状和最内部的多孔结构,这促进了骨向内生长并导致减少了术后并发症。
    目的:本研究的目的是评估3D打印自动稳定人工椎骨在胸腰椎转移瘤整块切除和重建中的有效性。
    方法:本研究纳入了基于Weinstein-Boriani-Biagini手术分期系统的胸腰椎转移瘤整块切除术的患者,2019年1月至2021年4月。将患者分为两组:观察组,使用3D打印的自动稳定椎体重建,和对照组,用钛笼和同种异体骨处理。患者的评估标准包括评估植入物沉降,器械相关并发症,VAS评分,脊髓损伤的Frankel分级.
    结果:中位随访期为21.8个月(范围12-38个月)。在患者中,10收到定制的3D打印人造椎体,而其余的10只收到了一个钛笼。观察组手术时间明显减少,术中失血,术后引流量与对照组比较(P<0.05)。在最后的后续行动中,观察组平均种植下沉量为1.8±2.1mm,对照组为5.2±5.1mm(P<0.05)。两组患者术前视觉模拟量表(VAS)评分差异无统计学意义,24h,3个月,术后1年(P<0.05)。两组脊髓功能改善情况无统计学差异。
    结论:在胸腰椎转移瘤整块切除后,利用3D打印的自动稳定人工椎骨进行重建似乎是一个可行且可靠的选择。3D打印假体的假体下沉发生率低,可以提供即时和强大的稳定性。
    BACKGROUND: Nerve compression symptoms and spinal instability, resulting from spinal metastases, significantly impact the quality of life for patients. A 3D-printed vertebral body is considered an effective approach to reconstruct bone defects following en bloc resection of spinal tumors. The advantage of this method lies in its customized shape and innermost porous structure, which promotes bone ingrowth and leads to reduced postoperative complications.
    OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study is to assess the effectiveness of 3D-printed auto-stable artificial vertebrae in the en bloc resection and reconstruction of thoracolumbar metastases.
    METHODS: This study included patients who underwent en bloc resection of thoracolumbar metastases based on the Weinstein-Boriani-Biagini surgical staging system, between January 2019 and April 2021. The patients were divided into two groups: the observation group, which was reconstructed using 3D-printed auto-stable vertebral bodies, and the control group, treated with titanium cages and allograft bone. Evaluation criteria for the patients included assessment of implant subsidence, instrumentation-related complications, VAS score, and Frankel grading of spinal cord injury.
    RESULTS: The median follow-up period was 21.8 months (range 12-38 months). Among the patients, 10 received a customized 3D-printed artificial vertebral body, while the remaining 10 received a titanium cage. The observation group showed significantly lower operation time, intraoperative blood loss, and postoperative drainage compared to the control group (P < 0.05). At the final follow-up, the average implant subsidence was 1.8 ± 2.1 mm for the observation group and 5.2 ± 5.1 mm for the control group (P < 0.05). The visual analog scale (VAS) scores were not statistically different between the two groups at preoperative, 24 h, 3 months, and 1 year after the operation (P < 0.05). There were no statistically significant differences in the improvements of spinal cord functions between the two groups.
    CONCLUSIONS: The utilization of a 3D-printed auto-stable artificial vertebra for reconstruction following en bloc resection of thoracolumbar metastases appears to be a viable and dependable choice. The low occurrence of prosthesis subsidence with 3D-printed prostheses can offer immediate and robust stability.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:了解膀胱肿瘤整块切除术(ERBT)的历史和发展,并讨论其未来治疗膀胱癌的方向。
    方法:在这篇叙述性综述中,我们总结了ERBT的历史和早期发展,以前在克服肿瘤大小限制方面的尝试,在ERBT程序标准化方面的共同努力,ERBT中出现的证据,不断发展的治疗大型膀胱肿瘤的概念,以及ERBT的未来方向。
    结果:自1980年关于ERBT的第一份报告以来,在其技术方面取得了巨大的进步,能量模式和肿瘤检索方法。2020年,关于ERBT的国际共识声明已经制定,它是泌尿科医生实践ERBT的标准参考。最近,关于ERBT的高质量证据正在出现。值得注意的是,EB-StaR研究显示,ERBT导致1年复发率从38.1%降至28.5%.目前正在进行个体患者数据荟萃分析,这将有助于确定ERBT治疗非肌层浸润性膀胱癌的真正价值。对于大的膀胱肿瘤,应接受修改后的ERBT方法,因为切除的质量比单纯切除肿瘤更为重要。已经启动了全球ERBT登记册,以研究ERBT在现实世界中的价值。
    结论:ERBT是治疗膀胱癌的一种有前途的外科技术,并且在全球范围内引起了越来越多的关注。现在是我们在临床实践中采用这种技术的时候了。
    OBJECTIVE: To learn about the history and development of en bloc resection of bladder tumour (ERBT), and to discuss its future directions in managing bladder cancer.
    METHODS: In this narrative review, we summarised the history and early development of ERBT, previous attempts in overcoming the tumour size limitation, consolidative effort in standardising the ERBT procedure, emerging evidence in ERBT, evolving concepts in treating large bladder tumours, and the future directions of ERBT.
    RESULTS: Since the first report on ERBT in 1980, there has been tremendous advancement in terms of its technique, energy modalities and tumour retrieval methods. In 2020, the international consensus statement on ERBT has been developed and it serves as a standard reference for urologists to practise ERBT. Recently, high-quality evidence on ERBT has been emerging. Of note, the EB-StaR study showed that ERBT led to a reduction in 1-year recurrence rate from 38.1 to 28.5%. An individual patient data meta-analysis is currently underway, and it will be instrumental in defining the true value of ERBT in treating non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer. For large bladder tumours, modified approaches of ERBT should be accepted, as the quality of resection is more important than a mere removal of tumour in one piece. The global ERBT registry has been launched to study the value of ERBT in a real-world setting.
    CONCLUSIONS: ERBT is a promising surgical technique in treating bladder cancer and it has gained increasing interest globally. It is about time for us to embrace this technique in our clinical practice.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

公众号