Early breast cancer

早期乳腺癌
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    对于临床上腋窝淋巴结(cN0)阴性的早期乳腺癌(EBC)患者,通常通过前哨淋巴结活检进行腋窝分期。本研究旨在探讨腋窝淋巴结转移(ALNM),肿瘤的临床病理特征和腋窝超声(US)扫描结果。此外,建立了基于相关因素预测ALNM风险的列线图模型.对符合纳入标准的998例患者的数据进行回顾性分析。然后将这些患者以7:3的比例随机分为训练和验证组。在训练组中,接收器工作特性曲线分析用于确定连续测量数据的截止值。使用R软件通过单变量和多变量逻辑回归分析来识别训练组中的独立ALNM风险变量。将选定的独立危险因素纳入列线图。使用曲线下面积(AUC)评估模型差异,同时通过校准图表和Hosmer-Lemeshow测试评估校准。为了评估临床适用性,进行了决策曲线分析(DCA).通过1000轮引导重采样进行内部验证。在998例EBC患者中,228(22.84%)发展ALNM。多因素logistic分析确定淋巴血管侵犯,美国腋窝发现,最大直径和分子亚型是ALNM的独立危险因素。Akaike信息标准是列线图开发和模型选择的基础。训练和验证组的AUC值分别为0.855(95%CI,0.817-0.892)和0.793(95%CI,0.725-0.857),分别。Hosmer-Lemeshow检验得出的训练和验证组的P值为0.869和0.847,分别,校准图与理想曲线紧密对齐,确认优良的校准。DCA显示,列线图的净收益大大超过了“无干预”和“全面干预”方法,训练组的阈值概率区间为12-97%,验证组的阈值概率区间为17-82%.这强调了该模型的强大临床实用性。成功构建并验证了一个列线图模型来预测EBC和cN0状态患者的ALNM风险。该模型表现出良好的差异化,校准和临床适用性,为评估该人群的腋窝淋巴结状态提供有价值的指导。
    Axillary staging is commonly performed via sentinel lymph node biopsy for patients with early breast cancer (EBC) presenting with clinically negative axillary lymph nodes (cN0). The present study aimed to investigate the association between axillary lymph node metastasis (ALNM), clinicopathological characteristics of tumors and results from axillary ultrasound (US) scanning. Moreover, a nomogram model was developed to predict the risk for ALNM based on relevant factors. Data from 998 patients who met the inclusion criteria were retrospectively reviewed. These patients were then randomly divided into a training and validation group in a 7:3 ratio. In the training group, receiver operating characteristic curve analysis was used to identify the cutoff values for continuous measurement data. R software was used to identify independent ALNM risk variables in the training group using univariate and multivariate logistic regression analysis. The selected independent risk factors were incorporated into a nomogram. The model differentiation was assessed using the area under the curve (AUC), while calibration was evaluated through calibration charts and the Hosmer-Lemeshow test. To assess clinical applicability, a decision curve analysis (DCA) was conducted. Internal verification was performed via 1000 rounds of bootstrap resampling. Among the 998 patients with EBC, 228 (22.84%) developed ALNM. Multivariate logistic analysis identified lymphovascular invasion, axillary US findings, maximum diameter and molecular subtype as independent risk factors for ALNM. The Akaike Information Criterion served as the basis for both nomogram development and model selection. Robust differentiation was shown by the AUC values of 0.855 (95% CI, 0.817-0.892) and 0.793 (95% CI, 0.725-0.857) for the training and validation groups, respectively. The Hosmer-Lemeshow test yielded P-values of 0.869 and 0.847 for the training and validation groups, respectively, and the calibration chart aligned closely with the ideal curve, affirming excellent calibration. DCA showed that the net benefit from the nomogram significantly outweighed both the \'no intervention\' and the \'full intervention\' approaches, falling within the threshold probability interval of 12-97% for the training group and 17-82% for the validation group. This underscores the robust clinical utility of the model. A nomogram model was successfully constructed and validated to predict the risk of ALNM in patients with EBC and cN0 status. The model demonstrated favorable differentiation, calibration and clinical applicability, offering valuable guidance for assessing axillary lymph node status in this population.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    循环肿瘤DNA(ctDNA)是一种潜在的生物标志物,不仅能够在新辅助治疗(NAT)或抢救治疗期间监测治疗反应,还可以识别微小残留病(MRD)并检测初级治疗后的早期复发。然而,目前还不确定是否在诊断时检测到ctDNA,在任何治疗之前,可以预测早期乳腺癌患者的预后。我们的研究目的是评估基线ctDNA对早期乳腺癌患者预后的预测价值。
    2016年8月至2016年10月共招募了90例早期乳腺癌患者和24例健康女性。在诊断时收集患者的外周血样本,在任何治疗之前。对血液样品进行处理,并使用1,021个癌症相关基因的下一代测序(NGS)组进行靶向深度测序。报告了无复发生存率(RFS)和无侵袭性疾病生存率(iDFS)。
    90例乳腺癌患者包括6例导管原位癌(DCIS)和84例浸润性乳腺癌患者。在浸润性乳腺癌患者队列中,在57例患者中检测到ctDNA,ctDNA检出率为67.9%。同时,在DCIS患者中未检测到ctDNA.在84例浸润性乳腺癌患者中,与低水平ctDNA患者相比,高水平ctDNA患者的RFS显著降低(log-rankP=0.0036).
    我们的研究表明,ctDNA在诊断时,在任何治疗之前,可能作为预测早期乳腺癌患者预后的生物标志物。然而,需要进一步的随访和更多的大样本量研究来证实这些发现.
    UNASSIGNED: Circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) is a potential biomarker not only capable of monitoring the treatment response during neoadjuvant therapy (NAT) or rescue therapy, but also identifying minimal residual disease (MRD) and detecting early relapses after primary treatment. However, it remains uncertain whether the detection of ctDNA at diagnosis, before any treatment, can predict the prognosis for patients with early breast cancer. The objective of our study was to evaluate the predictive value of baseline ctDNA for prognosis in patients with early breast cancer.
    UNASSIGNED: A total of 90 patients with early breast cancer and 24 healthy women were recruited between August 2016 and October 2016. Peripheral blood samples were collected from patients at diagnosis, before any treatment. Blood samples were processed and subjected to targeted deep sequencing with a next-generation sequencing (NGS) panel of 1,021 cancer-related genes. The recurrence-free survival (RFS) and invasive disease-free survival (iDFS) were reported.
    UNASSIGNED: The 90 patients with breast cancer included 6 patients with ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) and 84 patients with invasive breast cancer. Within the cohort of patients with invasive breast cancer, ctDNA were detected in 57 patients, with a ctDNA detection rate of 67.9%. Meanwhile, no ctDNA was detected in DCIS patients. Among 84 patients with invasive breast cancer, patients with high-level ctDNA had a significantly lower RFS compared to patients with low-level ctDNA (log-rank P=0.0036).
    UNASSIGNED: Our study suggested that ctDNA at diagnosis, before any treatment, could potentially serve as a biomarker to predict the prognosis for patients with early breast cancer. However, further follow-up and more studies with large sample sizes are required to confirm these findings.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    欧洲医学肿瘤学会(ESMO)诊断的临床实践指南,2023年更新并在线发表早期乳腺癌患者的治疗和随访,根据以前建立的标准方法,为亚洲早期乳腺癌患者的管理制定泛亚适应(PAGA)ESMO共识指南。本手稿中提出的适应指南代表了代表中国肿瘤学会(CSCO)的亚洲专家小组在治疗乳腺癌患者方面达成的共识意见。印度尼西亚(ISHMO),印度(ISMPO),日本(JSMO),韩国(KSMO),马来西亚(MOS),菲律宾(PSMO)新加坡(SSO),台湾(TOS)和泰国(TSCO),由ESMO和KSMO协调。投票基于科学证据,独立于当前的治疗实践,10个肿瘤学会代表的亚洲地区的药物获取限制和报销决定。后者在手稿中单独讨论。目的是为亚洲不同地区早期乳腺癌患者的管理优化和协调提供指导,借鉴西方和亚洲试验提供的证据,在尊重筛查实践差异的同时,分子谱分析,以及演讲的年龄和阶段。提请注意药物批准和报销策略的差异,在亚洲不同地区之间。
    The European Society for Medical Oncology (ESMO) Clinical Practice Guidelines for the diagnosis, treatment and follow-up of patients with early breast cancer were updated and published online in 2023, and adapted, according to previously established standard methodology, to produce the Pan-Asian adapted (PAGA) ESMO consensus guidelines for the management of Asian patients with early breast cancer. The adapted guidelines presented in this manuscript represent the consensus opinions reached by a panel of Asian experts in the treatment of patients with breast cancer representing the oncological societies of China (CSCO), Indonesia (ISHMO), India (ISMPO), Japan (JSMO), Korea (KSMO), Malaysia (MOS), the Philippines (PSMO), Singapore (SSO), Taiwan (TOS) and Thailand (TSCO), co-ordinated by ESMO and KSMO. The voting was based on scientific evidence and was independent of the current treatment practices, drug access restrictions and reimbursement decisions in the different Asian regions represented by the 10 oncological societies. The latter are discussed separately in the manuscript. The aim is to provide guidance for the optimisation and harmonisation of the management of patients with early breast cancer across the different regions of Asia, drawing on the evidence provided by both Western and Asian trials, whilst respecting the differences in screening practices, molecular profiling, as well as the age and stage at presentation. Attention is drawn to the disparity in the drug approvals and reimbursement strategies, between the different regions of Asia.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:作为新发现的与预后较差相关的HER2阴性肿瘤亚型,评估潜在的预后和预测因素仍然至关重要,特别是非侵入性生物标志物,对于患有人类表皮生长因子2(HER2)低早期乳腺癌(EBC)的个体。多项研究强调,HER2阴性的EBC患者表现出高同源重组缺陷(HRD)评分,对新辅助化疗(NAC)的病理完全反应(PCR)率较低。然而,迄今为止,尚无研究探讨HER2低的EBC患者HRD与长期预后之间的相关性.
    方法:本回顾性观察研究的重点是来源于癌症基因组图谱数据集(TCGA)的原发性EBC。它揭示了低HER2表达的EBC中的基因突变景观,并阐明了不同HRD状态下的肿瘤免疫景观。利用生物信息学分析和Cox比例模型,连同Kaplan-Meier方法,该研究评估了HRD状态与疾病特异性生存期(DSS)之间的相关性,无病间隔(DFI),和无进展间期(PFI)。进行亚组分析以确定HRD与预后之间关联的潜在差异。
    结果:在低HER2乳腺癌患者中,具有同源重组相关基因(HRRGs)缺陷的患者的HRD评分约为没有相关基因突变的患者的两倍,并且获得ARID1A的风险更高,ATM,和BRCA2突变。我们还发现,在高HRD的EBC肿瘤中,大多数免疫细胞丰度明显高于低HRD或HRD-medium的EBC肿瘤。特别是血浆B细胞丰度,CD8T细胞丰度,和M1巨噬细胞。此外,这些HRD高的肿瘤似乎也有更高的肿瘤免疫评分和更低的间质评分.然后,分析不同HRD状态与预后的关系。低HRD组和高HRD组的DSS和PFI差异有统计学意义(分别为P=.036和P=.046)。HRD高EBC患者的生存结局相对较差.中等HRD评分(危险比,HR=2.15,95%CI:1.04-4.41,P=0.038)是PFI的重要危险因素。激素受体阳性是获得中高HRD评分和不良预后的重要因素。
    结论:较高的HRD评分与较差的PFI结局相关,特别是在HR+/HER2低的人群中。不同的HRD状态在HRRG和肿瘤免疫景观中表现出差异。这些见解有可能帮助临床医生及时识别高危人群,并为低HER2EBC患者定制个性化治疗方法。旨在提高长期成果。
    BACKGROUND: As a newly identified subtype of HER2-negative tumors associated with a less favorable prognosis, it remains crucial to evaluate potential prognostic and predictive factors, particularly non-invasive biomarkers, for individuals with human epidermal growth factor 2 (HER2) low early-stage breast cancer (EBC). Multiple investigations have highlighted that HER2-negative patients with EBC exhibiting high homologous recombination deficiency (HRD) scores display lower rates of pathological complete response (PCR) to neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC). Nevertheless, no study to date has explored the correlation between HRD and the long-term prognosis in HER2-low patients with EBC.
    METHODS: This retrospective observational study focuses on primary EBC sourced from The Cancer Genome Atlas dataset (TCGA). It reveals the gene mutation landscape in EBC with low HER2 expression and elucidates the tumor immune landscape across different HRD states. Utilizing bioinformatics analysis and Cox proportional models, along with the Kaplan-Meier method, the study assesses the correlation between HRD status and disease-specific survival (DSS), disease-free interval (DFI), and progression-free interval (PFI). Subgroup analyses were conducted to identify potential variations in the association between HRD and prognosis.
    RESULTS: In the patients with HER2-low breast cancer, patients with homologous recombination related genes (HRRGs) defects had an HRD score about twice that of those without related genes mutations, and were at higher risk of acquiring ARID1A, ATM, and BRCA2 mutations. We also found that most immune cell abundances were significantly higher in EBC tumors with high HRD than in EBC tumors with low HRD or HRD-medium, particularly plasma B-cell abundance, CD8 T-cell abundance, and M1 macrophages. In addition, these tumors with HRD-high also appear to have significantly higher tumor immune scores and lower interstitial scores. Then, we analyzed the relationship between different HRD status and prognosis. There was statistical significance (P = .036 and P = .046, respectively) in DSS and PFI between the HRD-low and HRD-high groups, and patients with HRD-high EBC showed relatively poor survival outcomes. A medium HRD score (hazard ratio, HR = 2.15, 95% CI: 1.04-4.41, P = .038) was a significant risk factor for PFI. Hormone receptor positivity is an important factor in obtaining medium-high HRD score and poor prognosis.
    CONCLUSIONS: Higher HRD scores were associated with poorer PFI outcomes, particularly in people with HR+/HER2-low. Varied HRD states exhibited distinctions in HRRGs and the tumor immune landscape. These insights have the potential to assist clinicians in promptly identifying high-risk groups and tailoring personalized treatments for patients with HER2-low EBC, aiming to enhance long-term outcomes.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    最近的临床试验试图确定cT1-2N0乳腺癌患者省略腋窝淋巴结手术是否合适。本研究旨在调查临床阴性淋巴结患者腋窝淋巴结病变的真实程度,并探讨腋窝超声阴性(AUS-cN0)与可疑腋窝超声阴性细针穿刺活检(FNA-cN0)的差异。
    在2019年1月至2022年12月期间,在我们中心对病理鉴定为临床阴性的T1-2浸润性乳腺癌患者进行了回顾性分析。手术前接受任何系统治疗的患者被排除在本研究之外。
    本研究共纳入538例患者。134例(24.9%)患者有病理阳性淋巴结,404例(75.1%)患者淋巴结阴性。单因素分析显示肿瘤大小,T级,Ki67级别,血管侵犯(VI)与病理腋窝淋巴结阳性密切相关。在多变量分析中,VI是cT1-2N0病患者淋巴结阳性的唯一独立危险因素(OR:3.723,置信区间[CI]:2.380-5.824,p<0.001)。否则,AUS-cN0组和FNA-cN0组的病理淋巴结阳性无显著差异(23.4%vs.28.8%,p=0.193)。然而,FNA-cN0组淋巴结负荷高率(≥3个阳性淋巴结)明显较高.进一步调查显示,FNA-cN0和VI独立地与高节点负荷相关(OR:2.650,CI:1.081-6.496,p=0.033;OR:3.521,CI:1.249-9.931,p=0.017,分别)。
    临床上腋窝淋巴结阴性的cT1-2乳腺癌患者可能具有病理阳性淋巴结,甚至高淋巴结负担。AUS和AUS指导的FNA中的假阴性不容忽视,cT1-2N0乳腺癌患者仍需进行前哨淋巴结活检。
    UNASSIGNED: Recent clinical trials attempt to determine whether it is appropriate to omit axillary lymph node surgery in patients with cT1-2N0 breast cancer. The study aimed to investigate the true extent of axillary node disease in patients with clinically negative nodes and explore the differences between negative axillary ultrasound (AUS-cN0) and suspicious axillary ultrasound with negative fine-needle aspiration (FNA-cN0).
    UNASSIGNED: Pathologically identified T1-2 invasive breast cancer patients with clinically negative nodes were retrospectively analyzed at our center between January 2019 and December 2022. Patients who received any systematic treatment before surgery were excluded from this study.
    UNASSIGNED: A total of 538 patients were enrolled in this study. 134 (24.9%) patients had pathologically positive nodes, and 404 (75.1%) patients had negative nodes. Univariate analysis revealed that tumor size, T stage, Ki67 level, and vascular invasion (VI) were strongly associated with pathological axillary lymph node positivity. In multivariate analysis, VI was the only independent risk factor for node positivity in patients with cT1-2N0 disease (OR: 3.723, confidence interval [CI]: 2.380-5.824, p < 0.001). Otherwise, pathological node positivity was not significantly different between AUS-cN0 and FNA-cN0 groups (23.4% vs. 28.8%, p = 0.193). However, the rate of high nodal burden (≥3 positive nodes) was significantly higher in FNA-cN0 group. Further investigation revealed that FNA-cN0 and VI were independently associated with a high nodal burden (OR: 2.650, CI: 1.081-6.496, p = 0.033; OR: 3.521, CI: 1.249-9.931, p = 0.017, respectively).
    UNASSIGNED: cT1-2 breast cancer patients with clinically negative axillary lymph nodes may have pathologically positive lymph nodes and even a high nodal burden. False negatives in AUS and AUS-guided FNA should not be ignored, and sentinel lymph node biopsy remains an ongoing necessity for cT1-2N0 breast cancer patients.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Practice Guideline
    暂无摘要。
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:化疗诱导的白细胞减少症(CIL)与早期乳腺癌(EBC)患者生存率之间的关系尚不清楚。我们调查了接受辅助化疗的EBC患者的不同CIL等级与生存率之间的关系。
    方法:共有442例接受蒽环类(A)和紫杉烷(T)治疗方案的EBC患者纳入我们的分析。使用Kaplan-Meier曲线进行生存分析。使用对数秩检验计算P值。根据患者临床病理特征进行亚组分析,探讨CIL分级与生存的相关性。之后,单因素和多因素分析筛选出独立的预后因素来构建预后模型,其鲁棒性得到了验证。
    结果:经历2-4级(“中度”和“重度”)CIL的EBC患者与0-1级(轻度)CIL患者的总生存期(OS)更长(P=0.021)。与mildCIL患者相比,重度CIL患者的OS更长(P=0.029)。患有中度CIL的患者比患有轻度CIL的患者具有更长的OS(P=0.082)。然而,中度或重度CIL组之间的OS无明显差异.亚组分析显示,在经前患者中,中度CIL患者的OS长于轻度CIL患者,或人类表皮生长因子受体2阳性(HER2+),>3淋巴结转移,肿瘤直径>5厘米。基于月经状态的预后模型,N级,和CIL等级显示出令人满意的稳健性。
    结论:在接受蒽环类和紫杉烷类治疗方案的EBC患者中,CIL的分级与预后密切相关。具有“中度”CIL等级的患者往往具有更好的生存结果。
    BACKGROUND: The association between chemotherapy-induced leukopenia (CIL) and survival for patients with early breast cancer (EBC) is not known. We investigated the relationship between different grades of CIL and survival in patients with EBC receiving adjuvant chemotherapy.
    METHODS: A total of 442 patients with EBC receiving a regimen containing an anthracycline (A) and taxane (T) were included into our analysis. Survival analyses were undertaken using Kaplan-Meier curves. The P-value was calculated using the log rank test. Subgroup analysis was conducted to investigate the correlation of CIL grade and survival based on the clinicopathological characteristics of patients. Afterwards, univariate and multivariate analyses screened out independent prognostic factors to construct a prognostic model, the robustness of which was verified.
    RESULTS: Patients with EBC who experienced grade 2-4 (\"moderate\" and \"severe\") CIL were associated with longer overall survival (OS) than those with grade 0-1 (mild) CIL (P = 0.021). Compared with patients with mild CIL, OS was longer in patients with severe CIL (P = 0.029). Patients who suffered from moderate CIL tended to have longer OS than those with mild CIL (P = 0.082). Nevertheless, there was no distinguishable difference in OS between moderate- or severe-CIL groups. Subgroup analysis revealed that patients with moderate CIL had longer OS than those with mild CIL among patients who were premenstrual, or with human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-positive (HER2+), > 3 lymph nodes with metastases, a tumor diameter > 5 cm. A prognostic model based on menstrual status, N stage, and CIL grade showed satisfactory robustness.
    CONCLUSIONS: The grade of CIL was strongly associated with the prognosis among patients with EBC who received a regimen containing both anthracyclines and taxanes. Patients with a \"moderate\" CIL grade tended to have better survival outcomes.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    在抗HER2靶向治疗的时代,将1-3个腋窝淋巴结阳性的HER2过度表达的乳腺癌病例视为低风险的潜在临床可行性,从而考虑术后放疗减少,仍然是深入考察的重要课题。这项回顾性研究的目的是评估在接受抗HER2靶向治疗的T1-2N1M0HER2过表达的乳腺癌患者中,降级放疗的有效性。具体来说,保留乳房手术后省略区域淋巴结照射(RNI),仅进行全乳照射或省略乳房切除术后的放射治疗。
    对2004年至2018年间来自我们中心的429例T1-2N1M0期原发性浸润性HER2过表达乳腺癌患者进行了回顾性分析。将接受抗HER2靶向治疗的患者分为RNI组和无RNI组以评估RNI的作用。通过Kaplan-Meier方法和Cox比例风险模型研究了RNI的预后作用。
    中位随访时间为46.8个月(7.1-225.8个月)。在抗HER2靶向治疗组中,RNI在无侵袭性疾病生存期(IDFS)方面没有显着改善(p=0.940),局部区域无复发生存率(p=0.380),无远处转移生存率(p=0.698),或总生存期(p=0.403)。雌激素受体(ER)状态(风险比[HR]0.105,95%置信区间[CI]0.023-0.749,p=0.004)和淋巴管浸润状态(LVI)(HR5.721,95%CI1.586-20.633,p=0.008)被确定为IDFS的独立预后因素,ER阳性和LVI阴性患者表现出更好的预后。
    在接受标准化抗HER2靶向治疗的T1-2N1HER2过表达的乳腺癌患者中,省略RNI可能是一种安全的选择;特别是在ER阳性或LVI阴性亚组中。
    UNASSIGNED: In the era of anti-HER2 targeted therapy, the potential clinical feasibility of considering HER2-overexpressing breast cancer cases presenting with 1-3 positive axillary lymph nodes as low-risk, and thereby contemplating postoperative radiotherapy reduction, remains an important subject for in-depth examination. The aim of this retrospective study was to evaluate the effectiveness of de-escalated radiotherapy in T1-2N1M0 HER2-overexpressing breast cancer patients receiving anti-HER2 targeted therapy. Specifically, omitting regional lymph node irradiation (RNI) after breast-conserving surgery and only performing whole-breast irradiation or omitting postmastectomy radiation therapy.
    UNASSIGNED: A retrospective analysis was conducted on 429 patients with stage T1-2N1M0 primary invasive HER2-overexpressing breast cancer from our center between 2004 and 2018. Patients who received anti-HER2 targeted therapy were divided into an RNI group and a no RNI group to assess the role of RNI. The prognostic role of RNI was investigated via the Kaplan-Meier method and Cox proportional hazards modeling.
    UNASSIGNED: The median follow-up time was 46.8 months (range 7.1-225.8 months). In the anti-HER2 targeted therapy group RNI yielded no significant improvements in invasive disease-free survival (IDFS) (p = 0.940), local-regional recurrence-free survival (p = 0.380), distant metastases-free survival (p = 0.698), or overall survival (p = 0.403). Estrogen receptor (ER) status (hazard ratio [HR] 0.105, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.023-0.749, p = 0.004) and lymph vascular invasion status (LVI) (HR 5.721, 95% CI 1.586-20.633, p = 0.008) were identified as independent prognostic factors for IDFS, and ER-positive and LVI-negative patients exhibited better prognoses.
    UNASSIGNED: Omitting RNI may be a safe option in T1-2N1 HER2-overexpressing breast cancer patients receiving standardized anti-HER2 targeted therapy; particularly in ER-positive or LVI-negative subgroups.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:本文的目的是评估abemaciclib加内分泌治疗(ABEET)与ET作为中国高危激素受体阳性和人表皮生长因子受体2阴性(HR+/HER2-)早期乳腺癌的辅助治疗。
    方法:从中国医疗系统的角度来看,建立了一个具有生命周期的5态马尔可夫模型。使用MonarchEIII期临床试验的数据对无侵袭性疾病生存(iDFS)进行建模,并使用标准参数模型进行数据外推。费用来自国家数据来源,专家意见和发表的文献使用2023美元,折扣5%。根据寿命年(LYs)和质量调整寿命年(QALYs)评估结果。进行了敏感性分析和情景分析,以测试基本结果的稳健性。
    结果:在基本案例分析结果中,该模型预测,对于ABE+ET,增量成本效益比(ICER)24,841美元/LY和22,385美元/QALY,结果有所改善(0.65LYs和0.72QALY),成本增加(16,057.72美元)ET患者。情景分析的结果估计,在混合治疗模型中,ABE+ET治疗的ICER为$16,959/LY和$15,264/QALY,在非混合固化模型中,$13,560/LY和$12,191/QALY。该模型对结果折现率和iDFS的效用敏感。
    结论:ABE+ET在中国人均GDP的一次性支付意愿(WTP)门槛上可能没有经济优势,但预计在人均GDP三倍的WTP阈值下更具成本效益。一旦获得长期研究的数据,将进行进一步的分析。
    OBJECTIVE: The aim of this article is to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of abemaciclib plus endocrine therapy (ABE + ET) vs. ET as adjuvant treatment for high-risk hormone receptor-positive and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative (HR+/HER2-) early breast cancer in China.
    METHODS: From the perspective of the Chinese health care system, a 5-state Markov model was developed with a lifetime horizon. Data of the monarchE phase III clinical trial were used to model the invasive disease-free survival (iDFS) and standard parameters models were used for data extrapolation. Costs were obtained from national data sources, expert opinions and published literature using 2023 US dollars and discounted by 5%. The results were evaluated in terms of life-years (LYs) and quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs). Sensitivity analyses and scenario analyses were performed to test the robustness of the basic results.
    RESULTS: In the base-case analysis result, the model projected improved outcomes (by 0.65 LYs and 0.72 QALYs) and increased costs (by $16,057.72) for incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs) of $24,841/LY and $22,385/QALY for ABE + ET vs. ET patients. The results in scenario analysis estimated the ICERs of ABE + ET treatment to be $16,959/LY and $15,264/QALY in a mixture cure model, and $13,560/LY and $12,191/QALY in a non-mixture cure model. The model was sensitive to outcome discount rate and utility of iDFS.
    CONCLUSIONS: ABE + ET might not have an economic advantage over ET at a willingness-to-pay (WTP) threshold of one time the per capita GDP in China, but was expected to be more cost-effective at a WTP threshold of three times the per capita GDP. Further analysis will be conducted once data from longer-term studies become available.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Randomized Controlled Trial
    背景:机会窗(WOO)研究提供了对乳腺癌新药临床活性的见解。
    方法:AMEERA-4(NCT04191382)是一项WOO研究,旨在比较amcenestrant的药效学效果,一种选择性雌激素受体降解剂,来曲唑在新诊断的绝经后妇女中的应用,可操作的雌激素受体阳性,人表皮生长因子受体2阴性(ER+/HER2-)乳腺癌。妇女被随机分配(1:1:1)接受amcenestrant400毫克,amcenestrant200毫克,或来曲唑2.5mg,每天一次,持续14天。主要终点是基线和第15天之间Ki67的变化(即,手术日)。
    结果:由于招募缓慢,提前停止了招募,在COVID-19大流行的背景下。修改后的意向治疗人群由95名研究参与者组成,这些参与者具有基线和治疗后的Ki67值。而安全性人群包括接受至少一剂研究药物治疗的104名参与者.Ki67相对于基线的相对变化为-75.9%(95%置信区间[CI]-81.9至-67.9),-68.2%(-75.7至-58.4),200毫克来曲唑(几何最小二乘均值[LSM]估计值)为-77.7%(-83.4至-70.0)。ErH评分相对于基线的绝对变化(LSM估计)是-176.7,-202.9在侵行者200毫克的手臂,来曲唑臂-32.5。没有≥3级治疗相关的不良事件。
    结论:在先前未治疗的绝经后妇女中,amcenestrant和来曲唑均具有抗增殖活性,可手术的ER+/HER2-乳腺癌,总体耐受性良好。
    背景:ClinicalTrials.gov,NCT04191382https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04191382.2019年12月9日注册。
    Window-of-opportunity (WOO) studies provide insights into the clinical activity of new drugs in breast cancer.
    AMEERA-4 (NCT04191382) was a WOO study undertaken to compare the pharmacodynamic effects of amcenestrant, a selective estrogen receptor degrader, with those of letrozole in postmenopausal women with newly diagnosed, operable estrogen receptor-positive, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative (ER+/HER2-) breast cancer. Women were randomized (1:1:1) to receive amcenestrant 400 mg, amcenestrant 200 mg, or letrozole 2.5 mg once daily for 14 days before breast surgery. The primary endpoint was change in Ki67 between baseline and Day 15 (i.e., day of surgery).
    Enrollment was stopped early because of slow recruitment, in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic. The modified intent-to-treat population consisted of 95 study participants with baseline and post-treatment Ki67 values, whereas the safety population included 104 participants who had received at least one dose of study medication. Relative change from baseline in Ki67 was - 75.9% (95% confidence interval [CI] - 81.9 to - 67.9) for amcenestrant 400 mg, - 68.2% (- 75.7 to - 58.4) for amcenestrant 200 mg, and - 77.7% (- 83.4 to - 70.0) for letrozole (geometric least-squares mean [LSM] estimates). Absolute change in ER H-score from baseline (LSM estimate) was - 176.7 in the amcenestrant 400 mg arm, - 202.9 in the amcenestrant 200 mg arm, and - 32.5 in the letrozole arm. There were no Grade ≥ 3 treatment-related adverse events.
    Both amcenestrant and letrozole demonstrated antiproliferative activity in postmenopausal women with previously untreated, operable ER+/HER2- breast cancer and had good overall tolerability.
    ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT04191382 https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04191382 . Registered 9 December 2019.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

公众号