HRS9432(A) is a long-acting echinocandin antifungal medication primarily used to treat invasive fungal infections, particularly invasive candidiasis. The safety, tolerability, and pharmacokinetic characteristics of HRS9432(A) injection were investigated in a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, single- and multiple-ascending-dose Phase I study involving 56 healthy adult subjects. Doses ranging from 200 to 1200 mg were administered. Safety was continually monitored, including adverse events, clinical laboratory examinations, vital signs, 12-lead electrocardiograms, and physical examinations, while the pharmacokinetic profile within the body was evaluated. The results indicated that concentrations of HRS9432 peaked immediately after infusion, demonstrating essentially linear pharmacokinetic characteristics within the dosage range of 200-1,200 mg. It exhibited a low clearance rate and an extended half-life, with a clearance of approximately 0.2 L/h, a volume of distribution of around 40 L, and a half-life of approximately 140h following a single dose. The accumulation index for AUC0-τ after multiple doses ranged from 1.41 to 1.75. No severe adverse events occurred during the study, and the severity of all adverse events was mild or moderate. Therefore, the intravenous administration of HRS9432(A) in healthy Chinese adult subjects, either as multiple infusions of 200 to 600 mg (once a week, four doses) or as a single infusion of 900-1,200 mg, demonstrated overall good safety and tolerability. The pharmacokinetic exhibited essentially linear characteristics in the body, supporting a weekly dosing frequency for clinical applications and providing additional options for the treatment or prevention of invasive fungal infections.
RESULTS: This study is registered with the International Clinical Trials Registry Platform as ChiCTR2300073525.

The use of bevacizumab has been hampered by safety concerns despite demonstrable progression-free survival (PFS) benefit in subjects with platinum-resistant ovarian cancer, highlighting the need for novel effective and safe antiangiogenic agents. This study aimed to characterize the tolerability, safety, and antitumor activities of escalating doses of anti-VEGF antibody suvemcitug plus chemotherapy in platinum-resistant ovarian cancer patients.
This open-label, dose-escalation trial enrolled adult patients (≥18 years) with platinum-resistant histologically or cytologically-confirmed epithelial ovarian, fallopian tube and primary peritoneal cancer. Eligible patients received paclitaxel or topotecan plus escalating doses of suvemcitug 0.5, 1, 1.5, or 2 mg/kg once every two weeks. The primary endpoints were safety and tolerability, and antitumor activities of suvemcitug.
Twenty-nine subjects received paclitaxel (n = 11) or topotecan (n = 18). No dose-limiting toxicities occurred. The most common adverse events of special interest were proteinuria (41.4%), hypertension (20.7%) and epistaxis (10.3%). No gastrointestinal perforations occurred. Nine subjects (31.0%, 95% CI 15.3-50.8) demonstrated investigators-confirmed objective response, including complete response in 1 and partial response in 8. The median PFS was 5.4 months (95% CI 2.2-7.4).
Suvemcitug demonstrated an acceptable safety profile and promising antitumor activities in platinum-resistant ovarian cancer patients, supporting its further clinical development.

First-in-human (FIH) dose-escalation trials on oncology should prioritize safety and emphasize efficacy. We reviewed the FIH trials of 67 anti-tumor products approved by the Food and Drug Administration between 2018 and 2023 and found that the \"3 + 3\" design remains the predominant dose-escalation method (66.2%). The number of patients receiving sub-therapeutic doses is positively correlated with the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) or maximum dose (MD) to starting dose ratio (P = 0.056) and the number of dose levels in trials (P < 0.001). In addition, the proportion of products with a high ratio in antibody drugs is higher than that in small molecules (P < 0.001). The MTD or MD exceeded the label dose by three or more doses in 22.03% of the products. In conclusion, optimizing the starting dose selection method, refining the way of determining doses, and finding alternative indicators to replace toxicity as the endpoints will increase the effectiveness and broaden the beneficiary scope.

OBJECTIVE: Neutrophil elastase has been identified as a potential therapeutic target for acute lung injury or acute respiratory distress syndrome, and Sivelestat is a selective, reversible and competitive neutrophil elastase inhibitor. This study was designed to investigate the safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics and neutrophil elastase inhibitory effects of Sivelestat in healthy Chinese subjects.
METHODS: A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled single- and multiple-dose escalation clinical trial was carried out. Briefly, healthy volunteers in twelve cohorts with 8 per cohort received 1.0-20.2 mg/kg/h Sivelestat or placebo in an intravenous infusion manner for two hours, and healthy volunteers in four cohorts received two hours intravenous infusion of 2.0-5.0 mg/kg/h Sivelestat or placebo with an interval of twelve hours for seven times. The safety and tolerability were evaluated and serial blood samples were collected for pharmacokinetics and neutrophil elastase inhibitory effects analysis at the specified time-point.
RESULTS: A total of 128 subjects were enrolled and all participants completed the study except one. Sivelestat exhibited satisfactory safety and tolerability up to 20.2 mg/kg/h in single-dose cohorts and 5.0 mg/kg/h in multiple-dose cohorts. Even so, more attention should be paid to the safety risks when using high doses. The Cmax and AUC of Sivelestat increased in a dose dependent manner, and Tmax was similar for different dose cohorts. In multiple-dose cohorts, the plasma concentrations reached steady state 48 h after first administration and the accumulation of Cmax and AUC was not obvious. Furthermore, the Cmin_ss of 5.0 mg/kg/h dose cohort could meet the needs of clinical treatment. For some reason, the pharmacodynamics data revealed that the inhibitory effect of Sivelestat on neutrophil elastase content in healthy subjects was inconclusive.
CONCLUSIONS: Sivelestat was safe and well tolerated with appropriate pharmacokinetic parameters, which provided support for more diverse dosing regimen in clinical application.
BACKGROUND: www.chinadrugtrials.org.cn identifier is CTR20210072.

Approximately 40% of patients with hormone receptor (HR)-positive and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-negative advanced breast cancer (ABC) exhibit PIK3CA mutations.
This study aims to evaluate the safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics, and preliminary antitumor activity of HS-10352, a selective PI3Kα inhibitor, in this patient population.
Conducted as a phase 1 dose-escalation trial, HS-10352 was administered orally once-daily (QD) at dose levels of 2, 4, 6, and 8 mg. The primary endpoints were dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) and the maximum tolerated dose (MTD). This study is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT04631835).
Between August 2020 and March 2022, a total of 18 female patients were enrolled. DLT, manifested as hyperglycemia, occurred in two patients in the 8 mg QD group, establishing an MTD of 6 mg QD. The most common treatment-related adverse events were hyperglycemia (88.9%) and weight loss (61.3%). In the 6 mg QD group, four patients (66.7%) had a partial response (PR), and one (16.7%) had stable disease (SD). Among the four patients with PIK3CA mutated tumors in this dosage group, three (75.0%) had PR and one (25.0%) had SD. The median progression-free survival was not reached (95% confidence interval, 11.1-NA).
HS-10352 at 6 mg QD was well-tolerated in patients with HR-positive, HER2-negative ABC, and showed preliminary antitumor activity in patients with PIK3CA mutated tumors. These findings support the further clinical development of HS-10352.

This phase I study aimed to assess the safety, dose-limiting toxicity (DLT), maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and preliminary effect of nanoparticle albumin-bound (nab)-paclitaxel in combination with concurrent chemoradiotherapy in patients with locally advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC).
Patients with locally advanced ESCC who were ineligible or refused surgery were enrolled. Nab-paclitaxel (60 mg/m2 , 75 mg/m2 , and 90 mg/m2 ) and cisplatin (25 mg/m2 ) were administered intravenously weekly on days 1, 8, 15, 22, and 29 on the basis of the 3 + 3 dose escalation method. The total dose of radiation was 50-64 Gy. The primary endpoint was the safety of chemotherapy.
The study enrolled 12 patients across three dose levels. No treatment-related deaths occurred. One patient in the 60 mg/m2 dose level occurred dose-limiting Grade 3 febrile neutropenia. No DLT was found in the 90 mg/m2 dose level thus the MTD was not reached. The phase II study\'s recommended dose was 75 mg/m2 based on the available preclinical and clinical data including pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, efficacy, and toxicity. The frequent hematologic toxicities were leukocytopenia (Grade 1-2 of 66.7% and Grade 3-4 of 33.3%), neutropenia (Grade 1-2 of 91.7% and Grade 3-4 of 8.3%). Nonhematologic toxicities were mild and manageable. Overall response rate (ORR) of all patients achieved 100%.
Weekly schedule of cisplatin and nab-paclitaxel in combination with concurrent radiotherapy showed manageable toxicities and promising antitumor activity in patients with locally advanced ESCC. The recommended dose of nab-paclitaxel for further studies is 75 mg/m2 .

Severe bronchopulmonary dysplasia (BPD) is a chronic lung disorder that primarily affects premature babies with extremely low birth weight and involves in multiple organ system; no effective pharmacotherapy for this disease exists, and mortality remains high. Based on the evidence from previous preclinical studies and phase I clinical trials, this study aims to test the safety of intravenous application of a single dose of human umbilical cord-derived mesenchymal stem cells (hUC-MSCs) in patients with severe BPD. The Mesenchymal Stem cells for Bronchopulmonary Dysplasia Treatment (MSBDT) trial is a single center, open-label, dose-escalation phase I clinical trial. Severe BPD patients were enrolled in Children Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, China. The first six patients were treated with low-dose hUC-MSCs (1 × 106 cells/kg) and the next seven patients were treated with high-dose hUC-MSCs (5 × 106 cells/kg). This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT03558334. No prespecified infusion-associated adverse events, immediate complication, respiratory or cardiovascular compromise were observed during infusion and 24 h after infusion. No significant changes in safety laboratory values were observed. One death event occurred in the low-dose group on study day 10, and one death event occurred in the high-dose group on study day 24, while, after review in detail, the two cases are not believed to be infusion-associated events. In conclusion, intravenous application of a single dose of hUC-MSCs was tolerated in thirteen patients with severe BPD.

SYHA1813 is a potent multikinase inhibitor that targets vascular endothelial growth factor receptors (VEGFRs)/colony-stimulating factor 1 receptor (CSF1R). This study aimed to evaluate the safety, pharmacokinetics (PK), and antitumor activity of escalating doses of SYHA1813 in patients with recurrent high-grade gliomas (HGGs) or advanced solid tumors. This study adopted a combination of accelerated titration and a 3 + 3 design for dose escalation, with a starting dose of 5 mg once daily. The dose escalation continued at successive dose levels until the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) was determined. A total of 14 patients were enrolled and treated, including 13 with WHO grade III or IV gliomas and 1 with colorectal cancer. Two patients experienced dose-limiting toxicities (grade 4 hypertension and grade 3 mucositis oral) at 30 mg SYHA1813. The MTD was defined as 15 mg once daily. Hypertension (n = 6, 42.9%) was the most frequent treatment-related adverse event. Among evaluable patients (n = 10), 2 (20%) patients achieved partial response, and 7 (70%) had stable disease. The exposure increased with increasing doses within the studied dose range of 5 to 30 mg. Biomarker assessments demonstrated significant reductions in the levels of soluble VEGFR2 (P = .0023) and increases in the levels of VEGFA (P = .0092) and placental growth factor (P = .0484). The toxicities of SYHA1813 were manageable, and encouraging antitumor efficacy was observed in patients with recurrent malignant glioma. This study is registered with the Chinese Clinical Trial Registry ( www.chictr.org.cn/index.aspx ; identifier ChiCTR2100045380).

Combinations of drugs are becoming increasingly common in oncology treatment. In some cases, patients can benefit from the interaction between two drugs, although there is usually a higher risk of developing toxicity. Due to drug-drug interactions, multidrug combinations often exhibit different toxicity profiles than those of single drugs, leading to a complex trial scenario. Numerous methods have been proposed for the design of phase I drug combination trials. For example, the two-dimensional Bayesian optimal interval design for combination drug (BOINcomb) is simple to implement and has desirable performance. However, in scenarios where the lowest and starting dose is close to being toxic, the BOINcomb design may tend to allocate more patients to overly toxic doses, and select an overly toxic dose combination as the maximum tolerated dose combination.
To improve the performance of BOINcomb in the above extreme scenarios, we widen the range of variation of the boundaries by setting the self-shrinking dose escalation and de-escalation boundaries. We refer to the new design as adaptive shrinking Bayesian optimal interval design for combination drug (asBOINcomb). We conduct a simulation study to evaluate the performance of the proposed design using a real clinical trial example.
Our simulation results show that asBOINcomb is more accurate and stable than BOINcomb, especially in some extreme scenarios. Specifically, in all ten scenarios, the percentage of correct selection is higher than the BOINcomb design within 30 to 60 patients.
The proposed asBOINcomb design is transparent and simple to implement and can reduce the trial sample size while maintaining accuracy compared with the BOINcomb design.

Liposomal irinotecan (nal-IRI) plus 5-fluorouracil and leucovorin (5-FU/LV) improves survival in patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) after progression to gemcitabine-based therapy. Few studies have examined whether the starting dose and dose escalation of nal-IRI in subsequent treatment cycles may influence patient outcomes and toxicity profiles. A total of 667 patients who received nal-IRI + 5-FU/LV for PDAC treatment between August 2018 and November 2020 at nine medical centers in Taiwan were included and retrospectively analyzed. Patients were allocated to the standard starting dose (SD), reduced starting dose (RD) without escalation, and RD with escalation of nal-IRI groups for comparison of survival outcome and safety. Propensity score matching (PSM) was performed to adjust for possible confounding variables. Nal-IRI was prescribed at SD, RD without escalation, and RD with escalation in 465 (69.7%), 147 (22.0), and 55 (8.2%), respectively. RD with escalation patients had significantly longer treatment cycles (6, range 2-25) than SD (5, range 1-42, P<0.001) and RD without escalation patients (4, range 1-26, P<0.001). The median overall survival (OS) of the patients were as follows: SD, 6.2 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 5.7-6.7); RD with escalation, 7.6 months (95% CI, 6.1-9.2); and RD without escalation, 3.6 months (95% CI, 2.6-4.5). After PSM to adjust for potential confounders, RD without escalation patients still had the poorest OS compared to the other two groups (P<0.001), while the OS difference between SD and RD with escalation patients was insignificant (P=0.10). SD patients had higher incidences of ≥ grade 3 neutropenia and febrile neutropenia than the other two groups. Administering nal-IRI at RD followed by dose escalation in subsequent treatment cycles is safe and does not compromise survival outcomes in selected patients with PDAC receiving nal-IRI plus 5-FU/LV.