Diltiazem

地尔硫
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    猪繁殖与呼吸综合征病毒(PRRSV)是猪的病原,给养猪业造成了巨大的经济损失。然而,在开发有效的PRRSV控制疫苗或药物方面收效甚微.在本研究中,我们发现盐酸地尔硫,L型Ca2+通道的抑制剂,以剂量依赖性方式有效抑制MARC-145、PK-15CD163和PAM细胞中的PRRSV复制。此外,它证明了针对PRRSV-1和PRRSV-2菌株的广谱活性。此外,我们探讨了潜在的机制,发现盐酸地尔硫对PRRSV的抑制与易感细胞钙离子稳态的调节有关。此外,我们评估了盐酸地尔硫对PRRSV攻击的仔猪的抗病毒作用,评估直肠温度,病毒血症,以及肉眼和显微镜下的肺部病变。我们的结果表明,盐酸地尔硫治疗可减轻PRRSV引起的直肠温度峰值,肺病理变化,和血清病毒载量。总之,我们的数据表明,盐酸地尔硫可作为抗PRRSV感染的新型治疗药物.
    Porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus (PRRSV) is a pathogen for swine, resulting in substantial economic losses to the swine industry. However, there has been little success in developing effective vaccines or drugs for PRRSV control. In the present study, we discovered that Diltiazem HCl, an inhibitor of L-type Ca2+ channel, effectively suppresses PRRSV replication in MARC-145, PK-15CD163 and PAM cells in dose-dependent manner. Furthermore, it demonstrates a broad-spectrum activity against both PRRSV-1 and PRRSV-2 strains. Additionally, we explored the underlying mechanisms and found that Diltiazem HCl -induced inhibition of PRRSV associated with regulation of calcium ion homeostasis in susceptible cells. Moreover, we evaluated the antiviral effects of Diltiazem HCl in PRRSV-challenged piglets, assessing rectal temperature, viremia, and gross and microscopic lung lesions. Our results indicate that Diltiazem HCl treatment alleviates PRRSV-induced rectal temperature spikes, pulmonary pathological changes, and serum viral load. In conclusion, our data suggest that Diltiazem HCl could serve as a novel therapeutic drug against PRRSV infection.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Randomized Controlled Trial
    在过去,腰方阻滞(QLB)主要用于患者的术后镇痛,很少有麻醉师在手术过程中使用无阿片类药物麻醉(OFA)。因此,目前尚不清楚仰卧位的QLB是否能在OFA策略下提供完美的镇痛和抑制麻醉应激。观察超声引导下OFA仰卧位腰方肌阻滞(US-QLB)用于下腹部及盆腔手术的临床疗效。选取2021年3月至2022年7月在万宁市人民医院行下腹部或盆腔手术的患者122例,按随机数字表法分为腰方肌阻滞组(Q组,n=62)和对照组(C组,n=60)。两组均采用仰卧位全麻联合QLB。镇静后,根据手术领域的需要,在局部麻醉下,基于类似于"人眼"和"摇篮中婴儿"的图像,通过超声引导前路进行单侧或双侧QLB.Q组,每侧注射20ml稀释在生理盐水(NS)中的0.50%利多卡因和0.20%罗哌卡因。C组,将20ml的NS注射到每一侧。BP的值,HR,SPO2,SE,RE,SPI,NRS,管家得分,异丙酚的剂量,右美托咪定,和罗库溴铵,需要瑞芬太尼的患者数量,异丙酚,或者地尔硫卓,穿刺点,块平面,麻醉持续时间,导管拔除,并监测手术期间的清醒情况。一般数据无显著差异,需要额外瑞芬太尼的病例数量,异丙酚,或者地尔硫治疗,两组穿刺点和穿刺平面比较(P>0.05)。HR,SBP,T1时Q组DBP值高于C组;HR,SPI,SE,而在T3,SE时,Q组的RE值低于C组,在T4和T5时,Q组Steward评分高于C组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。Q组拔管时间和清醒时间均低于C组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。TheSE,RE,T1、T2、T3和T4时的SPI值低于T0时的SPI值。Q组T4和T5时Steward评分高于C组,均低于T0时,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。两组在t1、t3、t4时的术后镇痛效果比较,差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05)。OFA仰卧位的US-QLB对下腹部或骨盆手术患者有效,术中生命体征稳定,完全恢复和更好的术后镇痛。
    In the past, quadratus lumborum block (QLB) was mostly used for postoperative analgesia in patients, and few anesthesiologists applied it during surgery with opioid-free anesthesia (OFA). Consequently, it is still unclear whether QLB in the supine position can provide perfect analgesia and inhibit anesthetic stress during surgery under the OFA strategy. To observe the clinical efficacy of ultrasound-guided quadratus lumborum block (US-QLB) in the supine position with OFA for lower abdominal and pelvic surgery. A total of 122 patients who underwent lower abdominal or pelvic surgery in People\'s Hospital of Wanning between March 2021 and July 2022 were selected and divided into a quadratus lumborum block group (Q) (n = 62) and control group (C) (n = 60) according to the random number table method. Both groups underwent general anesthesia combined with QLB in the supine position. After sedation, unilateral or bilateral QLB was performed via the ultrasound guided anterior approach based on images resembling a \"human eye\" and \"baby in a cradle\" under local anesthesia according to the needs of the operative field. In group Q, 20 ml of 0.50% lidocaine and 0.20% ropivacaine diluted in normal saline (NS) were injected into each side. In group C, 20 ml of NS was injected into each side. The values of BP, HR, SPO2, SE, RE, SPI, NRS, Steward score, dosage of propofol, dexmedetomidine, and rocuronium, the number of patients who needed remifentanil, propofol, or diltiazem, puncture point, block plane, duration of anesthesia, catheter extraction, and wakefulness during the operation were monitored. There were no significant differences in the general data, number of cases requiring additional remifentanil, propofol, or diltiazem treatment, as well as puncture point and puncture plane between the two groups (P > 0.05). HR, SBP, and DBP values were higher in group Q than in group C at T1; HR, SPI, and SE, while RE values were lower in group Q than in group C at T3, SE, and RE; the Steward score was higher in group Q than in group C at T4 and T5, and the difference was statistically significant (P < 0.05). The extubation and awake times were lower in group Q than in group C, and the difference was statistically significant (P < 0.05). The SE, RE, and SPI values were lower at T1, T2, T3, and T4 than at T0. The Steward scores at T4 and T5 were higher in group Q than in group C, and were lower than at T0, with a statistically significant difference (P < 0.05). There were significant differences in the effectiveness of postoperative analgesia between the two groups at t1, t3 and t4 (P < 0.05). US-QLB in the supine position with OFA is effective in patients undergoing lower abdominal or pelvic surgery with stable intraoperative vital signs, complete recovery and better postoperative analgesia.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Meta-Analysis
    抗凝相关的消化道出血(GIB)可能有许多预测因子,但直到现在,对证据确定性的系统评价和评估尚未公布。我们进行了系统评价,以确定抗凝相关GIB的所有危险因素,以告知抗凝相关GIB管理的风险预测。
    进行了系统评价和荟萃分析,以搜索PubMed,EMBASE,WebofScience,和CochraneLibrary数据库(从成立到2022年1月21日)使用以下搜索词:抗凝剂,肝素,华法林,达比加群,利伐沙班,阿哌沙班,DOAC,消化道出血,风险因素。根据纳入和排除标准,确定了抗凝相关GIB的危险因素研究.抗凝相关GIB的危险因素被用作本综述的结果指标。
    我们在分析中纳入了34项研究。对于抗凝剂相关的GIB,中度确定性证据显示可能与年龄有关,肾病,同时使用阿司匹林,同时使用抗血小板药,心力衰竭,心肌梗塞,便血,肾功能衰竭,冠状动脉疾病,幽门螺杆菌感染,社会风险因素,酒精使用,吸烟,贫血,睡眠呼吸暂停的病史,慢性阻塞性肺疾病,国际标准化比率(INR),肥胖等。其中一些因素不包括在当前的GIB风险预测模型中。比如贫血,吉非贝齐的共同给药,联合使用维拉帕米或地尔硫卓,INR,心力衰竭,心肌梗塞,等。
    研究发现贫血,吉非贝齐的共同给药,联合使用维拉帕米或地尔硫卓,INR,心力衰竭,心肌梗死等。与抗凝相关的GIB,这些因素不在现有的预测模型中。这项研究提供了抗凝剂相关GIB的风险预测,它还为GIB预防和未来研究提供了指导.
    There may be many predictors of anticoagulation-related gastrointestinal bleeding (GIB), but until now, systematic reviews and assessments of the certainty of the evidence have not been published. We conducted a systematic review to identify all risk factors for anticoagulant-associated GIB to inform risk prediction in the management of anticoagulation- related GIB.
    A systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted to search PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library databases (from inception through January 21, 2022) using the following search terms: anticoagulants, heparin, warfarin, dabigatran, rivaroxaban, apixaban, DOACs, gastrointestinal hemorrhage, risk factors. According to inclusion and exclusion criteria, studies of risk factors for anticoagulation-related GIB were identified. Risk factors for anticoagulant-associated GIB were used as the outcome index of this review.
    We included 34 studies in our analysis. For anticoagulant-associated GIB, moderate-certainty evidence showed a probable association with older age, kidney disease, concomitant use of aspirin, concomitant use of the antiplatelet agent, heart failure, myocardial infarction, hematochezia, renal failure, coronary artery disease, helicobacter pylori infection, social risk factors, alcohol use, smoking, anemia, history of sleep apnea, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, international normalized ratio (INR), obesity et al. Some of these factors are not included in current GIB risk prediction models. such as anemia, co-administration of gemfibrozil, co-administration of verapamil or diltiazem, INR, heart failure, myocardial infarction, etc.
    The study found that anemia, co-administration of gemfibrozil, co-administration of verapamil or diltiazem, INR, heart failure, myocardial infarction et al. were associated with anticoagulation-related GIB, and these factors were not in the existing prediction models. This study informs risk prediction for anticoagulant-associated GIB, it also informs guidelines for GIB prevention and future research.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    作为心血管药物地尔硫的关键合成中间体,甲基(2R,3S)-3-(4-甲氧基苯基)缩水甘油酸盐((2R,3S)-MPGM)(1)可通过氯醇(3S)-2-氯-3-羟基-3-(4-甲氧基苯基)丙酸甲酯((3S)-2)的闭环获得。我们报告了使用具有4.5倍提高的比活性的工程酶SSCRM2将2-氯-3-(4-甲氧基苯基)-3-氧代丙酸甲酯(3)有效还原为(3S)-2,通过缓解空间位阻和不希望的相互作用,通过酮还原酶SSCR的结构指导位点饱和诱变获得。结合使用共表达微调策略,重组大肠杆菌(pET28a-RBS-SSCRM2/pACYCDuet-GDH),共表达SSCRM2和葡萄糖脱氢酶,构建并优化蛋白质表达。优化反应条件后,实现了工业相关的300克/升3的全细胞催化完全还原,提供99%ee的(3S)-2和519.1g·L-1·d-1的时空产率,代表迄今为止报道的(3S)-2生物催化合成的最高记录。该生物催化合成的E因子为24.5(包括水)。该原子经济合成中产生的手性醇(3S)-2转化为(2R,3S)-MPGM,产率为95%,ee为99%。本文受版权保护。保留所有权利。
    As a key synthetic intermediate of the cardiovascular drug diltiazem, methyl (2R,3S)-3-(4-methoxyphenyl) glycidate ((2R,3S)-MPGM) (1) is accessible via the ring closure of chlorohydrin (3S)-methyl 2-chloro-3-hydroxy-3-(4-methoxyphenyl)propanoate ((3S)-2). We report the efficient reduction of methyl 2-chloro-3-(4-methoxyphenyl)-3-oxo-propanoate (3) to (3S)-2 using an engineered enzyme SSCRM2 possessing 4.5-fold improved specific activity, which was obtained through the structure-guided site-saturation mutagenesis of the ketoreductase SSCR by reliving steric hindrance and undesired interactions. With the combined use of the co-expression fine-tuning strategy, a recombinant E. coli (pET28a-RBS-SSCRM2 /pACYCDuet-GDH), co-expressing SSCRM2 and glucose dehydrogenase, was constructed and optimized for protein expression. After optimizing the reaction conditions, whole-cell-catalyzed complete reduction of industrially relevant 300 g L-1 of 3 was realized, affording (3S)-2 with 99% ee and a space-time yield of 519.1 g∙L-1 ∙d-1 , representing the highest record for the biocatalytic synthesis of (3S)-2 reported to date. The E-factor of this biocatalytic synthesis was 24.5 (including water). Chiral alcohol (3S)-2 generated in this atom-economic synthesis was transformed to (2R,3S)-MPGM in 95% yield with 99% ee.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Randomized Controlled Trial
    背景:目前,手术期间没有监测有害刺激的黄金标准,手术面积指数(SPI)只是众多监测方法中的一种。它通常用于常规阿片类麻醉的监测,但其在无阿片类药物麻醉(OFA)中的有效性尚未评估。因此,本研究的目的是观察手术面积指数在无阿片类药物麻醉下腹部或盆腔手术患者中的指导价值.
    方法:选取2021年3月至2022年7月在我院行下腹部或盆腔手术的患者122例,按随机数字表法平均分为OFA(F)组和对照组(C)。两组均根据手术野采用超声引导下仰卧位单侧/双侧腰方肌阻滞。F组,每侧注射0.50%利多卡因和0.20%罗哌卡因(在20mL的0.9%生理盐水中)。C组,每侧注射20mL0.9%生理盐水。F组接受无阿片类药物的全身麻醉,C组接受阿片类药物的全身麻醉。BP,脉搏氧饱和度,PETCO2,反应熵,状态熵,和SPI值;Steward评分;丙泊酚剂量,右美托咪定,罗库溴铵,监测两组的拔管时间和清醒时间。
    结果:两组一般资料比较差异无统计学意义(P>.05)。在T0,T1,T2,T3,T4和T5的SPI值或需要额外瑞芬太尼的病例数没有显着差异,异丙酚,两组间地尔硫(P>.05)。状态熵,反应熵,在T4和T5时,F组的Steward评分高于C组,而F组的拔管和清醒时间低于C组(P<0.05)。T3时,F组心率和SPI低于C组(P<0.05)。
    结论:SPI在OFA中的指导价值与其在阿片类麻醉中的应用相似。其临床疗效确切,生命体征稳定,快速启用,完全恢复意识。
    BACKGROUND: Currently, there is no gold standard for monitoring noxious stimulation during surgery, and the surgical pleth index (SPI) is only one of many monitoring methods. It is commonly used in the monitoring of conventional opiate anesthesia, but its effectiveness in opioid-free anesthesia (OFA) has not been evaluated. Therefore, the aim of this study was to observe the guidance value of the surgical pleth index in opioid-free anesthesia for patients undergoing lower abdominal or pelvic surgery.
    METHODS: A total of 122 patients who underwent lower abdominal or pelvic surgery in our hospital between March 2021 and July 2022 were selected and equally divided into OFA (F) and control (C) groups according to the random number table method. Both groups underwent ultrasound-guided unilateral/bilateral quadratus lumborum block in the supine position according to the surgical field. In group F, 0.50% lidocaine and 0.20% ropivacaine (in 20 mL of 0.9% normal saline) were injected on each side. In group C, 20 mL 0.9% normal saline was injected on each side. Group F received general anesthesia without opioids and group C received general anesthesia with opioids. BP, pulse oxygen saturation, PETCO2, reactionentropy, stateentropy, and SPI values; Steward score; dosage of propofol, dexmedetomidine, rocuronium, and diltiazem; extubation time; and awake time were monitored in both groups.
    RESULTS: There were no significant differences in the general data between the 2 groups (P > .05). There were no significant differences in SPI values at T0, T1, T2, T3, T4, and T5 or the number of cases requiring additional remifentanil, propofol, and diltiazem between the 2 groups (P > .05). The stateentropy, reactionentropy, and Steward scores were higher in group F than in group C at T4 and T5, while the extubation and awake times were lower in group F than in group C (P < .05). The heart rate and SPI of group F were lower than that of group C at T3 (P < .05).
    CONCLUSIONS: The guiding value of SPI in OFA was similar to its use in opiated anesthesia. Its clinical efficacy is exact, vital signs are stable, enabling rapid, and complete regaining of consciousness.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Clinical Trial Protocol
    背景:目前关于在使用桡动脉移植物(RA-CABG)的冠状动脉旁路移植术后使用慢性口服抗痉挛药物的证据是有争议的。钙通道阻滞剂,比如地尔硫卓,是RA-CABG后最常用的抗痉挛药物;其他选择包括硝酸盐和尼可地尔,但迄今为止,尚未进行足够有效的随机对照试验来比较其疗效.
    方法:这是一个单中心,开放标签,平行三臂,先导随机对照试验。没有任何研究药物禁忌症并且成功接受RA-CABG手术的患者将被连续筛选。符合条件的患者将以1:1:1的比例随机分配(总共150名患者,每臂50)每天三次口服尼可地尔5毫克,地尔硫卓180毫克,每天一次口服,或单硝酸异山梨酯50毫克,每天一次,持续24周。主要结果是在第1周和第24周的RA移植物衰竭。次要结局包括主要不良心血管事件(MACE,全因死亡的复合,心肌梗塞,中风,和计划外血运重建)和心绞痛复发。安全性结果包括低血压的发生,肾素血管紧张素醛固酮系统抑制剂停药,严重不良事件,以及24周内其他相关不良事件。
    结论:本试验将比较尼可地尔的初步效果,地尔硫卓,和单硝酸异山梨酯对RA-CABG患者血管造影和临床结局的影响。招聘始于2020年6月,预计主要完成日期为2023年初。这项研究的结果将为设计有关RA-CABG后口服抗痉挛药物有效性的大型验证性试验提供急需的信息。
    The current evidence for chronic oral antispastic medication use after coronary artery bypass grafting using radial artery grafts (RA-CABG) is controversial. Calcium channel blockers, such as diltiazem, are the most commonly used antispastic medications after RA-CABG; other options include nitrates and nicorandil, but to date no sufficiently powered randomized controlled trials have been conducted to compare their efficacy.
    This is a single-center, open-label, parallel three-arm, pilot randomized controlled trial. Patients without contraindications to any study medications and who successfully underwent RA-CABG surgery will be consecutively screened. Eligible patients will be randomized in a ratio of 1:1:1 (a total of 150 patients, 50 per arm) to receive nicorandil 5 mg orally thrice daily, diltiazem 180 mg orally once daily, or isosorbide mononitrate 50 mg orally once daily for 24 weeks. The primary outcomes are RA graft failure at week 1 and week 24. The secondary outcomes include major adverse cardiovascular event (MACE, a composite of all-cause death, myocardial infarction, stroke, and unplanned revascularization) and angina recurrence. The safety outcomes include hypotension occurrence, withdrawal of renin angiotensin aldosterone system inhibitors, serious adverse events, and other concerned adverse events within 24 weeks.
    This pilot trial will compare the preliminary effects of nicorandil, diltiazem, and isosorbide mononitrate on angiographic and clinical outcomes in patients who have undergone RA-CABG. Recruitment began in June 2020, and the estimated primary completion date is early 2023. Results of this study will provide much needed information for design of large confirmatory trials on the effectiveness of oral antispastic medications after RA-CABG.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Case Reports
    冠状动脉痉挛(CAS)的特征是可逆的弥漫性或局灶性血管收缩,在缺血性心脏病的发病机制中起重要作用的现象。致命的心律失常,如室性心动过速/纤颤和完全性房室传导阻滞(AV-B),在CAS患者中非常常见。非二氢吡啶类钙通道阻滞剂(CCB)如地尔硫卓被推荐作为治疗和预防CAS发作的一线药物。然而,在患有AV-B的CAS患者中,其使用仍存在争议,因为这种类型的CCB也可以引起AV-B本身。这里,我们介绍了地尔硫在1例CAS引起的完全性AV-B患者中的应用.病人的胸痛迅速缓解,静脉注射地尔硫卓后,完全AV-B迅速恢复至窦性心律,无任何不良反应。在这份报告中,我们强调了地尔硫在治疗和预防CAS引起的完全AV-B中的有用和有效的应用。
    Coronary artery spasm (CAS) is characterized by reversible diffuse or focal vasoconstriction, a phenomenon that plays an important role in the pathogenesis of ischemic heart disease. Fatal arrhythmias, such as ventricular tachycardia/fibrillation and complete atrioventricular block (AV-B), are very common in patients with CAS. Nondihydropyridine calcium channel blockers (CCBs) such as diltiazem were recommended as first-line medications for treating and preventing CAS episodes. However, its use remains controversial in CAS patients with AV-B as this type of CCB can also cause AV-B itself. Here, we present the use of diltiazem in a patient with complete AV-B caused by CAS. The patient\'s chest pain was rapidly relieved, and complete AV-B was promptly restored to sinus rhythm following the administration of intravenous diltiazem without any adverse effects. In this report, we highlight the useful and effective application of diltiazem for treating and preventing complete AV-B caused by CAS.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    地尔硫和格列本脲是常用的降血压和抗糖尿病药物。这项研究报告了使用结构动力学驱动的针对尿激酶受体(uPAR)的虚拟筛选发现这两种药物的潜在抗肿瘤和抗转移作用。由于uPAR的高度灵活性,目前解析的uPAR晶体结构,都处于配体结合状态,提供其生理构象的有限表示。为了提高筛查的准确性,我们进行了长时间尺度的分子动力学模拟,获得了apo-uPAR的代表性构象作为我们筛选的目标.实验上,我们证明地尔硫和格列本脲结合uPAR的KD值在微摩尔范围内。此外,两种化合物在体外和体内均以uPAR依赖性方式有效抑制肿瘤生长和转移。这项工作不仅提供了两种有效的uPAR抑制剂,而且还报道了地尔硫卓和格列本脲的潜在标签外抗肿瘤和抗转移用途的概念验证研究。
    Diltiazem and glibenclamide are commonly used hypotensive and antidiabetic drugs. This study reports the discovery of the potential antitumor and antimetastatic effects of these two drugs using a structural dynamics-driven virtual screening targeting urokinase receptor (uPAR). Owing to uPAR\'s high flexibility, currently resolved crystal structures of uPAR, all in ligand-bound states, provide limited representations of its physiological conformation. To improve the accuracy of screening, we performed a long-timescale molecular dynamics simulation and obtained the representative conformations of apo-uPAR as the targets for our screening. Experimentally, we demonstrated that diltiazem and glibenclamide bound uPAR with KD values in the micromolar range. In addition, both compounds effectively suppressed tumor growth and metastasis in a uPAR-dependent manner in vitro and in vivo. This work not only provides two potent uPAR inhibitors but also reports a proof-of-concept study on the potential off-label antitumor and antimetastatic uses of diltiazem and glibenclamide.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:羧酸酯酶2(CES2)主要分布在人的肝脏和肠道中,并在许多前药的代谢激活和脂质代谢中起着积极作用。虽然CES2意义重大,与CES2相关的动物模型仍然很少。
    目的:本研究旨在构建Ces2c基因敲除(KO)大鼠,并进一步研究CES2的功能。
    方法:采用CRISPR/Cas9基因编辑技术对大鼠Ces2c基因进行靶向和切割。在mRNA水平上检测到KO大鼠肝脏和小肠中主要CES亚型的代偿作用。同时,以地尔硫卓和阿司匹林为底物,检测Ces2c在KO大鼠体内的代谢能力。
    结果:该Ces2cKO大鼠模型显示正常生长和繁殖,没有脱靶效应。通过CES2底物的体外代谢研究验证了Ces2cKO大鼠的代谢功能。结果表明,地尔硫在KO大鼠体内的代谢能力减弱,而阿司匹林的代谢能力没有明显变化。此外,血清生理指标显示Ces2c缺失对大鼠肝功能无影响。
    结论:采用CRISPR/Cas9系统成功构建了Ces2cKO大鼠模型。该大鼠模型不仅可作为研究Ces2介导的药物代谢的重要工具,也可作为研究Ces2生理功能的重要动物模型。
    BACKGROUND: Carboxylesterase 2 (CES2) is mainly distributed in the human liver and gut, and plays an active role in the metabolic activation of many prodrugs and lipid metabolism. Although CES2 is of great significance, there are still few animal models related to CES2.
    OBJECTIVE: This research aims to construct Ces2c gene knockout (KO) rats and further study the function of CES2.
    METHODS: CRISPR/Cas9 gene editing technology was used to target and cleave the rat Ces2c gene. Compensatory effects of major CES subtypes both in the liver and small intestine of KO rats were detected at mRNA levels. Meanwhile, diltiazem and aspirin were used as substrates to test the metabolic capacity of Ces2c in KO rats.
    RESULTS: This Ces2c KO rat model showed normal growth and breeding without off-target effects. The metabolic function of Ces2c KO rats was verified by the metabolic study of CES2 substrates in vitro. The results showed that the metabolic capacity of diltiazem in KO rats was weakened, while the metabolic ability of aspirin did not change significantly. In addition, the serum physiological indexes showed that the Ces2c deletion did not affect the liver function of rats..
    CONCLUSIONS: The Ces2c KO rat model was successfully constructed by CRISPR/Cas9 system. This rat model can not only be used as an important tool to study the drug metabolism mediated by CES2, but also as an important animal model to study the physiological function of CES2.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Meta-Analysis
    目的:通过系统评价和网络荟萃分析评价不同镇痛措施治疗开腹痔术后疼痛的临床疗效和安全性。
    方法:符合PubMed纳入标准的随机对照试验,科克伦图书馆,Embase,WebofScience,Scopus,CNKI,万方数据,和VIP从数据库建设之日起至2022年6月28日进行检索。
    结果:在13项随机对照试验(RCT)中,731例患者纳入网络荟萃分析。大多数干预措施在缓解术后疼痛方面比安慰剂更有效。术后24h视觉模拟评分(VAS):三硝酸甘油酯(GTN)(均差(MD)-4.20,95%CI-5.35,-3.05),地尔硫卓(MD-1.97,95%CI-2.44,-1.51),肉毒杆菌毒素(BT)(MD-1.50,95%CI-2.25,-0.75),硫糖铝(MD-1.01,95%CI-1.53,-0.49),和电针(EA)(MD-0.45,95%CI-0.87,-0.04)。术后48hVAS:地尔硫卓(MD-2.45,95%CI-2.74,-2.15),BT(MD-2.18,95%CI-2.52,-1.84),和硫糖铝(MD-1.41,95%CI-1.85,-0.97)。术后7dVAS:地尔硫卓(MD-2.49,95%CI-3.20,-1.78)和硫糖铝(MD-1.42,95%CI-2.00,-0.85)。术后首次排便VAS:EA(MD-0.70,95%CI-0.95,-0.46)。关于干预安全的数据很少,和其他高质量的RCT有望在未来研究这个主题。
    结论:地尔硫软膏可能是开腹痔切除术后缓解疼痛的最有效药物,它可以在手术后一周内显著减轻疼痛。第二和第三推荐的药物是BT和硫糖铝软膏。GTN在缓解开放性痔切除术后24h疼痛方面具有显著优势,但是它是否导致头痛是有争议的;因此,应谨慎使用。EA的镇痛疗效尚不清楚。在这项研究中,关于干预措施安全性的证据有限,它只是在统计上呈现的。
    OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the clinical efficacy and safety of different analgesic interventions in the treatment of pain after open hemorrhoidectomy by systematic review and network meta-analysis.
    METHODS: Randomized controlled trials that met the inclusion criteria in PubMed, Cochrane Library, Embase, Web of Science, Scopus, CNKI, WANFANG DATA, and VIP were searched from the date of database construction to June 28, 2022.
    RESULTS: Among the 13 randomized controlled trials (RCTs), 731 patients were included in the network meta-analysis. Most interventions are more effective than placebo in relieving postoperative pain. 24 h postoperative Visual Analogue Scale (VAS): glyceryl trinitrate (GTN) (mean difference (MD) - 4.20, 95% CI - 5.35, - 3.05), diltiazem (MD - 1.97, 95% CI - 2.44, - 1.51), botulinum toxin (BT) (MD - 1.50, 95% CI - 2.25, - 0.75), sucralfate (MD - 1.01, 95% CI - 1.53, - 0.49), and electroacupuncture (EA) (MD - 0.45, 95% CI - 0.87, - 0.04). 48 h postoperative VAS: diltiazem (MD - 2.45, 95% CI - 2.74, - 2.15), BT (MD - 2.18, 95% CI - 2.52, - 1.84), and sucralfate (MD - 1.41, 95% CI - 1.85, - 0.97). 7 d postoperative VAS: diltiazem (MD - 2.49, 95% CI - 3.20, - 1.78) and sucralfate (MD - 1.42, 95% CI - 2.00, - 0.85). The first postoperative defecation VAS: EA (MD - 0.70, 95% CI - 0.95, - 0.46). There are few data on intervention safety, and additional high-quality RCTs are expected to study this topic in the future.
    CONCLUSIONS: Diltiazem ointment may be the most effective medication for pain relief following open hemorrhoidectomy, and it can dramatically reduce pain within one week of surgery. The second and third recommended medications are BT and sucralfate ointment. GTN has a significant advantage in alleviating pain 24 h after open hemorrhoidectomy, but whether it causes headache is debatable; thus, it should be used with caution. EA\'s analgesic efficacy is still unknown. There was limited evidence on the safety of the intervention in this study, and it was simply presented statistically.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

公众号