OBJECTIVE: To assess the value of using flat-sided culture tubes for preparing chromosomes through chorionic villi (CV) and amniotic fluid (AF) cell cultures during prenatal diagnosis.
METHODS: From February to March 2020, 157 CV samples and 147 AF samples subjected to prenatal diagnosis at the Maternal and Child Health Care Hospital of Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region were selected as the study subjects. For each sample, one flat-sided tube and one flask culture were set up by following the standard protocols. The methods were evaluated by comparing the cell growth, experimental process, quality of chromosome preparation and costs.
RESULTS: The success rates for the culturing of CV and AF samples by the flat-sided culture tube method were 97.45% (153/157) and 97.96% (144/147), respectively. By contrast, the success rates for the conventional flask method were 98.72% (155/157) for CV and 98.64% (145/147) for AF samples. No significant difference was found between the two methods (P > 0.05). The average harvest time required by the flat-sided culture tube method was 8.45 days for CV and 9.43 days for AF cultures, whilst the average harvest time for conventional flask method was 9.05 days and 9.54 days, respectively. The flat-sided culture tube method for CV had required significantly shorter average harvest time than the conventional method (P < 0.001). No statistical significant difference was found in the average harvest time for AF by the two methods (P > 0.05). The conventional culturing method had required three containers with two sample transfers. By contrast, the flat-sided culture tube method was carried out in one tube without any sample transfer. The average total amount of medium used was 3.91 mL for each flat-sided culture tube and 6.26 mL for each conventional flask.
CONCLUSIONS: The flat-sided culture tube method can provide a simple, cost-effective and error-reducing procedure for the CV and AF samples culture during prenatal diagnosis.

OBJECTIVE: We present low-level mosaic trisomy 13 at amniocentesis in a pregnancy associated with a positive non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT) result suspicious of trisomy 13, a chorionic villus sampling (CVS) result of mosaic trisomy 13, cytogenetic discrepancy in various tissues and a favorable fetal outcome.
METHODS: A 29-year-old, gravida 2, para 1, woman underwent amniocentesis at 20 weeks of gestation because of a positive NIPT result (Z-score = 20.9, positive ≥3) suspicious of trisomy 13 at 11 weeks of gestation and a CVS result of mosaic trisomy 13 at 14 weeks of gestation. At 14 weeks of gestation, CVS revealed the multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification (MLPA) result of rea X,Y (P095) × 1, 13 (P095) × 3, 18,21 (P095) × 2/X,Y (P095) × 1, 13,18,21 (P095) × 2 and a karyotype of 48,XY,+13,+mar [9]/47,XY,+mar[16]. She was referred to the hospital for genetic counseling at 15 weeks of gestation, and cytogenetic analysis of parental blood revealed 47,XY,+mar in the father and 46, XX in the mother. Fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) analysis on the paternal blood showed that the extra dicentric marker was derived from chromosome 15 without the locus SNRPN (15q11.2), and the result was 47,XY,+mar.ish dic(15) (D15Z1++, SNRPN-, PML-)[20]. Amniocentesis at 20 weeks of gestation revealed a karyotype of 47,XY,+mar pat (20/20). Simultaneous interphase FISH analysis on uncultured amniocytes revealed 32% (32/100 cells) mosaicism for trisomy 13. Quantitative fluorescence polymerase chain reaction (QF-PCR) analysis using the DNA extracted from the parental bloods and uncultured amniocytes excluded uniparental disomy (UPD) 13. Prenatal ultrasound findings were normal. The woman was advised to continue the pregnancy, and a phenotypically normal 2708-g male baby was delivered at 38 weeks of gestation, The cord blood, umbilical cord and placenta had the karyotypes of 47,XY,+mar pat and did not have UPD 13. When follow-up at age two months, the neonate was phenotypically normal. FISH analysis on buccal mucosal cells detected 5.3% (5/95 cells) mosaicism for trisomy 13, compared with 0% in the normal control.
CONCLUSIONS: Low-level mosaic trisomy 13 at amniocentesis can be associated with a positive NIPT result suspicious of trisomy 13, a CVS result of mosaic trisomy 13, cytogenetic discrepancy in various tissues and a favorable fetal outcome.

OBJECTIVE: We present low-level mosaic trisomy 2 at amniocentesis in a pregnancy associated with positive non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT) and chorionic villus sampling (CVS) results for trisomy 2, maternal uniparental disomy (UPD) 2, perinatal progressive decrease of the aneuploid cell line, cytogenetic discrepancy between cultured amniocytes and uncultured amniocytes, intrauterine growth restriction (IUGR) and a favorable fetal outcome.
METHODS: A 35-year-old, primigravid woman underwent amniocentesis at 16 weeks of gestation because both NIPT at 9 weeks of gestation and CVS at 11 weeks of gestation revealed trisomy 2. This pregnancy was conceived by in vitro fertilization (IVF) and embryo transfer (ET). Amniocentesis revealed a karyotype of 47,XY,+2[11]/46,XY[19]. Prenatal ultrasound findings were normal. She was referred to the hospital for genetic counseling at 20 weeks of gestation, and repeat amniocentesis performed at 24 weeks of gestation revealed a karyotype of 46,XY (22/22 colonies). The parental karyotypes were normal. Quantitative fluorescent polymerase chain reaction (QF-PCR) analysis on the DNA extracted from uncultured amniocytes and parental bloods revealed maternal uniparental heterodisomy of chromosome 2. Simultaneous molecular cytogenetic analysis on uncultured amniocytes showed the results of arr 2p25.3q37.3 × 2.4 with a log2 ratio = 0.26, consistent with 40% mosaicism for trisomy 2 by array comparative genomic hybridization (aCGH), and 28% (28/100 cells) mosaicism for trisomy 2 by interphase fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH). Despite IUGR on fetal ultrasound, the woman was advised to continue the pregnancy, and a 2252-g phenotypically normal male baby was delivered at 38 weeks of gestation. The karyotypes of cord blood, umbilical cord and placenta were 46,XY (40/40 colonies), 46,XY (40/40 colonies) and 47,XY,+2[9]/46,XY[31], respectively. QF-PCR analysis on cord blood, umbilical cord and placenta confirmed uniparental heterodisomy of chromosome 2 in the cord blood and umbilical cord, and maternal origin of trisomy 2 in the placenta. FISH analysis on buccal mucosal cells at age 1.5 months revealed 8.7% (9/104 cells) mosaicism for trisomy 2. When follow-up at age four months, the neonate manifested a normal phenotype except intermittent hypoventilation. Molecular analysis of the PHOX2B gene revealed a normal result. When follow-up at age one year, he manifested normal development.
CONCLUSIONS: Mosaic trisomy 2 at prenatal diagnosis should alert the possibility of UPD 2 and include a UPD 2 testing. Low-level mosaic trisomy 2 at amniocentesis can be associated with perinatal progressive decrease of the aneuploid cell line and a favorable fetal outcome.

暂无摘要。

OBJECTIVE: We present partial monosomy 8p (8p23.2→pter) and partial trisomy 15q (15q21.2→qter) and incidental detection of a familial chromosome translocation of paternal origin in a pregnancy associated with increased nuchal translucency (NT) and an abnormal maternal serum screening result.
METHODS: A 29-year-old primigravid woman underwent chorionic villus sampling (CVS) at 13 weeks of gestation because of an increased NT thickness of 3.2 mm at 12 weeks of gestation and an abnormal maternal serum screening for Down syndrome result with a calculated risk of 1/29. Her husband was 33 years old, and there was no family history of congenital malformations. CVS revealed a derived chromosome 8 or der(8). Cytogenetic analysis of the parents revealed a karyotype of 46,XY,t(8;15)(p21.3;q13) in the father and a karyotype of 46,XX in the mother. The CVS result was 46,XY,der(8)t(8;15)(p21.3;q13)pat. The woman requested for amniocentesis at 16 weeks of gestation. Array comparative genomic hybridization (aCGH) analysis on the DNA extracted from uncultured amniocytes revealed a result of arr 8p23.3p23.2 (191,530-2,625,470) × 1.0, arr 15q21.2q26.3 (50,903,432-102,338,129) × 3.0 with a 2.434-Mb deletion of 8p23.3-p23.2 including DLGAP2, CLN8 and ARHGEF10, and a 51.435-Mb duplication of 15q21.2-q26.3 including CYP19A1 and IGF1R. Conventional cytogenetic analysis of cultured amniocytes revealed the result of 46,XY,der(8) t(8;15)(p23.2;q21.2)pat in the fetus. The pregnancy was subsequently terminated, and a malformed fetus was delivered with characteristic craniofacial dysmorphism.
CONCLUSIONS: Maternal serum screening and NT screening may incidentally detect familial unbalanced reciprocal translocations, and aCGH analysis is useful for a precise determination of the breakpoints of the translocation and the involvement of the related genes under such a circumstance.

暂无摘要。

OBJECTIVE: We present prenatal diagnosis of maternal uniparental disomy (UPD) 5 by amniocentesis associated with confined placental mosaicism (CPM) for trisomy 5 and fetal trisomy 21 in a pregnancy.
METHODS: A 45-year-old woman underwent chorionic villus sampling (CVS) at 11 weeks of gestation because of maternal advanced age and an increased nuchal translucency of 4.0 mm in the first-trimester screening. CVS revealed a karyotype of 47,XY,+21[98]/48,XY,+5,+21[25]. Array comparative genomic hybridization (aCGH) analysis on the DNA extracted from chorionic villi revealed arr (5) × 3, arr (21) × 3 compatible with double trisomy 5 and trisomy 21. The woman underwent amniocenteses at 20 weeks and 22 weeks of gestation. Amniocenteses revealed a karyotype of 47,XY,+21. The parental karyotypes were normal. Quantitative fluorescent polymerase chain reaction (QF-PCR) on the DNA extracted from uncultured amniocytes showed trisomy 21 of maternal origin and maternal UPD 5. aCGH and interphase fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) on uncultured amniocytes confirmed trisomy 21. Prenatal ultrasound findings were unremarkable. The parents decided to continue the pregnancy, and a 2,198-g male baby was delivered at 38 weeks of gestation with characteristic phenotype of Down syndrome of hypertelorism, epicanthic folds and hypoplastic middle phalanx of the fifth fingers. Cytogenetic analysis of cord blood, umbilical cord and placenta revealed a karyotype of 47,XY,+21. QF-PCR analysis of the DNA extracted from placenta revealed double trisomy 5 and trisomy 21 with maternal gene dosage increase in chromosome 5 and chromosome 21.
CONCLUSIONS: Prenatal diagnosis of CPM for trisomy 5 at CVS can be associated with UPD 5 in the fetus, and UPD 5 causes no specific phenotype.

暂无摘要。

暂无摘要。

OBJECTIVE: To explore the mechanism of a false-negative result from karyotyping of chorionic villi cells for a trisomy 13 fetus featuring multiple malformations.
METHODS: For a fetus with multiple malformations by ultrasonography and a 46,XY karyotype by chorionic villi analysis, amniocytes were further analyzed with quantitative fluorescence PCR (QF-PCR), G-banded karyotyping and chromosomal microarray analysis (CMA). Meanwhile, non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT) was conducted on peripheral blood sample from the pregnant woman to determine the chromosomal composition of cytotrophoblast. After induction of labor, common aneuploidies in placenta and fetal tissue were also analyzed by QF-PCR.
RESULTS: QF-PCR, chromosomal karyotyping and CMA analysis of the amniocytes all suggested complete trisomy 13 (47,XY,+13) in the fetus. NIPT also suggested existence of fetal trisomy 13. QF-PCR analysis of the placenta and fetal tissues revealed that cells derived from the maternal surface and right side of fetal surface harbored mosaic trisomy 13, while those derived from other sites of fetal surface of the placenta, umbilical cord, amniotic membrane and fetal muscle tissue harbored trisomy 13.
CONCLUSIONS: Karyotyping of long-term cultured chorionic villus sample may give rise to false negative results due to placental mosaicism. To ensure accurate prenatal diagnosis, discordance between karyotyping of chorionic villi cells, fetal ultrasound and NIPT result should be verified by amniocentesis or cordocentesis and application of multiple cytogenetic and molecular techniques.