ChatGPT-4

ChatGPT - 4
  • 文章类型: Letter
    从图像数据生成放射学结果代表了医学图像分析的关键方面。ChatGPT-4的最新迭代,这是一种集成了文本和图像输入的大型多模态模型,包括皮肤镜检查图像,组织学图像,和X射线图像,在放射学领域引起了相当大的关注。为了进一步研究ChatGPT-4在医学图像识别中的性能,我们检查了ChatGPT-4识别可靠骨肉瘤X线图像的能力.结果表明,与邻近的正常组织相比,ChatGPT-4可以更准确地诊断有或没有明显占位性病变的骨骼,但区分骨骼中恶性病变的能力有限。到目前为止,ChatGPT-4目前的功能不足以对骨肉瘤进行可靠的影像学诊断.因此,用户应该意识到这项技术的局限性。
    The generation of radiological results from image data represents a pivotal aspect of medical image analysis. The latest iteration of ChatGPT-4, a large multimodal model that integrates both text and image inputs, including dermatoscopy images, histology images, and X-ray images, has attracted considerable attention in the field of radiology. To further investigate the performance of ChatGPT-4 in medical image recognition, we examined the ability of ChatGPT-4 to recognize credible osteosarcoma X-ray images. The results demonstrated that ChatGPT-4 can more accurately diagnose bone with or without significant space-occupying lesions but has a limited ability to differentiate between malignant lesions in bone compared to adjacent normal tissue. Thus far, the current capabilities of ChatGPT-4 are insufficient to make a reliable imaging diagnosis of osteosarcoma. Therefore, users should be aware of the limitations of this technology.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    台湾以其优质的医疗保健系统而闻名。该国的医疗许可考试提供了一种评估ChatGPT医疗水平的方法。
    我们分析了2022年2月,2022年7月,2023年2月和2033年7月的考试数据。每次考试包括四篇论文和80个单选题,分组为描述性或基于图片的。我们使用ChatGPT-4进行评估。不正确的答案引发了“思想链”的方法。准确率以百分比计算。
    ChatGPT-4在医学检查中的准确性范围为63.75%至93.75%(2022年2月至2023年7月)。准确率最高(93.75%)是在2022年2月的医学考试(3)中。误答率最高的受试者是眼科(28.95%),乳房手术(27.27%),整形外科(26.67%),骨科(25.00%),和普外科(24.59%)。在使用“思想链”时,“(CoT)提示的准确性范围从0.00%到88.89%,最终的总体准确率从90%到98%不等。
    ChatGPT-4在台湾的医学执照考试中获得成功。随着“思想链”提示,精度提高到90%以上。
    UNASSIGNED: Taiwan is well-known for its quality healthcare system. The country\'s medical licensing exams offer a way to evaluate ChatGPT\'s medical proficiency.
    UNASSIGNED: We analyzed exam data from February 2022, July 2022, February 2023, and July 2033. Each exam included four papers with 80 single-choice questions, grouped as descriptive or picture-based. We used ChatGPT-4 for evaluation. Incorrect answers prompted a \"chain of thought\" approach. Accuracy rates were calculated as percentages.
    UNASSIGNED: ChatGPT-4\'s accuracy in medical exams ranged from 63.75% to 93.75% (February 2022-July 2023). The highest accuracy (93.75%) was in February 2022\'s Medicine Exam (3). Subjects with the highest misanswered rates were ophthalmology (28.95%), breast surgery (27.27%), plastic surgery (26.67%), orthopedics (25.00%), and general surgery (24.59%). While using \"chain of thought,\" the \"Accuracy of (CoT) prompting\" ranged from 0.00% to 88.89%, and the final overall accuracy rate ranged from 90% to 98%.
    UNASSIGNED: ChatGPT-4 succeeded in Taiwan\'s medical licensing exams. With the \"chain of thought\" prompt, it improved accuracy to over 90%.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:随着人工智能(AI)在医疗保健中的日益融合,像ChatGPT-4这样的人工智能聊天机器人正被用来提供健康信息。
    目的:本研究旨在评估ChatGPT-4在回答与腹部成形术相关的常见问题方面的能力,评估其作为患者教育和术前咨询辅助工具的潜力。
    方法:对ChatGPT-4提交了关于腹部成形术的各种常见问题。这些问题来自美国整形外科学会提供的问题列表,以确保它们的相关性和全面性。一位经验丰富的整形外科医生仔细评估了ChatGPT-4在信息深度方面产生的反应,反应衔接,和能力,以确定人工智能在提供以患者为中心的信息方面的熟练程度。
    结果:研究表明ChatGPT-4可以给出明确的答案,使其对回答常见的查询有用。然而,它挣扎着个性化的建议,有时提供不正确或过时的参考。总的来说,ChatGPT-4可以有效地共享腹部成形术信息,这可以帮助患者更好地理解手术。尽管有这些积极的发现,人工智能需要更多的改进,特别是在提供个性化和准确的信息方面,充分满足整形外科患者的教育需求。
    结论:尽管ChatGPT-4有望成为患者教育的资源,持续的改进和严格的检查对于将其有利地融入医疗保健环境至关重要。研究强调需要进一步研究,特别侧重于提高人工智能响应的个性化和准确性。
    方法:本期刊要求作者为每篇文章分配一定程度的证据。对于这些循证医学评级的完整描述,请参阅目录或在线作者说明www。springer.com/00266.
    BACKGROUND: With the increasing integration of artificial intelligence (AI) in health care, AI chatbots like ChatGPT-4 are being used to deliver health information.
    OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to assess the capability of ChatGPT-4 in answering common questions related to abdominoplasty, evaluating its potential as an adjunctive tool in patient education and preoperative consultation.
    METHODS: A variety of common questions about abdominoplasty were submitted to ChatGPT-4. These questions were sourced from a question list provided by the American Society of Plastic Surgery to ensure their relevance and comprehensiveness. An experienced plastic surgeon meticulously evaluated the responses generated by ChatGPT-4 in terms of informational depth, response articulation, and competency to determine the proficiency of the AI in providing patient-centered information.
    RESULTS: The study showed that ChatGPT-4 can give clear answers, making it useful for answering common queries. However, it struggled with personalized advice and sometimes provided incorrect or outdated references. Overall, ChatGPT-4 can effectively share abdominoplasty information, which may help patients better understand the procedure. Despite these positive findings, the AI needs more refinement, especially in providing personalized and accurate information, to fully meet patient education needs in plastic surgery.
    CONCLUSIONS: Although ChatGPT-4 shows promise as a resource for patient education, continuous improvements and rigorous checks are essential for its beneficial integration into healthcare settings. The study emphasizes the need for further research, particularly focused on improving the personalization and accuracy of AI responses.
    METHODS: This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

公众号