OBJECTIVE: Dysphagia, a serious symptom of oral cancer, is also the most common. Further, patients who are more uncertain regarding their illness tend to catastrophize, which may affect their rehabilitation and long-term survival rate. Considering this relationship, this study aimed to investigate the occurrence of dysphagia in Chinese patients with oral cancer and explore the correlation between catastrophic cognition, illness uncertainty, and dysphagia.
METHODS: Applying a cross-sectional design, convenience sampling was used to recruit 180 patients with oral cancer. Advanced statistical methods were employed to analyze the mediating effects of catastrophic cognition on illness uncertainty and dysphagia.
RESULTS: Chinese patients with oral cancer had a mean dysphagia score of 52.88 ± 10.95. Catastrophic cognition and illness uncertainty in patients with oral cancer were significantly positively correlated (r = 0.447, P < 0.001). There was a significant negative correlation between dysphagia score and catastrophic cognition (r = -0.385, P < 0.001), and between dysphagia and illness uncertainty (r = -0.522, P < 0.001). Bootstrapping results indicated that the mediating effect of catastrophic cognition between illness uncertainty and dysphagia was -0.07 (95% CI: [-0.15, -0.03]) and significant, and the mediation effect accounted for 15.6% of the total effect.
CONCLUSIONS: Chinese patients with oral cancer have poor swallowing function. Results suggest that catastrophic cognition partially mediated the relationship between illness uncertainty and dysphagia in patients with oral cancer. Medical staff can improve patients\' swallowing function by reducing the level of catastrophic cognition via decreasing the level of illness uncertainty.

The way individuals handle daily stressors can significantly influence their mental health. Those who struggle with emotion regulation are especially vulnerable to the negative effects of stress. This study explored the role of catastrophizing, a maladaptive emotion regulation strategy, in shaping the relationships between daily stress responses and depressive symptoms. A total of 75 healthy college students participated in the study. We adopted an Ecological Momentary Assessment protocol over 14 consecutive days to capture the day-to-day dynamics of stress reactivity and recovery. Our findings indicate that individuals with higher levels of catastrophizing exhibited increased daily stress reactivity and delayed daily stress recovery, consequently raising their likelihood of experiencing amplified depressive symptoms. In contrast, those with lower levels of catastrophizing did not experience the same negative effects of increased daily stress reactivity on their mental health. These results enhance understanding of how real-life stressors contribute to the development of mental health issues and underscore the importance of adaptive emotion regulation for improved overall health and well-being.

OBJECTIVE: The clinical efficacy of cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) after Total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is still controversial, and the purpose of this meta-analysis was to evaluate the effect of CBT on pain, knee function, and psychological status of patients after TKA.
METHODS: We systematically searched electronic databases such as CNKI, CBM, VIP, PubMed, Cochrane Library, and EMBASE for randomized controlled studies up to February 30, 2023. Screening against inclusion criteria to select valid studies and extract data. The quality of included studies was evaluated by the Cochrane Collaboration risk-of-bias 2 (RoB 2) tool for randomized trials. Statistical analysis of the data from this study was carried out using Stata 15.1 software.
RESULTS: Finally, our meta-analysis incorporated seven randomized controlled studies of high quality, including 608 patients. The findings of the meta-analysis demonstrated a noteworthy decrease in kinesiophobia levels during the early postoperative phase in the CBT group as compared to the usual care group (WMD = -6.35, 95% CI: -7.98 to -4.72, Z = 7.64, P < 0.001). However, no statistically significant difference between the CBT and usual care groups in terms of postoperative pain as well as knee function.
CONCLUSIONS: CBT may effectively reduce the level of kinesiophobia in the short term after TKA, but did not significantly relieve knee pain or improve knee function.

UNASSIGNED: To examine the relationship between fear of recurrence and depression in patients with cancer.
UNASSIGNED: Two hundred and fifty-nine participants completed self-report questionnaires, including the Fear of Progression Questionnaire-Short Form, Rumination Inventory, Cognitive Emotion Regulation Questionnaire (Chinese version), and Center for Epidemiological Studies Depression Scale.
UNASSIGNED: Fear of recurrence in patients with cancer was moderate, and the level of depression was significantly higher than that in the normal population. Fear of recurrence, invasive rumination, catastrophizing, and depression in patients with cancer were significantly positively correlated. The level of fear of recurrence was a significant positive predictor of the level of depression. Invasive rumination played a partial mediating role between fear of recurrence and depression; that is, fear of recurrence directly affected depression, and fear of recurrence indirectly affected depression through invasive rumination. Catastrophizing played a moderating role in the mediation model, in which fear of recurrence affected depression through invasive rumination.
UNASSIGNED: Invasive rumination plays a mediating role between fear of recurrence and depression in patients with cancer. Catastrophizing moderates the relationship between fear of recurrence and depression as well as the relationship between invasive rumination and depression.

The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has affected college students\' mental health and caused post-traumatic stress symptoms (PTSS). Event centrality is thought to play a key role in the development of PTSS, but it is not yet clear by what mechanism. Theoretically, event centrality may affect the retrieval of traumatic memories and further prompt post-traumatic cognitions to understand events, and so may in turn be associated with PTSS in college students. However, few empirical studies have examined the mediating role of post-traumatic cognitions in the relationship between event centrality and PTSS, especially among college students during the COVID-19 pandemic.
The objective of this study was to examine the mediating roles of post-traumatic cognitive factors (e.g. attention to negative information, catastrophizing, and rumination) in the relationship between event centrality and PTSS among college students during the COVID-19 pandemic.
We recruited 1153 college students who completed the pandemic experiences scale, the centrality of event scale, the attention to positive and negative information scale, the cognitive emotion regulation questionnaire, and the PTSD Checklist for DSM-5 during the COVID-19 pandemic in May 2020.
In this sample of college students, event centrality directly predicted PTSS, and PTSS was also indirectly predicted by event centrality through attention to negative information, catastrophizing, and rumination.
These findings support the existing literature on the relationship between event centrality, proposed cognitive variables, and PTSS, and shed light on the mechanisms underlying PTSS. Our findings also highlight the importance and applicability of targeted cognitive interventions for PTSS in college students during the COVID-19 pandemic.
The COVID-19 pandemic has caused post-traumatic stress symptoms among college students.Event centrality is a risk factor of post-traumatic stress symptoms among college students during the COVID-19 pandemic.Attention to negative information, catastrophizing and rumination mediate the relationship between event centrality and post-traumatic stress symptoms.
Antecedentes: La pandemia de enfermedad coronavirus 2019 (COVID-19) ha afectado la salud mental de los estudiantes universitarios y causado síntomas de estrés postraumático (PTSS por sus siglas en ingles). Se cree que la centralidad del evento juega un rol importante en el desarrollo de PTSS, pero aún no está claro por qué mecanismo. Teóricamente, la centralidad del evento podría afectar la recuperación de los recuerdos traumáticos y estimular cogniciones postraumáticas para comprender los eventos y así su vez, podría estar asociada con PTSS en estudiantes universitarios. Sin embargo, pocos estudios empíricos han examinado el rol mediador de las cogniciones postraumáticas en la relación entre centralidad del evento y PTSS, especialmente entre estudiantes universitarios durante la pandemia de COVID-19.Objetivos: El objetivo de este estudio fue examinar los roles mediadores de los factores cognitivos postraumáticos (ej.: atención a información negativa, catastrofización y rumiación) en la relación entre centralidad del evento y PTSS entre los estudiantes universitarios durante la pandemia de COVID 19. Método: Reclutamos 1.153 estudiantes universitarios que completaron la escala de experiencias pandémicas, la escala de centralidad del evento, la escala de atención a la información positiva y negativa, el cuestionario de regulación cognitiva de las emociones y la lista de chequeo de TEPT para el DSM-5 durante la pandemia de COVID-19 en mayo del 2020.Resultados: En esta muestra de estudiantes universitarios, la centralidad del evento predijo directamente PTSS, y PTSS fueron tambien predichos indirectamente tambien por la centralidad del evento través de la atención a la información negativa, catastrofización y rumiación.Conclusiones: Estos hallazgos apoyan la literatura existente en la relación entre centralidad del evento, las variables cognitivas propuestas y PTSS y arrojan luz sobre los mecanismos subyacentes a PTSS. Nuestros hallazgos destacan tambien la importancia y aplicabilidad de las intervenciones cognitivas dirigidas a los PTSS en estudiantes universitarios durante la pandemia de COVID-19.
背景： 2019年新型冠状病毒肺炎(COVID-19)疫情影响了大学生的心理健康，并引发其创伤后应激症状(PTSS)。事件中心化被认为在PTSS的发展中起关键作用，但其内在机制尚不清楚。理论上，事件中心化可能会影响创伤记忆的提取，并进一步促进个体的创伤后认知来理解事件，因此可能与大学生的PTSS相关。然而，较少有实证研究考查创伤后认知在事件中心化与PTSS之间的中介作用，尤其是在COVID-19疫情期间的大学生群体当中。目的：本研究旨在探究COVID-19疫情期间大学生的创伤后认知因素(例如，消极注意偏向、灾难化和反刍)在事件中心化和PTSS之间的中介作用。方法：我们在2020年5月COVID-19疫情期间招募了1153名大学生，并采用疫情暴露量表、事件中心化量表、积极/消极注意偏向量表、认知情绪调节问卷和 DSM-5 PTSD核查表对大学生进行测查。结果：在该大学生样本中，事件中心化可以直接预测PTSS，也可以通过消极注意偏向、灾难化和反刍来间接预测PTSS。结论：这些结果支持了事件中心化、创伤后认知变量和PTSS之间关系的现有文献，并阐明了PTSS的潜在机制。本研究结果还强调了在COVID-19疫情期间对大学生PTSS进行有针对性的认知干预的重要性和适用性。.

The high prevalence of somatic symptom disorder (SSD) led to cumulative burdens to the medical system. However, the pathogenesis of this disease still remains unclear. Graph theoretical analysis discovered altered network topology across various psychiatric disorders, yet alteration in the topological structure of brain functional network in SSD patients is still unexplored. Catastrophizing is a common cognitive distortion in SSD. We hypothesize that the network topological metrics of SSD should be altered, and should correlate with catastrophizing scales. 32 medication-naïve, first-episode SSD patients and 30 age, gender matched HCs were recruited. The 17-item Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HAMD-17), Hamilton Anxiety Rating Scale (HAMA) and Cognitive Emotion Regulation Questionnaire (CERQ) were accessed. Functional MRI were scanned and brain functional networks were constructed based on 166 anatomically cerebrum regions from the automated anatomical labeling 3 (AAL3) template. Network topological metrics were calculated and compared between the two groups. Correlation between these metrics and clinical scales were also calculated. Network global efficiency of SSD was significantly lower than that of HC. Nodal global efficiency of the left subgenual anterior cingulate cortex (sgACC) of SSD was significantly lower than that of HC. FCs between the left sgACC and other 21 seed nodes were significantly declined in SSD in comparison with HC. In SSD group, HAMD total score was significantly negatively correlated with the connection between the left medial superior frontal gyrus and the left sgACC. CERQ catastrophizing score was significantly negatively correlated with nodal global efficiency of left sgACC and with the FCs between the left sgACC and other 13 seed nodes. Catastrophizing could reflect the specific sgACC-centered dysfunction of brain network global efficiency of SSD. The left sgACC may be a future treatment target of dealing with catastrophizing, which is a core cognitive distortion of SSD.

UNASSIGNED: Catastrophizing is commonly co-occurrence with anxiety in somatic symptom disorder (SSD). However, the quantitative relationship between catastrophizing and anxiety in SSD and its underlying neuropsychopathology remains unclear.
UNASSIGNED: To address the issue, twenty-eight SSD patients and twenty-nine healthy controls (HCs) completed the Hamilton anxiety scale and the catastrophizing subscale of the cognitive emotion regulation questionnaire. Then they underwent structural magnetic resonance imaging and voxel-based morphometry analysis was performed to obtain gray matter density (GMD) of the dorsomedial prefrontal cortex (dmPFC).
UNASSIGNED: Independent samples t-tests showed no significance between SSD patients and HCs in the scores on the catastrophizing subscale and GMD of the dmPFC. However, correlation analysis found that catastrophizing was significantly positively associated with anxiety in SSD. Further, mediation analyses revealed that GMD of the dmPFC (bilateral medial Brodmann area 8) mediated the relationship between catastrophizing and anxiety in SSD.
UNASSIGNED: These findings support Kirmayer\'s disease model of SSD that catastrophic interpretations of somatic symptoms resulted in increased anxiety and demonstrate that the dmPFC may be a potential neural site linking catastrophizing and anxiety in SSD.

UNASSIGNED: Chronic prostatitis/chronic pelvic pain syndrome (CP/CPPS) is a chronic disease with a variety of psychosocial and somatic symptoms. CP/CPPS has substantial health care costs with unclear etiology, which may be caused by psychosocial factors. Moreover, previous studies suggested that cognitive processes played a crucial role in the perception of somatic pain. Therefore, the aim of this meta-analysis was to analyze the psychosocial characteristics in men with CP/CPPS, especially the symptom of pain catastrophizing.
UNASSIGNED: Relevant publications were searched in different databases including PubMed, MEDLINE, EMBASE, Google Scholar and the Cochran Library using the search terms of \"Chronic prostatitis\", \"Chronic pelvic pain syndrome\", \"Psychosocial\" and \"Catastrophizing\". The prevalence of psychological factors and pain catastrophizing in men with CP/CPPS were extracted and calculated.
UNASSIGNED: Ten studies inclusive of 1,308 patients were included. Analysis of NIH-CPSI scores showed that the severity of CP/CPPS was 23.20 (95% CI: 21.13-25.28). The severity of pain catastrophizing was 13.81 (95% CI: 9.83-17.79) estimated by coping strategies questionnaire (CSQ), while the severity of pain catastrophizing was 24.83 (95% CI: 9.19-40.47) estimated by pain catastrophizing scale (PCS). The prevalence of psychosocial symptom was 0.43 (95% CI: 0.32-0.55), while the prevalence of pain catastrophizing was 0.26 (95% CI: 0.21-0.31).
UNASSIGNED: The psychological factors and pain catastrophizing in men with CP/CPPS was serious. Furthermore, the prevalence of psychosocial symptom and pain catastrophizing was high. There might be a link between pain catastrophizing and somatic symptoms in CPPS. Thus, further prospective studies are needed to evaluate the importance of psychosocial factors in symptom severity of CP/CPPS.

To evaluate the effects of a cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) program on kinesiophobia, knee function, pain and pain catastrophizing in patients following total knee arthroplasty (TKA).
This was a parallel-group, randomized, controlled pilot study in which 100 patients who exhibited kinesiophobia after TKA were randomly assigned to participate in a CBT (experimental group) or standard care (control group) program. Each group included 50 patients. Before intervention (preintervention), 4 weeks after intervention (postintervention), and 6 months after the end of intervention (follow-up), patients were assessed via the Tampa Scale for Kinesiophobia, the Pain Catastrophizing Scale, a numerical rating scale, and the Hospital for Special Surgery knee rating scale. Repeated-measures analysis of variance was used to test the significance of each outcome measure.
The CBT program had significant group (P < .001), time (P < .001), and group-by-time interaction (P < .001) effects on kinesiophobia, pain catastrophizing, and knee function, and these effects lasted for at least 6 months after the end of the intervention. Pain was reduced in both groups after the intervention, but there were significant time and group effects (P = .003) in favor of the experimental group.
The CBT program was superior to standard care in reducing kinesiophobia, pain catastrophizing, and knee pain and in enhancing knee function in patients who have a high level of kinesiophobia following TKA. The treatment effect was clinically significant and lasted for at least 6 months after the end of the intervention.

Presurgery emotional distress has had variable associations with outcomes of surgery in past narrative reviews. This meta-analysis was designed to evaluate the overall strengths of relations between presurgical emotional distress and key postsurgical pain outcomes (ie, pain intensity, analgesic use, functional impairment) and to identify moderators that might explain effect size heterogeneity between studies. PubMed, Web of Science, PsychINFO, Google Scholar, and Science Direct databases were searched to identify studies subjected to meta-analysis. Forty-seven studies of 6,207 patients met all 10 inclusion criteria. High presurgery emotional distress levels were associated with significantly more postsurgical pain, analgesic use, and impairment after surgery, with small to medium average effect sizes. Moderator analyses for relations between distress and pain intensity indicated effect sizes were larger in studies that assessed catastrophizing, anxiety, and/or depression than other types of emotional distress as well as those with lower rather than higher quality scores. Associations between presurgery distress and postoperative impairment were moderated by type of surgery. Heterogeneity in these relations was reduced or no longer significant after statistically controlling for moderators. Moderator analyses also supported the role of presurgery emotional distress as a risk factor for, rather than simply a correlate of, elevations in postoperative pain and disability.
This meta-analysis indicates presurgery emotional distress has significant associations with postoperative outcomes but specific methodological factors and sample characteristics contribute to effect size variability in the literature. Considering emotional distress within presurgical assessment protocols may aid in identifying vulnerable patients who can benefit from interventions targeting distress reductions.