BACKGROUND: In the recent years, National Early Warning Score2 (NEWS2) is utilized to predict early on, the worsening of clinical status in patients. To this date the predictive accuracy of National Early Warning Score (NEWS2), Revised Trauma Score (RTS), and Trauma and injury severity score (TRISS) regarding the trauma patients\' mortality rate have not been compared. Therefore, the objective of this study is comparing NEWS2, TRISS, and RTS in predicting mortality rate in trauma patients based on prehospital data set.
METHODS: This cross-sectional retrospective diagnostic study performed on 6905 trauma patients, of which 4191 were found eligible, referred to the largest trauma center in southern Iran, Shiraz, during 2022-2023 based on their prehospital data set in order to compare the prognostic power of NEWS2, RTS, and TRISS in predicting in-hospital mortality rate. Patients are divided into deceased and survived groups. Demographic data, vital signs, and GCS were obtained from the patients and scoring systems were calculated and compared between the two groups. TRISS and ISS are calculated with in-hospital data set; others are based on prehospital data set.
RESULTS: A total of 129 patients have deceased. Age, cause of injury, length of hospital stay, SBP, RR, HR, temperature, SpO2, and GCS were associated with mortality (p-value < 0.001). TRISS and RTS had the highest sensitivity and specificity respectively (77.52, CI 95% [69.3-84.4] and 93.99, CI 95% [93.2-94.7]). TRISS had the highest area under the ROC curve (0.934) followed by NEWS2 (0.879), GCS (0.815), RTS (0.812), and ISS (0.774). TRISS and NEWS were superior to RTS, GCS, and ISS (p-value < 0.0001).
CONCLUSIONS: This novel study compares the accuracy of NEWS2, TRISS, and RTS scoring systems in predicting mortality rate based on prehospital data. The findings suggest that all the scoring systems can predict mortality, with TRISS being the most accurate of them, followed by NEWS2. Considering the time consumption and ease of use, NEWS2 seems to be accurate and quick in predicting mortality based on prehospital data set.

BACKGROUND: Poor communication about serious injury in older adults can lead to treatment that is inconsistent with patient preferences, create conflict and strain healthcare resources. We developed a communication intervention called Best Case/Worst Case-intensive care unit (ICU) that uses daily scenario planning, that is, a narrative description of plausible futures, to support prognostication and facilitate dialogue among patients, their families and the trauma ICU team. This article describes a protocol for a multisite, randomised, stepped-wedge study to test the effectiveness of the intervention on the quality of communication (QOC) in the ICU.
METHODS: We will follow all patients aged 50 and older admitted to the trauma ICU for 3 or more days after a serious injury at eight high-volume level 1 trauma centres. We aim to survey one family or \'like family\' member per eligible patient 5-7 days following their loved ones\' admission and clinicians providing care in the trauma ICU. Using a stepped-wedge design, we will use permuted block randomisation to assign the timing for each site to begin implementation of the intervention and routine use of the Best Case/Worst Case-ICU tool. We will use a linear mixed-effects model to test the effect of the tool on family-reported QOC (using the QOC scale) as compared with usual care. Secondary outcomes include the effect of the tool on reducing clinician moral distress (using the Measure of Moral Distress for Healthcare Professionals scale) and patients\' length of stay in the ICU.
BACKGROUND: Institutional review board (IRB) approval was granted at the University of Wisconsin, and all study sites ceded review to the primary IRB. We plan to report results in peer-reviewed publications and national meetings.
BACKGROUND: NCT05780918.

BACKGROUND: Orthopedic injuries are serious and continue to be a concern for healthcare systems worldwide. Approximately 90% of the estimated traumatic injuries occur in low- and middle-income countries. In Kenya, there is a dearth of information on orthopedic injury patterns that could be used to prioritize injury prevention measures and to help hospital management teams allocate resources appropriately. The purpose of this study was to determine the epidemiology of orthopedic injuries admitted to Kenyatta National Hospital.
METHODS: This was a retrospective cross-sectional study. Overall, 720 charts were reviewed. Data were analyzed using frequency distribution, pearson chi-square test and logistic regression.
RESULTS: Overall, 85% were aged 15-64 years. Approximately 80% were male, married or single. Patients with primary or secondary education composed 72%. Road traffic accidents (59.4%) and falls (24.7%) were the most common mechanisms of injury. A total of 99.9% of the inpatients were Kenyans. Open injuries were 40.1%. Lower limb (67.4%) and upper limb (26.9%) injuries were the most common. Inpatients aged 15-24 years were 74% less likely to have upper limb injuries than those aged 0-14 years (p = 0.023). However, those aged 15-24 years were 19.250 times more likely to have spine injuries than those aged 0-14 years (p = 0.008). Males were 68.6% and 51.2% less likely to have pelvic injury and comorbidities, respectively, than females (p < 0.001). Patients with secondary and tertiary education were 2.016 (p = 0.003) and 2.3 (p < 0.001) times more likely to have upper limb injuries, respectively, than those with no or preschool education. Similarly, those with tertiary education were 2.079 times more likely to have comorbidities than those with no or preschool education (p = 0.017).
CONCLUSIONS: Most of the inpatients with orthopedic injuries were young, male involved in Road traffic accidents and therefore Kenya National Transport and Safety Authority needs to enforce road safety measures to reduce road carnage. Those with higher education and children were more likely to have upper limb injuries. Females were more likely to have pelvic injuries and co-morbidities. Lower and upper limb injuries were the most common injuries and this should guide resource allocation in management of orthopedic injuries.

BACKGROUND: Trauma poses a significant global health challenge. Despite advancements in the management of severely injured patients, (poly)trauma continues to be a primary contributor to morbidity and mortality worldwide. In the context of trauma resuscitation, supplemental oxygen is commonly administered generously as suggested by guidelines. Yet, it remains uncertain whether the trauma population might derive advantages from a more conservative approach to supplemental oxygen.
METHODS: In this retrospective cohort study from two Swiss trauma centers, severely injured adult (> 16 years) trauma patients with an Injury Severity Score (ISS) ≥ 16 were divided into four groups according to the first blood gas analysis taken: hypoxaemia (PaO2 < 10.7 kPa/80 mmHg), normoxaemia (PaO2 10.7-16.0 kPa/80-120 mmHg), which served as reference, moderate hyperoxaemia (PaO2 > 16.0-40 kPa/120-300 mmHg) and severe hyperoxaemia (PaO2 > 40 kPa/300 mmHg). The primary outcome was 28-day mortality. Length of hospital stay (LOS) and length of intensive care unit stay (LOS-ICU) were analyzed as secondary outcomes.
RESULTS: Of 1,189 trauma patients, 41.3% had hyperoxaemia (18.8% with severe hyperoxaemia) and 19.3% had hypoxaemia. No difference was found for 28-day mortality (hypoxaemia: 15.7%, normoxaemia: 14.1%, hyperoxaemia: 13.8%, severe hyperoxaemia: 16.0%, p = 0.846). Patients with severe hyperoxaemia had a significant prolonged LOS (median 12.5 [IQR 7-18.5] days vs. 10 [7-17], p = 0.040) and extended LOS-ICU (3.8 [1.8-9] vs. 2 [1-5] days, p = 0.149) compared to normoxaemic patients. In multivariable analysis, oxygen group was not associated with the primary outcome 28-day mortality or LOS-ICU. Severe hyperoxaemia patients had a tendency towards longer hospital stay (adjusted coefficient 2.23 days [95% CI: - 0.32; 4.79], p = 0.087).
CONCLUSIONS: Hyperoxaemia was not associated with an increased 28-day mortality when compared to normoxaemia. However, both moderate and severe hyperoxaemia is frequently observed in trauma patients, and the presence of severe hyperoxaemia showed a tendency with extended hospital stay compared to normoxaemia patients. Robust randomized controlled trials are imperative to thoroughly evaluate the potential correlation between hyperoxaemia and outcomes in trauma patients . Trial Registration Retrospectively registered.

Geriatric emergency management (GEM) nursing has emerged as a critical response to the increasing number of emergency department (ED) visits by older people, particularly in North America and specifically in Canada. This demographic often presents with complex medical conditions and atypical disease manifestations. The GEM programme, implemented in Ontario, Canada, aims to provide targeted assessment and establish community connections for frail older individuals, helping prevent their decline and loss of independence. There is a significant demand for specialised wound care services in EDs and frontline ED staff have a limited capacity to provide these. Advanced wound management was integrated into the GEM nursing scope of practice in an initiative. Patients who received wound care from GEM nurses and clinical nurse specialists had positive outcomes; those treated by GEM nurses had shorter wait times. Although the wound care role requires additional training and adds to the GEM nurse workload, the advantages appear substantial. Merging geriatric-focused care with specialist wound management may significantly benefit the care and satisfaction of older people attending the ED, as well as improve patient flow in the ED. This initiative requires further consideration by healthcare leaders and policymakers.

UNASSIGNED: Managing the gap between the dressing and the wound bed can facilitate the healing of exuding wounds. A silicone foam dressing (Biatain Silicone; Coloplast A/S, Denmark) was developed for application to exuding wounds. A sub-analysis of the real-world, prospective, observational VIPES (Observatoire en Ville des Plaies ExSudatives) study was conducted to investigate the use and performance of the silicone foam dressing in a community nursing setting in France.
UNASSIGNED: The sub-analysis included patients from the VIPES study who received the silicone foam dressing as a primary dressing for an acute or hard-to-heal (chronic) wound. Epidemiological and wound healing outcomes were reported via a smartphone application.
UNASSIGNED: Overall, 64 patients were included in the sub-analysis. At baseline, most wounds (n=33/40; 82.5%) were in treatment failure (i.e., were stagnant, non-healing or had poor exudate management). At the last follow-up visit, a median of 22.5 (range: 3-151) days post baseline, 48.4% of wounds had healed and 25.0% were progressing towards healing. From baseline to the last follow-up visit, significant reductions in exudate level (p<0.0001) and exudate pooling (p<0.0001), and significant improvements in wound edges (p≤0.0001) and periwound skin (p<0.01) were observed. A total of 62.3% of patients had re-epithelialising wounds at the last follow-up visit. The majority of nurses (88.3%) and patients (85.0%) reported that the wound had improved and, at most dressing removals (93.5%), nurses reported that the dressing conformed closely to the wound bed.
UNASSIGNED: Overall, the data suggest that use of the silicone foam dressing in community practice supported the healing of wounds, illustrating the importance of exudate and gap management.

Due to new legal requirements, a patient-relevant benefit for other wound treatment products (sPW) must be demonstrated through clinical studies if reimbursement at the expense of the statutory health insurance is sought in the non-inpatient sector.
An interdisciplinary group with expertise in clinical wound care has developed general recommendations for the design of suitable studies. In addition to regulatory documents, previous studies that have already been recognized as proof of benefit in other areas served as a basis.
Randomized controlled trials that cover at least the most common types of chronic wounds (arterial, venous, diabetic or pressure sore) are recommended as the best method for gathering evidence. Despite the heterogeneous etiology of chronic wounds, the results should also be transferable to other wound types. The test intervention does not usually consist of the sPW alone, but of a combined wound treatment that follows a treatment plan that is as clearly defined as possible. In the comparison group, all wound treatment options (besides the sPW) must also be available and used according to a similar predefined treatment plan. Depending on the intended purpose and treatment goal, complete wound closure should, if possible, be recorded as the cardinal - although not always as the primary - endpoint. In justified cases, e.g. in the case of intermediate use as part of phase-appropriate wound therapy for chronic wounds, a significant reduction in the wound area can also be considered for benefit assessment. Quality of life (e.g. pain) can also justify a benefit and can therefore be recorded as a primary outcome parameter in clinical trials. The duration of the clinical trial should be adapted to the central endpoints, the medical or nursing goal of wound care and the intended purpose of the sPW. A benefit does not always arise from microbiological, physiological, laboratory or histological parameters or imaging findings.
Hintergrund: Aufgrund neuer gesetzlicher Vorgaben muss für sonstige Produkte zur Wundbehandlung (sPW) ein patientenrelevanter Nutzen durch klinische Studien nachgewiesen werden, wenn die Erstattung zulasten der Gesetzlichen Krankenversicherung (GKV) im nicht stationären Bereich angestrebt wird.
Eine interdisziplinäre Gruppe mit Expertise in der klinischen Wundbehandlung hat allgemeine Empfehlungen zur Konzeption geeigneter Studien erarbeitet. Als Basis dienten neben regulatorischen Dokumenten frühere Studien, die als Nutzennachweis in anderen Bereichen bereits Anerkennung fanden.Ergebnisse: Zu empfehlen sind als beste Methode zur Evidenzgewinnung randomisierte kontrollierte Studien, die sich mindestens auf die häufigsten Wundtypen chronischer Wunden (arteriell, venös, diabetisch oder Druckgeschwüre) beziehen. Die Ergebnisse sollten trotz der heterogenen Ätiologie chronischer Wunden auch auf andere Wundtypen übertragbar sein. Die Prüfintervention besteht in der Regel nicht aus dem sPW allein, sondern aus einer kombinierten Wundbehandlung, die einem möglichst klar vorgegebenen Therapieschema folgt. In der Vergleichsgruppe müssen (außer dem sPW) ebenfalls alle Optionen der Wundbehandlung verfügbar sein und einem gleichartigen vordefinierten Therapieschema gemäß zum Einsatz kommen. In Abhängigkeit von Zweckbestimmung und Therapieziel sollte nach Möglichkeit der vollständige Wundverschluss als kardinaler - wenn auch nicht immer als primärer - Endpunkt erhoben werden. In begründeten Fällen, z.B. bei intermediärer Anwendung im Rahmen der phasengerechten Wundtherapie chronischer Wunden, kann auch eine signifikante Reduktion der Wundfläche zur Nutzenbewertung betrachtet werden. Auch die Lebensqualität (z.B. Schmerz) kann einen Nutzen begründen und daher als primärer Zielparameter in klinischen Prüfungen erhoben werden. Die Dauer der klinischen Prüfung sollte an die zentralen Endpunkte, das medizinische oder pflegerische Ziel der Wundversorgung sowie die Zweckbestimmung des sPW angepasst sein. Nicht regelhaft ergibt sich ein Nutzen aus mikrobiologischen, physiologischen, laborchemischen oder histologischen Parametern sowie Bildbefunden.Schlüsselwörter: Sonstiges Produkt zur Wundbehandlung, therapeutischer Nutzen, Nutzenbewertung, VerbandmittelEingereicht am 6. Mai 2024 - Revision akzeptiert am 25. Juni 2024.

For assessing health-related quality of life in patients with chronic wounds, the Wound-QoL questionnaire has been developed. Two different versions exist: the Wound-QoL-17 and the Wound-QoL-14. For international and cross-cultural comparisons, it is necessary to demonstrate psychometric properties in an international study. Therefore, the aim of this study was to test both questionnaires in a European sample, using item response theory (IRT). Participants were recruited in eight European countries. Item characteristic curves (ICC), item information curves (IIC) and differential item functioning (DIF) were calculated. In both questionnaires, ICCs for most items were well-ordered and sufficiently distinct. For items, in which adjacent response categories were not sufficiently distinct, response options were merged. IICs showed that items on sleep and on pain, on worries as well as on day-to-day and leisure activities had considerably high informational value. In the Wound-QoL-14, the item on social activities showed DIFs regarding the country and age. The same applied for the Wound-QoL-17, in which also the item on stairs showed DIFs regarding age. Our study showed comparable results across both versions of the Wound-QoL. We established a new scoring method, which could be applied in international research projects. For clinical practice, the original scoring can be maintained.

BACKGROUND: Intentional physical self-injury (IPSI) is a pressing health challenge and there is little awareness of injury patterns, management and outcomes. This study examines IPSI\'s epidemiological and clinical aspects in one major Auckland hospital, highlighting demography, injury patterns and implications for clinical practice and prevention.
METHODS: Using Auckland City Hospital Trauma Registry data, a retrospective, descriptive study was conducted covering adult patients admitted from January 2015 to December 2019. It assessed demographic characteristics, injury patterns and outcomes, using Mann-Whitney U tests, Fisher\'s exact tests and Chi-squared tests.
RESULTS: Among 137 IPSI admissions, 92 (67%) required surgery, and 24% experienced post-operative complications. Major trauma was identified in 39 (28.5%) admissions. Discharge destinations varied, with only 64 (47%) patients returning home unassisted. Injury severity did not significantly vary across sex, age or injury event location. Major injuries often resulted from falls (19 of 39) and minor injuries from lacerations/stabs (73 of 98).
CONCLUSIONS: IPSI represents a significant challenge to Auckland health services, with a notable burden of care. The study highlights the need for targeted interventions to reduce the incidence of IPSI and improve outcomes. It underscores the importance of multidisciplinary approaches to care, integrating surgical, mental health and rehabilitative services.

UNASSIGNED: Suicidal Ideation (SI) is a risk factor for suicide, a leading cause of death amongst young men globally. In this study we assess whether sustaining a serious physical combat injury is associated with SI and whether leaving service mediates this association.
UNASSIGNED: We analysed data from male UK Armed Forces personnel who sustained a combat injury in Afghanistan and a frequency-matched comparison group who did not sustain such an injury (the ADVANCE cohort). SI was measured from the Patient Health Questionnaire-9 item \'thoughts that you would be better off dead or of hurting yourself in some way\'.
UNASSIGNED: Approximately, 11.9% (n = 61) of the uninjured group, 15.3% (n = 83) of the overall injured group, 8.5% (n = 13) of an Amputation injury (AI) subgroup and 17.6% (n = 70) of a Non-Amputation Injury (NAI) subgroup reported SI in the past 2 weeks. The NAI subgroup reported greater likelihood of SI (Relative Risk Ratio (RR) = 1.44, 95% confidence interval (CI) [1.04, 2.00]) compared to the comparison group, whereas the overall injured group (RR = 1.23, 95% CI [0.90, 1.68]) and AI subgroup (RR = 0.65, 95% CI [0.36, 1.18]) did not. Leaving service fully mediated the association between sustaining a NAI and SI (natural direct effect RR = 1.08, 95% CI [0.69, 1.69]).
UNASSIGNED: UK military personnel with NAI reported significantly higher rates of SI compared to demographically similar uninjured personnel, while those who sustained AIs reported no significant difference. Leaving service was associated with greater rates of SI for both injured and uninjured personnel and fully mediated the association between sustaining a NAI and SI.