A short course of corticosteroids is among the management strategies considered by specialists for the treatment of vestibular neuritis (VN). We conducted an umbrella review (systematic review of systematic reviews) to summarize the evidence of corticosteroids use for the treatment of VN.
We included systematic reviews of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and observational studies that evaluated the effects of corticosteroids compared to placebo or usual care in adult patients with acute VN. Titles, abstracts, and full texts were screened in duplicate. The quality of reviews was assessed with the A MeaSurement Tool to Assess systematic Reviews (AMSTAR-2) tool. The Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) assessment was used to rate certainty of evidence. No meta-analysis was performed.
From 149 titles, five systematic reviews were selected for quality assessment, and two reviews were of higher methodological quality and were included. These two reviews included 12 individual studies and 660 patients with VN. In a meta-analysis of two RCTs including a total of 50 patients, the use of corticosteroids (compared to placebo) was associated with higher complete caloric recovery (risk ratio 2.81, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.32 to 6.00, low certainty). It is very uncertain whether this translates into clinical improvement as shown by the imprecise effect estimates for outcomes such as patient-reported vertigo or patient-reported dizziness disability. There was a wide CI for the outcome of dizziness handicap score (one study, 30 patients, 20.9 points in corticosteroids group vs. 15.8 points in placebo, mean difference +5.1, 95% CI -8.09 to +18.29, very low certainty). Higher rates of minor adverse effects for those receiving corticosteroids were reported, but the certainty in this evidence was very low.
There is limited evidence to support the use of corticosteroids for the treatment of VN in the emergency department.

OBJECTIVE: To compare the prevalence of cardiovascular risk factors (CVRF) in patients with superior vestibular neuritis (SVN) versus the general French population, and to examine the possibility of vascular etiology in acute superior vestibular deficit.
METHODS: A single-center retrospective study compared the prevalence of hypercholesterolemia, hypertension, diabetes, smoking, cardiovascular disease and atrial fibrillation between patients with SVN and the French general population. Inclusion criteria comprised: rotatory vertigo lasting several days, without hearing impairment or neurological signs, with anterior and lateral semicircular canal involvement on video-Head-Impulse-Test (vHIT). A senior radiologist analyzed superior vestibular nerve and inner ear structure enhancement on cerebellopontine MRI.
RESULTS: One hundred and eighteen cases of SVN were included from May 2016 to February 2020. Statistical analyses concerned 106 cases. The SVN population had significantly less hypercholesterolemia (RR=0.40) than the general French population. There was no significant difference concerning other CVRFs. Superior vestibular nerve enhancement was observed on 84% of MRIs.
CONCLUSIONS: Prevalence of CVRF was not higher in patients with SVN than in the general population. The present study highlighted involvement of the superior vestibular nerve more than of the anterior vestibular artery in SVN.

The virtual practice has made major advances in the way that we care for patients in the modern era. The culture of virtual practice, consulting, and telemedicine, which had started several years ago, took an accelerated leap as humankind was challenged by the novel coronavirus pandemic (COVID19). The social distancing measures and lockdowns imposed in many countries left medical care providers with limited options in evaluating ambulatory patients, pushing the rapid transition to assessments via virtual platforms. In this novel arena of medical practice, which may form new norms beyond the current pandemic crisis, we found it critical to define guidelines on the recommended practice in neurotology, including remote methods in examining the vestibular and eye movement function. The proposed remote examination methods aim to reliably diagnose acute and subacute diseases of the inner-ear, brainstem, and the cerebellum. A key aim was to triage patients into those requiring urgent emergency room assessment versus non-urgent but expedited outpatient management. Physicians who had expertise in managing patients with vestibular disorders were invited to participate in the taskforce. The focus was on two topics: (1) an adequate eye movement and vestibular examination strategy using virtual platforms and (2) a decision pathway providing guidance about which patient should seek urgent medical care and which patient should have non-urgent but expedited outpatient management.