OBJECTIVE: The aim was to predict the effectiveness of using frailty, defined by the frailty index (FI), for predicting recurrent pneumonia and death in patients over 50 years and older with vascular cognitive impairment (VCI) during long-term hospitalization.
METHODS: This retrospective cohort study was conducted at a teaching hospital in western China and included VCI patients aged ≥50 years undergoing long-term hospitalization. The relevant data were collected from the electronic medical record system. The FI was based on 31 parameters and groups were defined using a cutoff value (0.2) as robust (FI < 0.2) and FRAIL (≥0.2). The definition of recurrent pneumonia was a minimum of two episodes within a year, with the symptoms, signs, and imaging results of pneumonia disappearing completely between episodes, and a minimum interval between episodes of seven days. Death was recorded by the hospital as the result of cardiac and respiratory arrest and survival was defined as the interval between hospital admission and confirmed death. Logistic regression models were used to assess the association between FI and recurrent pneumonia, while associations between FI and death were assessed by Cox proportional hazards models.
RESULTS: A total of 252 long-term hospitalized VCI patients ≥50 years old were enrolled, of whom 115 were male (45.6 %). Ninety-seven patients (38.5 %) were defined as FRAIL. The median length of stay for hospitalized patients was 37 months. Overall, 215 patients developed pneumonia during hospitalization, which occurred an average of 14.5 months after admission, while 151 (59.9 %) had recurrent pneumonia, and 155 (61.5 %) died. Of these, 143 died in the hospital and 12 died after discharge. No significant differences were seen in the incidence of recurrent pneumonia between FRAIL and robust long-term hospitalized VCI patients (FRAIL vs. robust: 66.0 % vs. 56.1 %, P = 0.121) while FRAIL patients had a higher mortality rate than robust patients (FRAIL vs. robust: 71.1 % vs. 55.5 %, P = 0.013). After further Cox regression analysis and adjustment for possible confounders found to be significant in the univariate analysis (including age, sex, smoking history, and activities of daily living (ADL) score), FRAIL patients had a higher risk of death than healthy patients (HR = 1.595, 95 % CI: 1.149-2.213). In addition, based on Model 2, confounding variables that were not statistically significant in the univariate analysis but may have had an impact on the results (including marital status, educational level, drinking history, comorbidity and rehabilitation treatment) were incorporated into Model 3 for further correction. The result remained unchanged, namely, that compared with robust patients, FRAIL patients had a higher risk of death (HR = 1.771, 95 % CI: 1.228-2.554).
CONCLUSIONS: Frailty defined by the FI was effective for predicting the risk of mortality but not that of recurrent pneumonia in long-term hospitalized VCI patients aged 50 or older.

UNASSIGNED: Post-diagnostic care for people with vascular cognitive impairment (VCI) typically involves multiple professions and disjointed care pathways not specifically designed to aid VCI needs.
UNASSIGNED: Exploring perspectives of healthcare professionals on post-diagnostic care for people with VCI.
UNASSIGNED: We conducted a qualitative focus group study. We used purposive sampling to include healthcare professionals in different compositions of primary and secondary care professionals per focus group. Thematic saturation was reached after seven focus groups. Transcripts were iteratively coded and analyzed using inductive thematic analysis.
UNASSIGNED: Forty participants were included in seven focus groups (4-8 participants). Results showed knowledge and awareness of VCI as prerequisites for adequate post-diagnostic care, and for pre-diagnostic detection of people with VCI (theme 1). In light of perceived lack of differentiation between cognitive disorders, participants shared specific advice regarding post-diagnostic care for people with VCI and informal caregivers (theme 2). Participants thought current care for VCI was fragmented and recommended further integration of care and collaboration across settings (theme 3).
UNASSIGNED: People with VCI and their caregivers risk getting stuck in a \"no man\'s land\" between post-diagnostic care pathways; challenges lie in acknowledgement of VCI and associated symptoms, and alignment between healthcare professionals. Education about the symptoms and consequences of VCI, to healthcare professionals, people with VCI and caregivers, may increase awareness of VCI and thereby better target care. Specific attention for symptoms common in VCI could further tailor care and reduce caregiver burden. Integration could be enhanced by combining expertise of dementia and stroke/rehabilitation pathways.

UNASSIGNED: The Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) is a valuable tool for detecting cognitive impairment, widely used in many countries. However, there is still a lack of large sample normative data and whose cut-off values for detecting cognitive impairment is considerable controversy.
UNASSIGNED: The assessment conducted in this study utilizes the MoCA scale, specifically employing the Mandarin-8.1 version. This study recruited a total of 3,097 healthy adults aged over 20 years. We performed multiple linear regression analysis, incorporating age, gender, and education level as predictor variables, to examine their associations with the MoCA total score and subdomain scores. Subsequently, we established normative values stratified by age and education level. Finally, we included 242 patients with vascular cognitive impairment (VCI) and 137 controls with normal cognition, and determined the optimal cut-off value of VCI through ROC curves.
UNASSIGNED: The participants in this study exhibit a balanced gender distribution, with an average age of 54.46 years (SD = 14.38) and an average education period of 9.49 years (SD = 4.61). The study population demonstrates an average MoCA score of 23.25 points (SD = 4.82). The multiple linear regression analysis indicates that MoCA total score is influenced by age and education level, collectively accounting for 46.8% of the total variance. Higher age and lower education level are correlated with lower MoCA total scores. A score of 22 is the optimal cut-off value for diagnosing vascular cognitive impairment (VCI).
UNASSIGNED: This study offered normative MoCA values specific to the Chinese adults. Furthermore, this study indicated that a score of 26 may not represent the most optimal cut-off value for VCI. And for detecting VCI, a score of 22 may be a better cut-off value.

The aging population in Europe faces a substantial burden from dementia, with vascular cognitive impairment and dementia (VCID) being a preventable cause. Atrial fibrillation (AF), a common cardiac arrhythmia, increases the risk of VCID through mechanisms such as thromboembolism, cerebral hypoperfusion, and inflammation. This review explores the epidemiology, pathophysiology, and preventive strategies for AF-related VCID. Epidemiological data indicate that AF prevalence rises with age, affecting up to 12% of individuals over 80. Neuroimaging studies reveal chronic brain changes in AF patients, including strokes, lacunar strokes, white matter hyperintensities (WMHs), and cerebral microbleeds (CMHs), while cognitive assessments show impairments in memory, executive function, and attention. The COVID-19 pandemic has exacerbated the underdiagnosis of AF, leading to an increase in undiagnosed strokes and cognitive impairment. Many elderly individuals did not seek medical care due to fear of exposure, resulting in delayed diagnoses. Additionally, reduced family supervision during the pandemic contributed to missed opportunities for early detection of AF and related complications. Emerging evidence suggests that long COVID may also elevate the risk of AF, further complicating the management of this condition. This review underscores the importance of early detection and comprehensive management of AF to mitigate cognitive decline. Preventive measures, including public awareness campaigns, patient education, and the use of smart devices for early detection, are crucial. Anticoagulation therapy, rate and rhythm control, and addressing comorbid conditions are essential therapeutic strategies. Recognizing and addressing the cardiovascular and cognitive impacts of AF, especially in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic, is essential for advancing public health.

Neurocognitive dysfunction is common in heart failure (HF), with 30% to 80% of patients experiencing some degree of deficits in one or more cognitive domains, including memory, attention, learning ability, executive function, and psychomotor speed. Although the mechanism is not fully understood, reduced cardiac output, comorbidities, chronic cerebral hypoperfusion, and cardioembolic brain injury leading to cerebral hypoxia and brain damage seem to trigger the neurocognitive dysfunction in HF. Cognitive impairment is independently associated with worse outcomes including mortality, rehospitalization, and reduced quality of life. Patients with poorer cognitive function are at an increased risk of severe disease as they tend to have greater difficulty complying with treatment requirements. Coronary revascularization in patients with ischemic HF has the potential to improve cardiovascular outcomes but risks worsening neurocognitive dysfunction even further. Revascularization by coronary artery bypass grafting carries inherent risks for delirium, cognitive impairment, neurologic injury, and stroke, which are known to exacerbate the risk of neurocognitive dysfunction. Alternatively, percutaneous coronary intervention, as a less-invasive approach, has the potential to minimize the risk of cognitive impairment but has not yet been evaluated as an alternative to coronary artery bypass grafting in patients with ischemic HF. Therefore, it is paramount to raise awareness of the neurocognitive consequences in ischemic HF and devise strategies for recognition and prevention as an important target of patient management and personalized decision making that contributes to patient outcomes.

BACKGROUND: Vascular mild cognitive impairment (VMCI) is a transitional condition that may evolve into Vascular Dementia(VaD). Hippocampal volume (HV) is suggested as an early marker for VaD, the role of white matter lesions (WMLs) in neurodegeneration remains debated.
OBJECTIVE: Evaluate HV and WMLs as predictive markers of VaD in VMCI patients by assessing: (i)baseline differences in HV and WMLs between converters to VaD and non-converters, (ii) predictive power of HV and WMLs for VaD, (iii) associations between HV, WMLs, and cognitive decline, (iv)the role of WMLs on HV.
METHODS: This longitudinal multicenter study included 110 VMCI subjects (mean age:74.33 ± 6.63 years, 60males/50females) from the VMCI-Tuscany Study database. Subjects underwent brain MRI and cognitive testing, with 2-year follow-up data on VaD progression. HV and WMLs were semi-automatically segmented and measured. ANCOVA assessed group differences, while linear and logistic regression models evaluated predictive power.
RESULTS: After 2 years, 32/110 VMCI patients progressed to VaD. Converting patients had lower HV(p = 0.015) and higher lesion volumes in the posterior thalamic radiation (p = 0.046), splenium of the corpus callosum (p = 0.016), cingulate gyrus (p = 0.041), and cingulum hippocampus(p = 0.038). HV alone did not fully explain progression (p = 0.059), but combined with WMLs volume, the model was significant (p = 0.035). The best prediction model (p = 0.001) included total HV (p = 0.004) and total WMLs volume of the posterior thalamic radiation (p = 0.005) and cingulate gyrus (p = 0.005), achieving 80% precision, 81% specificity, and 74% sensitivity. Lower HV were linked to poorer performance on the Rey Auditory-Verbal Learning Test delayed recall (RAVLT) and Mini Mental State Examination (MMSE).
CONCLUSIONS: HV and WMLs are significant predictors of progression from VMCI to VaD. Lower HV correlate with worse cognitive performance on RAVLT and MMSE tests.

UNASSIGNED: Effect of stenosis of vertebrobasilar artery (VBA) on cognitive function is elusive.
UNASSIGNED: To investigate association of cerebral hypoperfusion and poor collaterals with vascular cognitive impairment (VCI) in severe VBA stenosis patients.
UNASSIGNED: We consecutively enrolled patients with severe VBA stenosis confirmed by digital subtraction angiography who underwent computed tomographic perfusion (CTP) and cognitive assessments. Patients were divided into poor or good collaterals groups according to the collateral circulation status, and were grouped into different perfusion groups according to CTP. Cognitive function was measured by Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA), Clock Drawing Test, Stroop Color Word Test, Trail Making Test, Digital Span Test, Auditory Verbal Learning Test, and Boston Naming Test scales. The association of cerebral perfusion and collaterals with VCI were explored.
UNASSIGNED: Among 88 eligible patients, VCI occurred in 51 (57.9%) patients experienced. Poor collateral was present in 73 (83.0%) patients, and hypoperfusion in 64 (72.7%). Compared with normal perfusion patients, the odds ratio with 95% confidence interval for VCI was 12.5 (3.7-42.4) for overall hypoperfusion, 31.0 (7.1-135.5) for multiple site hypoperfusion, 3.3 (1.0-10.5) for poor collaterals, and 0.1 (0-0.6) for presence of posterior communicating artery (PcoA) compensated for posterior cerebral artery (PCA) and basilar artery (BA). Additionally, decreased scores of cognitive function tests occurred in patients with decompensated perfusion or poor collaterals.
UNASSIGNED: Hypoperfusion and poor collaterals were positively associated with cognitive impairment in patients with severe VBA. However, PcoA compensated for the PCA and BA had a protective role in cognitive impairment development.

White matter hyperintensity (WMH) shape is associated with long-term dementia risk in community-dwelling older adults, however, the underlying structural correlates of this association are unknown. We therefore aimed to investigate the association between baseline WMH shape and cerebrovascular disease progression over time in community-dwelling older adults. The association of WMH shape and cerebrovascular disease markers was investigated using linear and logistic regression models in the Age, Gene/Environment Susceptibility-Reykjavik (AGES) study (n = 2297; average time to follow-up: 5.2 years). A more irregular shape of periventricular/confluent WMH at baseline was associated with a larger increase in WMH volume, and with occurrence of new subcortical infarcts, new microbleeds, new enlarged perivascular spaces, and new cerebellar infarcts at the 5.2-year follow-up (all p < 0.05). Furthermore, less elongated and more irregularly shaped deep WMHs were associated with a larger increase in WMH volume, and new cortical infarcts at follow-up (p < 0.05). A less elongated shape of deep WMH was associated with new microbleeds at follow-up (p < 0.05). Our findings show that WMH shape may be indicative of the type of cerebrovascular disease marker progression. This underlines the significance of WMH shape to aid in the assessment of cerebrovascular disease progression.

UNASSIGNED: Post-stroke cognitive impairment (PSCI) represents a serious post-stroke complication with poor cognitive consequences. A vascular consequence after a stroke is that the occurrence and progression of PSCI may be closely related to blood pressure (BP). Thus, we systematically reviewed and performed a meta-analysis of the literature to examine the correlations between BP and PSCI.
UNASSIGNED: We systematically queried databases, including PubMed, the Cochrane Library, Embase, and Scopus, and conducted meta-analyses on studies reporting odds ratios (ORs) related to the association between BP and PSCI. Two authors autonomously assessed all titles, abstracts, and full texts and extracted data following the Meta-Analysis of Observational Studies in Epidemiology guidelines. The quality of the studies was evaluated using the modified Newcastle-Ottawa scale.
UNASSIGNED: Meta-analyses incorporated 12 articles comprising a cumulative participant cohort of 21,732 individuals. The quality assessment indicated good in five studies, fair in one study, and poor in six. Through meta-analyses, we found that hypertension, systolic or diastolic BP (SBP or DBP) was significantly associated with PSCI (OR 1.53, 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.18-1.99; p = 0.001, I 2 = 66%; OR 1.13, 95% CI, 1.05-1.23; p = 0.002, I 2 = 52%; OR 1.38, 95% CI, 1.11-1.72; p = 0.004, I 2 = 90%, respectively). In the subgroup analysis, SBP < 120 mmHg, 120-139 mmHg, 140-159 mmHg, 160-179 mmHg, and DBP ≥ 100 mmHg highly predicted the occurrence of PSCI (OR 1.15, p = 0.0003; OR 1.26, p = 0.010; OR 1.15, p = 0.05; OR 1.02, p = 0.009; OR 1.96, p < 0.00001, respectively). However, the predictive effect of BP for PSCI declines when SBP ≥ 180 mmHg and DBP ≤ 99 mmHg (p > 0.05). Statistical heterogeneity was moderate to high, and publication bias was detected in SBP for PSCI.
UNASSIGNED: Considering the multifactorial etiology of PSCI, it is difficult to conclude that BP is an independent risk factor for PSCI. Given the restricted inclusion of studies, caution is advised when interpreting the findings from this meta-analysis. Subsequent investigations with substantial sample sizes are essential to exploring BP as a prospective target for addressing PSCI.
UNASSIGNED: CRD42023437783 from PROSPERO.

OBJECTIVE: To conduct a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) to evaluate the efficacy of Prospekta in the treatment of SCI of varying severity.
METHODS: The meta-analysis included the results of RCTs of the efficacy of Prospekta in the treatment of VCI, the severity of which was assessed using the Montreal Cognitive Scale (MoCA). The pooled effect estimate included all publications of double-blind, placebo-controlled RCTs that provided sufficient MoCA efficacy data to support further statistical analysis. The main result of the meta-analysis was obtained for the final values of the efficacy indicator in the groups of patients receiving the drug Prospekta, in comparison with the placebo group.
RESULTS: A meta-analysis of the effectiveness of Prospekta in the treatment of SCI of varying severity was carried out based on data from 3 RCTs and 2 CTs involving 12.701 patients aged 18 years and older. When using the mixed models method, the effect size for the endpoint «change in total MoCA score from baseline to follow-up visit» was 3.4 points for Prospekta (2.7 points for placebo, p<0.0001); for the end point «∆ between changes in the total score on the MoCA scale while taking Prospekta and placebo» - 0.6736 points (p<0.0001).
CONCLUSIONS: A statistically significant improvement in cognitive function according to the MoCA scale was demonstrated in patients with VCI using the drug Prospekta.
UNASSIGNED: Провести метаанализ рандомизированных контролируемых исследований (РКИ) по оценке эффективности препарата Проспекта в терапии сосудистых когнитивных нарушений (СКН) различной степени выраженности.
UNASSIGNED: В метаанализ включены результаты РКИ эффективности препарата Проспекта в терапии СКН, выраженность которых оценивалась по Монреальской шкале оценки когнитивных функций (MoCA). В оценку объединенного эффекта были включены все публикации по результатам РКИ с двойным слепым плацебо-контролем, в которых были представлены данные оценки эффективности по шкале MoCA на уровне, достаточном для проведения дальнейшего статистического анализа. Основной результат метаанализа получен для итоговых значений показателя эффективности в группах пациентов, получавших препарат Проспекта, в сравнении с группой плацебо.
UNASSIGNED: Метаанализ эффективности препарата Проспекта в терапии СКН различной степени выраженности проведен на основе данных 3 РКИ и 2 КИ с участием 12 701 пациента в возрасте от 18 лет и старше. При использовании метода «смешанных моделей» размер эффекта по конечной точке «изменение суммарного балла по шкале MoCA от исходного значения до значения на завершающем визите» составил 3,4 балла для препарата Проспекта (2,7 балла для плацебо, p=0,0039); по конечной точке «∆ между изменениями суммарного балла по шкале MoCA на фоне приема препарата Проспекта и плацебо» — 0,6736 балла (p<0,0001).
UNASSIGNED: Продемонстрировано статистически значимое улучшение когнитивных функций при оценке по шкале MoCA у пациентов с СКН на фоне применения препарата Проспекта.