Mild psoriasis may be burdensome; if symptoms are inadequately controlled, switching therapy may be warranted. In the Phase 3 NAVIGATE trial, patients with moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis received ustekinumab for 16 weeks. Patients with inadequate response (Investigator\'s Global Assessment [IGA] ≥ 2) were randomized to switch to guselkumab or continue ustekinumab. This post-hoc analysis evaluated the patient subgroup with residual mild psoriasis (IGA = 2) after initial ustekinumab therapy. Outcomes assessed included the Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI), Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI), and Psoriasis Symptoms and Signs Diary (PSSD). Initially, 871 patients received ustekinumab. At Week 16, 161 randomized patients had residual mild psoriasis (IGA = 2). Among guselkumab- vs ustekinumab-treated patients at Week 28, 59.0% vs 27.7% achieved PASI 90, and 50.0% vs 21.0% achieved DLQI 0/1. Mean changes from baseline in PSSD score were -44 vs -28 and -50 vs -32, respectively, with thresholds of -40 considered clinically meaningful. Mean changes in PSSD itch score were -4.6 vs -2.9, with reductions ≥ 4.0 considered clinically meaningful. Treatment differences were maintained/increased through Week 52. Among patients with residual mild psoriasis after 16 weeks of ustekinumab, those switching to guselkumab had greater improvements in skin clearance, health-related quality of life, and patient-reported symptoms and signs than those continuing ustekinumab.

UNASSIGNED: The advent of biosimilars may increase the frequency of dose escalation with biologics in psoriasis.
UNASSIGNED: To explore the frequency and outcomes of dose escalation with adalimumab etanercept, and ustekinumab.
UNASSIGNED: Data were extracted from DermaReg-Pso, a psoriasis register in Stockholm, Sweden. The main exposure was treatment, and the main outcome was dose escalation. We describe outcomes with dose escalation by estimating drug survival and changes in the Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI).
UNASSIGNED: 554 patients had 946 treatment episodes with adalimumab, etanercept, or ustekinumab. The cumulative incidence of dose escalation was 4.1 per 100 treatment years. The Hazard Ratios (HRs) for dose escalation with ustekinumab vs adalimumab and ustekinumab vs etanercept were 1.93 (95% CI: 1.25-2.98), and 2.20 (95% CI: 1.42-3.41), respectively. After dose escalation, the HRs for treatment discontinuation with adalimumab and etanercept compared with ustekinumab were 3.10 (95% CI: 1.56-6.18) and 7.15 (95% CI: 3.96-12.94), respectively. PASI was higher after compared to before dose escalation for etanercept (p = 0.036), but not for adalimumab (p = 0.832) or ustekinumab (p = 0.300).
UNASSIGNED: Dose escalation was comparatively more frequent with ustekinumab than with adalimumab or etanercept; however, treatment discontinuation after dose escalation was more common with adalimumab and etanercept than ustekinumab.

UNASSIGNED: Biological therapies are effective for psoriasis, but patient responses vary, often requiring therapy switching or discontinuation.
UNASSIGNED: To identify physicians\' prescribing patterns of biological therapies at a referral tertiary center in Saudi Arabia and assess the probability of biologic persistence following treatment initiation.
UNASSIGNED: We conducted a retrospective study of biologic-naïve adult psoriasis patients who initiated therapy from October 2013 to July 2022 in Dammam. Descriptive statistics and a Kaplan-Meier analysis evaluated treatment persistence at 6, 12, 24, and 36 months.
UNASSIGNED: A total of 151 patients received adalimumab (n = 89), etanercept (n = 17), risankizumab (n = 30), ustekinumab (n = 14), and ixekizumab (n = 1). At 6 months, all therapies demonstrated 100% persistence. At 12 months, persistence was highest for ustekinumab (100%) and lowest for etanercept (88.2%). At 24 months, ustekinumab maintained 100% persistence, followed by risankizumab (96.6%), adalimumab (94.3%), and etanercept (76.4%). At 36 months, risankizumab had the highest persistence (96.6%), followed by adalimumab (83.1%), ustekinumab (78%), and etanercept (70.6%). The most common reasons for discontinuation were lack of effectiveness and intolerability.
UNASSIGNED: This study shows changing psoriasis treatment patterns with new therapies. Risankizumab demonstrated high long-term persistence, while etanercept and ustekinumab showed declining persistence, suggesting evolving treatment considerations.

BACKGROUND: This study investigated the safety and effectiveness of ustekinumab (UST) in Korean patients with Crohn\'s disease (CD).
METHODS: Adult patients with CD treated with UST were prospectively enrolled in the K-STAR (Post-MarKeting Surveillance for Crohn\'s Disease patients treated with STelARa) study between April 2018 and April 2022. Both the clinical effectiveness and adverse effects of UST therapy were analyzed. Missing data were handled using nonresponder imputation (ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03942120).
RESULTS: Of the 464 patients enrolled from 44 hospitals across Korea, 457 and 428 patients (Crohn\'s disease activity index ≥150) were included in the safety analysis and effectiveness analysis sets, respectively. At weeks 16 to 20 after initiating UST, clinical response, clinical remission, and corticosteroid-free remission rates were 75.0% (321 of 428), 64.0% (274 of 428), and 61.9% (265 of 428), respectively. At week 52 to 66, clinical response, clinical remission, and corticosteroid-free remission rates were 62.4% (267 of 428), 52.6% (225 of 428), and 50.0% (214 of 428), respectively. Combined effectiveness (clinical response + biochemical response) was achieved in 40.0% (171 of 428) and 41.6% (178 of 428) at week 16 to 20 and week 52 to 66, respectively. Biologic-naïve patients exhibited significantly higher rates of combined effectiveness than biologic-experienced patients (50.3% vs 30.7% at week 16-20, P < .001; 47.7% vs 36.0% at week 52-66, P = .014). No additional benefits were observed with the concomitant use of immunomodulators. Ileal location was independently associated with a higher probability of clinical remission compared with colonic or ileocolonic location at week 52 to 66. Adverse and serious adverse events were observed in 28.2% (129 of 457) and 12.7% (58 of 457), respectively, with no new safety signal associated with UST treatment.
CONCLUSIONS: Ustekinumab was well-tolerated, effective, and safe as induction and maintenance therapy for CD in Korea.
Ustekinumab was well-tolerated and safe for Koran patients with Crohn’s disease with no new safety signal as induction and maintenance therapy. Biologic-naïve patients exhibited better effectiveness outcomes, whereas combination therapy with immunomodulators was not superior to ustekinumab monotherapy.

UNASSIGNED: The risk of serious infection and active tuberculosis in patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) has not been concurrently evaluated based on the use of anti-tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-α agents versus non-anti-TNF biologics (vedolizumab/ustekinumab) in the Korean population.
UNASSIGNED: We compared the risk of serious infection and active tuberculosis in Korean patients with IBD treated with non-anti-TNF biologics (vedolizumab/ustekinumab) or anti-TNF-α agents.
UNASSIGNED: This study was a population-based cohort analysis of nationwide administrative claims data.
UNASSIGNED: Health Insurance Review and Assessment Service claims data (representing 97% of the South Korean population) from between January 2007 and February 2021 were reviewed, and adults with IBD who initiated vedolizumab/ustekinumab or anti-TNF-α treatment (n = 6123) between 2017 and 2020 were enrolled. Intergroup differences in the risk of serious infection requiring hospitalization/emergency department visits or active tuberculosis during the follow-up period were analyzed.
UNASSIGNED: In the patients treated with anti-TNF-α agents or vedolizumab/ustekinumab during a mean follow-up of 1.55 ± 1.05 and 0.84 ± 0.69 years, the incidence rates of serious infection were 9.43/100 and 6.87/100 person-years, respectively. Multivariable analysis showed no significant intergroup difference in the risk of serious infection with vedolizumab/ustekinumab or anti-TNF-α treatment; the adjusted relative risk of vedolizumab/ustekinumab compared with anti-TNF-α agents was 0.81 (95% confidence interval 0.46-1.44, p = 0.478). Among patients treated with anti-TNF-α agents and vedolizumab/ustekinumab, the incidence rates of active tuberculosis were 0.87 and 0.37 per 100 person-years, respectively. The relative risk of vedolizumab/ustekinumab compared with anti-TNF-α agents was 0.31 (95% confidence interval 0.07-1.26, p = 0.101). In a subset analysis comparing vedolizumab and ustekinumab with anti-TNF-α agents, similar results were observed.
UNASSIGNED: In Korean patients with IBD, non-anti-TNF biologics (vedolizumab/ustekinumab) tended to be associated with a lower risk of serious infection or active tuberculosis than anti-TNF-α agents.

Ustekinumab has been shown to be effective in inducing and maintain clinical and endoscopic remission in Crohn disease (CD). We aim to assess whether ustekinumab trough levels are associated with improved outcomes in CD in real-life. We recruited patients with CD who were treated with ustekinumab for at least 6 months from January 2017 to June 2023. Patients received ustekinumab 6 mg/kg intravenous induction followed by 90 mg every 4-, 8-, or 12-weeks during maintenance were included. We assessed clinical, biochemical, and endoscopic outcomes. Trough concentrations of ustekinumab that were taken from week 42 to week 52 were measured. Primary outcome was to evaluate the relationship between ustekinumab trough concentrations and clinical remission, biochemical normalization, and endoscopic remission. Logistic regression was conducted to assess outcomes. A total of 137 patients with CD, median age of 32 years and 83 (60.6%) males. The median serum levels of ustekinumab measured was 7.2 mcg/mL (interquartile range [IQR] 3.1-9.6). Using Spearman correlation analysis, a strong negative correlation was observed between ustekinumab drug levels and simple endoscopic score (SES-CD) (r = -0.464, P < .001). Additionally, ustekinumab drug levels demonstrated substantial negative correlations with disease severity measured by Harvey-Bradshaw index (HBI) score (r = -0.582, P < .001), C-Reactive Protein (CRP) levels (r = -0.598, P < .001) and fecal calprotectin (FC) levels (r = -0.529, P < .001). A multivariable analysis adjusted for age, sex and body mass index (BMI) showed a significant association between ustekinumab serum drug levels and predefined outcomes. Ustekinumab serum drug level above 4.5 mcg/mL was associated with 24% increase in the likelihood of having an SES-CD score <3 (OR 1.24, confidence interval [CI] 1.12-1.37, P value < .001), 44% more likely to achieve HBI score <5 (OR 1.44, CI 1.26-1.65, P value < .001), 52% higher likelihood of CRP more than 10 (OR 1.52, CI 1.31-1.77, P < .001), and 42% increased likelihood of FC more than 250 (OR 1.42, CI 1.24-1.62, P < .001). Ustekinumab trough concentrations above 4.5 mcg/mL were associated with clinical, biochemical and endoscopic remission in CD. Prospective data is warranted to confirm these findings.

BACKGROUND: Although biologic agents are very effective, long-term comparative studies demonstrating their safety relative to one another are still lacking.
METHODS: A total of 124 patients with psoriasis were followed up for 30 months; 74 received anti-TNF-alpha inhibitors (adalimumab, etanercept, infliximab), 33 were on ustekinumab, and 17 were treated with secukinumab. The rates of adverse events in these groups were recorded and statistically analyzed.
RESULTS: Infliximab-treated patients showed a high occurrence of asymptomatic, but increased liver enzymes, fatigue, and respiratory as well as dermatologic infections. Adalimumab-treated patients were more often affected by musculoskeletal disorders and infections of all types. Patients treated with secukinumab presented with higher rates of cardiovascular disorders as well as respiratory and dermatologic infections. The group receiving etanercept was more often diagnosed with musculoskeletal and reproductive disorders, specifically menstrual disorders. The rates of therapy discontinuation and serious adverse events did not reach statistically significant values.
CONCLUSIONS: A higher incidence of adverse events was observed among adalimumab-, and infliximab-treated patients, with ustekinumab found to have the safest profile. Our results demonstrate that a personalized approach, including evaluation of a patient\'s risk profile, is necessary before commencing a biologic. Further research is warranted to confirm the findings of our study.

UNASSIGNED: This study observed the effectiveness of ustekinumab and reactivation risk of concurrent latent tuberculosis infection (LTBI) and inactive hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection in Chinese mainland psoriasis patients on ustekinumab treatment.
UNASSIGNED: This retrospective, multicenter, observational study was conducted in three centers in China. Adult patients with moderate to severe plaque psoriasis were treated with ustekinumab for 28 weeks. The effectiveness endpoint included 75% and 90% improvement in Psoriasis Area Severity Index (PASI75/90) response rate, percentage of PASI improvement, change of absolute PASI score and body surface area involvement (BSA) score, absolute PASI ≤1/3 and Physicians\' Global Assessment (PGA)=0/1, as well as Dermatology life quality index (DLQI)=0/1 response rate at week 4, 16 and 28. Screening of tuberculosis and hepatitis were performed at baseline and week 28.
UNASSIGNED: A total of 82 patients were enrolled between March 2021 and May 2023 and the number of patients combined with LTBI and inactive HBV infection was 20 and 21 respectively. The PASI75 and PASI90 response rate at week 28 was 95.1% and 81.7% respectively. The mean PASI score decreased from 14.93 ± 12.07 at baseline to 0.78 ± 1.86 at week 28, and the mean BSA score decreased from 21% ± 18% at baseline to 1% ± 2% at week 28 (both P<0.001 compared with baseline). DLQI 0/1 response rate at week 28 was 73.2%. No reactivation of LTBI and inactive HBV infection and also no new-onset tuberculosis and hepatitis B occurred in patients without LTBI and inactive HBV infection at baseline.
UNASSIGNED: Ustekinumab demonstrated great effectiveness in Chinese plaque psoriasis patients and good safety in psoriasis concurrent with LTBI and inactive HBV infection under the real-world setting.

BACKGROUND: No biomarkers are currently available to predict therapeutic response to ustekinumab (UST) in Crohn\'s disease (CD). The aim of this prospective study was to identify 1 or more cytokines able to predict mucosal healing in patients with CD treated with UST.
METHODS: We prospectively enrolled consecutive CD patients treated with UST. At weeks 0 (baseline), 24, and 48, a panel of serum cytokines was measured by a fluorescence assay. At the same time points, fecal calprotectin (FC) was assessed. A colonoscopy was performed at baseline and at week 48, where therapeutic outcome was evaluated in terms of mucosal healing.
RESULTS: Out of 44 patients enrolled, 22 (50%) achieved mucosal healing at the end of follow-up. Response was associated with higher interleukin (IL)-23 levels (P < .01). Fecal calprotectin levels decreased over time in responders but did not change in nonresponders (test for the interaction between time and mucosal healing, P < .001).
CONCLUSIONS: This pilot study showed that IL-23 and FC could be reliable biomarkers in predicting therapeutic outcome to UST therapy in CD. In particular, the correlation between baseline serum levels of IL-23 and mucosal healing at 48 weeks is particularly strong, paving the way for its use to drive therapeutic decisions.
This prospective pilot study showed that the assessment of IL-23 levels at baseline could predict clinical and endoscopic outcomes to ustekinumab therapy in Crohn’s disease. Testing this biomarker before starting a biological therapy could be useful for a personalized choice.

UNASSIGNED: Limited data exist on the efficacy of combination therapy with ustekinumab and budesonide in patients with Crohn\'s disease. Our objective was to compare the clinical outcomes of ustekinumab and budesonide combination therapy with those of ustekinumab monotherapy.
UNASSIGNED: In this phase 2 single-center, double-blind, randomized controlled trial, we assigned 19 patients with Crohn\'s disease with a Crohn\'s disease activity index (CDAI) equal to or greater than 220 and less than 450 in a 1:1 ratio to receive ustekinumab and budesonide or ustekinumab for 32 weeks. The primary endpoint was the clinical remission rate at 8 weeks. The secondary endpoints were the clinical remission rate at 32 weeks and mucosal healing rates at 8 and 32 weeks.
UNASSIGNED: Of 19 patients, the mean age was 37.8 years, and 42.1% were women (CDAI ≥220 and <450). There was no difference between combination therapy and ustekinumab monotherapy in terms of clinical remission rates (50.0% vs. 30.0%, p = 0.39 at 8 weeks and 37.5% vs. 20.0%, p = 0.41) and mucosal healing rates (75.0% vs. 90.0%, p = 0.40 and 37.5% vs. 60.0%, p = 0.34 at 8 and 32 weeks, respectively). The most common adverse event was an exacerbation of Crohn\'s. There were no differences in safety profiles between the two groups.
UNASSIGNED: Our study showed no difference between ustekinumab monotherapy and ustekinumab and budesonide combination therapy in terms of the induction and maintenance of remission (trial registration number: jRCTs021200013).