Inguinal hernias are commonly encountered and are primarily managed by surgeons; however, it is unusual for retroperitoneal structures, such as the ureter, to herniate into it. More importantly, hernias containing ureters are not usually identified preoperatively unless specific imaging was ordered prior, as they are generally asymptomatic. This poses a risk to the patient as unidentified structures can be mistakenly injured during the surgery. We describe a case of a man in his 60s, who presented with a large left-sided indirect inguinoscrotal hernia. Intraoperatively, a large amount of irreducible retroperitoneal fat was encountered in addition to a cord-like structure, which was discovered to be the left ureter after reviewing imaging intraoperatively. Initially, the hernia repair was done robotically, but it was converted to open repair due to its irreducibility and the potential risk imposed on the ureter. Additionally, we discuss the aetiology and common presentations of this kind of hernia.

We experienced a rare case in which iliopsoas abscess (IPA), caused by an Extended Spectrum β-Lactamase (ESBL)-producing Proteus mirabilis, perforated and communicated with the ureter and caused sepsis. An 84-year-old woman, bedridden due to sequelae of a cerebral hemorrhage, was brought to our hospital with a chief complaint of fever lasting for 3 weeks. Computed tomography (CT) revealed a huge 180 × 110 × 100 mm IPA in the right iliopsoas muscle. The ureter was also found to communicate with the iliopsoas muscle abscess, ureteral stenosis was detected at the same site, and dilatation of the renal pelvis occurred above the area of the ureteral stenosis, indicating hydronephrosis. Considering the mechanism of this case, if the ureter first ruptures and urine leaks, followed by the formation of an IPA, urine will flow along the surrounding fatty tissue and cause an abscess around the ureter and kidney. However, because almost no abscess was detected around the ureter, the abscess was thought to have originated from the iliopsoas muscle located near the center of the ureter. In summary, in this case, an abscess first formed within the iliopsoas muscle, which gradually expanded and compressed the right ureter, resulting in hydronephrosis. The upper ureter, which had become dilated and thinned due to ureteral obstruction, became even more fragile because of the spread of inflammation from the IPA, and the IPA perforated and communicated with the ureter. In patients who have difficulty communicating, the diagnosis of IPA may be delayed because the only symptom is fever. As in this case, if the diagnosis is delayed, the abscess may become large and perforate the ureter; thus, IPA should always be considered as a cause of fever of unknown origin.

OBJECTIVE: To assess CT-scan based parameters, particularly ureteral wall thickness (UWT), in predicting spontaneous ureteral stone passage.
METHODS: Cross-sectional, analytical study. Place and Duration of the Study: Section of Urology, Department of Surgery, The Aga Khan University Hospital, Karachi, Pakistan, from June to November 2023.
METHODS: Patients with symptomatic, single, radio-opaque, unilateral ureteral stones having size ≤10 mm with normal kidney functions, diagnosed by non-contrast CT-scan KUB, and treated by conservative option for four weeks were enrolled. Clinical and radiological predictors for stone passage (SP), including stone size, area, laterality, location, density, degree of hydronephrosis, maximal UWT at the stone site, and ureteral diameter and density above and below the stone, were evaluated. Binary logistic regression analysis was employed to identify predictors of stone passage. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was used to find the optimal cut-off for UWT.
RESULTS: Among 34 eligible patients, 22 (64.7%) passed their stones spontaneously. Patients who passed had smaller stone size and area and lesser UWT. Stone location, laterality, degree of hydronephrosis, stone density, ureteral wall diameter, and density above and below stones were not associated with SP. Multivariate analysis revealed maximum UWT as the independent predictor of SP, with a cut-off of 1.95 mm and an accuracy of 0.94.
CONCLUSIONS: UWT was the single most convincing factor for the spontaneous passage of ureteral stone in this study. By applying UWT\'s optimal cut-off value, it might be an extremely significant tool when taking decisions in daily practice.
BACKGROUND: Ureteral wall thickness, Medical expulsive therapy, Non-contrast computed tomography.

OBJECTIVE: To report our initial experience of one-stage flexible ureteroscopic lithotripsy(FURL) with 11/13Fr suctioning ureteral access sheath(UAS) and 8.55Fr single-use digital flexible ureteroscope(SDFU) in upper ureteral or renal calculi.
METHODS: We retrospectively collected the clinical data of 900 adult patients with upper ureteral or renal calculi treated by FURL with 11/13Fr suctioning UAS and 8.55Fr SDFU from January 2022 to April 2024. Demographics, peri- and postoperative outcomes were assessed.
RESULTS: In all, 40 of 940 cases(4.26%) failed to introduce UAS and required second-stage FURL because of ureterostenosis and were excluded. Mean stones size of the remaining 900 eligible cases was 1.68 ± 0.58 cm in greatest diameter. There were 228 cases of upper ureteral stone, 456 cases of renal stone and 216 cases of concomitant ureteral and renal calculi. The mean operation time was 52.20 ± 20.21 min and the postoperative hospital stay was 2.87 ± 1.37 days. The stone-free rate of 1 month postoperatively was 89.56% and only 2.44% of patients with residue underwent additional reoperation. The rate of postoperative fever, postoperative pain needing analgesic and slight ureteral mucosal injury were 5.11%, 8.22% and 7.78%, respectively. None of patient suffered from severe complications, such as sepsis or ureteral perforation.
CONCLUSIONS: It\'s practical and suitable for the vast majority of adult patients to undergo FURL in single session with 11/13Fr suctioning UAS without preoperative stenting. FURL with 11/13Fr suctioning UAS and 8.55Fr SDFU is feasible, reliable, safe, and efficient in the management of renal stone and upper ureteral stone.

Stone size and location are key factors in predicting spontaneous stone passage (SSP), but little attention has been paid to the influence of radiological signs of stone impaction (RSSI). This research aims to determine whether RSSI, alongside stone size, can predict SSP and to evaluate the consistency of ureteral wall thickness (UWT) measurements among observers. In this retrospective study, 160 patients with a single upper or middle ureteral stone on acute non-enhanced computed tomography (NCCT) were analysed. Patient data were collected from medical records. Measurements of RSSI, including UWT, ureteral diameters, and average attenuation above and below the stone, were taken on NCCT by four independent readers blind to the outcomes. The cohort consisted of 70% males with an average age of 51 ± 15. SSP occurred in 61% of patients over 20 weeks. The median stone length was 5.7 mm (IQR: 4.5-7.3) and was significantly shorter in patients who passed their stones at short- (4.6 vs. 7.1, p < 0.001) and long-term (4.8 vs. 7.1, p < 0.001) follow-up. For stone length, the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) for predicting SSP was 0.90 (CI 0.84-0.96) and only increased to 0.91 (CI 0.85-0.95) when adding ureteral diameters and UWT. Ureteral attenuation did not predict SSP (AUC < 0.5). Interobserver variability for UWT was moderate, with ± 2.0 mm multi-reader limits of agreement (LOA). The results suggest that RSSI do not enhance the predictive value of stone size for SSP. UWT measurements exhibit moderate reliability with significant interobserver variability.

BACKGROUND: Crossed fused renal ectopia (CFRE) is a common congenital anomaly where one kidney is positioned abnormally on the opposite side of the midline, often fused with the other kidney. However, single ureter draining crossed fused renal ectopia is a rare occurrence.
METHODS: Here, we report a case of crossed fused renal ectopia with a single ureter in a 46-year-old Nepali male who presented with history of lithuria. Computed tomography revealed that the left kidney was situated on the right side and fused with the right kidney. The renal pelvises of both kidneys were fused, and a single ureter, located on the right side, was draining both kidneys into the bladder. The patient was advised to have regular follow-ups.
CONCLUSIONS: Crossed fused renal ectopia with a single ureter represents a rare renal anomaly. Asymptomatic patients can typically be managed conservatively. Regular follow-up is recommended to monitor renal function, calculus formation, infections, and malignant changes.

UNASSIGNED: Iatrogenic ureteral injury is a severe surgical complication, with a highest incidence of 1.5% in gynecological surgeries. The purpose of this report is to document our initial experience with using methylene blue (MB) to label the ureter in gynecological laparoscopic surgeries and to explore its effectiveness and safety. This is also a novel description of simultaneously visualizing ureteral MB fluorescence and sentinel lymph nodes (SLN\'s) Indocyanine Green (ICG) fluorescence using the same camera.
UNASSIGNED: This study included patients undergoing gynecological laparoscopic surgeries, with the same surgeon performing all cases. During the early stages of each surgery, rapid intravenous infusion of MB was administered. For cases requiring SLN imaging, we also injected ICG solution into the cervix. Assessment of the included cases was conducted both intraoperatively and postoperatively. The group that had MB fluorescence (Group A) was compared to a control group that did not have it (Group B).
UNASSIGNED: A total of 25 patients (Group A) received MB during surgery, demonstrating 45 ureters clearly, with an imaging success rate of 90%. Continuous and clearer fluorescence imaging was achieved in cases with ureteral hydronephrosis. In most patients, ureteral fluorescence was visible 15-20 min after intravenous infusion of MB, and 64% still exhibited fluorescence at the end of the surgery. In patients who had both ICG and MB, dual fluorescence imaging was achieved clearly. Among the included cases, there were no iatrogenic ureteral injuries (0%), which we observed to be lower than in patients who did not receive MB (1.3%). The rate of adverse events was similar in both groups.
UNASSIGNED: Using MB fluorescence is an effective and safe method of visualizing the ureters during gynecological surgeries, and can diminish iatrogenic ureteral injury without increased associated adverse events. It therefore may offer promising prospects for clinical application.

OBJECTIVE: Megaureter (MU) is an uncommon condition in adults. The aim is to present a review of the current literature.
METHODS: A literature search was conducted to explore the current literature including case reports on MU in adults in the period 2003-2023. Each case was characterised in terms of the eight categories: sex, age, etiology, location, symptoms, diagnostic tool used, type of treatment and follow-up.
RESULTS: There was no meta-analysis but two reviews. Total, 39 case reports were included based on 35 articles. The most common observations for the first four categories were male (sex), age below 40 (age), obstructed MU (etiology) and left-sided MU (location). Almost every patient appeared with symptoms, most frequently flank pain, abdominal pain and recurrent urinary tract infections. CT scan and transabdominal ultrasonography are the most commonly used diagnostic tools. Most cases underwent either laparoscopic or open surgical treatment with ureteral reimplantation as the most performed surgical procedure. A majority of the patients had an uneventful follow-up.
CONCLUSIONS: MU in adults is a rare condition presenting with heterogeneous symptoms. CT scan and transabdominal ultrasonography should be used as diagnostic tools. Nearly all patients underwent surgical treatment with an uneventful follow-up. Complications such as stone formation and altered function of the affected kidney are common. Surgical treatment is recommended and is determined by consideration of age, symptoms, ureteral extension and progressive loss of renal function.

OBJECTIVE: High-pressure balloon dilatation (HPBD) of the ureterovesical junction with double-J stenting is a minimally invasive alternative to ureteral reimplantation or cutaneous ureterostomy for first-line surgical treatment of primary obstructive megaureter (POM). The aim of our study was to identify the risk factors associated with the need for secondary procedures due to HPBD failure.
METHODS: Prospective data were collected from patients who underwent HPBD for POM between 2007 and 2021 at a single institution. The collected data included patient demographics, diagnostic modalities, surgical details, results, and follow-up. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was performed.
RESULTS: Fifty-five ureters underwent HPBD for POM in 50 children, with a median age of 6.4 months (IQR: 4.5-13.8). Nineteen patients (37.25%) underwent secondary ureteric reimplantation, with a median of 9.8 months after primary HBPD (95% CI 6.2-9.9). The median follow-up was 29.4 months (IQR: 17.4-71). Independent risk factors for redo-surgery in a multivariate logistic regression model were: progressive ureterohydronephrosis (OR = 7.8; 95% CI 0.77-78.6) and early removal of the double-J stent. A risk reduction of 7% (95% CI 2.2%-11.4%) was observed per extra-day of catheter maintenance. The optimal cut-off point is 55 days, ROC curve area: 0.77 (95% CI 0.62-0.92). Gender, distal ureteral diameter, pelvis diameter, dilatation balloon diameter and preoperative differential renal function did not affect the need for reimplantation.
CONCLUSIONS: The use of a double-J stent for at least 55 days seems to avoid the need for a secondary procedure. Therefore, we recommend removing the double-J catheter at least 2 months after the HBPD.

OBJECTIVE: To compare the outcomes of retrograde flexible ureteroscopy (fURS) with retroperitoneal laparoscopic ureterolithotomy (RLU) for large proximal ureteric stones.
METHODS: A prospective randomised trial was conducted from January 2018 through December 2022 including patients with impacted proximal ureteric stones of 15-25 mm. Patients underwent fURS or RLU. Primary outcome was the stone-free rate. Demographic data, stone features, and complications rates were also compared between groups.
RESULTS: A total of 64 patients were enrolled, 32 in each group. The mean impacted stone time was similar between groups, as well as stone size (17 mm) and stone density (>1000 Hounsfield Units). The ureteric stone-free rates between the two groups (93.7% in fURS vs 96.8% in RLU; odds ratio [OR] 0.72, 95% confidence interval [CI] -1.72 to 3.17; P = 0.554), and overall success rates, which take into account residual fragments in the kidney (84.3% in fURS vs 93.7% in RLU; OR 1.02, 95% CI -0.69 to 2.74; P = 0.23), were similar. Operative time was also not statistically significantly different between groups (median 80 vs 82 min; P = 0.101). There was no difference in hospital length of stay. Retropulsion rate was higher with fURS (65.6% vs 3.1%; p < 0.001). Residual hydronephrosis (34.3% each group) and complication rates did no differ according to treatment.
CONCLUSIONS: Flexible URS and RLU are both highly efficient and present low morbidity for large impacted proximal ureteric stone treatment. RLU is not superior to fURS.