traffic

交通
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:创伤并发症已成为全球最严重的公共卫生问题之一。在大多数报告中,泌尿生殖道损伤(UGI)见于约10%的成人创伤患者和少于3%的腹部或骨盆多发/严重创伤儿童。交通事故是UGI最常见的原因。这项研究的目的是系统地确定车祸后UGI的患病率和类型。
    方法:搜索策略旨在于2023年10月寻找相关研究。没有语言或日期限制。以下标准被认为是资格标准:报告道路交通伤害(RTI)人群中UGI的至少一个流行病学方面,并对UGI中的RTI进行单独的流行病学分析(我们还包括那些指出所有RTI但单独提及UGI的文章)。两名专家使用JoannaBriggs研究所的标准化关键评估工具评估了文章的报告质量。使用CMA统计软件3.2.0版进行本研究的统计分析。
    结果:共有1,466,024例RTIs通过107项研究纳入我们的综述。其中,29项研究与儿童有关(20,036),其他人报告了成人的RTI(1,445,988)。总患病率为4.7%,在36项研究中,车祸是原因,其次是25起摩托车事故,17起自行车事故,以及23项相关研究中的汽车-行人碰撞。在基于受损器官的亚组分析中,膀胱损伤率为3.5%。肾脏的这一比率为5.3%。
    结论:这项系统综述和荟萃分析发现,RTIs后UGI的患病率为4.7%,车祸是最常见的原因。UGI在成人中比在儿童中更普遍,膀胱和肾脏损伤是最常见的报告类型。UGI的患病率因国家和研究设计而异。
    OBJECTIVE: Trauma complications have been one of the most serious public health concerns worldwide. In most reports, urogenital injuries (UGIs) are seen in approximately 10% of adult traumatic patients and less than 3% of children with multiple/severe trauma to the abdomen or pelvis. Traffic accidents are the most common cause of UGIs. The purpose of this study is to systematically determine the prevalence and types of UGIs after car accidents.
    METHODS: The search strategy was aimed at finding relevant studies in October 2023. No restrictions on language or date were applied. The following criteria were considered eligibility criteria: reporting at least one epidemiological aspect of UGIs in people with road traffic injury (RTI) and a separate epidemiological analysis of RTIs in UGI (we also included those articles that pointed out all RTIs but separately mentioned UGIs). Two experts assessed the reporting quality of articles using standardized critical appraisal instruments from the Joanna Briggs Institute. Statistical analysis for this study was conducted using the CMA statistical software version 3.2.0.
    RESULTS: A total of 1,466,024 cases following RTIs through 107 studies were included in our review. Of these, 29 studies were related to children (20,036), and the others reported RTIs in adults (1,445,988). The total prevalence was 4.7%, and car accidents were responsible in 36 studies, followed by motorcycle accidents in 25, bicycles in 17 studies, and automobile-pedestrian collisions in 23 related studies. In subgroup analysis based on the damaged organ, the rate of bladder injury was 3.5%. This rate was 5.3% for kidneys.
    CONCLUSIONS: This systematic review and meta-analysis found that the prevalence of UGI following RTIs was 4.7%, with car accidents being the most common cause. UGIs were more prevalent in adults than in children, and bladder and kidney injuries were the most commonly reported types. The prevalence of UGI varied by country and study design.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    全球范围内,道路交通事故(RTA)的频率急剧上升。令人担忧的是,沙特阿拉伯王国(KSA)的区域贸易协定数量在过去十年中有所增加。因此,必须执行有关超速驾驶和安全带使用的法律,以确保驾驶安全。这项研究旨在确定沙特阿拉伯道路交通事故的患病率和决定因素。2023年11月进行了彻底的搜索,主要是使用PubMed,符合PRISMA标准。搜索仅限于英语研究,以检查道路交通事故的原因及其患病率。制定了某些纳入和排除标准,以保证评估研究的质量和适用性。来自沙特阿拉伯的广泛研究被纳入研究,没有侧重于特定的性别。一个明显的模式表明,受道路交通事故影响的个人比例很高。根据我们的调查结果,越来越多的证据表明,尽管最近道路交通事故的发生率有所改善,沙特阿拉伯的事故发生率仍然存在显著差异。这些结果表明,需要进一步研究才能更好地了解道路交通事故的预防。
    Globally, the frequency of road traffic accidents (RTAs) is sharply rising. It is concerning that the number of RTAs in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia (KSA) has risen within the past ten years. As a result, laws governing things like speeding and seat belt use must be implemented to ensure driving safety. This study aims to determine the prevalence and determinants of road traffic accidents in Saudi Arabia. A thorough search was carried out in November 2023, mostly using PubMed, in compliance with PRISMA criteria. The search was limited to English-language research examining the causes of road traffic accidents and their prevalence. Certain inclusion and exclusion criteria were developed to guarantee the quality and applicability of the evaluated research. A wide spectrum of research from Saudi Arabia was included in the study without focusing on a specific gender. A discernible pattern indicated a high proportion of individuals affected by road traffic accidents. According to the findings of our investigation, there is growing evidence that Despite recent improvements in the incidence of road accidents, there is still significant variation in the incidence of accidents in Saudi Arabia. These results indicate that further study is needed to understand road accident prevention better.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    在史无前例的COVID-19封锁期间,道路交通有限,预计创伤急诊入院模式会发生变化。我们进行了当前的系统评价和荟萃分析,以评估COVID-19大流行对道路交通事故住院的影响。
    这项系统综述和荟萃分析是根据JoannaBriggs研究所(JBI)的说明进行的。搜索了以下数据库:PubMed,ISIWebofKnowledge,Scopus,ProQuest,还有Cochrane图书馆.两名独立评审员根据评审的纳入标准筛选文章,并使用适当的评估清单评估纳入研究的方法学质量。由JBI介绍,根据研究类型。Meta分析采用综合Meta分析(CMA)软件进行。考虑到研究之间的异质性,采用随机效应模型对二元结局采用95%置信区间(CI)估计合并效应.
    本系统综述共纳入13项研究,所有这些都被考虑进行荟萃分析。根据荟萃分析,COVID-19大流行期间和大流行前一年的住院率差异有统计学意义[RR:0.685CI95%(0.578-0.813)p<0.00001].荟萃分析中纳入研究的异质性评估显示高度异质性(I2=78%,p<0.00001)。
    这项系统评价的结果表明,由于隔离和生活方式的改变,COVID-19大流行大大减少了与道路交通事故有关的住院人数。卫生政策制定者和高级卫生管理人员可能会在将来的类似情况下使用此系统审查的结果。
    UNASSIGNED: During the unprecedented COVID-19 lockdowns, road traffic was limited, and a change in the traumatic emergency admission pattern was anticipated. We conducted the current systematic review and meta-analysis to assess the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on hospital admissions due to road traffic crashes.
    UNASSIGNED: This systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted based on the Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) instructions. The following databases were searched: PubMed, ISI Web of Knowledge, Scopus, ProQuest, and the Cochrane Library. Two independent reviewers screened articles based on the inclusion criteria for the review and assessed the methodological quality of the included studies using an appropriate appraisal checklist, introduced by the JBI, based on the study type. The meta-analysis was performed using Comprehensive meta-analysis (CMA) software. Considering the heterogeneity among studies, a random effect model was adopted to estimate the pooled effect with 95% confidence interval (CI) for binary outcomes.
    UNASSIGNED: A total of 13 studies were included in this systematic review, and all of them were considered for meta-analysis. According to the meta-analysis, differences in hospital admission rates during the COVID-19 pandemic and one year before this pandemic were statistically significant [RR: 0.685 CI 95% (0.578 -0.813) p<0.00001]. The heterogeneity assessment of the included studies in the meta-analysis showed high heterogeneity (I2=78%, p<0.00001).
    UNASSIGNED: The results of this systematic review showed that the COVID-19 pandemic dramatically reduced the number of hospital admissions related to road traffic crashes because of both quarantines and lifestyle changes. Health policymakers and top health managers might use the results of this systematic review in similar contexts in the future.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Systematic Review
    对于阿尔茨海默病患者的车辆驾驶限制存在疑问。使用系统审查和荟萃分析方案(PRISMA-ScR)方法的首选报告项目进行范围审查。在相关数据库中搜索了2000年至2022年之间以英文发表的文章,西班牙语,或者葡萄牙语。如果文章专门针对驾驶,事故风险,在重要的认知能力下降的背景下驾驶机动车的许可或执照,或者如果解决了关于驾驶和痴呆症的交通立法。选择了23篇文章进行全面阅读,其中六项是观察性研究,只有一项采用干预方法。所有文章都是在英国等高收入国家进行的,美国,和澳大利亚。作为结论,文献中没有足够敏感的心理测验来评估有认知缺陷的老年人的车辆驾驶能力。根据选定的研究,对于轻度认知功能减退或轻度痴呆的患者,目前还没有有力的证据支持或反对停止车辆驾驶.在某些情况下,停止车辆驾驶会影响患者及其家人。此外,关于老年人和痴呆症患者车辆驾驶的法律法规在全球范围内很少。尽管缺乏针对痴呆症背景下车辆驾驶主题的研究,有一定程度的共识推理,中度至重度痴呆患者应该停止驾驶活动,但轻度认知障碍的患者也是如此,包括轻度痴呆.
    There are doubts about vehicle driving restriction for patients with Alzheimer\'s disease. A scoping review was carried out using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis Protocols (PRISMA-ScR) methodology. Relevant databases were searched for articles published between 2000 and 2022 in English, Spanish, or Portuguese. Articles were included if they specifically addressed driving, risk of accidents, permission or licence to drive a motor vehicle in a context of important cognitive decline, or if addressed traffic legislation on driving and dementia. Twenty-three articles were selected for full reading, six of which were observational studies and only one with an interventionist method. All articles were carried out in high-income countries such as the UK, the US, and Australia. As a conclusion, there is no psychometric test in the literature sensitive enough to assess vehicle driving competence in older adults with cognitive deficits. Based on selected studies, there is no robust evidence to make recommendation for or against the cessation of vehicular driving for patients with mild cognitive decline or with mild dementia. In some situations, vehicle driving cessation can impact patients and their families. In addition, legal regulations regarding vehicle driving for older adults and people with dementia are scarce worldwide. Despite the scarcity of studies addressing the theme of vehicle driving in the context of dementia, there is some level of consensual reasoning that patients with moderate to severe dementia should halt driving activities, but the same does not apply for patients with mild levels of cognitive impairment, including mild dementia.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目前的证据表明乳腺癌(BC)风险与空气污染暴露有关,特别是交通废气,仍然没有定论,暴露评估方法具有异质性。本研究旨在对交通相关空气污染(TRAP)与BC发生率(PROSPEROCRD42021286774)之间的关系进行系统评价和荟萃分析。我们系统回顾了截至2022年6月发表的评估暴露于TRAP和BC风险的观察性研究,可在Medline/PubMed和WebofScience数据库上获得。使用模型评估与交通有关的空气污染物的暴露或使用暴露代理(包括交通密度,距离道路,等。)有资格入选。对研究NO2/NOx暴露与BC风险之间关联的研究进行了随机效应荟萃分析。总的来说,纳入了21项符合纳入标准的研究(7项病例对照,一个嵌套的案例控件,13项队列研究);13项研究(5项病例对照,八个队列)提供了纳入荟萃分析的数据。个别研究几乎没有证据表明TRAP和BC风险之间存在关联;暴露评估方法和交通排放时间段不同。对NO2暴露的元估计表明呈正相关(每10µg/m3NO2的合并相对风险:1.015;95%置信区间,CI:1.003;1.028)。未发现NOx暴露与BC之间的关联(三项研究)。尽管有限的证据表明TRAP与代理之间存在关联,荟萃分析显示,NO2暴露之间存在显着关联,一个常见的TRAP污染物标记,和BC风险,但效果很小。我们的发现为空气污染致癌性提供了额外的支持。
    Current evidence of an association of breast cancer (BC) risk with air pollution exposure, in particular from traffic exhaust, remains inconclusive, and the exposure assessment methodologies are heterogeneous. This study aimed to conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis on the association between traffic-related air pollution (TRAP) and BC incidence (PROSPERO CRD42021286774). We systematically reviewed observational studies assessing exposure to TRAP and BC risk published until June 2022, available on Medline/PubMed and Web of Science databases. Studies using models for assessing exposure to traffic-related air pollutants or using exposure proxies (including traffic density, distance to road, etc.) were eligible for inclusion. A random-effects meta-analysis of studies investigating the association between NO2/NOx exposure and BC risk was conducted. Overall, 21 studies meeting the inclusion criteria were included (seven case-control, one nested case-control, 13 cohort studies); 13 studies (five case-control, eight cohort) provided data for inclusion in the meta-analyses. Individual studies provided little evidence of an association between TRAP and BC risk; exposure assessment methods and time periods of traffic emissions were different. The meta-estimate on NO2 exposure indicated a positive association (pooled relative risk per 10 µg/m3 of NO2: 1.015; 95% confidence interval, CI: 1.003; 1.028). No association between NOx exposure and BC was found (three studies). Although there was limited evidence of an association for TRAP estimated with proxies, the meta-analysis showed a significant association between NO2 exposure, a common TRAP pollutant marker, and BC risk, yet with a small effect size. Our findings provide additional support for air pollution carcinogenicity.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Systematic Review
    背景:道路交通伤害(RTI)是发病率和死亡率的最主要原因之一,尤其是儿童和年轻人。摩托车碰撞是RTI的重要组成部分。政策制定者认为,安全帽是防止摩托车相关伤害的唯一最重要的保护措施。然而,摩托车手没有以理想的价格戴头盔。这项研究系统地调查了与两轮摩托车骑手头盔使用呈正相关的因素。
    方法:我们在PubMed上进行了系统的搜索,Scopus,WebofScience,Embase,和Cochrane图书馆相关的关键字。没有语言,发布日期,或应用了方法学限制。所有评估与头盔佩戴行为相关因素并在2021年12月31日之前发表的文章都包括在我们的研究中,并进行了数据提取。我们使用用于观察性研究的加强流行病学观察性研究报告(STROBE)清单评估了纳入文章的质量。
    结果:共纳入50篇。大多数证据表明,头盔的使用在司机中更为普遍(与乘客相比),女人,中年人,那些受过高等教育的人,已婚个体,许可证持有者,头盔的主人。此外,在高速公路和中心城市道路以及早晨和工作日,头盔的使用率更高。长途旅行的人,更频繁的用户,发动机更大的摩托车的骑手更常用安全帽。不使用头盔的驾驶员似乎对强制性头盔法律具有可接受的认识,并且了解其对头部受伤的保护作用。重要的是,关于头盔不适的抱怨在使用头盔的司机中很常见。
    结论:为了提高头盔的使用率,政策制定者应该强调乘客和儿童对RTI的脆弱性,致命的碰撞发生在低容量道路上和低速巡航期间。警方的监控应该扩大到一天的深夜,周末,和较低的容量和较少的交通道路。旨在提高对其他守法行为的接受度(例如,系安全带,在速度限制内骑行,等。),特别是在年轻人和年轻人中,将提高摩托车骑手头盔佩戴行为的普遍性。干预措施应将重点放在改善骑手对安全帽的态度上,因为他们的好处是可以接受的。
    Road traffic injuries (RTI) are one of the most prominent causes of morbidity and mortality, especially among children and young adults. Motorcycle crashes constitute a significant part of RTIs. Policymakers believe that safety helmets are the single most important protection against motorcycle-related injuries. However, motorcyclists are not wearing helmets at desirable rates. This study systematically investigated factors that are positively associated with helmet usage among two-wheeled motorcycle riders.
    We performed a systematic search on PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, Embase, and Cochrane library with relevant keywords. No language, date of publication, or methodological restrictions were applied. All the articles that had evaluated the factors associated with helmet-wearing behavior and were published before December 31, 2021, were included in our study and underwent data extraction. We assessed the quality of the included articles using the Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) checklist for observational studies.
    A total of 50 articles were included. Most evidence suggests that helmet usage is more common among drivers (compared to passengers), women, middle-aged adults, those with higher educations, married individuals, license holders, and helmet owners. Moreover, the helmet usage rate is higher on highways and central city roads and during mornings and weekdays. Travelers of longer distances, more frequent users, and riders of motorcycles with larger engines use safety helmets more commonly. Non-helmet-using drivers seem to have acceptable awareness of mandatory helmet laws and knowledge about their protective role against head injuries. Importantly, complaint about helmet discomfort is somehow common among helmet-using drivers.
    To enhance helmet usage, policymakers should emphasize the vulnerability of passengers and children to RTIs, and that fatal crashes occur on low-capacity roads and during cruising at low speeds. Monitoring by police should expand to late hours of the day, weekends, and lower capacity and less-trafficked roads. Aiming to enhance the acceptance of other law-abiding behaviors (e.g., wearing seat belts, riding within the speed limits, etc.), especially among youth and young adults, will enhance the prevalence of helmet-wearing behavior among motorcycle riders. Interventions should put their focus on improving the attitudes of riders regarding safety helmets, as there is acceptable knowledge of their benefits.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Systematic Review
    目标:系统评估与道路交通伤害(RTIs)相关的永久性残疾风险,并确定道路交通事故后永久性残疾对未来研究的影响。
    方法:我们根据系统评价和荟萃分析陈述的首选报告项目进行了系统评价。在1980年1月至2020年2月发表的4个主要电子数据库中对文献进行了扩展搜索。两队各有两名审稿人,独立筛选标题/摘要,之后,回顾了纳入研究的全文。使用加强流行病学观察性研究报告(STROBE)清单评估研究的质量。评估了第三位审阅者的任何差异,并提取了纳入研究的所有数据。最后,对数据进行系统分析,并对相关数据进行解释.
    结果:根据STROBE检查表,16项研究中有5项被评价为高质量。15项研究根据2005年简化的伤害量表对初始伤害进行了排名。五项研究报告了RTI后永久性医疗损害的总风险,汽车乘员的风险为2%至23%,骑自行车者的风险为2.8%-46%。七项研究报告了不同身体部位永久性医疗损害的风险。11项研究表明,最常见的身体区域发展为永久性损伤,其中6项研究表明,颈椎和颈部受伤是永久性受伤的最高风险。
    结论:这篇综述的发现揭示了提供一种全球验证的方法来评估全球范围内RTI后的永久性医疗损害的必要性。这将有助于交通伤害和有效管理的决策,以减轻个人和社区的财务和心理负担。
    OBJECTIVE: To systematically review the risk of permanent disability related to road traffic injuries (RTIs) and to determine the implications for future research regarding permanent impairment following road traffic crashes.
    METHODS: We conducted this systematic review according to the preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analysis statement. An extended search of the literature was carried out in 4 major electronic databases for scientific research papers published from January 1980 to February 2020. Two teams include 2 reviewers each, screened independently the titles/abstracts, and after that, reviewed the full text of the included studies. The quality of the studies was assessed using the strengthening the reporting of observational studies in epidemiology (STROBE) checklist. A third reviewer was assessed any discrepancy and all data of included studies were extracted. Finally, the data were systematically analyzed, and the related data were interpreted.
    RESULTS: Five out of 16 studies were evaluated as high-quality according to the STROBE checklist. Fifteen studies ranked the initial injuries according to the abbreviated injury scale 2005. Five studies reported the total risk of permanent medical impairment following RTIs which varied from 2% to 23% for car occupants and 2.8% to 46% for cyclists. Seven studies reported the risk of permanent medical impairment of the different body regions. Eleven studies stated the most common body region to develop permanent impairment, of which 6 studies demonstrated that injuries of the cervical spine and neck were at the highest risk of becoming permanent injured.
    CONCLUSIONS: The finding of this review revealed the necessity of providing a globally validated method to evaluate permanent medical impairment following RTIs across the world. This would facilitate decision-making about traffic injuries and efficient management to reduce the financial and psychological burdens for individuals and communities.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    这项研究旨在检查损伤的模式,这些伤害对患者的影响,并通过行业监管改革和教育确定潜在的可改变的影响因素。
    从2020年9月起,确定了与皇家布里斯班和妇女医院急诊和创伤中心有关的食品交付骑手(FDR)相关的演讲。收集的数据包括患者和事件人口统计:时间,受伤的类型和位置,需要调查和护理,逗留时间,录取要求和跟进。
    该队列包括81.8%的男性,平均年龄为25.2岁。大多数受伤发生在与车辆碰撞的道路上。最常见的损伤是骨折。发病率在周末和晚上增加。超过一半的队列被送往医院。只有22.7%的患者有资格获得工人补偿,不到一半的患者获得了Medicare的承保。大多数(72.7%)的案件涉及来自其他国家的非居民乘客。
    大多数受伤的FDR不是澳大利亚公民,不到一半的Medicare符合条件,可能导致无法充分获得护理,尤其是骨折随访。晚上受伤人数激增,周末和大流行期间相关的封锁表明,在这段时间内,送货服务的使用有所增加。结果突出显示了送货骑手经历的伤害模式以及零工经济中这一快速增长的就业领域的潜在可改变的风险因素。
    This study aimed to examine patterns of injury, the impact of these injuries on patients and identification of potentially modifiable contributing factors through industry regulation reforms and education.
    Food delivery rider (FDR)-related presentations to the Royal Brisbane and Women\'s Hospital Emergency and Trauma Centre for a year from September 2020 were identified. Data collected included patient and incident demographics: time, type and location of injuries, investigations and care required, length of stay, admission requirements and follow up.
    The cohort included 81.8% male with a mean age of 25.2 years. Most injuries occurred on the road from a collision with a vehicle. The most common injury was fractures. Incidence increased on weekends and during the evening. More than half the cohort were admitted to hospital. Only 22.7% of patients were eligible for workers compensation and less than half were covered by Medicare. The majority (72.7%) of cases involved non-resident riders from other countries.
    The majority of FDRs presenting with injuries are not Australian citizens and less than half were Medicare eligible potentially contributing to inadequate access to care especially fracture follow up. There were spikes in injuries occurring at night, weekends and during periods of pandemic associated lockdowns demonstrating an increased usage of delivery services during these times. Results highlight injury patterns experienced by delivery riders and potentially modifiable risk factors for this rapidly growing area of employment within the gig economy.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    与道路交通事故(RTC)相关的通行费很高,受伤的负担不成比例地由行人和驾车者承担,特别是在发展中国家。这项研究综合了非洲与摩托车相关RTC的相关因素。
    PICO框架和进行审查的PRISMA指南被纳入搜索,筛选,并报告调查结果。在五个电子数据库中进行高级搜索(谷歌学者,PubMedCentral,Scopus,CINAHL,和Embase)从手动搜索中产生了2552个标题和22个标题,过滤为2016年至2022年(生成1699),然后进一步进行初步研究(854)。通过标题,摘要和全文筛选,22适合本次审查。数据提取由两位研究人员独立完成,并对结果进行了比较。采用趋同合成对结果进行整合,转化为叙事,并使用主题合成进行分析。
    确定的四个主要主题是与骑手有关的,非骑手相关因素,RTC损伤的患病率和严重程度,以及降低RTC的措施。与RTC相关的行为因素是饮酒,吸烟,使用非法药物,骑手的疲倦,交通规则知识贫乏,不止一个枕头骑手,缺乏驾照,不遵守交通规则,不使用个人防护设备。道路交通事故在年轻人和男性中很常见。确定的其他因素包括不良的道路网络,警方意外停止行动,非法车辆包装,城市化进程加快,和光滑的地板。
    有必要制定针对骑手行为改变的多部门措施。协调努力应针对政府,执法机关,和监管机构执行确保道路安全使用的法规。
    The toll associated with road traffic crashes (RTC) is high, and the burden of injury is disproportionately borne by pedestrians and motor riders, particularly in developing countries. This study synthesized the factors associated with motorcycle-related RTC in Africa.
    The PICO framework and the PRISMA guidelines for conducting reviews were incorporated in searching, screening, and reporting the findings. Advanced search in five electronic databases (Google Scholar, PubMed Central, Scopus, CINAHL, and Embase) yielded 2552 titles and 22 from manual search, filtered for 2016 to 2022 (to generate 1699) and then further for primary studies (854). Through the title, abstract and full-text screening, 22 were appropriate for this review. Data extraction was done by the two researchers independently, and the results were compared. Convergent synthesis was adopted to integrate results, transformed into a narrative, and analyzed using thematic synthesis.
    The four main themes identified were the rider-related, non-rider-related factors, prevalence and severity of injuries from RTC, and the measures to reduce RTC. The behavioral factors associated with RTC were alcohol use, smoking, use of illicit drugs, tiredness of rider, poor knowledge on traffic regulations, more than one pillow rider, lack of rider license, non-observance of traffic regulations, and non-use of personal protective equipment. Road traffic crashes were common among younger age and male gender. Other factors identified included poor road network, unplanned stoppage by police, unlawful vehicular packing, increased urbanization, and slippery floors.
    There is the need to institute multi-sectoral measures that target riders\' behavior change. Coordinated efforts should target governments, enforcement authorities, and regulatory bodies to enforce enactment that ensures safe use of roads.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目标:评估中低收入国家(LMICs)道路安全干预措施的有效性,考虑到《道路安全行动十年全球计划》中提出的系统理论原则。方法:我们根据PRISMA指南进行了系统评价。我们在以下数据库中搜索了2011-2019年期间发表的原创研究:Medline,Embase,PsycInfo,Scopus,WebofScience,科克伦图书馆,全球健康图书馆,ProQuest和TRID。我们纳入了在LMIC中进行的研究,评估道路交通安全干预措施的效果并报告与健康相关的结果。结果:在12,353条非重复记录中,我们共纳入33项研究.大多数干预措施与立法和执法有关(n=18),领导力(n=5)和速度管理(n=4)。总的来说,立法和执法干预似乎产生了最大的影响。很少有关于道路基础设施的研究,车辆安全标准和碰撞后响应干预措施。结论:根据现有证据,立法和执法干预措施对低收入国家影响最大。然而,许多干预措施仍未得到充分研究,似乎需要采用更全面的方法来捕捉道路运输系统的复杂性。系统审查注册:https://www。crd.约克。AC.uk/prospro/display_record.php?RecordID=197267,标识符CRD42020197267。
    Objectives: To evaluate the effectiveness of road safety interventions in low and middle-income countries (LMICs), considering the principles of systems theory presented in the Global Plan for the Decade of Action for Road Safety. Methods: We conducted a systematic review according to PRISMA guidelines. We searched for original research studies published during 2011-2019 in the following databases: Medline, Embase, PsycInfo, Scopus, Web of Science, Cochrane library, Global Health Library, ProQuest and TRID. We included studies conducted in LMICs, evaluating the effects of road traffic safety interventions and reporting health-related outcomes. Results: Of 12,353 non-duplicate records, we included a total of 33 studies. Most interventions were related to legislation and enforcement (n = 18), leadership (n = 5) and speed management (n = 4). Overall, legislation and enforcement interventions appear to have the largest impact. Few studies were found for road infrastructure, vehicle safety standard and post crash response interventions. Conclusion: Based on the currently available evidence, legislation and enforcement interventions appear most impactful in LMICs. However, many interventions remain understudied and more holistic approaches capturing the complexity of road transport systems seem desirable. Systematic Review Registration: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?RecordID=197267, identifier CRD42020197267.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

公众号