tissue stiffness

组织硬度
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    Ultrasound elastography is an innovation of ultrasound technology that has developed since the 1990s. It has been successfully applied for many organs, such as the thyroid, breast, liver, prostate, and muscle systems, providing qualitative and quantitative information about tissue stiffness for clinical diagnoses. For colorectal tumors, ultrasound elastography can distinguish colon adenoma from colon adenocarcinoma and predict the chemotherapeutic effects of colon cancer by monitoring the stiffness changes of cancer tissue. In Crohn\'s disease, ultrasound elastography helps assess the stages of the course and guides further treatment strategies. Compared with colonoscopy, ultrasound elastography frees patients from the fears of uncomfortable procedures and enables operators to comprehensively observe the bowel wall and the surrounding structures. In this review, we introduced the principles and the pathological basis of ultrasound elastography and compared the diagnostic efficacies of colonoscopy with colonic ultrasound elastography. Meanwhile, we summarized the ultrasonography of colonic diseases and reviewed the clinical usefulness of ultrasound elastography in colonic diseases.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    超声二维剪切波弹性成像(US2D-SWE)是一种非侵入性、用于量化组织硬度的成本有效工具。在对美国2D-SWE进行肌肉骨骼研究的兴趣日益浓厚的情况下,建议应报告剪切波速(SWV)而不是弹性模量,以避免在数据中引入不必要的误差。这项范围审查审查了US2D-SWE在骨骼肌中测量SWV的不断发展的用途,并确定了优缺点以指导未来的研究。我们搜索了电子数据库和关键评论参考列表,以确定2000年1月至2021年5月之间发表的文章。两名审稿人在标题/摘要和全文筛选期间评估了记录的资格,一位审阅者提取并编码了数据。六十六项研究符合资格标准,其中58篇发表于2017年或更晚。我们发现对于年龄和性别对骨骼肌SWV的影响缺乏共识,和广泛可变的可靠性值。研究之间在方法上的巨大差异表明,迫切需要制定标准化的,已验证的扫描协议。这篇范围审查说明了US2D-SWE在肌肉骨骼研究中的应用广度,数据综合揭示了当前文献中几个显著的不一致和空白,值得在未来的研究中加以考虑。
    Ultrasound 2-D shear wave elastography (US 2D-SWE) is a non-invasive, cost-effective tool for quantifying tissue stiffness. Amidst growing interest in US 2D-SWE for musculoskeletal research, it has been recommended that shear wave velocity (SWV) should be reported instead of elastic moduli to avoid introducing unwanted error into the data. This scoping review examined the evolving use of US 2D-SWE to measure SWV in skeletal muscle and identified strengths and weaknesses to guide future research. We searched electronic databases and key review reference lists to identify articles published between January 2000 and May 2021. Two reviewers assessed the eligibility of records during title/abstract and full-text screening, and one reviewer extracted and coded the data. Sixty-six studies met the eligibility criteria, of which 58 were published in 2017 or later. We found a striking lack of consensus regarding the effects of age and sex on skeletal muscle SWV, and widely variable reliability values. Substantial differences in methodology between studies suggest a pressing need for developing standardized, validated scanning protocols. This scoping review illustrates the breadth of application for US 2D-SWE in musculoskeletal research, and the data synthesis exposed several notable inconsistencies and gaps in current literature that warrant consideration in future studies.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:糖尿病与软组织结构和功能的改变有关。然而,这种变化的方向性以及组织厚度或僵硬对糖尿病相关足部溃疡发病机制的影响程度尚不清楚.因此,本系统综述旨在总结糖尿病患者和非糖尿病患者足部软组织结构差异的现有证据。
    方法:符合MOOSE和PRISMA指南,AMED,CINAHL,MEDLINE,ProQuest健康与医疗收藏,ProQuest护理和相关健康数据库,和WebofScience电子数据库被系统地搜索从数据库开始到2020年10月1日发表的研究[ProsperoCRD42020166614]。进一步筛选纳入研究的参考列表。使用麦克马斯特大学开发的用于定量研究的改良关键评估工具评估了方法学质量。
    结果:总共有35项非随机观察性研究适合纳入。在这些之内,20项研究评估了足底组织厚度,19项研究评估了足底组织硬度,9项研究评估了跟腱厚度,5项研究评估了跟腱刚度结果。在55%的研究(11/20)中,有和没有糖尿病的人之间足底组织厚度没有发现显著差异,而在47%的研究中发现糖尿病患者足底组织硬度显著增加(9/19)。在44%的研究中(4/9),糖尿病患者的跟腱厚度显着增加,而在60%的研究(3/5)中,糖尿病患者和非糖尿病患者的跟腱硬度没有显著差异。
    结论:本系统综述发现了一些糖尿病患者和非糖尿病患者之间软组织结构差异的证据。然而,这些差异是否独立导致糖尿病相关足部溃疡仍存在不确定性.方法学方法的异质性使得难以在不同研究中进行比较,方法学质量普遍不足。需要在明确定义的人群中使用标准化和验证的评估技术进行高质量的研究,以更充分地确定结构组织特性在糖尿病相关足部溃疡发病机理中的作用。
    BACKGROUND: Diabetes mellitus is associated with changes in soft tissue structure and function. However, the directionality of this change and the extent to which either tissue thickness or stiffness contributes to the pathogenesis of diabetes-related foot ulcerations is unclear. Hence, this systematic review aims to summarise the existing evidence for soft tissue structural differences in the feet of people with and without diabetes.
    METHODS: In compliance with MOOSE and PRISMA guidelines, AMED, CINAHL, MEDLINE, ProQuest Health & Medical Collection, ProQuest Nursing & Allied Health Database, and Web of Science electronic databases were systematically searched for studies published from database inception until 1st October 2020 [Prospero CRD42020166614]. Reference lists of included studies were further screened. Methodological quality was appraised using a modified critical appraisal tool for quantitative studies developed by McMaster University.
    RESULTS: A total of 35 non-randomised observational studies were suitable for inclusion. Within these, 20 studies evaluated plantar tissue thickness, 19 studies evaluated plantar tissue stiffness, 9 studies evaluated Achilles tendon thickness and 5 studies evaluated Achilles tendon stiffness outcomes. No significant differences in plantar tissue thickness were found between people with and without diabetes in 55% of studies (11/20), while significantly increased plantar tissue stiffness was found in people with diabetes in 47% of studies (9/19). Significantly increased Achilles tendon thickness was found in people with diabetes in 44% of studies (4/9), while no significant differences in Achilles tendon stiffness were found between people with and without diabetes in 60% of studies (3/5).
    CONCLUSIONS: This systematic review found some evidence of soft tissue structural differences between people with and without diabetes. However, uncertainty remains whether these differences independently contribute to diabetes-related foot ulcerations. The heterogeneity of methodological approaches made it difficult to compare across studies and methodological quality was generally inadequate. High-quality studies using standardised and validated assessment techniques in well-defined populations are required to determine more fully the role of structural tissue properties in the pathogenesis of diabetes-related foot ulcerations.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Sci-hub)

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    Pluripotent stem cells (PSCs) are an attractive, reliable source for generating functional cardiomyocytes for regeneration of infarcted heart. However, inefficient cell engraftment into host tissue remains a notable challenge to therapeutic success due to mechanical damage or relatively inhospitable microenvironment. Evidence has shown that excessively formed scar tissues around cell delivery sites present as mechanical and biological barriers that inhibit migration and engraftment of implanted cells. In this review, we focus on the functional responses of stem cells and cardiomyocytes during the process of cardiac fibrosis and scar formation. Survival, migration, contraction, and coupling function of implanted cells may be affected by matrix remodeling, inflammatory factors, altered tissue stiffness, and presence of electroactive myofibroblasts in the fibrotic microenvironment. Although paracrine factors from implanted cells can improve cardiac fibrosis, the transient effect is insufficient for complete repair of an infarcted heart. Furthermore, investigation of interactions between implanted cells and fibroblasts including myofibroblasts helps the identification of new targets to optimize the host substrate environment for facilitating cell engraftment and functional integration. Several antifibrotic approaches, including the use of pharmacological agents, gene therapies, microRNAs, and modified biomaterials, can prevent progression of heart failure and have been developed as adjunct therapies for stem cell-based regeneration. Investigation and optimization of new biomaterials is also required to enhance cell engraftment of engineered cardiac tissue and move PSCs from a laboratory setting into translational medicine.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Sci-hub)

       PDF(Pubmed)

公众号