Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) can manifest with ocular symptoms. These symptoms can be divided into isolated events attributed to COVID-19, and those occurring in multisystem inflammatory syndrome in children (MIS-C), a newly diagnosed disease entity associated with COVID-19 infection. Currently, the literature lacks specific guidelines and treatment regimens for COVID-19 ocular symptoms, especially in children. The authors present the case of a 14-and-a-half-year-old boy with bilateral uveitis of the anterior and posterior segments along with vasculitis and optic neuritis associated with SARS-CoV-2 infection. The authors also perform an up-to-date review of all available publications on the treatment of post-COVID-19 uveitis in children described in the literature between 2020 and 2023. In the case described by the authors, the treatment involved a Depo-Medrol 40 mg/mL injection uder the Tenon capsule, with two subconjunctival injections of epinephrine, topical steroid therapy and non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs: dexamethasone 0.1%; diclofenac eye drops. In addition, acetylsalicylic acid (150 mg) and pentoxifylline (100 mg, orally) were administered throughout the course of the disease as well as up to 12 months after its termination, until a complete improvement in visual acuity and the withdrawal of ocular lesions were achieved. It can be assumed that this type of treatment is far more beneficial for pediatric patients, with an effect comparable to systemic steroid administration with a preserved improvement in retinal-vascular circulation, without exposing the child to systemic post-steroid complications.

COVID-19 infection has been associated with thrombotic complications, especially venous thromboembolism. Although arterial thrombotic complications are rarely seen in these patients, we report the case of a 43-year-old patient who developed thrombosis of the main branch of the left renal artery, causing partial infarction of the left kidney associated with severe pain. He had no risk factors for thrombosis except for COVID-19 infection. We excluded any possible condition usually associated with renal artery thrombosis/embolism (i.e., cardiovascular, oncological, hematological, or rheumatic). The thrombosis resolved after a combination of anticoagulant and anti-platelet therapy. This case highlights the importance of the risk of recurrence of thrombosis in patients with a recent history of COVID-19, even after hospital discharge, improvement of the initial thrombotic event, and clearance of SARS-CoV-2 infection.

The outcomes of COVID-19 in kidney transplant recipients have shown high mortality. In addition to their immunocompromised states, kidney transplant recipients frequently have certain exacerbation risk comorbidities of COVID-19, such as diabetes mellitus, hypertension, and chronic kidney disease. Several concomitant diseases develop during the course of COVID-19, one of which is thromboembolism, which can potentially lead to a critical condition. However, thromboembolic complications in kidney transplant recipients with COVID-19 have not been fully addressed in previous studies. A 62-year-old man, who underwent kidney transplantation 17 years ago, was diagnosed with COVID-19 and was admitted to our hospital. Although the patient was in remission at the start of the hospitalization, his condition became severe on day 7 after admission, with fever, elevated white blood cell counts (10,000/μL) and a high C-reactive protein level (6.9 mg/dL). Although the patient was not under forced bed rest, an ultrasound study on day 10 detected deep venous thrombosis (DVT), with an elevated D-dimer level (6.2 µg/dL). We withdrew the mycophenolate mofetyl and the tacrolimus dosage but did not administer any specific treatment for COVID-19. The patient achieved successful clearance of SARS-CoV-2 on day 16. The DVT disappeared after systematic heparin treatment and oral rivaroxaban for 2 months. DVT occurred in a kidney transplant recipient with COVID-19 who was not bedridden and might manifest when the clinical status was exacerbated during hospitalization.

Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is known to manifest with bilateral pneumonia and acute respiratory distress syndrome. This infection with severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SAR-CoV-2) is alarming because it not only affects the respiratory system but may also cause thromboembolic events. Multiple studies have reported procoagulation/hypercoagulable complications in COVID-19. This case series is a valuable addition to the literature because it reflects unique presentations of thrombotic events in COVID-19 patients. We report two cases in which patients presented with thromboembolic complications secondary to COVID-19 infection: one with severe bowel ischemia and the other with blue toe syndrome. To formulate management strategies to prevent fatal outcomes for patients with COVID-19, physicians must be vigilant in identifying life-threatening thromboembolic complications from this disease.

Many reports focus on the probability of intracranial hemorrhage as a complication after recombinant tissue plasminogen activator (rt-PA) therapy. However, thromboembolic complications are not well discussed. We experienced a case in which severe thromboembolic complications occurred in the right radial and right ulnar artery. Arterial fibrillation was observed in this case. If multiple thrombi exist in the atrium or ventricle, multiple small embolic particles may appear following thrombolytic therapy, and that may be a potential risk of secondary thromboembolic complications due to incomplete dissolution of thrombi. Transesophageal echocardiography is a standard method to detect intracardiac sources of emboli in the case of arterial fibrillation. Transesophageal echocardiography is, however, an invasive method for patients with ischemic stroke during rt-PA therapy. High resolution enhanced CT could be a useful tool and may be a reliable alternative to transthoracic echocardiography. Careful assessment of thromboembolic complications following rt-PA therapy in patients with arterial fibrillation is needed. In this case report and mini review, we would like to discuss about the accurate diagnostic methods to detect cardiac or undetermined embolic sources and provide expedited stroke care. These embolic sources may be more readily discovered during rt-PA therapy within the limited therapeutic time window.

Direct oral factor inhibitors (DOFIs) are an attractive alternative to vitamin K antagonists (VKA) for the treatment of patients with antiphospholipid syndrome (APS). In the absence of prospective, randomised trial data, reports of therapeutic failures in clinical practice alert clinicians to potential limitations of DOFI therapy for this indication. Data for all cases were collected from a centralised system that contains complete medical records of all patients treated and followed at Mayo Medical Center. We present here three consecutive APS patients who had had no thromboembolism recurrence on warfarin but were switched to DOFIs. The diagnosis of APS was established according to currently recommended criteria. The three cases were as follows: A woman with primary APS developed thrombotic endocarditis with symptomatic cerebral emboli after transition to dabigatran. A second woman with primary APS experienced ischemic arterial strokes and right transverse-sigmoid sinus thrombosis after conversion to rivaroxaban. A man with secondary APS suffered porto-mesenteric venous thrombosis after switching to rivaroxaban. None of these patients had failed warfarin prior to the transition to DOFIs. Based on these three cases, we advocate caution in using DOFIs for APS patients outside of a clinical trial setting, until further data becomes available.