To explore how the expression of positive emotions during the interaction between patients and providers can cultivate the patient-provider relationship.
We conducted a realist review guided by the Realist and Meta-narrative Evidence Syntheses: Evolving Standards.
We systematically searched CINAHL, MEDLINE, PsychINFO and Scopus from inception to March 2019. Study selection and data extraction were performed blinded in pairs. From 3146 abstracts blinded in pairs, 15 papers were included and analysed. From each included paper, we extracted contexts, mechanisms and outcomes that were relevant to answer our research questions, creating a configuration between these elements (CMO configuration).
Our findings suggest that in the contexts of person orientation and positive outlook, patient-provider relationships improve by communication conveying and eliciting positive emotions. We found six underlying mechanisms for this that form either direct or indirect pathways between the context and the outcome.

WHAT IS KNOWN ON THE SUBJECT?: Engagement is regarded as important and beneficial for service users and mental health services A universal definition of engagement is not yet fully agreed upon. WHAT THIS PAPER ADDS TO EXISTING KNOWLEDGE?: Based upon their experience, mental health staff use varied engagement approaches to fit with the changeable and unique needs of people who use services (service users). Mental health staff demonstrate qualities such as persistence and adaptability to successfully engage with service users. WHAT ARE THE IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE?: Irrespective of professional background, the role of community mental health staff is not restricted to any single approach. Practical help and social support are as seen as important as clinical treatment to establish successful engagement. Little is known about the engagement experiences of mental health staff working in early intervention settings as most studies in this review focused on the perspectives of staff based in assertive outreach or community mental health teams. There is a need to further understand staff experiences of engagement with service users in early intervention settings. Role descriptions and expectations of community mental health workers should account for the wide-ranging flexible approach required in order to deliver appropriate interventions. This may involve a focus on engagement in training programmes. ABSTRACT: Introduction Effective mental health care is dependent on engaging service users, but some individuals do not actively attend appointments, and may stop engaging with mental health services. Quantitative studies reveal some salient factors that seem to predict engagement, but these studies miss the nuances of good clinical practice in this area. A number of qualitative studies of health professionals\' experiences and understanding of effective engagement have been published. Aim This review aimed to systematically identify, evaluate and synthesize results from these studies with a view to informing effective practice in this area. Methods Electronic databases MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, PsychINFO and AMED were searched (PROSPERO systematic review protocol registry (www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/; ID CRD42017083976). Of 799 records, ten papers met the inclusion criteria. All papers were subjected to quality appraisal based on the CASP checklist and data systematically extracted. A thematic synthesis of included studies examining mental health practitioners\' experiences of engagement in community mental health settings was conducted. Results Mental health practitioners see engaging service users as depending upon complex, multi-dimensional phenomena which should include individualized person-centred approaches as well as practical, social and clinical support. Mental health practitioners demonstrate qualities such as determination and adaptability to establish and maintain engagement with service users. Implications for practice As a core aspect of nurse education, registered mental health nurses and other professionals would benefit from systematic guidance regarding engagement strategies. Most studies in this review focused on assertive outreach or community mental health teams, more clarification is needed of practitioner\'s engagement experiences in early intervention settings.

WHAT IS KNOWN ABOUT THE SUBJECT?: Risk in psychiatry involves harm to self or others owing to mental health difficulties, for example iatrogenic effects of treatment, self-harm, suicide and violence. Risk management is a framework to minimize risks, comprising of risk assessment, generation of risk management plans and evaluation of interventions. Literature has extensively explored risk management and presented a critique that its practices can lead to patient harm. However, there is a paucity of literature about what patients identify as helpful risk management practices, despite the potential for such patient views to ameliorate harm and improve mental health care. WHAT THIS PAPER ADDS TO EXISTING KNOWLEDGE: Interpersonal relationships with clinicians, and communication that keeps patients involved and informed of management processes, were found to be central to beneficial risk management practices, while patients having agency and autonomy to influence their participation was also important. Beneficial interpersonal relationships and connectivity in the form of patients\' wider community of support were found to be influential in aiding risk management. Meaningful relationships, and particularly peer support, that maintained personal and collective identities were prevalent in the literature. WHAT ARE THE IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE?: Rendering risk management more visible and accessible in practice might cultivate an openness that promotes patient participation. This includes drawing on a wider network of support, for example the patient\'s friends and family, as well as having advocacy utilizing peer support. Abstract Introduction Minimizing the harm that patients pose to themselves and others, due to mental health difficulties, is a central component of risk management in psychiatry. However, risk management itself can cause patient harm, but despite this and the potentially informative value of lived experience, little is known about what patients want or expect from risk management. Aim To review research and explore what patients consider beneficial in risk management practice. Method A mixed studies systematic review utilizing PRISMA guidelines, alongside a convergent qualitative design to categorize findings. Results Twelve papers were identified, generating two categories of beneficial practices: interpersonal relationships and communication with clinicians; coupled with patient agency in their own risk management. Discussion Connectivity appears important. Particularly patients feeling involved, and their voices being heard in both the identification of risks and then shaping risk management practice. Moreover, this included involvement of friends, family and peers to widen input and supportive networks beyond clinical relationships. Implications for Practice Risk management needs to be an accessible part of care, which is more inclusive of patient views and needs. The latter might also be aided by drawing on the patient\'s wider community in order to provide more effective support and risk management.

WHAT IS KNOWN ON THE SUBJECT?: It is generally felt that it is helpful for mental health nurses to control their emotions during their work. There are different approaches, but there is growing acceptance that different emotions may need different coping strategies. There is lots of evidence that nurses sometimes feel anger in a number of situations, but the research about anger in mental health nurses has never been examined as a whole. WHAT THIS PAPER ADDS TO EXISTING KNOWLEDGE?: We have systematically identified all previous research where nurses completed measures that tried to measure their anger in certain situations, compared it to other people or investigated how it affected them or what its relationship was with their practice. Only a few studies have measured nurses\' anger. However, it seems that while nurses are not generally angrier than any other group, they do often feel anger in relation to management of patient aggression and their job situation more generally. WHAT ARE THE IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE?: Anger is the most commonly reported problematic emotion for mental health nurses. It may influence their practice and affect their well-being. This has implications for staff support and training.
UNASSIGNED: Introduction Emotional regulation is important in mental health nursing practice, but individual emotions may require different regulation strategies. There is ample evidence that nurses experience anger specifically during their work, for example when experiencing patient aggression. It is, therefore, important to consolidate what is known about how anger manifests in mental health nursing practice.
OBJECTIVE: We aimed to systematically identify, evaluate and synthesize results from studies about mental health nurses and anger, where anger was measured objectively.
METHODS: Systematic literature review based on PRISMA guidelines.
RESULTS: We identified 12 studies. A range of validated and nonvalidated instruments was used. Mental health nurses may have lower levels of anger than normative samples, but anger is commonly reported as an issue for them. Anger was studied in relation to its links with (1) clinical management of patients, notably violence containment; and (2) employment issues more generally, notably job motivation. Anger is related to nurses\' attitudes about the acceptability of coercion, but there is no evidence that it results in more coercion.
CONCLUSIONS: Nurses should be aware of the potential influence of anger on their practice. Anger, specifically, should be considered when supporting mental health nurses, for example in clinical supervision. Emotional regulation training should target anger.

This systematic review explored how adult survivors of child sexual abuse experienced nonspecific and trauma-focused talking therapies. Following extensive systematic searches of academic databases, 23 qualitative empirical studies were chosen for review. Using a line-by-line thematic synthesis, four analytical themes developed. These themes were: The Therapeutic Process as a Means for Forming Connections, which discusses therapeutic relationships; Developing a Sense of Self Through the Therapeutic Processes, which identifies stages of developmental recovery; Therapeutic Lights and Black Holes in the Shadows of child sexual abuse, which reflects on how a history of child sexual abuse influenced experiences of therapy; and Healing or Harrowing: Connecting With Others and First-time Experiences, which explores what was helpful, hindering, and new throughout the therapeutic journey. Findings related to participants developing new options for interpersonal relationships through the experience of authentic trust and the experiential learning of control and choice. Recommendations are discussed in relation to developing therapeutic practice and future research.

OBJECTIVE: To describe how nurses experience caring for people with intellectual disability in an acute care setting.
BACKGROUND: Recent advances in the care of people with intellectual disability in hospital are primarily based upon the experiences of people with intellectual disability and their caregivers. Little is known about the experiences of registered nurses caring for people with intellectual disability, yet the experiences of nurses in delivering care largely determine the quality of care experienced by people with intellectual disability and their caregivers.
METHODS: A narrative literature review using electronic database searches was conducted using variants of the terms disability, nursing and acute care.
RESULTS: Through our reading of the recent literature describing the experiences of nurses caring for people with intellectual disability in an acute care setting, we have identified three themes: (1) nurses feel underprepared when caring for patients with intellectual disability, (2) nurses experience challenges when communicating with people with intellectual disability and (3) nurses have ambiguous expectations of paid and unpaid caregivers.
CONCLUSIONS: The enablers of and barriers to the delivery of nursing care in acute care settings need to be made explicit and researchers and nurses need to collaborate in the development, implementation and evaluation of care delivery strategies.
CONCLUSIONS: Nurses need to be adequately prepared to care for people with intellectual disability. Preparation should include dealing with the complexities of communicating with people with intellectual disability and practical experience of doing so in clinical and educational environments that ensure the safety and dignity of nurses and people with intellectual disability. Nurses need supportive strategies for developing therapeutic relationships with a range of informal and formal caregivers.

OBJECTIVE: For the purposes of this study, a selective review of the literature was undertaken with the aim of examining nurses\' preparedness to engage in intimate interactions within the context of sexual health care. Kirk\'s (2007) model of interactional intimacy is used as a lens to examine the literature.
BACKGROUND: The provision of sexual health care is often a neglected area of nursing care despite being recognised as a component of holistic nursing practice. Despite theoretical discussion about various forms of intimacy and intimate care, there has been little examination of the interface between intimacy and sexual health care that usefully informs practice.
METHODS: Selective review and synthesis of the literature.
CONCLUSIONS: The literature of humanistic interpretations of caring that has dominated nursing discourse over the last half-century has limited progress on defining and developing forms of clinical interaction that are suited to promoting nurses engagement in sexual health care. We propose that Kirk\'s model has useful utility in preparing nurses to engage more readily with sexual health care as a routine component of their practice.
CONCLUSIONS: Sexual health adversity can often accompany ill health, and therefore, the provision of appropriate care is required to negate detrimental outcomes and promote positive well-being. Although sexual health care is often not prioritised in practice, nurses are in a prime position to promote sexual health care and well-being. By conducting sexual health assessments and providing sexual health care routinely, the gap that exists between patients\' sexual healthcare needs and the lack of sexual health care provided can be minimised.