了解（a）使用“if-then”计划减少精神病患者的久坐行为和（b）建议的应用程序内容的可接受性。
定性可接受性研究。
对8名有精神病发作经历的参与者进行了三个结构化的焦点小组和访谈。他们讨论了久坐的行为，更加活跃,在他们可能会久坐不动的危急情况下，以及这些问题的解决方案(if-then计划)，和移动应用程序的模型。可接受的理论框架(TFA)用于定性分析转录本。
在每个转录物中编码所有TFA构建体。减少久坐行为的想法对于精神病患者来说是可以接受的，参与者知道更积极的重要性，然而，这并不总是他们的首要任务。同样，该应用程序的建议内容被认为是可以接受的，参与者已经使用了一些建议的解决方案。
这是第一项使用TFA框架来评估应用程序的可接受性的研究，该应用程序使用紧急情况和解决方案（“如果计划”）来帮助减少精神病患者的久坐行为。在这个样本中(男性，主要讲英语的白人)，参与者了解更积极的好处。然而,减少久坐行为不是这个人群的主要优先事项，当他们的心理健康不好时，久坐有好处。
To understand the acceptability of (a) reducing sedentary-behaviour in people with psychosis using \'if-then\' plans and (b) the proposed app content.
Qualitative acceptability
study.
Three structured focus-groups and an interview were conducted with eight participants who had experience of a psychotic episode. They discussed sedentary-behaviour, being more active, critical situations in which they may be tempted to be sedentary and solutions to these (the if-then plans), and a mock-up of the mobile application. The Theoretical Framework of Acceptability (TFA) was used to analyse qualitatively the transcripts.
All TFA constructs were coded in each of the transcripts. The idea of reducing sedentary-behaviour was acceptable to people with psychosis, participants knew the importance of being more active, however it is not always their main priority. Likewise, the proposed content of the app was found to be acceptable, with participants already using some of the proposed solutions.
This was the first
study to use the TFA framework to assess the acceptability of an app that uses critical situations and solutions (\'if-then plans\') to help reduce sedentary behaviour for people with psychosis. In this sample (male, English speaking mainly white people), participants understood the benefits of being more active. However, reducing sedentary-behaviour is not the main priority of this population and being sedentary has benefits when their mental-health is bad.
