Isolated testicular tuberculosis is rare, often diagnosed incidentally during histopathological examination due to its asymptomatic nature. We present a case of a 35-year-old male with a left testicular mass mimicking malignancy. Despite normal tumor markers and negative imaging for pulmonary tuberculosis, left inguinal orchiectomy revealed testicular tuberculosis. Diagnostic challenges are compounded by the disease\'s rarity and atypical presentation. Genitourinary tuberculosis\'s diagnostic complexity underscores the need for heightened clinical suspicion, particularly in tuberculosis-endemic regions. While orchiectomy may be necessary, this case underscores the importance of considering tuberculosis in testicular masses. Early recognition facilitates appropriate management and underscores the importance of diagnostic vigilance.

We describe the case of a 41-year-old Hispanic male, inconsistently adherent to visits and workup due to socioeconomic challenges, who presented with a right testicular mass. Because of the overriding concern that this was malignant, he underwent a right orchiectomy. Pathology revealed granulomatous disease with no evidence of malignancy. No specific diagnosis was made histologically or microbiologically on primary laboratory investigation. Six months later, he developed swelling of the left testicle and was subsequently seen in consultation at the Infectious Disease Clinic Kern Medical. An extensive evaluation for granulomatous inflammation was undertaken without a positive result. A clinical diagnosis of tuberculous epididymal orchitis was made and the patient was initiated on standard 4-drug antituberculous therapy. There was a gradual resolution of pain and swelling. After 6 months of therapy, there was no evidence of residual disease. The patient remains asymptomatic after 8 months of post-therapy follow-up.

Testicular tuberculosis (TB) is an uncommon presentation of extrapulmonary TB. Although rare in incidence, it is a great masquerader and should be kept in consideration while assessing focal abnormalities involving the testis. Ultrasound findings alone may be non-specific and mimic other diagnoses including infection, inflammation, tumor, infarct, and trauma. The main objective of this sonographic pictorial review is to discuss the imaging findings, specific differentiating features against each differential and use of ancillary imaging findings whenever available. Concurrent involvement of epididymis, septated hydrocele, scrotal wall edema, and calcification of tunica vaginalis provides strong evidence in an appropriate setting. Available extratesticular ancillary imaging findings must be correlated for correct diagnosis due to non-specific imaging and clinical presentation. Misdiagnosis of scrotal TB may lead to otherwise avoidable epididymo-orchiectomy.