OBJECTIVE: Terlipressin infusion is effective in hepatorenal syndrome (HRS-AKI). However, its efficacy for HRS-AKI resolution in acute-on-chronic liver failure (ACLF) patients has been suboptimal. Progression of AKI is rapid in ACLF. We investigated whether early initiation of terlipressin(eTerli) can improve response rates.
METHODS: Consecutive ACLF patients with stage II/III AKI despite albumin resuscitation (40 g) were randomized to receive terlipressin at 2 mg/24 h plus albumin at 12 h (ET, n = 35) or at 48 h as standard therapy (ST, n = 35). (June 22, 2020 to June 10, 2022). The primary end-point was AKI reversal by day7.
RESULTS: Baseline parameters including AKI stage and ACLF-AARC scores in two arms were comparable. Full AKI response at day 7 was higher in ET [24/35 (68.6%)] than ST arm [11/35 (31.4%; P 0.03]. Day3 AKI response was also higher in ET arm [11/35 (31.4%) vs. 4/35 (11.4%), P 0.04]. Using ST compared to ET [HR 4.3; P 0.026] and day 3 serum creatinine > 1.6 mg/dl [HR 9.1; AUROC-0.866; P < 0.001] predicted HRS-AKI non-response at day 7. ET patients showed greater improvement in ACLF grade, mean arterial pressure, and urine output at day 3, and required lower albumin within 7 days than ET arm (149.1 ± 41.8 g vs. 177.5 ± 40.3 g, P 0.006) and had lower 28-day mortality: 40% vs. 65.7%, P 0.031]. Early use of terlipressin than ST [HR 2.079; P 0.038], baseline HE [HR 2.929; P 0.018], and AKI persistence at day 3 [HR 1.369; P 0.011] predicted 28-day mortality. Fifteen (21.4%) patients had treatment related adverse effects, none was life threatening.
CONCLUSIONS: In ACLF patients, early initiation of terlipressin for AKI persisting after 12 h of volume expansion with albumin helps in reduced short-term mortality and early AKI reversal with regression of ACLF stage. These results indicate need for change in current practice for terlipressin usage in HRS-AKI.

OBJECTIVE: Observational studies suggest a beneficial effect of continuous terlipressin infusion (CTI) on ascites and sarcopenia in decompensated cirrhosis with portal hypertension.
RESULTS: This single-center, prospective, cross-over study randomized 30 patients with cirrhosis, ascites, and sarcopenia to commence on 12 weeks of home CTI or 12 weeks of observation prior to cross-over. The co-primary outcomes were change in handgrip strength and paracentesis volume. Secondary outcomes included quality of life, sarcopenia measures, renal function, safety, and hospitalization. The median age of participants was 62 years (IQR: 57-64), the median Model for End-Stage Liver Disease-Sodium was 16 (12.3-20.8), and 22 (73%) were male. Handgrip strength increased by a mean adjusted difference (MAD) of 3.09 kg (95% CI: 1.11-5.08 kg) between CTI and observation ( p =0.006); an 11.8% increase from baseline. The total volume of ascites drained decreased by a MAD of 11.39L (2.99-19.85, p =0.01), with 1.75 fewer episodes of paracentesis (0.925-2.59, p <0.001) on CTI. Serum creatinine decreased, urinary sodium excretion increased, and quality of life was significantly higher on CTI (all p <0.001), with an increase in Chronic Liver Disease Questionnaire score of 0.41 points (0.23-0.59). There were 7 minor line-related complications but no cardiac events or pulmonary edema.
CONCLUSIONS: This novel study demonstrates a significant increase in handgrip strength, reduction in paracentesis volume, and improved quality of life in patients with decompensated cirrhosis treated with continuous terlipressin infusion. These findings provide a strong rationale for the use of ambulatory CTI in appropriately selected patients with cirrhosis.

In cirrhosis patients with acute variceal bleeding (AVB), the optimal duration of vasoconstrictor therapy after endoscopic haemostasis is unclear.
We aimed to compare efficacy of 1-day versus 3-day terlipressin therapy in cirrhosis patients with AVB post-endoscopic intervention. The primary objective was to compare rebleeding at 5 days between the two arms. Secondary objectives included rebleeding and mortality rates at 6 weeks.
In this open-label, randomised controlled trial, cirrhosis patients with AVB were randomised to either 1-day or 3-day terlipressin therapy.
A total of 150 cirrhosis patients with AVB were recruited to receive either 1 day (n = 75) or 3 days (n = 75) of terlipressin therapy. One patient from 1-day arm was excluded. Modified intention-to-treat analysis included 149 patients. Baseline characteristics were comparable between the two groups. Rebleeding at 5 days: 3 (4.1%; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.4-9.0) versus 4 (5.3%; 95% CI: 2.0-10.0), risk difference (RD) p = 0.726 and 5-day mortality rates: 1 (1.4%; 95% CI: 0-7.3) versus 1 (1.3%; 95% CI: 0.2-7.0), RD p = 0.960 were similar. Rebleeding at 42 days: 9 (12.2%; 95% CI: 7.0-20.0) versus 10 (13.3%; 95% CI: 7.0-20.0), RD p = 0.842 and mortality at 42 days: 5 (6.8%; 95% CI: 3.0-10.0) versus 4 (5.3%; 95% CI: 2.0-10.0), RD p = 0.704 were also similar. Patients in the 1-day terlipressin therapy arm experienced significantly fewer adverse effects compared with those receiving 3 days of terlipressin therapy: 28 (37.8%) versus 42 (56%), p = 0.026.
Our results suggest that 1 day of terlipressin therapy is associated with similar 5-day and 42-day rebleeding rates, 42-day mortality and an overall superior safety profile compared with 3-day of terlipressin therapy. These findings require to be validated in double-blinded, larger, multiethnic and multicentre studies across the various stages of cirrhosis (CTRI/2019/10/021771).

How to cite this article: Sahoo P, Kothari N, Sharma A, Goyal S. Author Reply: Comparison of Norepinephrine and Terlipressin vs Norepinephrine Alone for Management of Septic Shock: A Randomized Control Study. Indian J Crit Care Med 2023;27(8):603-604.

BACKGROUND: Severe postreperfusion syndrome (PRS) is a critical and potentially catastrophic event during deceased donor liver transplantation (LT). Terlipressin has been widely used as a renoprotective agent during the perioperative period of LT. This study was designed to evaluate whether prophylactic terlipressin would reduce the occurrence of severe PRS in deceased donor LT.
METHODS: In this single-center, randomized, double-blind trial, we randomly assigned adults who underwent deceased donor LT to receive 1 mg of terlipressin or placebo immediately after portal vein (PV) clamping. The primary outcome was the incidence of severe PRS after PV declamping, defined according to hypotension-based criteria per the Peking criteria.
RESULTS: Between March 2019 and January 2021, we enrolled 64 patients and randomly assigned 32 to the terlipressin group and 32 to the control group. Severe PRS was significantly less frequent in the terlipressin group than in the control group (9.4 vs. 53.1%; OR, 0.09; 95% CI, 0.02-0.36; P <0.001). The vasopressor requirements for inferior vena cava clamping and severe PRS were significantly reduced by the intervention compared to controls (all P <0.01). Prophylactic terlipressin stabilized the mean arterial pressure ( P =0.001) and heart rate ( P =0.040) at 30 min after anhepatic phase but increased the pulmonary capillary wedge pressure (PCWP) at 5 min after reperfusion ( P =0.003). Patients in the terlipressin group had a decreased right PV flow velocity following reperfusion ( P =0.001), a longer postoperative mechanical ventilation time ( P =0.029), a lower initial poor graft function rate ( P =0.012), and lower peak alanine transaminase levels ( P =0.032) after transplantation.
CONCLUSIONS: The prophylactic use of terlipressin reduces the incidence of severe PRS in deceased donor LT. However, concerns remain regarding elevated PCWP.

Terlipressin and noradrenaline are effective in the management of hepatorenal syndrome (HRS). There are no reports on the combination of these vasoconstrictors in type-1 HRS.
To evaluate terlipressin with or without noradrenaline in type-1 HRS not responding to terlipressin at 48 hours.
Sixty patients were randomized to receive either terlipressin (group A; n = 30) or a combination of terlipressin and noradrenaline infusion (group B; n = 30). In group A, terlipressin infusion was started at 2 mg/day and increased by 1 mg/day (maximum 12 mg/day). In group B, terlipressin was given at a constant dose of 2 mg/day. Noradrenaline infusion was started at 0.5 mg/h at baseline and increased to 3 mg/h in a stepwise manner. The primary outcome was treatment response at 15 days. Secondary outcomes were 30-day survival, cost-benefit analysis and adverse events.
There was no significant difference in the response rate between the groups (50% vs. 76.7%, p = 0.06) and 30-day survival was similar (36.7% vs. 53.3%, p = 0.13). Treatment was more expensive in group A (USD 750 vs. 350, p < 0.001). Adverse events were more frequent in group A (36.7% vs. 13.3%, p < 0.05).
The combination of noradrenaline and terlipressin infusion results in a non-significantly higher rate of HRS resolution with significantly fewer adverse effects in HRS patients who do not respond to terlipressin within 48 hours.

gov (NCT03822091).

BACKGROUND: Patients with cirrhosis and ascites (and portal hypertension) are at risk of developing acute kidney injury (AKI). Although many etiologies exist, hepatorenal AKI (HRS-AKI) remains a frequent and difficult-to-treat cause, with a very high mortality when left untreated. The standard of care is the use of terlipressin and albumin. This can lead to reversal of AKI, which is associated to survival. Nevertheless, only approximately half of the patients achieve this reversal and even after reversal patients remains at risk for new episodes of HRS-AKI. TIPS is accepted for use in patients with variceal bleeding and refractory ascites, which leads to a reduction in portal pressure. Although preliminary data suggest it may be useful in HRS-AKI, its use in this setting is controversial and caution is recommended given the fact that HRS-AKI is associated to cardiac alterations and acute-on-chronic liver failure (ACLF) which represent relative contraindications for transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS). In the last decades, with the new definition of renal failure in patients with cirrhosis, patients are identified at an earlier stage. These patients are less sick and therefore more likely to not have contraindications for TIPS. We hypothesize that TIPS could be superior to the standard of care in patients with HRS-AKI.
METHODS: This study is a prospective, multicenter, open, 1:1-randomized, controlled parallel-group trial. The main end-point is to compare the 12-month liver transplant-free survival in patients assigned to TIPS compared to the standard of care (terlipressin and albumin). Secondary end-point include reversal of HRS-AKI, health-related Quality of Life (HrQoL), and incidence of further decompensation among others. Once patients are diagnosed with HRS-AKI, they will be randomized to TIPS or Standard of Care (SOC). TIPS should be placed within 72 h. Until TIPS placement, TIPS patients will be treated with terlipressin and albumin. Once TIPS is placed, terlipressin and albumin should be weaned off according to the attending physician.
CONCLUSIONS: If the trial were to show a survival advantage for patients who undergo TIPS placement, this could be incorporated in routine clinical practice in the management of patients with HRS-AKI.
BACKGROUND: Clinicaltrials.gov NCT05346393 . Released to the public on 01 April 2022.

UNASSIGNED: Terlipressin improves renal function in patients with septic shock. However, the mechanism remains unclear. Here, we aimed to evaluate the effects of terlipressin on renal perfusion in patients with septic shock.
UNASSIGNED: This pilot study enrolled patients with septic shock in the intensive care unit of the tertiary hospital from September 2019 to May 2020. We randomly assigned patients to terlipressin and usual care groups using a 1:1 ratio. Terlipressin was intravenously pumped at a rate of 1.3 μg/kg/hour for 24 h. We monitored renal perfusion using renal contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS). The primary outcome was peak sonographic signal intensity (a renal perfusion parameter monitored by CEUS) at 24 h after enrollment.
UNASSIGNED: 22 patients were enrolled in this study with 10 in the terlipressin group and 12 in the usual care group. The baseline characteristics of patients between the two groups were comparable. The peak sonographic signal intensity at 24 h after enrollment in the terlipressin group (60.5 ± 8.6 dB) was significantly higher than that in the usual care group (52.4 ± 7.0 dB; mean difference, 7.1 dB; 95% CI, 0.4-13.9; adjusted p = .04). Patients in the terlipressin group had a lower time to peak, heart rates, norepinephrine dose, and a higher stroke volume at 24 h after enrollment. No significant difference in the urine output within 24 h and incidence of acute kidney injury within 28 days was found between the two groups.
UNASSIGNED: Terlipressin improves renal perfusion, increases stroke volume, and decreases norepinephrine dose and heart rates in patients with septic shock.

UNASSIGNED: To compare norepinephrine and terlipressin vs norepinephrine alone for management of septic shock.
UNASSIGNED: In this prospective, randomized control trial, 50 adult patients with septic shock were randomized into two groups. Group I received a combination of injection terlipressin 0.02 µg/kg/min (fixed dose) infusion and injection norepinephrine 0.01 µg/kg/min infusion and group II received injection norepinephrine 0.01 µg/kg/min infusion alone. Dose of noradrenaline in both the groups was titrated to achieve the target MAP of 65-70 mm Hg. The data collected were the dose of norepinephrine required to maintain an MAP of above 65 mm Hg, urine output, serum lactate, procalcitonin level, C-reactive protein, sequential organ failure assessment (SOFA) score, total duration of vasopressor support, and incidences of the adverse effects.
UNASSIGNED: The norepinephrine dose in group I vs group II at 12 hours was found to be 0.141 ± 0.067 vs 0.374 ± 0.096 µg/kg/min (p ≤0.005). The serum lactate was lower, and urine output was higher in group I than group II (p <0.05). Group I had a significantly greater reduction in SOFA score in 12 hours than group II. Group I patient also had a significant decrease in the duration of vasopressor administration than group II patients being discharged from the ICU. However, there was no difference in the mortality between the two groups during their ICU stay.
UNASSIGNED: A low-dose continuous infusion of terlipressin and norepinephrine could help attain early resuscitation goals for managing patients with septic shock.
UNASSIGNED: Sahoo P, Kothari N, Goyal S, Sharma A, Bhatia PK. Comparison of Norepinephrine and Terlipressin vs Norepinephrine Alone for Management of Septic Shock: A Randomized Control Study. Indian J Crit Care Med 2022;26(6):669-675.

BACKGROUND: Variceal hemorrhage (VH) is a medical emergency. Prompt endoscopic variceal ligation (EVL) is therapeutic. Terlipressin is used in VH and continued for 2-5 days even after EVL. As hemostasis is primarily achieved by EVL, the benefit of continuing trelipressin after EVL is unknown.
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy of continuing terlipressin after EVL to prevent re-bleed and mortality.
METHODS: In this pilot study, after EVL 74 patients of VH were randomized into two treatment groups TG2 & TG5, received terlipressin (1 mg IV bolus q 4 hourly) for 2 days and 5 days respectively and one control group (TG0), received 0.9% normal saline (10 mL IV bolus q 4 hourly) and followed up for 8 weeks.
RESULTS: A total of 9 (12.6%) patients had re-bleed with maximum 4 (5.6%) patients in TG5 group followed by 3 (4.2%) in TG2 and 2 (2.8%) in TG0 groups (P=0.670). The overall mortality was 15 (21.1%) patients, 6 (8.5%) patients in TG0 group, followed by 5 (7.0%) in TG5 and 4 (5.6%) in TG2 group (P=0.691). Adverse drug reactions were significantly higher in treatment groups with maximum 18 (24.32%) patients in TG5, followed by 8 (10.8%) in TG2 and 2 (2.7%) in TG0 groups (P=0.00). Duration of hospital stay was also significantly higher in treatment group, 6.63 (±0.65) days in TG5 followed by 3.64 (±0.57) in TG2 and 2.40 (±0.50) days in TG0 groups (P=0.00).
CONCLUSIONS: The rational for continuing terlipressin after EVL is doubtful as it didn\'t have any benefit for the prevention of re-bleed or mortality; rather it increased the risk of adverse drug reactions and duration of hospital stay. Further randomized clinical trials are encouraged to generate more evidence in support or against continuing terlipressin after EVL.