OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the diagnostic performance of corneal and conjunctival staining, and lid wiper epitheliopathy (LWE) in detecting dry eye disease, as defined by the global consensus Tear Film and Ocular Surface Society Dry Eye Workshop II (TFOS DEWS II) criteria.
METHODS: A total of 2066 community residents (1285 females; mean ± SD age, 40 ± 19 years) were recruited in an investigator-masked, prospective registry-based, diagnostic accuracy study. Dry eye symptomology and ocular surface parameters were assessed in a single clinical session. The Sjögren\'s International Collaborative Clinical Alliance (SICCA) corneal and conjunctival staining scoring and Korb lid wiper epitheliopathy (LWE) grading were evaluated by an independent masked assessor.
RESULTS: Overall, 807 (39 %) participants fulfilled the TFOS DEWS II criteria for dry eye disease, of which 178 (9 %) participants were classified as moderate-to-severe disease. The discriminative abilities of superior and inferior LWE (C-statistics, 0.724 and 0.712, respectively) were greater than corneal and conjunctival staining (C-statistics, 0.573 and 0.627, respectively). The Youden-optimal diagnostic cut-offs for the SICCA corneal and conjunctival staining scores were both ≥1, and the optimal thresholds for the Korb superior and inferior LWE grades were both ≥1. LWE was more commonly detected in both mild-to-moderate and moderate-to-severe dry eye disease, and demonstrated more consistent correlation with other ocular surface parameters across a broader range of disease severity.
CONCLUSIONS: LWE demonstrates superior diagnostic performance relative to corneal and conjunctival staining. These findings would support the routine incorporation of LWE evaluation as part of the diagnostic workup of dry eye disease.

Background/Objectives: Modern life is inconceivable without visual display terminal (VDT) work, including smartphones, computers, and games for both children and adults. VDT work under air conditioning and low humidity poses a high risk of dry eye and digital eye strain. Methods: Thirty-one participants were randomly divided into two groups using a desktop humidifier with photocatalytic technology, namely the \"with mist\" (humidifier) group and \"without mist\" (control) group. Participants performed VDT tasks using the humidifier with or without mist for 1 h. Ocular subjective symptoms and objective tear film parameters were assessed before, immediately after, and 1.5 h after the VDT task with or without mist. (Registry ID: UMIN000054379) Results: Ocular symptom scores improved significantly in the humidifier group immediately after the VDT task and up to 1.5 h later compared to before the task (p < 0.001, =0.006, respectively). Immediately after the VDT task, tear meniscus height was significantly higher and non-invasive breakup time was significantly longer in the humidifier group than in the control group (p < 0.001, =0.040, respectively). Plugging of the meibomian gland orifices was significantly reduced only in the humidifier group immediately after the VDT task compared to before the VDT task and remained significantly reduced up to 1.5 h later (p = 0.004, 0.016, respectively). Conclusions: The use of the photocatalytic desktop humidifier during VDT task resulted in significant improvements in the tear film parameters and subjective symptoms. The photocatalytic desktop humidifier could be effective in alleviating dry eye and eye strain in computer users in a modern office environment.

UNASSIGNED: Maintaining a stable tear film is crucial for having healthy human and animal vision. Animals are expected to have thicker lipid layers than humans due to living in high-temperature and humid environments.
UNASSIGNED: The study aimed to evaluate the lipid layer patterns (LLPs) in Arabian dogs and rabbits using a non-invasive, practical, and easy-to-use device and compare them to humans with healthy eyes.
UNASSIGNED: The study included 75 domestic Arabian dogs (42 males and 33 females; mean ± SD = 6.1 ± 12.7 months) and 75 rabbits (37 males and 38 females; mean ± SD = 3.1 ± 3.4 months). In addition, 75 individuals with healthy eyes (39 males and 36 females; mean ± SD = 25.7 ± 5.0 years) were included for comparison. EASYTEAR View+ assessed the LLP in each animal\'s and individual\'s right eye.
UNASSIGNED: The median LLP grades significantly differed between dogs and humans (Mann-Whitney U test, p < 0.001). Similarly, the LLP grades differed significantly between rabbits and humans (Mann-Whitney U test, p < 0.001). No significant difference (Mann-Whitney U test) in the LLP grades between dogs and rabbits was found. The analysis indicated that most dogs had either an A (34.7%) or a B grade (37.3%). Similarly, rabbits had predominantly A or 1 (46.7%) and B (30.7%) grades. On the other hand, humans had predominantly D (53.3%) and E (30.7%) grades.
UNASSIGNED: The EASYTEAR View+ has been employed to assess LLP in dogs and rabbits, and the measurements were compared to those of humans with normal ocular health. Dogs and rabbits have thinner lipid layers than healthy humans.

UNASSIGNED: Healthy vision in humans and animals requires a stable tear film. The environmental factor could affect the status of the tear film. Therefore, assessing the tear film in animals is essential to avoid visual system disturbance.
UNASSIGNED: The current research used a noninvasive device to evaluate the tear meniscus height (TMH) and lipid layer pattern (LLP) in domestic cats. In addition, the scores were compared with those of humans with healthy eyes.
UNASSIGNED: Fifty-four domestic cats (28 males and 26 females; mean ± SD = 13.9 ± 18.2 months) were randomly selected and included in the study. The cats were healthy, without any ocular disorders or diseases. Fifty-four healthy eye subjects (27 males and 27 females; mean ± SD = 25.6 ± 5.1 years) were randomly recruited and took part in the study for comparison. EASYTEAR View+ was used, for the first time, to assess the tear film parameters on the right eye of each subject. The examiner allowed a 5-minute gap between the tests. Each test was performed by the same examiner three times, followed by calculating the mean scores.
UNASSIGNED: Significant differences (Mann-Whitney U test) were found in the median scores of LLP (p = 0.009) between cats and subjects with healthy eyes. The median TMH score was higher in cats (0.18 mm) than in humans (0.14). However, no significant difference (Mann-Whitney U Test, p = 0.210) exists in the TMH scores between cats and humans. The LLP analysis indicated that a dense white-blue lipid layer (grade 4 or D; lipid layer thickness, LLT, = approximately 80 nm) was predominant in both cats (N = 24, 44.4%) and humans (N = 29, 53.7%). In comparison, variable colors lipid layer (grade 5 or E; LLT = 90-140 nm) was a minority in cats (N = 5, 9.3%) and common in humans (N = 16, 29.6%). The statistical analysis indicated medium correlations between cats\' TMH and LLP scores (r = 0.431, p < 0.01) and between age and TMH scores in humans (r = 0.440, p < 0.01). In addition, it indicated a weak correlation (r = 0.291, p < 0.05) between the LLP scores in cats and humans.
UNASSIGNED: Assessing animals\' tear film is essential to avoid any ocular disorders. EASYTEAR View+ is efficiently used to evaluate domestic cats\' TMH and LLP. Cats have thicker lipid layers and longer TMH comparable to those reported for humans with healthy eyes.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the prognostic ability of non-contact esthesiometry corneal and lid margin sensitivity measurements in detecting symptoms and signs of dry eye disease, as defined by the global consensus TFOS DEWS II criteria.
METHODS: A total of 87 community residents (58 females; mean ± SD age, 53 ± 16 years) were recruited in an investigator-masked, prospective, prognostic accuracy study. Dry eye symptomology, tear film parameters, and ocular surface characteristics were evaluated in a single clinical session, and non-contact esthesiometry corneal and lid margin sensitivity measurements performed by an independent masked assessor.
RESULTS: Overall, 49 (56%) participants fulfilled the TFOS DEWS II criteria for dry eye disease, while 57 (66%) exhibited clinical symptoms, and 67 (77%) had positive signs. The prognostic abilities of corneal and lid margin sensitivity measurements were significantly greater than chance for the detection dry eye signs (both p ≤ 0.03), but not for symptoms or overall disease diagnosis (all p > 0.10). The Youden-optimal prognostic cut-offs for corneal and lid margin sensitivity thresholds were both ≥0.8 mbar for the detection of clinical dry eye signs. Lid margin sensitivity demonstrated marginally higher predictive performance than corneal sensitivity (C-statistic, 0.688 versus 0.658), and was significantly correlated with tear film stability, corneal, conjunctival and lid wiper staining (all p < 0.05).
CONCLUSIONS: Corneal and lid margin sensitivity demonstrated moderate prognostic utility for detecting clinical dry eye signs. Future research is warranted to investigate the utility of incorporating non-contact esthesiometry in the workup for dry eye disease and neurotrophic keratopathy.

Glaucoma is a leading cause of blindness worldwide, with elevated intraocular pressure being a major risk factor for its development and progression. First-line treatment for glaucoma relies on the administration of prostaglandin analogs, with latanoprost being the most widely used. However, before latanoprost reaches the cornea, it must pass through the tear film and tear film lipid layer (TFLL) on the ocular surface. Given the significant lipophilicity of latanoprost, we hypothesize that TFLL could, to a certain extent, act as a reservoir for latanoprost, releasing it on longer time scales, apart from the fraction being directly delivered to the cornea in a post-instillation mechanism. We investigated this possibility by studying latanoprost behavior in acellular in vitro TFLL models. Furthermore, we employed in silico molecular dynamics simulations to rationalize the experimental results and obtain molecular-level insight into the latanoprost-TFLL interactions. Our experiments demonstrated that latanoprost indeed accumulates in the TFLL models, and our simulations explain the basis of the accumulation mechanism. These results support the hypothesis that TFLL can serve as a reservoir for latanoprost, facilitating its prolonged release. This finding could have significant implications for optimizing glaucoma treatment, especially in the development of new drug delivery systems targeting the TFLL.

OBJECTIVE: Determine tear film kinetics with different fluorescein concentrations and repeated eye drop administration at various time intervals.
METHODS: Six healthy Beagles.
METHODS: Six experiments were conducted on separate days: single eye drop administration (control) or two separate eye drops administered at 30 s, 1, 2, 5, and 10 min intervals. For each experiment, one eye received 0.3% fluorescein solution while the other eye received 1% fluorescein solution, and tear fluid was collected with capillary tubes at 0, 1, 5, 10, 20, 30, 40, 50, 60, 90, 120, and 180 min. Fluorescein concentrations were measured using automated fluorophotometry.
RESULTS: Compared with 0.3% solution, eyes receiving 1% fluorescein solution had significantly higher tear film concentrations (p ≤ .046) and the area-under-the-fluorescein-time curve was twofold greater (p = .005). Compared with control: (i) Tear film concentrations were significantly higher for up to 20 min when repeating administration 30 s to 5 min after the first drop (p ≤ .006); (ii) The highest increase in area-under-the-curve was obtained with 2 and 5 min intervals for 0.3% (+109%-130%) and 1% solutions (+153%-157%); (iii) The highest increase in median precorneal retention time (defined as tear film concentration < 5% from baseline values) was obtained with 5 min intervals for 0.3% (55 min vs. 15 min in control) and 2-5 min intervals for 1% solutions (50 min vs. 25 min in control).
CONCLUSIONS: Drug delivery to the ocular surface can be enhanced by using more concentrated formulations and/or by repeating eye drop administration 2-5 min after the first dose.

OBJECTIVE: To compare the postoperative recovery of primary pterygium excision combined with either limbal stem cell transplantation (LSCT) or amniotic membrane transplantation (AMT).
METHODS: All relevant studies on the primary pterygium excision combined with either LSCT or AMT conducted before August 2022 were extracted from PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library databases. The main outcomes compared were tear film stability at 1, 3, and 6 months after surgery, postoperative corneal epithelial healing time, recurrence rate, and complications.
RESULTS: Sixteen randomized controlled trials (RCTs) with 1390 eye cases were included in this meta-analysis. We found that patients of the AMT group improved significantly in the results of the tear break-up time (BUT) and Schirmer I test at 1 month after surgery (BUT: MD=-0.37, 95% CI: -0.62, -0.12, P<0.05; Schirmer I test: MD=-0.32, 95% CI: -0.57, -0.07, P<0.05) compared with those of the LSCT group, suggesting that the early stage of tear film stability after primary pterygium excision combined with AMT was superior to the LSCT combination. However, according to the Schirmer I test result, the patients in the LSCT group showed increased tear production compared to the AMT group at 3 and 6 months after surgery (3 months: MD=0.36, 95% CI: 0.08, 0.64, P<0.05; 6 months: MD=0.33, 95% CI: 0.07, 0.60, P<0.05), suggesting that the LSCT combination was superior to the AMT combination in long-term postoperative tear film stability. As for postoperative corneal epithelial healing time, the LSCT group exhibited shorter time than the AMT group (MD=-1.17, 95% CI: -2.15, -0.19, P<0.05). Furthermore, the recurrence rate was lower in the LSCT group than in the AMT group (RR=0.42, 95% CI: 0.30, 0.59, P<0.05). Lastly, there was no statistical difference in BUT and complication rate at 3 and 6 months after surgery between the LSCT and AMT groups.
CONCLUSIONS: Our analysis suggests that primary pterygium excision combined with LSCT may be a better choice compared to the combination with AMT in postoperative recovery.

To determine the effects of a thermo-mechanical action-based peri-orbital fractional skin treatment (Tixel®) on dry eye disease.
This prospective, controlled, open labelled study was conducted at two study centres: Midland Eye, Solihull, UK, and Vallmedic Vision, Andorra. Participants were screened at the baseline visit (visit-1), received three Tixel® treatments at 2-weeks intervals including further assessment (visits 2, 3 and 4). Participants were followed up for three months post-treatment (visit 5). Vision, intraocular pressure (IOP), dry eye symptomatology were assessed, including the Ocular Surface Disease Index (OSDI) questionnaire, non-invasive tear break-up time (NIBUT) and tear osmolarity as well as detailed ophthalmic assessments.
Seventy-four participants (41 in Birmingham and 33 in Andorra) with periorbital wrinkles and moderate to severe dry eye disease (DED) were enrolled. The mean age was 59.3 ± 13.3 years and 57 were females. No adverse events, no change in vision (p = 0.310) or IOP (p = 0.419) were observed. Tixel treatment was associated with clinically and statistically significant improvement in the DED symptoms, which was supported by a reduction of 21.40 ± 15.08 (P < 0.001) of the OSDI index. Non-invasive tear break-up time improved by 2.10 ± 0.91 s (p < 0.001) in the Birmingham cohort and 6.60 ± 2.13 s (p < 0.001) in the Andorra cohort. Tear osmolarity reduced from 299.8 ± 13.3 mOsm/L to 298.8 ± 15.6 mOsm/L following the Tixel treatment (p = 0.271).
Thermo-mechanical action-based peri-orbital fractional skin treatment Tixel® could be an attractive, safe and effective treatment for DED. This treatment is associated with high clinical and statistically significant improvement in DED signs and symptoms with no adverse events.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the tear film layers and Meibomian glands by a noninvasive ocular surface analyzer in patients with and without type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1DM).
METHODS: Eighty-eight participants were enrolled in this study: 44 patients with T1DM without diabetic retinopathy, and 44 patients as a control group, between 18 and 49 years old. Limbal and bulbar redness classification, lipid layer thickness (LLT), tear meniscus height (TMH), first and mean noninvasive tear break-up time (FNIBUT and MNIBUT, respectively), and Meibomian glands loss (MGL) were assessment through the ICP Ocular Surface Analyzer (OSA). Schirmer\'s I test (SIT), the fluorescein tear break-up time test (TFBUT), OSDI and SPEED questionnaires, and percentage of glycosylated hemoglobin (HbA1c) were also tested.
RESULTS: The T1DM group showed higher limbal and bulbar redness (p = 0.010) and lower LLT (p < 0.001), TMH (p < 0.001), FNIBUT (p < 0.001), MNIBUT (p < 0.001), SIT (p = 0.001), and TFBUT (p < 0.001) than the control group. A higher percentage of MGL was found in the T1DM group in the upper (p = 0.097) and lower (p < 0.001) eyelids. No significant differences were found in dry eye symptoms across the OSDI and SPEED questionnaires between the two groups.
CONCLUSIONS: Patients with T1DM without signs of retinopathy showed involvement of the mucoaqueous and lipid layers of the tear film, as well as a higher percentage of MGL, using a noninvasive analyzer. Dry eye disease in people with T1DM cannot be ruled out by anamnesis and subjective symptom questionnaires alone; therefore, these patients should undergo regular anterior pole examinations.