systemic inflammation index

全身炎症指数
  • 文章类型: Meta-Analysis
    小说的鉴定,容易测量的炎症生物标志物可能增强免疫疾病(IDs)的诊断和管理。我们进行了系统评价和荟萃分析,以调查来自全血细胞计数的新兴生物标志物,全身炎症指数(SII),在有ID和健康对照的患者中。我们搜查了Scopus,PubMed,和WebofScience从成立到2023年12月12日的相关文章,并使用JoannaBriggs清单和建议等级评估了偏见的风险和证据的确定性,评估,发展,和评估工作组系统,分别。在16项符合条件的研究中,与对照组相比,患有ID的患者的SII明显更高(标准平均差,SMD=1.08,95%CI0.75至1.41,p<0.001;I2=96.2%,p<0.001;证据的中等确定性)。诊断准确性的合并曲线下面积(AUC)为0.85(95%CI0.82-0.88)。在亚组分析中,效应大小在不同类型的ID中显著,除非系统性红斑狼疮(p=0.20)。在进一步的分析中,活动性疾病的ID患者的SII明显高于缓解期(SMD=0.81,95%CI0.34-1.27,p<0.001;I2=93.6%,p<0.001;证据的中等确定性)。合并的AUC为0.74(95%CI0.70-0.78)。我们的研究表明,SII可以有效区分有和没有ID的受试者以及有和没有活动性疾病的ID患者。有必要进行前瞻性研究,以确定SII是否可以在常规实践中增强ID的诊断。(PROSPERO注册号:CRD42023493142)。
    The identification of novel, easily measurable biomarkers of inflammation might enhance the diagnosis and management of immunological diseases (IDs). We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to investigate an emerging biomarker derived from the full blood count, the systemic inflammation index (SII), in patients with IDs and healthy controls. We searched Scopus, PubMed, and Web of Science from inception to 12 December 2023 for relevant articles and evaluated the risk of bias and the certainty of evidence using the Joanna Briggs Checklist and the Grades of Recommendation, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation Working Group system, respectively. In 16 eligible studies, patients with IDs had a significantly higher SII when compared to controls (standard mean difference, SMD = 1.08, 95% CI 0.75 to 1.41, p < 0.001; I2 = 96.2%, p < 0.001; moderate certainty of evidence). The pooled area under the curve (AUC) for diagnostic accuracy was 0.85 (95% CI 0.82-0.88). In subgroup analysis, the effect size was significant across different types of ID, barring systemic lupus erythematosus (p = 0.20). In further analyses, the SII was significantly higher in ID patients with active disease vs. those in remission (SMD = 0.81, 95% CI 0.34-1.27, p < 0.001; I2 = 93.6%, p < 0.001; moderate certainty of evidence). The pooled AUC was 0.74 (95% CI 0.70-0.78). Our study suggests that the SII can effectively discriminate between subjects with and without IDs and between ID patients with and without active disease. Prospective studies are warranted to determine whether the SII can enhance the diagnosis of IDs in routine practice. (PROSPERO registration number: CRD42023493142).
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Meta-Analysis
    过度的全身促炎状态会增加2019年冠状病毒病患者的严重疾病和死亡风险(COVID-19)。然而,对于特定的炎症生物标志物是否可以增强该组的风险分层,目前还不确定.我们进行了系统评价和荟萃分析,以调查来自常规血液学参数的系统性炎症的新兴生物标志物。全身炎症指数(SII),在不同疾病严重程度和生存状态的COVID-19患者中。
    在PubMed进行了系统的文献检索,WebofScience,还有Scopus,在2019年12月1日至2023年3月15日之间。使用JoannaBriggs研究所关键评估清单和建议等级来评估偏倚和证据确定性的风险,评估,发展与评价,分别(PROSPERO注册号:CRD42023420517)。
    在39项研究中,与具有非严重疾病或生存状态的患者相比,具有严重疾病或非生存状态的患者在入院时的SII值显著较高(标准均差(SMD)=0.91,95%CI0.75~1.06,p<0.001;中等证据确定性).在10项报告比值比的研究中,SII也与严重疾病或死亡的风险显著相关(1.007,95%CI1.001至1.014,p=0.032;证据的确定性非常低),在6项报告风险比的研究中,SII与严重疾病或死亡的风险显著相关(1.99,95%CI1.01至3.92,p=0.047;证据的确定性非常低)。汇集灵敏度,特异性,严重疾病或死亡率的曲线下面积为0.71(95%CI0.67至0.75),0.71(95%CI0.64至0.77),和0.77(95%CI0.73至0.80),分别。在元回归中,在SMD和白蛋白之间观察到显着的相关性,乳酸脱氢酶,肌酐,和D-二聚体。
    我们的系统评价和荟萃分析表明,入院时的SII与COVID-19患者的严重疾病和死亡率显着相关。因此,这种源自常规血液学参数的炎症生物标志物有助于本组的早期风险分层.
    https://www.crd.约克。AC.英国/PROSPERO,标识符CRD42023420517。
    An excessive systemic pro-inflammatory state increases the risk of severe disease and mortality in patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). However, there is uncertainty regarding whether specific biomarkers of inflammation can enhance risk stratification in this group. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to investigate an emerging biomarker of systemic inflammation derived from routine hematological parameters, the systemic inflammation index (SII), in COVID-19 patients with different disease severity and survival status.
    A systematic literature search was conducted in PubMed, Web of Science, and Scopus, between the 1st of December 2019 and the 15th of March 2023. Risk of bias and certainty of evidence were assessed using the Joanna Briggs Institute Critical Appraisal Checklist and the Grades of Recommendation, Assessment, Development and Evaluation, respectively (PROSPERO registration number: CRD42023420517).
    In 39 studies, patients with a severe disease or non-survivor status had significantly higher SII values on admission compared to patients with a non-severe disease or survivor status (standard mean difference (SMD)=0.91, 95% CI 0.75 to 1.06, p<0.001; moderate certainty of evidence). The SII was also significantly associated with the risk of severe disease or death in 10 studies reporting odds ratios (1.007, 95% CI 1.001 to 1.014, p=0.032; very low certainty of evidence) and in six studies reporting hazard ratios (1.99, 95% CI 1.01 to 3.92, p=0.047; very low certainty of evidence). Pooled sensitivity, specificity, and area under the curve for severe disease or mortality were 0.71 (95% CI 0.67 to 0.75), 0.71 (95% CI 0.64 to 0.77), and 0.77 (95% CI 0.73 to 0.80), respectively. In meta-regression, significant correlations were observed between the SMD and albumin, lactate dehydrogenase, creatinine, and D-dimer.
    Our systematic review and meta-analysis has shown that the SII on admission is significantly associated with severe disease and mortality in patients with COVID-19. Therefore, this inflammatory biomarker derived from routine haematological parameters can be helpful for early risk stratification in this group.
    https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO, identifier CRD42023420517.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

公众号