UNASSIGNED: SMARCA2 and SMARCA4 are subunits of the SWI/SNF complex which is a chromatin remodeling complex and a key epigenetic regulator that facilitates gene expression. Tumors with loss of function mutations in SMARCA4 rely on SMARCA2 for cell survival and this synthetic lethality is a potential therapeutic strategy to treat cancer.
UNASSIGNED: The current review focuses on patent applications that claim proteolysis-targeting chimeras (PROTAC) degraders that bind the bromodomain site of SMARCA2 and are published between January 2019-June 2023. A total of 29 applications from 9 different applicants were evaluated.
UNASSIGNED: SMARCA2/4 bromodomain inhibitors do not lead to desired effects on cancer proliferation; however, companies have converted bromodomain binders into PROTACs to degrade the protein, with a preference for SMARCA2 over SMARCA4. Selective degradation of SMARCA2 is most likely required to be efficacious in the SMARCA4-deficient setting, while allowing for sufficient safety margin in normal tissues. With several patent applications disclosed recently, interest in targeting SMARCA2 should continue, especially with a selective SMARCA2 PROTAC now in the clinic from Prelude Therapeutics. The outcome of the clinical trials will influence the evolution of selective SMARCA2 PROTACs development.

UNASSIGNED: The multi-subunit SWI/SNF chromatin remodeling complex is a key epigenetic regulator for many cellular processes, and several subunits are found to be mutated in human cancers. The inactivating mutations of SMARCA4, the ATPase subunit of the complex, result in cellular dependency on the paralog SMARCA2 for survival. This observed synthetic lethal relationship posits targeting SMARCA2 in SMARCA4-deficient settings as an attractive therapeutic target in oncology.
UNASSIGNED: This review covers patent literature disclosed during the 2019-30 June 2023 period which claim ATPase inhibitors and PROTAC degraders that bind to the ATPase domain of SMARCA2 and/or SMARCA4. A total of 16 documents from 6 applicants are presented.
UNASSIGNED: The demonstration of cellular dependence on SMARCA2 ATPase activity in SMARCA4-deficient settings has prompted substantial research toward SMARCA2-targeting therapies. Although selectively targeting the ATPase domain of SMARCA2 is viewed as challenging, several ATPase inhibitor scaffolds have been disclosed within the last five years. Most early compounds are weakly selective, but these efforts have culminated in the first dual SMARCA2/SMARCA4 ATPase inhibitor to enter clinical trials. Data from the ongoing clinical trials, as well as continued advancement of SMARCA2-selective ATPase inhibitors, are anticipated to significantly impact the field of therapies, targeting SMARCA4-deficient tumors.

Cancer metabolism is a marvellously complex topic, in part, due to the reprogramming of its pathways to self-sustain the malignant phenotype in the disease, to the detriment of its healthy counterpart. Understanding these adjustments can provide novel targeted therapies that could disrupt and impair proliferation of cancerous cells. For this very purpose, genome-scale metabolic models (GEMs) have been developed, with Human1 being the most recent reconstruction of the human metabolism. Based on GEMs, we introduced the genetic Minimal Cut Set (gMCS) approach, an uncontextualized methodology that exploits the concepts of synthetic lethality to predict metabolic vulnerabilities in cancer. gMCSs define a set of genes whose knockout would render the cell unviable by disrupting an essential metabolic task in GEMs, thus, making cellular proliferation impossible. Here, we summarize the gMCS approach and review the current state of the methodology by performing a systematic meta-analysis based on two datasets of gene essentiality in cancer. First, we assess several thresholds and distinct methodologies for discerning highly and lowly expressed genes. Then, we address the premise that gMCSs of distinct length should have the same predictive power. Finally, we question the importance of a gene partaking in multiple gMCSs and analyze the importance of all the essential metabolic tasks defined in Human1. Our meta-analysis resulted in parameter evaluation to increase the predictive power for the gMCS approach, as well as a significant reduction of computation times by only selecting the crucial gMCS lengths, proposing the pertinency of particular parameters for the peak processing of gMCS.

Endometriosis is a benign gynecologic condition affecting up to one woman out of ten of reproductive age. It is defined by the presence of endometrial-like tissue in localizations outside of the uterine cavity. It often causes symptoms such as chronic pain, most frequently associated with the menstrual cycle, and infertility, but may also be oligo- or asymptomatic. There is evidence that some ovarian carcinoma (OC) histotypes, mainly the ovarian clear cell (OCCC) and endometrioid (EnOC) carcinoma, may arise from endometriosis. The most frequent genomic alterations in these carcinomas are mutations in the AT-rich interacting domain containing protein 1A (ARID1A) gene, a subunit of the SWI/SNF chromatin remodeling complex, and alterations in the phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase (PI3K)/AKT/mTOR pathway, which frequently co-occur. In ARID1A deficient cancers preclinical experimental data suggest different targetable mechanisms including epigenetic regulation, cell cycle, genomic instability, the PI3K/AKT/mTOR pathway, inflammatory pathways, immune modulation, or metabolic alterations as potential precision oncology approaches. Most of these strategies are relying on the concept of synthetic lethality in which tumors deficient in ARID1A are more sensitive to the different compounds. Some of these approaches are currently being or have recently been investigated in early clinical trials. The remarkably frequent occurrence of these mutations in endometriosis-associated ovarian cancer, the occurrence in a relatively young population, and the high proportion of platinum-resistant disease certainly warrants further investigation of precision oncology opportunities in this population. Furthermore, advanced knowledge about oncogenic mutations involved in endometriosis-associated ovarian carcinomas may be potentially useful for early cancer detection. However, this approach may be complicated by the frequent occurrence of somatic mutations in benign endometriotic tissue as recent studies suggest. In this narrative review of the current literature, we will discuss the data available on endometriosis-associated ovarian carcinoma, with special emphasis on epidemiology, diagnosis and molecular changes that could have therapeutic implications and clinical applicability in the future.

Poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) acts as an essential DNA repair enzyme. PARP inhibitors are novel small molecule targeted drugs based on the principle of \"Synthetic Lethality\", which affect DNA repair process by competitively inhibiting the activity of PARP enzyme and thereby kill cancer cells. Currently, four PARP inhibitors including olaparib, rucaparib, niraparib, and talazoparib have been approved by FDA for cancer treatment and have achieved great success in the treatment of ovarian cancer, breast cancer, and pancreatic cancer, etc. This paper provides a general overview of the research progress of PARP inhibitors including the major structure types, structure-activity relationship (SAR), and synthetic routes, with the aim of providing ideas for the discovery and synthesis of novel PARP inhibitors.

Poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitors are the first clinically approved drugs designed to exploit synthetic lethality, and were first introduced as a cancer-targeting strategy in 2005. They have led to a major change in the treatment of advanced ovarian cancer, and altered the natural history of a disease with extreme genetic complexity and defective DNA repair via homologous recombination (HR) pathway. Furthermore, additional mechanisms apart from breast related cancer antigens 1 and 2 (BRCA1/2) mutations can also result in HR pathway alterations and consequently lead to a clinical benefit from PARP inhibitors. Novel combinations of PARP inhibitors with other anticancer therapies are challenging, and better understanding of PARP biology, DNA repair mechanisms, and PARP inhibitor mechanisms of action is crucial. It seems that PARP inhibitor and biologic agent combinations appear well tolerated and clinically effective in both BRCA-mutated and wild-type cancers. They target differing aberrant and exploitable pathways in ovarian cancer, and may induce greater DNA damage and HR deficiency. The input of immunotherapy in ovarian cancer is based on the observation that immunosuppressive microenvironments can affect tumour growth, metastasis, and even treatment resistance. Several biologic agents have been studied in combination with PARP inhibitors, including inhibitors of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF; bevacizumab, cediranib), and PD-1 or PD-L1 (durvalumab, pembrolizumab, nivolumab), anti-CTLA4 monoclonal antibodies (tremelimumab), mTOR-(vistusertib), AKT-(capivasertib), and PI3K inhibitors (buparlisib, alpelisib), as well as MEK 1/2, and WEE1 inhibitors (selumetinib and adavosertib, respectively). Olaparib and veliparib have also been combined with chemotherapy with the rationale of disrupting base excision repair via PARP inhibition. Olaparib has been investigated with carboplatin and paclitaxel, whereas veliparib has been tested additionally in combination with temozolomide vs. pegylated liposomal doxorubicin, as well as with oral cyclophosphamide, and topoisomerase inhibitors. However, overlapping myelosuppression observed with PARP inhibitor and chemotherapy combinations requires further investigation with dose escalation studies. In this review, we discuss multiple clinical trials that are underway examining the antitumor activity of such combination strategies.

Poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitors are a class of small-molecule drugs suppressing PARP enzymes activity, inducing the death of cells deficient in homologous recombination repair (HRR). HRR deficiency is common in tumor cells with BRCA gene mutation. Since their first clinical trial in 2003, PARP inhibitors have shown benefit in the treatment of HRR-deficient tumors. Recently, several randomized clinical trials (RCTs) have been conducted to investigate the potential benefit of administration of PARP inhibitors in cancer patients. However, the results remain controversial. To evaluate the efficiency and safety of PARP inhibitors in patients with cancer, we performed a comprehensive meta-analysis of RCTs. According to our study, PARP inhibitors could clearly improve progression-free survival (PFS), especially in patients with BRCA mutation. However, our study showed no significant difference in overall survival (OS) between the PARP inhibitors and controls, even in the BRCA mutation group. Little toxicity was reported in the rate of treatment correlated adverse events (AEs) in PARP inhibitor group compared with controls. In conclusion, PARP inhibitors do well in improving PFS with little toxicity, especially in patients with BRCA deficiency.