UNASSIGNED: An intramuscular abscess of the subscapularis is a rare phenomenon but important pathology for surgeons to be aware of because clinical deterioration can be rapid and diagnosis difficult. The presentation often mimics other common shoulder pathologies with subacute shoulder pain and stiffness. Early diagnosis, antibiotics and surgical drainage are critical to reduce the spread and joint destruction.
UNASSIGNED: A search of PubMed and Google Scholar databases identified cases of subscapular intramuscular abscess. Data collected about each case included patient demographics, presentation, pathology, surgical treatment and outcome. The authors report one additional subscapular abscess case.
UNASSIGNED: Data from 17 cases of subscapular abscess were found, 16 in the literature and one case described by the authors. Sixteen of 17 cases (94.1%) presented with shoulder pain and reduced range of motion worsening over a mean of 6.7 days prior to presentation. Surgical approaches utilised included a posterior inferomedial approach, deltoid-pectoral approach and one posterior inferolateral approach.
UNASSIGNED: From the limited data available regarding subscapular intramuscular abscess, the authors make the following recommendations: (1) Empirical antibiotics covering Staphylococcus aureus +/- methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus, (2) drainage is indicated in all cases; and (3) tendon-sparing approaches can access an abscess in most locations within the subscapular space.

UNASSIGNED: This systematic review and network meta-analysis compare clinical outcomes of three different subscapularis management techniques in anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty: lesser tuberosity osteotomy, subscapularis peel, and subscapularis tenotomy.
UNASSIGNED: PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, and Cochrane\'s trial registry were searched in July 2021. Comparative studies and case series evaluating the outcomes of these three techniques were included. The network meta-analysis was performed only on comparative studies.
UNASSIGNED: Twenty-three studies were included. Both lesser tuberosity osteotomy and subscapularis peel had significantly higher Western Ontario Osteoarthritis Scores compared to subscapularis tenotomy, but no difference in American Shoulder and Elbow Society Scores. Subscapularis peel had superior external rotation compared to lesser tuberosity osteotomy. However, no difference was found in external rotation between subscapularis peel and subscapularis tenotomy or between subscapularis tenotomy and lesser tuberosity osteotomy. The overall weighted average for lesser tuberosity osteotomy bony union was 93.6%, whereas the overall weighted average for subscapularis tendon healing was 79.4% and 87% for subscapularis tenotomy and subscapularis peel, respectively.
UNASSIGNED: This network meta-analysis demonstrated that lesser tuberosity osteotomy and subscapularis peel were associated with the high union and subscapularis healing rates and may be associated with improved shoulder function and quality of life, compared to subscapularis tenotomy. Lesser tuberosity osteotomy and subscapularis peel demonstrate a trend of superior outcomes compared to subscapularis tenotomy during anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty.

UNASSIGNED: There is no consensus on whether to repair the subscapularis in the setting of reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (rTSA). There have been an assortment of studies showing mixed results regarding shoulder stability and postoperative strength outcomes when looking at subscapularis repair in rTSA. The purpose of this systematic review was to investigate differences in biomechanical strength outcomes of cadaveric subscapularis repair vs. no repair in rTSA.Increased force will be required to move the shoulder through normal range of motion (ROM) in cadaveric rTSA shoulders with the subscapularis repaired when compared with no subscapularis repair.
UNASSIGNED: A comprehensive literature review was conducted in accordance with the 2009 Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis statement. The databases used to search the keywords used for the concepts of subscapularis, reverse total shoulder arthroplasty, and muscle strength were PubMed (includes MEDLINE), Embase, Web of Science, Cochrane Reviews and Trials, and Scopus. Original, English-language cadaveric studies evaluating rTSA and subscapularis management were included, with subscapularis repair surgical techniques and strength outcomes being evaluated for each article meeting inclusion criteria.
UNASSIGNED: The search yielded 4113 articles that were screened for inclusion criteria by 4 authors. Two articles met inclusion criteria and were subsequently included in the final full-text review. A total of 11 shoulders were represented between these 2 studies. Heterogeneity of the data across the 2 studies did not allow for meta-analysis. Hansen et al found that repair of the subscapularis with rTSA significantly increased the mean joint reaction force and the force required by the posterior deltoid, total deltoid, infraspinatus, teres minor, total posterior rotator cuff, and pectoralis major muscles. Giles et al found that rotator cuff repair and glenosphere lateralization both increased total joint load.
UNASSIGNED: The present review of biomechanical literature shows that repair of the subscapularis in the setting of rTSA can effectively restore shoulder strength by increasing joint reactive forces and ROM force requirements of other rotator cuff muscles and of the deltoid muscle. Available biomechanical evidence is limited, and further biomechanical studies evaluating the strength of various subscapularis repair techniques are needed to evaluate the effects of these techniques on joint reactive forces and muscle forces required for ROM.

The use of reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (RTSA) has expanded from its original indication as a rotator cuff arthropathy treatment to include a large variety of pathologies. A frequently reported complication with this surgery is postoperative shoulder instability with reported incidence varying widely from 2.3 to 38%. The etiology for this instability is broad and includes prosthesis design, mechanical impingement, surgical technique, and axillary/deltoid function. A PROSPERO-registered systematic review was performed utilizing PRISMA guidelines using Cochrane, PUBMED, Embase, and Eline. Of the 1442 studies initially identified, 7 studies met all inclusion criteria, all of which were level III or IV evidence. All 7 studies evaluated postoperative instability, but no study reported a statistically significant difference in instability rates between the groups. Dislocations occurred in 5 patients (5/679, 0.7%) with subscapularis repair and 8 patients (8/527, 1.5%) without repair. A nonsignificant difference in the risk of instability for surgeries with repair compared to surgeries without repair was found (overall risk difference: 0.01, random effects 95% confidence interval: -0.00 to 0.02, P = .11). This review suggests no difference in postoperative shoulder instability rates between patients that underwent primary RTSA with or without subsequent repair of the subscapularis tendon. Interestingly, one study comparing implants with a medialized or nonlateralized implant showed a significantly increased rate of dislocation with the medialized group compared to the lateralized group. When these groups were then stratified based on subscapularis repair status, there was no increased risk with a nonrepaired tendon. This study suggests that implant design may have more influence on the stability of RTSA than subscapularis status. However, overall, there does appear to be a trend suggesting improved postoperative clinical outcomes and active range of motion for patients with a subscapularis repair vs. without a repair. Further research is needed to better elucidate the ideal combination of surgical technique and implant design to minimize postoperative glenohumeral joint instability while optimizing postoperative clinical outcomes and range of motion after primary RTSA.

UNASSIGNED: There is no differences in abduction, internal rotation, or external rotation strength after reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (rTSA) with or without subscapularis repair. Repair of the subscapularis can be effective in the setting of rTSA. However, consensus has yet to be reached on whether postoperative strength after rTSA differs based on subscapularis management. The purpose of this review is to evaluate shoulder strength outcomes after rTSA with and without subscapularis tendon repair.
UNASSIGNED: A comprehensive literature review was conducted using the key terms \"subscapularis\" AND \"reverse total shoulder arthroplasty\" AND \"muscle strength\" in PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, Cochrane Reviews and Trials, and Scopus. Original, English-language studies evaluating shoulder strength outcomes after rTSA published from January 1, 2000, to present were evaluated. Strength outcomes reported included abduction strength (kg) and internal rotation strength (kg) using an electric spring balance and external rotation strength (lb) using a handheld dynamometer. Heterogeneity of data in the included studies did not allow for meta-analysis.
UNASSIGNED: The search yielded 4253 unique results, which were screened for inclusion according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA). Two articles met eligibility criteria and were included in the final full-text review. A total of 267 shoulders were represented, 111 with subscapularis repair and 156 without subscapularis repair. No significant differences in abduction (P = .39), internal rotation (P = .09), and external rotation (P = .463) strength were observed between subscapularis repair and nonrepair groups.
UNASSIGNED: There were no differences in abduction, internal rotation, or external rotation strength after rTSA with or without subscapularis repair. The literature on postoperative strength outcomes after rTSA is limited, and further study in this area is warranted.

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to systematically review the literature to ascertain the clinical outcomes of the open Latarjet (OL) procedure using either a subscapularis-split (SS) or subscapularis tenotomy (ST) via a deltopectoral (DP) approach.
METHODS: Two independent reviewers performed a literature search using the PubMed, Embase, and Scopus databases according to PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses) guidelines. Only studies reporting on outcomes of the OL procedure via a DP approach comparing both SS and ST were considered for inclusion. Meta-analysis to compare clinical outcomes was performed using RevMan software.
RESULTS: Our search found 5 studies that met our inclusion criteria, including 615 shoulders (80.8% male patients), with an average age of 27.8 ± 12.6 years (range, 15-79 years) and mean follow-up period of 50.1 ± 29.4 months (range, 12-180 months). A total of 410 shoulders and 205 shoulders underwent the OL procedure via a DP approach using the ST technique and the SS technique, respectively, with both techniques resulting in significant increases in the Rowe score postoperatively (P < .0001 for both). Additionally, significantly higher postoperative Constant scores were observed in patients who underwent the OL procedure via an SS technique vs. those in the ST group (91.8 ± 7.2 vs. 79.6 ± 16.1, P < .0001). However, meta-analysis showed nonsignificantly higher postoperative Rowe and American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons scores in patients who underwent the OL procedure via an SS technique vs. those in the ST group (96.1 ± 2.6 vs. 86.4 ± 7.6 [P = .57] and 91.6 ± 1.3 vs. 80.6 ± 25.5 [P = .47], respectively). Furthermore, meta-analysis showed that significantly more patients in the ST group had positive lift-off test results (10.0%) when compared with the SS group at final follow-up (2.7%, P = .01). However, meta-analysis indicated that the rate of recurrent instability was trending toward significance in favor of the SS group (0% vs. 11.7%, P = .07).
CONCLUSIONS: Our systematic review established that in cases of OL procedures being carried out via a DP approach, the SS technique results in significantly better functional outcome measures and significantly lower rates of subscapularis insufficiency when compared with an L-shaped ST technique at medium-term follow-up. Furthermore, there were lower rates of recurrent instability that were trending toward significance in favor of the SS technique.

The population of Hawai\'i is uniquely connected to the Ocean and to open water sports. Shoulder injuries, particularly those to the rotator cuff, are among the most common injuries sustained to athletes participating in ocean sports such as surfing, paddling, and swimming. In addition, rotator cuff injuries increase in prevalence with advanced age. As a consequence, the number of patients in Hawai\'i who present with an injury to the subscapularis tendon will continue to rise. However, limited research has been done to delineate the involvement of subscapularis injuries in this population. This article covers the anatomy and function of the subscapularis, the epidemiology and classification of tears in this tendon, and the management of tears. The anatomy section will cover innervation, vascular supply and insertional anatomy of the subscapularis tendon. The function of the subscapularis in regards to both stability and motion of the glenohumeral joint will be examined. The focus of the article will then shift to the tears of the subscapularis, starting with an in depth look at the epidemiology and classification of these tears. The article will then cover the different imaging modalities and their utility in regards to subscapularis tears. Finally, the operative and non-operative management and indications for each modality will be discussed in detail.

BACKGROUND: Previous systematic reviews and meta-analyses on the diagnostic accuracy of shoulder clinical tests do not reach conclusions regarding subscapularis tears.
OBJECTIVE: To compare the diagnostic accuracy of commonly used clinical tests for subscapularis tears.
METHODS: Systematic review; Level of evidence, 3.
METHODS: An electronic literature search was conducted using Medline, Embase, and the Cochrane Library/Central. Eligibility criteria were original clinical studies reporting the diagnostic accuracy of clinical tests to diagnose the presence of rotator cuff tears involving the subscapularis.
RESULTS: The electronic literature search returned 2212 records, of which 13 articles were eligible. Among 8 tests included in the systematic review, the lift-off test was most frequently reported (12 studies). Four tests were eligible for meta-analysis: bear-hug test, belly-press test, internal rotation lag sign (IRLS), and lift-off test. The highest pooled sensitivity was 0.55 (95% CI, 0.28-0.79) for the bear-hug test, while the lowest pooled sensitivity was 0.32 (95% CI, 0.13-0.61), for the IRLS. In all tests, pooled specificity was >0.90.
CONCLUSIONS: Among the 4 clinical tests eligible for meta-analysis (bear-hug test, belly-press test, IRLS, and lift-off test), all had pooled specificity >0.90 but pooled sensitivity <0.60. No single clinical test is sufficiently reliable to diagnose subscapularis tears.
BACKGROUND: PROSPERO (CRD42019137019).

UNASSIGNED: There is a renewed interest in diagnosing and treating subscapularis tears, but there is a paucity of clinical guidance to optimize diagnostic decision-making.
UNASSIGNED: To perform a literature review to evaluate advanced maneuvers and special tests in the diagnosis of subscapularis tears and create a diagnostic algorithm for subscapularis pathology.
UNASSIGNED: PubMed, MEDLINE, Ovid, and Cochrane Reviews databases.
UNASSIGNED: Inclusion criteria consisted of level 1 and 2 studies published in peer-reviewed scientific journals that focused on physical examination.
UNASSIGNED: Systematic review.
UNASSIGNED: Level 2.
UNASSIGNED: Individual test characteristics (bear hug, belly press, lift-off, Napoleon, and internal rotation lag sign) were combined in series and in parallel to maximize clinical sensitivity and specificity for any special test evaluated in at least 2 studies. A secondary analysis utilized subjective pretest probabilities to create a clinical decision tree algorithm and provide posttest probabilities.
UNASSIGNED: A total of 3174 studies were identified, and 5 studies met inclusion criteria. The special test combination of the bear hug and belly press demonstrated the highest positive likelihood ratio (18.29). Overall, 3 special test combinations in series demonstrated a significant impact on posttest probabilities. With parallel testing, the combination of bear hug and belly press had the highest sensitivity (84%) and lowest calculated negative likelihood ratio (0.21).
UNASSIGNED: The combined application of the bear hug and belly press physical examination maneuvers is an optimal combination for evaluating subscapularis pathology. Positive findings using this test combination in series with a likely pretest probability yield a 96% posttest probability; whereas, negative findings tested in parallel with an unlikely pretest probability yield a 12% posttest probability.

BACKGROUND: There have been conflicting results when comparing outcomes of open vs. arthroscopic anterosuperior rotator cuff repairs with subscapularis involvement. The purpose of this study was to evaluate midterm outcome differences and complications following open vs. arthroscopic repair of rotator cuff tears involving the subscapularis by a single surgeon.
METHODS: This was a retrospective review of 57 rotator cuff repairs involving the subscapularis performed by a single surgeon over a 10-year period. During this time, the surgeon transitioned from open to arthroscopic repair. Preoperative and postoperative range of motion, lift-off test, belly press test, and American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) Standardized Shoulder Assessment form scores were measured.
RESULTS: Eighteen patients had open procedures and 39 had arthroscopic repair. The mean preoperative ASES score for the open group was 39 and postoperatively was 79. The mean preoperative ASES score for the arthroscopic group was 44 and improved to 80 postoperatively. There was no significant difference in score or change in score between the 2 groups (P > .05). There was only 1 complication. It occurred in the open group and was a superficial wound dehiscence.
CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrated no outcome differences between open and arthroscopic rotator cuff repair involving the subscapularis, even with large subscapularis tears. Both techniques significantly improved shoulder function. Arthroscopic and open rotator cuff repairs including the subscapularis are relatively safe procedures, and either technique is an acceptable option.