spontaneous bacterial peritonitis

自发性细菌性腹膜炎
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    自发性细菌性腹膜炎(SBP)是肝硬化患者的严重并发症和常见死亡原因。在2017年1月至2024年3月之间,进行了一项回顾性研究,涉及在波兰东南部三级转诊中心治疗的302例腹水患者(>18岁)。对所有患者进行了腹水的微生物学分析。在17名患者的样本中发现了微生物的存在,分离出21种病原体,其中革兰氏阳性菌15株,革兰氏阴性菌6株。表皮葡萄球菌,MRCNS(耐甲氧西林凝固酶阴性葡萄球菌,对所有β-内酰胺抗生素具有抗性:青霉素,青霉素与β-内酰胺酶抑制剂,头孢菌素和碳青霉烯类抗生素)是检出的主要病原体(19.05%,4/21),其次是粪肠球菌(9.52%,2/21),屎肠球菌(9.52%,2/21),溶血葡萄球菌,MRCNS(4.76%,1/21),链球菌(9.52%,2/21),副血链球菌(9.52%,2/21),黄体微球菌(4.76%,1/21)和芽孢杆菌属。(4.76%,1/21).在检查的标本中还发现了以下革兰氏阴性菌:大肠杆菌,ESBL(产超广谱β-内酰胺酶大肠杆菌)(4.76%,1/21),大肠杆菌(4.76%,1/21),铜绿假单胞菌(4.76%,1/21),氧化克雷伯菌(9.52%,2/21)和梭菌单胞菌(4.76%,1/21).革兰阳性菌引起9例SBP患者医院感染,2例革兰阴性菌引起医院感染。在6名SBP患者中,在3例病例中发现了由革兰氏阴性菌引起的社区获得性感染,革兰氏阳性菌2例,在一个案例中,社区获得性感染是由革兰氏阳性和革兰氏阴性混合引起的.从医院获得性SBP患者中分离出的细菌比非医院性SBP患者中发现的细菌具有更高的耐药性。合并并发症的肝硬化患者的细菌感染可能是其健康状况恶化的原因。及时干预对于降低死亡率至关重要。
    Spontaneous Bacterial Peritonitis (SBP) is a serious complication and a common cause of death in patients with liver cirrhosis. Between January 2017 and March 2024, a retrospective study was conducted involving 302 patients (>18 years old) with ascites treated at a tertiary referral center in south-eastern Poland. Microbiological analysis of the ascitic fluids was performed in all patients. The presence of microorganisms was found in samples from 17 patients, and 21 pathogens were isolated, including 15 Gram-positive bacteria and 6 Gram-negative bacteria. Staphylococcus epidermidis, MRCNS (methicillin-resistant coagulase-negative staphylococci, resistant to all beta-lactam antibiotics: penicillins, penicillins with beta-lactamase inhibitor, cephalosporins and carbapenems) was the main pathogen detected (19.05%, 4/21), followed by Enterococcus faecalis (9.52%, 2/21), Enterococcus faecium (9.52%, 2/21), Staphylococcus haemolyticus, MRCNS (4.76%, 1/21), Streptococcus mitis (9.52%, 2/21), Streptococcus parasanguinis (9.52%, 2/21), Micrococcus luteus (4.76%, 1/21) and Bacillus spp. (4.76%, 1/21). The following Gram-negative bacteria were also found in the specimens examined: Escherichia coli, ESBL (extended-spectrum β-lactamase producing E. coli) (4.76%, 1/21), Escherichia coli (4.76%, 1/21), Pseudomonas aeruginosa (4.76%, 1/21), Klebsiella oxytoca (9.52%, 2/21) and Sphingomonas paucimobilis (4.76%, 1/21). Gram-positive bacteria caused nosocomial infections in nine patients with SBP, Gram-negative bacteria caused nosocomial infections in two patients. In six patients with SBP, community-acquired infections caused by Gram-negative bacteria were found in three cases, Gram-positive bacteria in two cases, and in one case, community-acquired infection was caused by mixed Gram-positive and Gram-negative. Bacteria isolated from patients with hospital-acquired SBP showed higher drug resistance than those found in patients with non-hospital SBP. Bacterial infections in cirrhotic patients with complications may be responsible for their deteriorating health. Prompt intervention is critical to reducing mortality.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    大肠杆菌是自发性细菌性腹膜炎(SBP)的常见病原体。在这项回顾性研究中,我们调查了从患有医院SBP的肝硬化患者中获得的大肠杆菌临床分离株的微生物学特征和抗生素敏感性。我们的结果表明,产超广谱β-内酰胺酶(ESBL)的大肠杆菌占病例的47%,而62%的分离株是多重耐药(MDR)病原体。产ESBL和MDR的分离株对第三代头孢菌素的耐药性发生率很高,但是它们对碳青霉烯类物质很敏感,β-内酰胺酶抑制剂,和氨基糖苷类.重要的是,肝硬化患者MDR大肠杆菌SBP的死亡率明显高于非MDR感染患者(P=0.021)。院内SBP的30天死亡率与女性性别独立相关[优势比(OR)=5.200,95%置信区间(CI)=1.194-22.642],肝功能衰竭(OR=9.609,95%CI=1.914-48.225),肝细胞癌(OR=8.176,95%CI=2.065-32.364),肝性脑病(OR=8.176,95%CI=2.065-32.364),终末期肝病模型评分(OR=1.191,95%CI=1.053-1.346),白细胞计数(OR=0.847,95%CI=0.737-0.973),和腹水多形核(OR=95.903,95%CI=3.410-2697.356)。总之,第三代头孢菌素可能不适合经验性治疗由大肠杆菌引起的院内SBP,由于ESBLs的广泛存在和MDR病原体的高发病率。
    Escherichia coli is a prevalent causative pathogen of spontaneous bacterial peritonitis (SBP). In this retrospective study, we investigated the microbiological characteristics and antibiotic susceptibility of E. coli clinical isolates obtained from liver cirrhosis patients suffering from nosocomial SBP. Our results showed that extended-spectrum β-lactamase (ESBL)-producing E. coli accounted for 47% of the cases, while 62% of the isolates were multi-drug resistant (MDR) pathogens. ESBL-producing and MDR isolates showed high incidences of resistance to third-generation cephalosporins, but they displayed susceptibility to carbapenems, β-lactamase inhibitors, and aminoglycosides. Importantly, liver cirrhosis patients with MDR E. coli SBP showed a significantly higher death rate than patients with non-MDR infections (P = 0.021). The 30-day mortality of nosocomial SBP was independently correlated with female gender [odds ratio (OR) = 5.200, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 1.194-22.642], liver failure (OR = 9.609, 95% CI = 1.914-48.225), hepatocellular carcinoma (OR = 8.176, 95% CI = 2.065-32.364), hepatic encephalopathy (OR = 8.176, 95% CI = 2.065-32.364), model of end-stage liver disease score (OR = 1.191, 95% CI = 1.053-1.346), white blood cell count (OR = 0.847, 95% CI = 0.737-0.973), and ascites polymorphonuclear (OR = 95.903, 95% CI = 3.410-2697.356). In conclusion, third-generation cephalosporins may be inappropriate for empiric treatment of nosocomial SBP caused by E. coli, due to the widespread presence of ESBLs and high incidence of MDR pathogens.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Multicenter Study
    背景:质子泵抑制剂(PPI)经常用于肝硬化患者。
    目的:本研究旨在确定PPI的使用是否与肝硬化患者的预后相关。
    方法:我们进行了一项多中心回顾性队列研究,纳入了来自韩国7个转诊中心的1485例肝性脑病(HE)患者。主要结局是总生存率,次要结局包括肝硬化并发症的发展。包括反复发作的HE,自发性细菌性腹膜炎(SBP),肝肾综合征(HRS),和消化道出血.对于每个结果,将平均定义日剂量(mDDD)≥0.5的PPI治疗患者(高剂量PPI组)与mDDD<0.5的PPI治疗患者(无或低剂量PPI组)进行比较。
    结果:在1485名患者中(中位年龄,61岁;男性,61%),232人被分配到高剂量PPI组。高剂量PPI使用与较高的死亡风险独立相关(校正后HR[aHR]=1.71,95%置信区间[CI]=1.38-2.11,p<0.001)。该结果在倾向评分匹配(PSM)后是可重复的(aHR=1.90,95%CI=1.49-2.44,p<0.001)。高剂量PPI使用是HE复发的独立危险因素(PSM前:aHR=2.04,95%CI=1.66-2.51,p<0.001;PSM后:aHR=2.16,95%CI=1.70-2.74,p<0.001),SBP(PSM前:aHR=1.87,95%CI=1.43-2.43,p<0.001;PSM后:aHR=1.76,95%CI=1.31-2.36,p=0.002),HRS(PSM前:aHR=1.48,95%CI=1.02-2.15,p=0.04;PSM后:aHR=1.47,95%CI=0.95-2.28,p=0.09),和消化道出血(PSM前:aHR=1.46,95%CI=1.12-1.90,p=0.006;PSM后:aHR=1.74,95%CI=1.28-2.37,p<0.001)。
    结论:大剂量PPI的使用与死亡率和肝硬化并发症的风险增加独立相关。
    Proton pump inhibitors (PPI) are frequently used in patients with cirrhosis.
    This study aimed to determine whether PPI use is associated with the prognosis of cirrhotic patients.
    We conducted a multicentre retrospective cohort study involving 1485 patients who had experienced hepatic encephalopathy (HE) from 7 referral centres in Korea. The primary outcome was overall survival and secondary outcomes included the development of cirrhotic complications, including recurrent HE, spontaneous bacterial peritonitis (SBP), hepatorenal syndrome (HRS), and gastrointestinal bleeding. Patients treated with PPI with a mean defined daily dose (mDDD) ≥0.5 (high-dose PPI group) were compared to those treated with PPI of an mDDD < 0.5 (No or low-dose PPI group) for each outcome.
    Among 1485 patients (median age, 61 years; male, 61%), 232 were assigned to the high-dose PPI group. High-dose PPI use was independently associated with a higher risk of death (adjusted HR [aHR] = 1.71, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.38-2.11, p < 0.001). This result was reproducible after propensity score-matching (PSM) (aHR = 1.90, 95% CI = 1.49-2.44, p < 0.001). High-dose PPI use was an independent risk factor of recurrent HE (before PSM: aHR = 2.04, 95% CI = 1.66-2.51, p < 0.001; after PSM: aHR = 2.16, 95% CI = 1.70-2.74, p < 0.001), SBP (before PSM: aHR = 1.87, 95% CI = 1.43-2.43, p < 0.001; after PSM: aHR = 1.76, 95% CI = 1.31-2.36, p = 0.002), HRS (before PSM: aHR = 1.48, 95% CI = 1.02-2.15, p = 0.04; after PSM: aHR = 1.47, 95% CI = 0.95-2.28, p = 0.09), and gastrointestinal bleeding (before PSM: aHR = 1.46, 95% CI = 1.12-1.90, p = 0.006; after PSM: aHR = 1.74, 95% CI = 1.28-2.37, p < 0.001).
    The use of high-dose PPI was independently associated with increased risks of mortality and cirrhotic complications.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    抗生素和白蛋白输注构成了患有自发性细菌性腹膜炎(SBP)的失代偿性肝硬化患者的治疗标准。最近的研究还表明,在患有SBP以外的感染的晚期肝病患者中使用白蛋白可导致急性和慢性肝衰竭的解决,并防止医院感染的发展。对于像印度这样的资源有限的环境中的许多人来说,这些患者的白蛋白推荐剂量是遥不可及的。这一建议的证据也很少。本研究旨在评估除抗生素外,低剂量白蛋白输注对肝硬化和感染患者短期死亡率和发病率的疗效。
    预期,开放标签,进行随机对照研究.连续肝硬化和感染患者以2:1的比例随机分为两组:A组(116)和B组(58)患者。除了抗生素和标准的药物治疗,A组给予白蛋白,剂量为20克/天,持续五天,B组给予推荐剂量(在第1天和第3天给予1.5g/kg体重和1g/kg体重,分别)。主要结果是院内死亡率。次要结果是临床和实验室参数的改善。
    除了病因,两组的所有基线临床和实验室变量均具有可比性.A组和B组的住院死亡率为(11[10.67%]vs.6[10.09%],(P=0.965)。住院时间,30天死亡率,改善休克和感觉,和血清肌酐的绝对改善,国际标准化比率(INR),两组的血清胆红素水平也相当。
    肝硬化和感染患者的低剂量白蛋白输注可具有与标准剂量白蛋白相同的结果,可用于资源有限的情况。
    CTRI/2020/03/023794。
    UNASSIGNED: Antibiotics and albumin infusion constitute the standard of treatment in patients with decompensated cirrhosis who have spontaneous bacterial peritonitis (SBP). Recent studies have also shown that the use of albumin in patients with advanced liver disease who have infections other than SBP leads to the resolution of acute and chronic liver failure and prevents the development of nosocomial infections. The recommended dose of albumin for these patients is out of reach for many in resource-limited settings like India. The evidence for this recommendation is also scarce. This study aimed to assess the efficacy of a lower dose of albumin infusion in addition to antibiotics on short-term mortality and morbidity in patients with cirrhosis and infections.
    UNASSIGNED: A prospective, open-label, randomized control study was performed. Consecutive patients with cirrhosis and infections were randomized in a 2:1 ratio into two groups: group A (116) and group B (58) patients. In addition to antibiotics and standard medical therapy, group A was given albumin in a dose of 20 g/day for five days, and group B was given the recommended dose (1.5 g/kg/body weight and 1 g/kg body weight on days one and three, respectively). The primary outcome was in-hospital mortality. Secondary outcomes were improvements in clinical and laboratory parameters.
    UNASSIGNED: Except for etiology, all the baseline clinical and laboratory variables in both groups were comparable. The in-hospital mortality in groups A and B was (11 [10.67%] vs. 6 [10.09%], (P = 0.965). The duration of hospitalization, 30-day mortality, improvement in shock and sensorium, and absolute improvements in serum creatinine, international normalized ratio (INR), and serum bilirubin were also comparable in both groups.
    UNASSIGNED: Low-dose albumin infusion in patients with cirrhosis and infections can have the same results as standard-dose albumin and can be used in resource-limited situations.
    UNASSIGNED: CTRI/2020/03/023794.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:自发性细菌性腹膜炎(SBP)是肝硬化腹水患者的严重并发症,如果不及时治疗,会导致高死亡率。然而,缺乏针对SBP的具体预测模型。
    目的:本研究旨在比较常用的肝硬化预测模型(CTP评分,MELD,MELD-Na,IMELD,和MELD3.0)用于短期死亡率预测,并开发一种新颖的模型来改善死亡率预测。
    方法:纳入首次SBP发作的患者。使用AUROC分析评估死亡率的预后值。建立并验证了一种新的预测模型。
    结果:总计,327例SBP患者进行了分析,以HBV感染为主要病因。MELD3.0在传统模型中表现出最高的AUROC。新颖的模型,合并HRS,表现出优越的预测准确性,在所有患者和3个月的死亡率在乙肝肝硬化,AUROC值分别为0.827和0.813,超过0.8
    结论:MELD3.0评分优于CTP评分,与其他基于MELD的评分相比,没有显着改善,而新的SBP模型表现出令人印象深刻的准确性。内部验证和HBV相关的肝硬化亚组敏感性分析支持这些发现,强调需要针对SBP的特定预后模型以及预防HRS发展以改善SBP预后的重要性。
    BACKGROUND: Spontaneous bacterial peritonitis (SBP) is a severe complication in cirrhosis patients with ascites, leading to high mortality rates if not promptly treated. However, specific prediction models for SBP are lacking.
    OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to compare commonly used cirrhotic prediction models (CTP score, MELD, MELD-Na, iMELD, and MELD 3.0) for short-term mortality prediction and develop a novel model to improve mortality prediction.
    METHODS: Patients with the first episode of SBP were included. Prognostic values for mortality were assessed using AUROC analysis. A novel prediction model was developed and validated.
    RESULTS: In total, 327 SBP patients were analyzed, with HBV infection as the main etiologies. MELD 3.0 demonstrated the highest AUROC among the traditional models. The novel model, incorporating HRS, exhibited superior predictive accuracy for in-hospital in all patients and 3-month mortality in HBV-cirrhosis, with AUROC values of 0.827 and 0.813 respectively, surpassing 0.8.
    CONCLUSIONS: MELD 3.0 score outperformed the CTP score and showed a non-significant improvement compared to other MELD-based scores, while the novel SBP model demonstrated impressive accuracy. Internal validation and an HBV-related cirrhosis subgroup sensitivity analysis supported these findings, highlighting the need for a specific prognostic model for SBP and the importance of preventing HRS development to improve SBP prognosis.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Randomized Controlled Trial
    目标:20%白蛋白(诊断时1.5g/kg,第3天1g/kg,建议在6小时内输注),特别是在高危自发性细菌性腹膜炎(SBP)中。尚不清楚减少剂量的白蛋白输注是否与标准剂量的白蛋白输注一样有效。这项研究的目的是比较标准剂量白蛋白输注与低剂量白蛋白输注在肝硬化和高危SBP患者急性肾损伤(AKI)发展或进展中的作用。
    方法:63例患者随机分为标准剂量白蛋白组(n=31)和低剂量白蛋白组(n=32,诊断时0.75g/kg,48h后0.5g/kg)。两组均在6小时内输注白蛋白。当患者出现呼吸窘迫时,停止白蛋白输注,且未重新开始该剂量(即第1天或第3天),也未尝试完成当天的整个剂量.然而,如果在下一次输注开始时没有呼吸窘迫的证据,则以预先计算的输注速率开始下一次给药.
    结果:标准剂量组的所有31例患者和低剂量组的2例患者(6.25%)出现有症状的循环超负荷(p<0.001),过早停止输液。在第1天接受的实际白蛋白剂量在两组中是相似的,在第3天的标准剂量组中仅稍高。SBP的分辨率,AKI进展到更高阶段,两组的住院死亡率和28日死亡率相似.
    结论:对于SBP的治疗,印度患者不耐受标准剂量白蛋白输注(诊断时1.5g/kg,48小时后1g/kg)超过6小时.在更长时间内输注标准剂量白蛋白的有效性,与减少剂量的白蛋白相比,应该在进一步的研究中进行评估。
    背景:临床试验.gov标识符:NCT04273373。
    Twenty per cent albumin (1.5 g/kg at diagnosis and 1 g/kg on day three, infused over six-hour duration) is recommended particularly in high-risk spontaneous bacterial peritonitis (SBP). Whether reduced dose albumin infusion is as effective as the standard dose albumin infusion is not clear. The aim of this study was to compare standard dose albumin infusion with reduced dose albumin infusion in acute kidney injury (AKI) development or progression in patients with cirrhosis and high-risk SBP.
    Sixty-three patients were randomized to the standard dose albumin arm (n = 31) and reduced dose albumin arm (n = 32, 0.75 g/kg at diagnosis and 0.5 g/kg 48 h later). The albumin was infused over six-hour duration in both groups. When the patient developed respiratory distress, the albumin infusion was stopped and that dose (i.e. of day one or day three) was not restarted and no attempt was made to finish the whole dose of that day. However, the next dose was started at the pre-calculated infusion rate if there was no evidence of respiratory distress at the start of next infusion.
    All 31 patients in standard dose and two (6.25%) in the reduced dose group developed symptomatic circulatory overload (p < 0.001), with infusions being stopped prematurely. The actual albumin dose received on day one was similar in both groups and only slightly higher in the standard dose group on day three. Resolution of SBP, progression of AKI to higher stage, in-hospital mortality and 28 days\' mortality were similar in both groups.
    For treatment of SBP, standard dose albumin infusion (1.5 g/kg at diagnosis and 1 g/kg 48 hours later) infused over six hours is not tolerated by Indian patients. The effectiveness of standard dose albumin infused over more prolonged periods, as compared to reduced dose albumin, should be evaluated in further studies.
    Clinical Trials.gov Identifier: NCT04273373 .
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:自发性真菌性腹膜炎(SFP)和肺腹水在肝硬化患者中的认识和描述较少。这项研究的目的是确定临床特征,预后,和肝硬化患者SFP/肺腹水的危险因素,并提高自发性细菌性腹膜炎(SBP)的早期鉴别诊断。
    方法:这是一项回顾性病例对照研究,对54例肝硬化患者(52例SFP和2例真菌腹水)的自发性腹膜炎进行真菌阳性腹水培养。随机纳入54例腹水细菌培养阳性的SBP肝硬化患者作为对照组。建立了SFP和肺腹水的早期鉴别诊断的列线图。
    结果:医院获得性感染是SFP/真菌腹水的主要原因。在54例SFP/肺腹水患者中,31例(57.41%)患者进行抗真菌治疗,这似乎可以改善短期(30天)死亡率,但不能改善长期死亡率。脓毒性休克和HCC是SFP/肺腹水患者高30天死亡率的独立预测因子。我们构建了一个包含AKI/HRS的预测列线图模型,发烧,(1,3)-β-D-葡聚糖,和医院获得性感染标记物,用于早期鉴别诊断肝硬化腹水患者的SFP/真菌腹水,诊断性能良好,AUC为0.930(95%CI:0.874-0.985)。
    结论:SFP/肺腹水与高死亡率相关。本文建立的列线图是早期识别SBP患者SFP/肺腹水的有用工具。对于强烈怀疑或确诊为SFP/肺腹水的患者,应及时进行抗真菌治疗。
    BACKGROUND: Spontaneous fungal peritonitis (SFP) and fungiascites is less well-recognized and described in patients with liver cirrhosis. The aims of this study were to determine the clinical characteristics, prognosis, and risk factors of cirrhotic patients with SFP/fungiascites and to improve early differential diagnosis with spontaneous bacterial peritonitis (SBP).
    METHODS: This was a retrospective case-control study of 54 cases of spontaneous peritonitis in cirrhotic patients (52 SFP and 2 fungiascites) with fungus-positive ascitic culture. Fifty-four SBP cirrhotic patients with bacteria-positive ascitic culture were randomly enrolled as a control group. A nomogram was developed for the early differential diagnosis of SFP and fungiascites.
    RESULTS: Hospital-acquired infection was the main cause of SFP/fungiascites. Of the 54 SFP/fungiascites patients, 31 (57.41%) patients carried on with the antifungal treatment, which seemed to improve short-term (30-days) mortality but not long-term mortality. Septic shock and HCC were independent predictors of high 30-day mortality in SFP/fungiascites patients. We constructed a predictive nomogram model that included AKI/HRS, fever, (1,3)-β-D-glucan, and hospital-acquired infection markers for early differential diagnosis of SFP/fungiascites in cirrhotic patients with ascites from SBP, and the diagnostic performance was favorable, with an AUC of 0.930 (95% CI: 0.874-0.985).
    CONCLUSIONS: SFP/fungiascites was associated with high mortality. The nomogram established in this article is a useful tool for identifying SFP/fungiascites in SBP patients early. For patients with strongly suspected or confirmed SFP/fungiascites, timely antifungal therapy should be administered.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    最近的研究结果表明,使用质子泵抑制剂(PPI)的肝硬化患者发生自发性细菌性腹膜炎(SBP)的风险高于非PPI使用者。我们的目的是确定在美国(US)的肝硬化患者中使用PPI是否是SBP发展的独立危险因素。
    我们使用经过验证的多中心数据库注册了一个回顾性队列。确定了1999年至2022年之间SNOMED-CT诊断为“肝硬化”的患者。所有18岁以下的患者被排除在外。我们计算了1999年至今在美国总人口和肝硬化患者中使用PPI的个体的患病率,以及过去一年中SBP的发病率。最后,我们构建了一个多元回归模型,控制多个协变量。
    最终分析包括377,420名患者。肝硬化患者SBP的20年患病率为3.54%,美国人群中使用PPI的患者患病率为12,000/100,000(12.00%)。使用PPI的肝硬化患者中SBP的1年发病率为2500/100,000人。在考虑了混杂因素之后,男性SBP的风险较高,诊断为消化道出血的患者,以及使用β受体阻滞剂和PPI的患者。
    到目前为止,这是用于检查美国肝硬化患者中SBP患病率的最大队列.PPI使用和肝性脑病为SBP的发展提供了最高的风险,独立于消化道出血。应鼓励肝硬化患者明智地使用PPI。
    UNASSIGNED: Recent findings suggest that cirrhotic patients on proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) are at a higher risk for developing spontaneous bacterial peritonitis (SBP) than non-PPI users. We aimed to identify whether PPI use is an independent risk factor for the development of SBP among cirrhotic patients in the United States (US).
    UNASSIGNED: We enrolled a retrospective cohort using a validated multicenter database. Patients with a SNOMED-CT diagnosis of \"cirrhosis\" between 1999 and 2022 were identified. All patients below 18 years of age were excluded. We calculated the prevalence of individuals using PPIs in the total US population and in cirrhotic patients from 1999 to date, and the incidence of SBP in the past year. Finally, we constructed a multivariate regression model, controlling for multiple covariates.
    UNASSIGNED: The final analysis included 377,420 patients. The 20-year-period prevalence of SBP in patients with cirrhosis was 3.54% and the prevalence of patients using PPIs in the US population was 12,000 per 100,000 people (12.00%). The 1-year incidence of SBP in cirrhotic patients using PPIs was 2500 per 100,000 people. After accounting for confounders, the risk of SBP was higher among males, patients with a diagnosis of gastrointestinal bleeding, and those using β-blockers and PPIs.
    UNASSIGNED: To date, this is the largest cohort used to examine the prevalence of SBP among cirrhotic patients in the US. PPI use and hepatic encephalopathy offered the highest risk for the development of SBP, independently of gastrointestinal bleeding. Focusing on judicious PPI use should be encouraged among cirrhotic patients.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    质子泵抑制剂(PPI)通常用于预防和治疗上消化道溃疡和出血。研究发现,在服用PPI的肝硬化患者中,自发性细菌性腹膜炎和肝性脑病(HE)的发生率增加。然而,结果是相互矛盾的,由于PPI是用于静脉曲张破裂出血的处方,感染和HE的主要危险因素,辨别这些关联是否是因果关系具有挑战性。
    在对ATTIRE试验的事后分析中,我们汇集了所有患者数据,以研究PPI使用对临床结局的影响.ATTIRE是一个多中心,开放标签,针对20%人白蛋白溶液(HAS)每日输注与标准治疗的随机试验,涉及777例失代偿性肝硬化成人,因急性并发症和白蛋白<30g/L住院研究招募时间为2016年1月25日至2019年6月28日,在英格兰35家医院进行,苏格兰,威尔士。关键排除标准是预期寿命<8周的晚期肝细胞癌和接受姑息治疗的患者。在ATTIRE,患者在进入试验时按PPI使用情况分组.我们研究了基线时的感染和HE以及医院获得性感染的发生率,新发作的他,肾功能不全和死亡率。我们尝试用倾向评分匹配来解释疾病严重程度的差异。
    基线时使用总PPI与感染发生率增加无关,肾功能障碍或死亡率,但与住院期间III/IV级HE发生率显著增加相关(P=0.011).这仅对那些服用静脉PPI的患者有意义,与非PPI患者相比,这些患者静脉曲张破裂出血的发生率>10倍,28天死亡率接近两倍。然而,倾向评分匹配是不可能的,因为PPI使用的患者选择如此强烈,我们找不到足够的非PPI患者来匹配。我们发现使用PPI对细菌易位的血浆标志物没有影响,感染或全身性炎症。
    我们从完成的随机试验中获得的实际数据表明,PPI在英国被广泛开处方,合理使用对失代偿期肝硬化住院患者似乎是安全的。然而,处方PPI的患者与未处方PPI的患者具有根本不同的表型,一种通过指示混淆的形式,在解释研究和对其使用提出建议时,应强烈考虑这一点。
    惠康信托基金和卫生与社会护理部。
    UNASSIGNED: Proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) are commonly prescribed to prevent and treat upper gastrointestinal ulceration and bleeding. Studies have identified increased incidence of spontaneous bacterial peritonitis and hepatic encephalopathy (HE) in cirrhosis patients taking PPIs. However, results are conflicting, and as PPIs are prescribed for variceal bleeding, a major risk factor for infection and HE, it is challenging to discern whether these associations are causal.
    UNASSIGNED: In this post-hoc analysis of the ATTIRE trial, we pooled all patient data to investigate the effects of PPI use on clinical outcomes. ATTIRE was a multicentre, open-label, randomised trial of targeted 20% human albumin solution (HAS) daily infusions versus standard care involving 777 adults with decompensated cirrhosis hospitalised with acute complications and albumin <30 g/L. Study recruitment was between Jan 25, 2016, and June 28, 2019, at 35 hospitals across England, Scotland, and Wales. Key exclusion criteria were advanced hepatocellular carcinoma with life expectancy <8 weeks and patients receiving palliative care. In ATTIRE, patients were grouped by PPI use at trial entry. We studied infection and HE at baseline and incidence of hospital acquired infection, new onset HE, renal dysfunction and mortality. We attempted with propensity score matching to account for differences in disease severity.
    UNASSIGNED: Overall PPI use at baseline was not associated with increased incidence of infection, renal dysfunction or mortality, but was associated with significantly increased incidence of grade III/IV HE during hospital stay (P = 0.011). This was only significant for those taking intravenous PPIs and these patients had >10 times the incidence of variceal bleeding and near double the 28-day mortality compared to non-PPI patients. However, propensity score matching was not possible as there was such a strong selection of patients for PPI use, that we could not find sufficient non-PPI patients to match to. We found no impact of PPI use on plasma markers of bacterial translocation, infection or systemic inflammation.
    UNASSIGNED: Our real-world data from a completed randomised trial show that PPIs are widely prescribed in the UK and judicious use appears safe in patients hospitalised with decompensated cirrhosis. However, patients prescribed PPIs had fundamentally different phenotypes to those not prescribed PPIs, a form of confounding by indication, which should be strongly considered when interpreting studies and making recommendations about their use.
    UNASSIGNED: Wellcome Trust and Department of Health and Social Care.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    OBJECTIVE: A highly sensitive and specific point-of-care method for diagnosing spontaneous bacterial peritonitis (SBP) is currently lacking. The objective of the present study is to evaluate the diagnostic value of a rapid, easy-to-use, mid-infrared fiber evanescent wave spectroscopy (MIR-FEWS) method for ruling out SBP.
    METHODS: Cirrhotic patients (n = 256) at five centers in France were included for suspected SBP or for the scheduled evacuation of ascites fluid. The mid-infrared spectrum of 7 µL of an ascites fluid sample was recorded using a MIR-FEWS system. To define a model for the diagnosis of SBP, the patients were divided into a calibration group (n = 170) and a validation group (n = 86).
    RESULTS: Most of the patients were male (71%). The mean age was 60.25 years. Alcohol-related liver disease was the most common cause of cirrhosis. SBP was observed in 18% of the patients. For the diagnosis of SBP in the calibration and validation groups, respectively, the model gave areas under the receiver operating characteristic curves of 0.87 and 0.89, sensitivities of 90% and 87%, specificities of 78% and 80%, positive predictive values of 48% and 50%, negative predictive values of 97% and 96%, positive likelihood ratio of 4.09 and 4.35, negative likelihood ratio of 0.13 and 0.16, Youden index of 0.68 and 0.67, and correct classification rates of 80% and 81%.
    CONCLUSIONS: The results of this proof-of-concept study show that MIR-FEWS is a highly sensitive diagnostic method for ruling out SBP. The method warrants further investigation.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

公众号