spinal cord compression

脊髓压迫
  • 文章类型: Letter
    暂无摘要。
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Letter
    暂无摘要。
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    这是骨转移治疗指南的第二部分。在第一部分,无并发症骨转移的诊断和治疗已得到解决.骨转移可能会由于相关症状和可能的并发症而显着降低生活质量。最常见的症状包括疼痛和神经缺陷。骨转移最严重的并发症是骨骼相关事件(SRE)。定义为病理性骨折,脊髓压迫,疼痛,或其他需要紧急干预的症状,如手术或放疗。弥漫性骨转移可能导致高钙血症,如果不治疗,可能是致命的。越来越多的现代诊断工具可以早期发现无症状的骨转移,如果对弥漫性骨转移进行寡转移或全身治疗以避免SRE的发展,则可以通过局部治疗成功地进行治疗。
    This is the second part of the guidelines on the management of bone metastases. In the first part, the diagnosis and management of uncomplicated bone metastases have been addressed. Bone metastases may significantly reduce quality of life due to related symptoms and possible complications. The most common symptoms include pain and neurologic deficits. The most serious complications of bone metastases are skeletal-related events (SRE), defined as pathologic fracture, spinal cord compression, pain, or other symptoms requiring an urgent intervention such as surgery or radiotherapy. Diffuse bone metastases may lead to hypercalcaemia that can be fatal if untreated. The growing access to modern diagnostic tools allows early detection of asymptomatic bone metastases that could be successfully managed with local treatment if oligometastatic or systemic treatment for diffuse bone metastases to try to avoid the development of SRE.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    The morbidity and mortality of prostate cancer ascend yearly, which seriously threatens the health of the male population. Bone is the main metastasis site of prostate cancer, with bone metastases and skeletal-related events (SREs) occuring in more than 70% of patients with advanced prostate cancer. Bone metastases and the resulting SREs, such as spinal cord compression and pathological fracture, seriously affect the life quality of the patients. Although the active treatments of the primary disease is important, the application of bone-modifying agents to prevent SREs cannot be overlooked. However, there is no standard treatment procedure for the bone metastasis of prostate cancer at present. According to the clinical status, the Genitourinary Oncology Committee of Chinese Anti-cancer Association formulated this consensus, which integrated clinical evidence and real world clinical practices in China and abroad, to help clinicians make more accurate diagnosis and treatment for the bone metastases of prostate cancer with multidisciplinary strategies.
    前列腺癌的发病率和死亡率逐年升高,严重威胁男性健康。骨骼是前列腺癌最主要的转移部位,超过70%的晚期前列腺癌患者会发生骨转移和骨相关事件(SREs)。骨转移及其引发的SREs如脊髓压迫、病理性骨折等,严重影响患者的生活质量。在积极治疗原发病灶的同时,使用骨改良药物治疗骨转移预防SREs不可忽视。目前,前列腺癌骨转移尚无统一治疗方案,针对现阶段的诊疗现状,结合临床实践与国内外相关研究,中国抗癌协会泌尿男生殖系统肿瘤专业委员会制定了前列腺癌骨转移和骨相关疾病临床诊疗专家共识(2021版),以期为临床医师提供更为合理的前列腺癌骨转移多学科诊疗策略。.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    Disorders of the spine present a common and difficult management concern in patients with skeletal dysplasia. Due to the rarity of these conditions however, the literature, largely consisting of small, single institution case series, is sparse in regard to well-designed studies to support clinical decision making in these situations.
    Using the Delphi method, an international, multi-disciplinary group of individuals, with significant experience in the care of patients with skeletal dysplasia, convened to develop multi-disciplinary, \"best practice\" guidelines in the care of spinal disorders in patients with skeletal dysplasia.
    Starting with 33 statements, the group a developed a list of 31 \"best practice\" guidelines.
    The guidelines are presented and discussed to provide context for clinicians in their decision making in this often-challenging realm of care.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Sci-hub)

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • DOI:
    文章类型: Case Reports
    Pneumocystis jirovecii, formerly known as Pneumocystis carinii, is an atypical fungal pathogen best known for causing Pneumocystis jirovecii pneumonia (PCP). The epidemiology of PCP is changing such that patients without HIV infection now comprise the largest subset of individuals diagnosed with PCP. While those with hematologic malignancies and organ transplants are at greatest risk for non-HIV-related PCP, this review will focus on PCP in patients with solid tumors. They are at risk for PCP due to their chemotherapy regimens and use of steroids in the management of various complications of treatment, and possibly because of the immunosuppressive effect of the cancer itself. In particular, patients with solid tumors being treated for metastatic spinal cord compression are at great risk for PCP. Patients with solid tumors and PCP face greater mortality than those with HIV infection. Multiple reviews have attempted to describe the ideal regimen of corticosteroids for metastatic spinal cord compression, but there is little consensus. We present 2 cases of patients with metastatic spinal cord compression due to prostate cancer undergoing radiation therapy and treatment with corticosteroids. These cases highlight the difficulties in predicting the length of corticosteroid therapy and the dangers that patients face without appropriate prophylaxis. This article will also provide a review of the current guidelines for PCP prophylaxis in patients undergoing treatment for metastatic spinal cord compression. We recommend empiric treatment with trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole or dapsone in those patients with a sulfa allergy in all patients with solid tumors when any high-dose steroids are started for the treatment of metastatic spinal cord compression. Further research is needed to assess the epidemiology of PCP in patients with solid tumors and additional trials are necessary to refine PCP prophylaxis.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    This article is a summary of the revised Dutch multidisciplinary evidence-based guideline \'Spinal metastases\' (English translation available at: https://www.oncoline.nl/spinal-metastases) that was published at the end of 2015. This summary provides an easy-to-use overview for physicians to use in their daily practice.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Sci-hub)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    UNASSIGNED: Guideline development.
    UNASSIGNED: The objective of this study is to develop guidelines that outline how to best manage (1) patients with mild, moderate, and severe myelopathy and (2) nonmyelopathic patients with evidence of cord compression with or without clinical symptoms of radiculopathy.
    UNASSIGNED: Five systematic reviews of the literature were conducted to synthesize evidence on disease natural history; risk factors of disease progression; the efficacy, effectiveness, and safety of nonoperative and surgical management; the impact of preoperative duration of symptoms and myelopathy severity on treatment outcomes; and the frequency, timing, and predictors of symptom development. A multidisciplinary guideline development group used this information, and their clinical expertise, to develop recommendations for the management of degenerative cervical myelopathy (DCM).
    UNASSIGNED: Our recommendations were as follows: (1) \"We recommend surgical intervention for patients with moderate and severe DCM.\" (2) \"We suggest offering surgical intervention or a supervised trial of structured rehabilitation for patients with mild DCM. If initial nonoperative management is pursued, we recommend operative intervention if there is neurological deterioration and suggest operative intervention if the patient fails to improve.\" (3) \"We suggest not offering prophylactic surgery for non-myelopathic patients with evidence of cervical cord compression without signs or symptoms of radiculopathy. We suggest that these patients be counseled as to potential risks of progression, educated about relevant signs and symptoms of myelopathy, and be followed clinically.\" (4) \"Non-myelopathic patients with cord compression and clinical evidence of radiculopathy with or without electrophysiological confirmation are at a higher risk of developing myelopathy and should be counselled about this risk. We suggest offering either surgical intervention or nonoperative treatment consisting of close serial follow-up or a supervised trial of structured rehabilitation. In the event of myelopathic development, the patient should be managed according to the recommendations above.\"
    UNASSIGNED: These guidelines will promote standardization of care for patients with DCM, decrease the heterogeneity of management strategies and encourage clinicians to make evidence-informed decisions.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    The role of imaging in myeloma has gained increasing importance over the past few years. The recently revised definition of myeloma from the International Myeloma Working Group (IMWG) includes cross sectional imaging as a method to define bone disease and also incorporates its use in the disease definition for patients with suspected smouldering myeloma. The National Institute for Health and Care Excellence myeloma guidelines also recommend cross sectional imaging for patients with suspected myeloma. There is also increasing use of imaging in disease assessments and the International Myeloma Working Group has recently incorporated imaging in defining new response categories of minimal residual disease negativity, with or without imaging-based evidence of disease. Plain X-rays have previously been the standard imaging modality included in a myeloma work up at presentation but evidence is mounting for use of cross-sectional modalities such as computed tomography (CT), magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and 18 fluoro-deoxyglucose (18 F-FDG) positron emission tomography (PET)/CT. Funding and therefore availability of newer imaging techniques remains a barrier. Here, we propose an evidence-based approach to the use and technical application of the latest imaging modalities at diagnosis and in the follow-up of patients with myeloma and plasmacytoma.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Sci-hub)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    OBJECTIVE Although postoperative stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) for spinal metastases is increasingly performed, few guidelines exist for this application. The purpose of this study is to develop consensus guidelines to promote safe and effective treatment for patients with spinal metastases. METHODS Fifteen radiation oncologists and 5 neurosurgeons, representing 19 centers in 4 countries and having a collective experience of more than 1300 postoperative spine SBRT cases, completed a 19-question survey about postoperative spine SBRT practice. Responses were defined as follows: 1) consensus: selected by ≥ 75% of respondents; 2) predominant: selected by 50% of respondents or more; and 3) controversial: no single response selected by a majority of respondents. RESULTS Consensus treatment indications included: radioresistant primary, 1-2 levels of adjacent disease, and previous radiation therapy. Contraindications included: involvement of more than 3 contiguous vertebral bodies, ASIA Grade A status (complete spinal cord injury without preservation of motor or sensory function), and postoperative Bilsky Grade 3 residual (cord compression without any CSF around the cord). For treatment planning, co-registration of the preoperative MRI and postoperative T1-weighted MRI (with or without gadolinium) and delineation of the cord on the T2-weighted MRI (and/or CT myelogram in cases of significant hardware artifact) were predominant. Consensus GTV (gross tumor volume) was the postoperative residual tumor based on MRI. Predominant CTV (clinical tumor volume) practice was to include the postoperative bed defined as the entire extent of preoperative tumor, the relevant anatomical compartment and any residual disease. Consensus was achieved with respect to not including the surgical hardware and incision in the CTV. PTV (planning tumor volume) expansion was controversial, ranging from 0 to 2 mm. The spinal cord avoidance structure was predominantly the true cord. Circumferential treatment of the epidural space and margin for paraspinal extension was controversial. Prescription doses and spinal cord tolerances based on clinical scenario, neurological compromise, and prior overlapping treatments were controversial, but reasonable ranges are presented. Fifty percent of those surveyed practiced an integrated boost to areas of residual tumor and density override for hardware within the beam path. Acceptable PTV coverage was controversial, but consensus was achieved with respect to compromising coverage to meet cord constraint and fractionation to improve coverage while meeting cord constraint. CONCLUSIONS The consensus by spinal radiosurgery experts suggests that postoperative SBRT is indicated for radioresistant primary lesions, disease confined to 1-2 vertebral levels, and/or prior overlapping radiotherapy. The GTV is the postoperative residual tumor, and the CTV is the postoperative bed defined as the entire extent of preoperative tumor and anatomical compartment plus residual disease. Hardware and scar do not need to be included in CTV. While predominant agreement was reached about treatment planning and definition of organs at risk, future investigation will be critical in better understanding areas of controversy, including whether circumferential treatment of the epidural space is necessary, management of paraspinal extension, and the optimal dose fractionation schedules.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Sci-hub)

公众号