OBJECTIVE: Complete visual
review of prolonged video-EEG recordings at an EMU (Epilepsy Monitoring Unit) is time consuming and can cause problems in times of paucity of educated personnel. In this study we aimed to show non inferiority for electroclinical diagnosis using sampled
review in combination with EEG analysis softreferware (P13 software, Persyst Corporation), in comparison to complete visual review.
METHODS: Fifty prolonged video-EEG recordings in adults were prospectively evaluated using sampled visual EEG review in combination with automated detection software of the complete EEG record. Visually assessed samples consisted of one hour during wakefulness, one hour during sleep, half an hour of wakefulness after wake-up and all clinical events marked by the individual and/or nurses. The final electro-clinical diagnosis of this new review approach was compared with the electro-clinical diagnosis after complete visual
review as presently used.
RESULTS: The electro-clinical diagnosis based on sampled visual review combined with automated detection software did not differ from the diagnosis based on complete visual
review. Furthermore, the detection software was able to detect all records containing epileptiform abnormalities and epileptic seizures.
CONCLUSIONS: Sampled visual review in combination with automated detection using Persyst 13 is non-inferior to complete visual
review for electroclinical diagnosis of prolonged video-EEG at an EMU setting, which makes this approach promising.