BACKGROUND: Proximally based, pedicled flexor carpi ulnaris (FCU) muscle flap has been described previously for soft tissue coverage of the proximal forearm and elbow. No studies have been done on the distal muscular perforators and its use as a distally based flap.
METHODS: Ten fresh-frozen cadaveric dissections were done. Specimens were injected with latex to facilitate identification of the perforators. Distal muscular perforators were dissected and distances of the pedicles from the distal wrist crease and ulnar styloid were measured and recorded. A clinical case is also presented where a distally based FCU muscle flap was used for coverage in a patient with median nerve neuroma.
RESULTS: A distal muscular perforator and a second more proximal perforator were identified in all specimens. The average distance from the most distal muscular perforator to the ulnar styloid was 3.0 cm. The average distance to the wrist crease was 4.6 cm. The more proximal perforators had an average distance to the ulnar styloid and wrist crease of 7.3 cm and 8.8 cm, respectively. At 7 months post-op, the patient who underwent median nerve neurolysis and coverage with pedicled FCU flap had much improved sensation, with complete resolution of pain and tingling, and without any functional deficits.
CONCLUSIONS: The use of a distally based FCU muscle flap is a good option for soft tissue coverage of the distal forearm, wrist, and hand. The distal muscular perforators from the ulnar artery exhibit a relatively consistent anatomy.

BACKGROUND: The posterior elbow is prone to soft tissue loss that may require reconstructive methods for wound healing to be achieved. The flexor carpi ulnaris (FCU) muscle has been described for coverage in case reports and small series. Previous studies give conflicting anatomic findings about the dominant vascular pedicle for the FCU.
METHODS: Twenty-five cadaveric specimens were dissected. Pedicle location, number, and distance from the medial epicondyle were recorded along with the extent of posterior elbow coverage. Chart review was conducted during a 4-year period. Eight patients who underwent FCU rotational flap coverage were identified. Those flaps relied entirely on a single proximal pedicle.
RESULTS: The vascular pedicles from the ulnar artery or recurrent ulnar artery were identified in 24 of 25 specimens. The average distance from the tip of the medial epicondyle to the first pedicle was 5.7 cm (range, 3 to 10 cm). The length of muscle coverage proximal to the olecranon tip averaged 9.3 cm. The clinical follow-up of 7 patients requiring FCU rotational flaps for coverage of the posterior elbow showed that all flaps survived and provided adequate coverage for the defect.
CONCLUSIONS: The FCU rotational pedicle flap provides predictable coverage of small to medium-sized defects about the posterior elbow. Although it is relatively consistent, the proximal vascular pedicle does demonstrate some variability, which should be considered in planning surgery. The consistent distal extent of the FCU muscle belly provides wider proximal coverage of defects.