暂无摘要。

BACKGROUND: Eradication of hepatitis C virus (HCV) using direct-acting agents (DAA) has been associated with a financial burden to health authorities worldwide. We aimed to evaluate the guideline-based treatment costs by DAAs from the perspective of the Brazilian Ministry of Health (BMoH).
METHODS: The activity based costing method was used to estimate the cost for monitoring/treatment of genotype-1 (GT1) HCV patients by the following strategies: peg-interferon (PEG-IFN)/ribavirin (RBV) for 48 weeks, PEG-IFN/RBV plus boceprevir (BOC) or telaprevir (TEL) for 48 weeks, and sofosbuvir (SOF) plus daclastavir (DCV) or simeprevir (SIM) for 12 weeks. Costs were reported in United States Dollars without (US$) and with adjustment for purchasing power parity (PPP$). Drug costs were collected at the National Database of Health Prices and an overview of the literature was performed to assess effectiveness of SOF/DCV and SOF/SIM regimens in real-world cohorts.
RESULTS: Treatment costs of GT1-HCV patients were PPP$ 43,176.28 (US$ 24,020.16) for PEG-IFN/RBV, PPP$ 71,196.03 (US$ 39,578.23) for PEG-IFN/RBV/BOC and PPP$ 86,250.33 (US$ 47,946.92) for PEG-IFN/RBV/TEL. Treatment by all-oral interferon-free regimens were the less expensive approach: PPP$ 19,761.72 (US$ 10,985.90) for SOF/DCV and PPP$ 21,590.91 (US$ 12,002.75) for SOF/SIM. The overview reported HCV eradication in up to 98% for SOF/DCV and 96% for SOF/SIM.
CONCLUSIONS: Strategies with all oral interferon-free might lead to lower costs for management of GT1-HCV patients compared to IFN-based regimens in Brazil. This occurred mainly because of high discounts over international DAA prices due to negotiation between BMoH and pharmaceutical industries.

Hepatitis C virus (HCV)-associated mixed cryoglobulinemia (MC) vasculitis commonly regresses upon virus eradication, but conventional therapy with pegylated interferon and ribavirin yields approximately 40% sustained virologic responses (SVR). We prospectively evaluated the efficacy and safety of sofosbuvir-based direct-acting antiviral therapy, individually tailored according to the latest guidelines, in a cohort of 44 consecutive patients with HCV-associated MC. In two patients MC had evolved into an indolent lymphoma with monoclonal B-cell lymphocytosis. All patients had negative HCV viremia at week 12 (SVR12) and at week 24 (SVR24) posttreatment, at which time all had a clinical response of vasculitis. The mean (±standard deviation) Birmingham Vasculitis Activity Score decreased from 5.41 (±3.53) at baseline to 2.35 (±2.25) (P < 0.001) at week 4 on treatment to 1.39 (±1.48) (P < 0.001) at SVR12 and to 1.27 (±1.68) (P < 0.001) at SVR24. The mean cryocrit value fell from 7.2 (±15.4)% at baseline to 2.9 (±7.4)% (P < 0.01) at SVR12 and to 1.8 (±5.1)% (P < 0.001) at SVR24. Intriguingly, in the 2 patients with MC and lymphoma there was a partial clinical response of vasculitis and ∼50% decrease of cryocrit, although none experienced a significant decrease of monoclonal B-cell lymphocytosis. Adverse events occurred in 59% of patients and were generally mild, with the exception of 1 patient with ribavirin-related anemia requiring blood transfusion.
Interferon-free, guideline-tailored therapy with direct-acting antivirals is highly effective and safe for HCV-associated MC patients; the overall 100% rate of clinical response of vasculitis, on an intention-to-treat basis, opens the perspective for curing the large majority of these so far difficult-to-treat patients. (Hepatology 2016;64:1473-1482).

Ever since direct-acting antiviral agents (DAA) have been approved and released into the world, numerous studies on the efficacy, adverse effects and drug-drug interactions of interferon-free DAA combination therapy have been studied and published. With all oral DAA therapy showing sustained virological response rate of 80-90% with minimal adverse events, HCV eradication has now become a realistic goal. DAA combination treatments were approved and adapted to practice in Korea in 2015, and Korean Association for the Study of the Liver (KASL) has revised the guideline based on the systematic approach that reflects evidence-based medicine and expert opinions. In this article, new recommendations for treatment of chronic HCV genotype 2 and 3 infected patients will be introduced base on KASL practice guidelines for management of hepatitis C that has been updated in 2015.

The introduction of direct-acting antiviral agents (DAAs) has markedly improved the sustained virological response (SVR) rates in patients with chronic hepatitis C. Currently, four classes of DAAs targeting three HCV proteins (NS3, NS5A, and NS5B) have been approved for treatment in many countries. Since drugs show advantages and disadvantages, use of a combination of two or more DAAs with different targets or addition of ribavirin in a difficult-to-treat patient shows an SVR rate of ~90% after 12 weeks of treatment or expanded treatment for 24 weeks. Various types of DAA are awaiting approval which will improve the treatment of chronic hepatitis C virus genotype 1 infection. However, high costs, drug resistance and interactions between various drugs remain to be overcome. With further advances in the development of antiviral agents, it could be expected that in the near future, there will be DAAs that are affordable and cost effective, require shorter treatment duration, effective in a broad range of patients, and have less side effects and drug-drug interactions.

Approximately 70,000 people are infected with hepatitis C virus in Hungary, and more than half of them are not aware of their infection. From the point of infected individuals early recognition and effective treatment of related liver injury may prevent consequent advanced liver diseases and complications (liver cirrhosis, liver failure and liver cancer) and can increase work productivity and life expectancy. Furthermore, these could from prevent further spread of the virus as well as reduce substantially long term financial burden of related morbidity, as a socioeconomic aspect. Pegylated interferon + ribavirin dual therapy, which is available in Hungary since 2003, can clear the virus in 40-45% of previously not treated (naïve), and in 5-21% of previous treatment-failure patients. Addition of a direct acting first generation protease inhibitor drug (boceprevir or telaprevir) to the dual therapy increases the chance of sustained viral response to 63-75% and 59-66%, respectively. These two protease inhibitors are available and financed for a segment of Hungarian patients since May 2013. Between 2013 and February 2015, other direct acting antivirals and interferon-free combination therapies have been registered for the treatment of chronic hepatitis C with a potential efficacy over 90% and typically with a short duration of 8-12 weeks. Indication of therapy includes exclusion of contraindications to the drugs and demonstration of viral replication with consequent liver injury, i.e., inflammation and/or fibrosis in the liver. Non-invasive methods (elastography and biochemical methods) are accepted and preferred for staging liver damage (fibrosis). For initiation of treatment accurate and timely molecular biology tests are mandatory. Eligibility for treatment is a subject of individual central medical review. Due to budget limitations therapy is covered only for a proportion of patients by the National Health Insurance Fund. Priority is given to those with urgent need based on a Hungarian Priority Index system reflecting primarily the stage of liver disease, and considering also additional factors, i.e., activity and progression of liver disease, predictive factors of treatment and other special issues. Approved treatments are restricted to the most cost-effective combinations based on the cost per sustained viral response value in different patient categories with consensus between professional organizations, National Health Insurance Fund and patient organizations. More expensive therapies might be available upon co-financing by the patient or a third party. Interferon-free treatments and shorter therapy durations preferred as much as financially feasible. A separate budget is allocated to cover interferon-free treatments for the most-in-need interferon ineligible/intolerant patients, and for those who have no more interferon-based therapy option.
Magyarországon 70000 egyén lehet fertőzött hepatitis C-vírussal, nagyobbik részük nem tud a fertőzöttségéről. A fertőzés időben történő felfedezése és meggyógyítása a beteg szempontjából a munkaképesség megőrzését, az életminőség javulását, a májzsugor és a májrák megelőzését, valamint a betegségmentes várható élettartam meghosszabbodását, míg a beteg környezete és a társadalom szempontjából a továbbfertőzés veszélyének megállítását, a későbbi súlyos májbetegségekből adódó egészségügyi ráfordításigény jelentős csökkenését eredményezi. A 2003 óta alkalmazott pegilált interferon+ribavirin kettős kezeléssel a hazánkban dominálóan 1-es genotípussal fertőzött, korábban terápiában nem részesült betegek 40–45%-a, a korábban sikertelenül kezeltek 5–21%-a gyógyítható meg. 2011-ben a korábbiaknál lényegesen hatékonyabb, két új, direkt antivirális hatású proteázgátló szer került forgalomba (boceprevir és telaprevir). A készítmények – az előrehaladott stádiumban lévő májbeteg számára – 2013 májusa óta hazánkban is finanszírozottá váltak. 2013 és 2015. február között újabb direkt ható antivirális szerek kerültek törzskönyvezésre. Ezek kombinációival rövidebb időtartamú (8–24 hetes), 90% feletti gyógyulási arányt biztosító interferonmentes kezelés válik lehetővé. A kezelés indikációja – az ellenjavallatok kizárása után – a vírusnukleinsav és a májbetegség kimutatása. Utóbbit a gyulladásos aktivitás és/vagy a májfibrosis mértéke (stádium) határozza meg. A stádium meghatározására az invazív májbiopszia mellett a nem invazív elasztográfiás és validált biokémiai fibrosistesztmódszerek alkalmazhatók. A kivizsgálás és a kezelés során fontos a virológiai vizsgálatok gyors és megbízható elvégzése. Hazánkban az Egészségügyi Alapból történő kezelés engedélyezéshez kötött. A szakmailag indokolt kezelés finanszírozási korlátok miatt csak a betegek egy részénél kerül engedélyezésre. A sorrend alapja az úgynevezett Prioritási Index. Ez a májbetegség stádiuma mellett figyelembe veszi a betegség aktivitását, progresszióját, a kezelés sikerességének várható esélyét és további meghatározott speciális szempontokat is. Az egyes betegcsoportokban használható készítményeket az egy beteg meggyógyításához szükséges átlagos kezelési költség alapján a finanszírozóval egyeztetett, időszakosan aktualizált finanszírozási algoritmus határozza meg. A lehetőségek határai között előnyt élveznek a nagy hatékonyságú és biztonságos interferonmentes, illetve a rövidebb időtartamú kezelések. Az interferonalapú terápiára alkalmatlan betegek interferonmentes kezelése külön keretből, külön Prioritási Index alapján történik, a szóba jövő gyógyszerek költséghatékonyságának figyelembevételével. Orv. Hetil., 2015, 156(9), 343–351.

暂无摘要。

暂无摘要。

BACKGROUND: Therapeutic options for the management of hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection have evolved rapidly over the past two decades, with a consequent improvement in cure rates. Novel therapeutic agents are an area of great interest in the research community, with a number of these agents showing promise in the clinical setting.
OBJECTIVE: To assess and present the available evidence for the use of novel therapeutic agents for the treatment of HCV, updating previous guidelines.
METHODS: All Phase 2 and 3 studies, as well as abstract presentations from international Hepatology meetings were identified and reviewed for suitable inclusion, based on studies of new therapies in HCV. Treatment-naïve and experienced individuals, as well as cirrhotic and co-infected individuals were included.
RESULTS: Sofosbuvir, simeprevir and faldaprevir, along with pegylated interferon and ribavirin, have a role in the treatment of chronic HCV infection. The precise regimens are largely dependent on the patient characteristics, patient and physician preferences, and cost implication.
CONCLUSIONS: Therapies for chronic HCV have evolved dramatically in recent years. Interferon-free regimens are now possible without compromise in the rate of sustained viral response. The decision as to which regimen is most appropriate is multifactorial, and based on efficacy, safety and cost.