背景:Restylane组合的软组织填充物涵盖了广泛的适应症,部分由于其互补的制造技术[非动物稳定的透明质酸(NASHA)和最佳平衡技术(OBT/XpresHAn)]。使用一系列产品,注射器可以实现整体,自然的寻找效果为他们的病人。然而,与广泛的产品可能很难选择一个最佳的组合。
目标:简化并调整NASHA与OBT产品的全球使用建议。
方法:有国际代表的11位主要意见领袖完成了两次会前调查,目的是收集有关其当前面部各种解剖区域的注射实践的信息(即,时间区域,前额,撕裂槽,外侧平均,前内侧脸颊,鼻子,梨形孔,鼻唇沟,口周区域,嘴唇,唇形折痕,木偶线,下巴,和jawline)。随后在一次共识小组会议上讨论了从这些调查中收集的数据,该会议涉及11名投票成员和3名无投票成员。
结果:确定了每个解剖区域的最佳产品建议,以及在定义的情况下也可以使用的二级和三级建议。基于对患者特征等元素的考虑提供了建议(例如,蒙皮厚度,骨骼结构),想要的美学结果,注射器的经验,和首选的注射技术。
结论:对于面部每个解剖区域的最佳NASHA与OBT产品选择达成了多数共识。这些建议代表了有关使用Restylane产品的国际协议。
BACKGROUND: The Restylane portfolio of soft tissue fillers spans a wide range of indications, due in part to their complementary manufacturing technologies [non-animal stabilized hyaluronic acid (NASHA) and Optimal Balance Technology (OBT/XpresHAn)]. Using an array of products, injectors can achieve a holistic, natural looking effect for their patients. However, with a wide range of products it may be difficult to choose an optimal combination.
OBJECTIVE: Simplify and align global use recommendations for NASHA versus OBT products.
METHODS: Two pre-meeting surveys were completed by 11 key opinion leaders with international representation, with the goal of collecting information regarding their current injection practices for various anatomical regions of the face (i.e., temporal region, forehead, tear trough, lateral zygoma, anteromedial cheek, nose, pyriform aperture, nasolabial fold, perioral area, lips, labiomental crease, marionette lines, chin, and jawline). The data collected from these surveys was subsequently discussed in a
consensus group meeting involving 11 voting members and 3 nonvoting members.
RESULTS: Top product recommendations were identified for each anatomical area, along with secondary and tertiary recommendations that can also be used under defined circumstances. Recommendations were provided based on a consideration of elements such as patient features (e.g., skin thickness, bone structure), the desired aesthetic outcome, experience of the injector, and the preferred injection technique.
CONCLUSIONS: A majority
consensus regarding the top NASHA versus OBT product choice for each anatomical region of the face was reached. These recommendations represent international agreement regarding the use of Restylane products.