sga

SGA
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    该国际共识指南是由全球10个儿科内分泌学会的SGA领域的专家制定的。举行了一次协商一致会议,1300篇文章构成了讨论的基础。所有专家都对建议的优势进行了投票。该指南为SGA出生后身材矮小的病因提供了新的临床相关见解,包括有关(epi)遗传原因的新知识。此外,它提出了SGA出生的长期后果和新的治疗选择,除生长激素(GH)治疗外,还包括促性腺激素释放激素激动剂(GnRHa)治疗,与适当的对照组相比,停止儿童期GH治疗后出生的SGA年轻人的代谢和心血管健康。要诊断SGA,建议使用准确的人体测量学和国家增长图。有必要在生命早期进行随访,并对有风险的人进行神经发育评估。应避免产后体重增加过多,因为这与成年期不利的心脏代谢健康状况有关。出生的SGA儿童在2岁时持续<-2.5SDS或在3-4岁时<-2SDS,应参考诊断工作。在畸形特征的情况下,主要畸形,小头畸形,发育迟缓,智力障碍和/或骨骼发育不良的迹象,应该考虑基因检测。在3-4岁持续身材矮小的情况下,建议用0.033-0.067mgGH/kg/天治疗。当预期在青春期开始时成人身高短时,可以考虑添加GnRHa治疗。所有出生SGA的年轻人都需要咨询以采用健康的生活方式。
    This International Consensus Guideline was developed by experts in the field of small for gestational age (SGA) of 10 pediatric endocrine societies worldwide. A consensus meeting was held and 1300 articles formed the basis for discussions. All experts voted about the strengths of the recommendations. The guideline gives new and clinically relevant insights into the etiology of short stature after SGA birth, including novel knowledge about (epi)genetic causes. Further, it presents long-term consequences of SGA birth and also reviews new treatment options, including treatment with gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist (GnRHa) in addition to growth hormone (GH) treatment, as well as the metabolic and cardiovascular health of young adults born SGA after cessation of childhood GH treatment in comparison with appropriate control groups. To diagnose SGA, accurate anthropometry and use of national growth charts are recommended. Follow-up in early life is warranted and neurodevelopment evaluation in those at risk. Excessive postnatal weight gain should be avoided, as this is associated with an unfavorable cardiometabolic health profile in adulthood. Children born SGA with persistent short stature < -2.5 SDS at age 2 years or < -2 SDS at 3 to 4 years of age, should be referred for diagnostic workup. In case of dysmorphic features, major malformations, microcephaly, developmental delay, intellectual disability, and/or signs of skeletal dysplasia, genetic testing should be considered. Treatment with 0.033 to 0.067 mg GH/kg/day is recommended in case of persistent short stature at age of 3 to 4 years. Adding GnRHa treatment could be considered when short adult height is expected at pubertal onset. All young adults born SGA require counseling to adopt a healthy lifestyle.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    Recently, a Delphi procedure was used to establish new criteria for defining fetal growth restriction (FGR). These criteria require clinical validation. We sought to validate the Delphi consensus criteria by comparing their performance with that of our current definition (estimated fetal weight (EFW) < 10th percentile) in predicting adverse neonatal outcome (ANO).
    This was a secondary analysis of data from a prospective cohort study of women referred for fetal growth assessment between 26 and 36 weeks\' gestation. The current standard definition of FGR used in our clinical practice is EFW < 10th percentile using Hadlock\'s fetal growth standard. The Delphi consensus criteria for FGR include either a very small fetus (abdominal circumference (AC) or EFW < 3rd percentile) or a small fetus (AC or EFW < 10th percentile) with additional abnormal Doppler findings or a decrease in AC or EFW by two quartiles or more. The primary outcome was the prediction of a composite of ANO including one or more of: admission to the neonatal intensive care unit, cord pH < 7.1, 5-min Apgar score < 7, respiratory distress syndrome, intraventricular hemorrhage, neonatal seizures or neonatal death. The discriminatory capacities of the two definitions of FGR for composite ANO and delivery of a small-for-gestational-age (SGA) neonate, defined as birth weight < 10th percentile, were compared using area under the receiver-operating-characteristics curve (AUC). The sensitivity, specificity and predictive values of the methods were also compared.
    Of 1055 pregnancies included in the study, composite ANO occurred in 139 (13.2%). There were only two cases of early FGR (before 32 weeks); therefore, the study focused on late FGR. Our current FGR diagnostic criterion of EFW < 10th percentile was not associated significantly with composite ANO (relative risk (RR), 1.1 (95% CI, 0.6-1.8)), while the Delphi FGR criteria were (RR, 2.0 (95% CI, 1.2-3.3)). Our current definition of FGR showed higher discriminatory ability in the prediction of a SGA neonate (AUC, 0.69 (95% CI, 0.65-0.73)) than did the Delphi definition (AUC, 0.64 (95% CI, 0.60-0.67)) (P = 0.001). The AUCs of both definitions were poor for the prediction of composite ANO, despite slightly improved performance using the Delphi consensus definition of FGR (AUC, 0.53 (95% CI, 0.50-0.55)) compared with that of our current definition (AUC, 0.50 (95% CI, 0.48-0.53)) (P = 0.02).
    The newly postulated criteria for defining FGR based on a Delphi procedure detects fewer cases of neonatal SGA than does our current definition of EFW < 10th percentile, but is associated with a slight improvement in predicting ANO. Copyright © 2020 ISUOG. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Sci-hub)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    To develop a consensus definition of growth restriction in the newborn that can be used clinically to identify newborn infants at risk and in research to harmonize reporting and definition in the current absence of a gold standard.
    An international panel of pediatric leaders in the field of neonatal growth were invited to participate in an electronic Delphi procedure using standardized methods and predefined consensus rules. Responses were fed back at group-level and the list of participants was provided. Nonresponders were excluded from subsequent rounds. In the first round, variables were scored on a 5-point Likert scale; in subsequent rounds, inclusion of variables and cut-offs were determined with a 70% level of agreement. In the final round participants selected the ultimate algorithm.
    In total, 57 experts participated in the first round; 79% completed the procedure. Consensus was reached on the following definition: birth weight less than the third percentile, or 3 out of the following: birth weight <10th percentile; head circumference <10th percentile; length <10th percentile; prenatal diagnosis of fetal growth restriction; and maternal pregnancy information.
    Consensus was reached on a definition for growth restriction in the newborn. This definition recognizes that infants with birth weights <10th percentile may not be growth restricted and that infants with birth weights >10th percentile can be growth restricted. This definition can be adopted in clinical practice and in clinical trials to better focus on newborns at risk, and is complementary to the previously determined definition of fetal growth restriction.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

公众号