serum tumor markers

血清肿瘤标志物
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    到目前为止,尚无具体研究报道在接受一线免疫治疗的晚期非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)患者中使用动态血清肿瘤标志物(STMs)作为预后因素.因此,目前尚不清楚STMs是否可作为晚期NSCLC一线免疫治疗的预后因素.
    阐明STM在监测晚期NSCLC免疫治疗反应中的作用。患者在四个中国中心接受一线程序性细胞死亡-1/程序性细胞死亡配体-1抑制剂治疗。
    这是一项多中心回顾性研究。
    在基线和治疗6-8周后收集血样。根据实体瘤的反应评估标准(RECIST)1.1,使用计算机断层扫描来评估治疗功效。STMs的治疗后下降[血清癌胚抗原(CEA),神经元特异性烯醇化酶(NSE),细胞角蛋白片段19(CYFRA21-1),糖类抗原19-9(CA19-9),和碳水化合物抗原125(CA125)]减少了20%(C组)超过基线用作定义标志物反应的截止水平。如果STM在治疗后增加了20%,治疗效果有限(A组).在单变量和多变量逐步Cox回归分析中,STM变化在20%增加或减少之间的患者被纳入B组。分析STM和RECIST反应对无进展生存期(PFS)和总生存期(OS)的影响。
    分析包括716名患者。通过多变量分析,CEA,NSE,CYFRA21-1、CA19-9和CA125(A组对比B组和A组对比C组)与PFS的显著差异相关。在OS分析中观察到类似的结果。在腺癌亚组分析中观察到类似的结果。在鳞状细胞癌亚组分析中,A组和B组CA125的PFS(p=0.147)和OS(p=0.068)无统计学差异。
    血清STM水平的升高和降低可能是NSCLC患者免疫治疗疗效的可靠预后因素。
    UNASSIGNED: To date, no specific studies have reported the use of dynamic serum tumor markers (STMs) as prognostic factors in patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) who receive first-line immunotherapy. Therefore, it is unclear whether STMs can be used as a prognostic factor for first-line immunotherapy in advanced NSCLC.
    UNASSIGNED: To elucidate the role of STMs in monitoring immunotherapy response in advanced NSCLC. Patients were treated with first-line programmed cell death-1/programmed cell death ligand-1 inhibitors at four Chinese centers.
    UNASSIGNED: This was a multicenter retrospective study.
    UNASSIGNED: Blood samples were collected at baseline and after 6-8 weeks of treatment. Computed tomography scans were used to evaluate treatment efficacy according to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) 1.1. Post-treatment drops in STMs [Serum carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA), neuron-specific enolase (NSE), cytokeratin fragment 19 (CYFRA21-1), carbohydrate antigen 19-9 (CA19-9), and carbohydrate antigen 125 (CA125)] were decreased ⩾20% (Group C) over baseline was used as cutoff level for defining a marker response. If STMs were increased by ⩾20% after treatment, the therapeutic effect was limited (Group A). Patients with STM changes between a 20% increase or decrease were enrolled in Group B. In univariate and multivariate stepwise Cox regression analyses, STMs and RECIST responses were analyzed for their impact on progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS).
    UNASSIGNED: The analysis included 716 patients. By multivariate analysis, CEA, NSE, CYFRA21-1, CA19-9, and CA125 (Group A versus Group B and Group A versus Group C) were associated with significant differences in PFS. Similar results were observed in the OS analysis. Similar results were observed in the adenocarcinoma subgroup analyses. In squamous cell carcinoma subgroup analyses, there was no statistical difference in PFS (p = 0.147) or OS (p = 0.068) between Group A and Group B for CA125.
    UNASSIGNED: The increase and decrease in serum levels of STMs might be reliable prognostic factors for immunotherapy efficacy in NSCLC patients.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:在非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)患者中及时鉴定表皮生长因子受体(EGFR)突变和间变性淋巴瘤激酶(ALK)重排状态对于酪氨酸激酶抑制剂(TKIs)给药至关重要。我们的目标是使用人工智能(AI)模型来预测EGFR突变和ALK重排状态,使用常见的人口统计学特征。病理学和血清肿瘤标志物(STMs)。
    方法:在这项单中心研究中,人口特征,病理学,EGFR突变状态,ALK重排,从武汉协和医院收集STM水平。一个回顾性集(N=1089)用于使用一个深度学习模型和五个机器学习模型来训练诊断性能。以及用于预测EGFR突变的堆叠集成模型,不常见的EGFR突变,和ALK重排状态。使用连续测试队列(n=1464)来验证预测模型。
    结果:使用堆叠集合的最终AI模型产生了最佳的诊断性能,预测EGFR突变状态的曲线下面积(AUC)为0.897和0.883,预测训练和测试队列中的ALK重排为0.995和0.921。分别。此外,训练和测试队列的总体准确度为0.93和0.83,分别,在区分常见和不常见的EGFR突变方面实现了,这是指导TKI选择的关键证据。
    结论:在这项研究中,基于稳健变量的无人驾驶AI可以帮助临床医生识别EGFR突变和ALK重排状态,并为NSCLC患者选择TKI靶向治疗提供重要指导.
    BACKGROUND: Timely identification of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutation and anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) rearrangement status in patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is essential for tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) administration. We aimed to use artificial intelligence (AI) models to predict EGFR mutations and ALK rearrangement status using common demographic features, pathology and serum tumor markers (STMs).
    METHODS: In this single-center study, demographic features, pathology, EGFR mutation status, ALK rearrangement, and levels of STMs were collected from Wuhan Union Hospital. One retrospective set (N = 1089) was used to train diagnostic performance using one deep learning model and five machine learning models, as well as the stacked ensemble model for predicting EGFR mutations, uncommon EGFR mutations, and ALK rearrangement status. A consecutive testing cohort (n = 1464) was used to validate the predictive models.
    RESULTS: The final AI model using the stacked ensemble yielded optimal diagnostic performance with areas under the curve (AUC) of 0.897 and 0.883 for predicting EGFR mutation status and 0.995 and 0.921 for predicting ALK rearrangement in the training and testing cohorts, respectively. Furthermore, an overall accuracy of 0.93 and 0.83 in the training and testing cohorts, respectively, were achieved in distinguishing common and uncommon EGFR mutations, which were key evidence in guiding TKI selection.
    CONCLUSIONS: In this study, driverless AI based on robust variables could help clinicians identify EGFR mutations and ALK rearrangement status and provide vital guidance in TKI selection for targeted therapy in NSCLC patients.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    BACKGROUND: The dynamic monitoring of perioperative carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) is recommended by current colorectal cancer (CRC) guidelines, while the benefits of additional measurements of carbohydrate antigen 19-9 (CA19-9) and carbohydrate antigen 125 (CA125) have remained controversial.
    METHODS: This retrospective longitudinal cohort included 3539 CRC patients who underwent curative resection. Distinct trajectory groups were identified by the latent class growth mixed model. Patients were grouped into subgroups jointly by CEA, CA19-9, and CA125 according to preoperative levels and longitudinal trajectories, respectively. The end points were overall survival (OS) and recurrence-free survival (RFS).
    RESULTS: Three distinct trajectory groups were characterized for serum CEA, CA19-9, and CA125: low-stable, early-rising, and later-rising. Jointly, patients were grouped into six preoperative (trajectory) joint groups. Compared with the three-low group, the adjusted hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) associated with death were 1.87 (1.29-2.70), 3.82 (2.37-6.17), 1.87 (0.97-3.61), 2.81 (1.93-4.11), and 4.99 (2.80-8.86) for the CEA-high, CA19-9-high, CA125-high, two-high, and three-high group, respectively. And compared with the three-stable trajectory group, the corresponding HRs (95% CIs) were 1.59 (1.10-2.30), 1.55 (0.77-3.10), 6.25 (4.02-9.70), 4.05 (2.73-6.02), and 12.40 (5.77-26.70) for the five rising trajectory groups, respectively. Similar associations between joint groups and RFS were observed. Notably, the trajectory joint group still had prognostic significance after adjusting for preoperative levels. The CA19-9-high group (HR: 3.82, 95% CI: 2.37-6.17) was associated with higher risk of death than the two-high group (HR: 2.81, 95% CI: 1.93-4.11). Likewise, for the CA125-rising trajectory group and two-rising trajectory group, the HRs (95% CIs) were 6.13 (3.75-10.00) and 3.99 (2.63-6.05) for death, and 3.08 (2.07-4.58) and 2.10 (1.52-2.90) for recurrence.
    CONCLUSIONS: In addition to CEA, the dynamic measurements of CA19-9 and CA125 are recommended to monitor the prognosis of CRC patients.
    BACKGROUND: National Natural Science Foundation of China [81973147, 82001986, 81960592, 82073569, 81660545].
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

公众号