Urinary ascites represents a scarcely observed pseudo-acute kidney injury in clinical settings. Protracted or missed diagnosis may hold grave ramifications for patient outcomes.
We reported a case involving an elderly female patient experiencing pseudo-acute kidney injury accompanied by ascites, wherein her renal dysfunction persisted despite medical intervention and hemodialysis. Urinary ascites was identified via a methylene blue test and by contrasting creatinine levels in serum and ascites. This patient\'s kidney function was multiple typified by a marked elevation in serum creatinine/Cystatin C ratio (> 2 L/dL), potentially serving as a clue for the clinical diagnosis of pseudo-acute kidney injury engendered by urinary ascites.
This case suggested the potential diagnostic value of an asynchronous increase in serum creatinine and serum CysC (or an increased ratio of blood creatinine to blood CysC) in patients with pseudo-acute kidney injury.

Background Frequent venepuncture for monitoring of serum urea and creatinine in chronic kidney disease (CKD) patients on dialysis will result in venous damage and infection. In this research, we assessed the feasibility of utilizing salivary samples as a substitute for serum samples in determining the levels of urea and creatinine in patients with CKD undergoing dialysis. Methods The study participants included 50 patients diagnosed with CKD undergoing hemodialysis and an equal number of apparently healthy individuals. We measured the serum and salivary levels of urea and creatinine in normal subjects. CKD patients were also subjected to similar investigations both before and after hemodialysis. Results In our study, we found that the mean value of salivary urea and creatinine are significantly elevated in the case group (salivary urea: 99.56 ± 43.28 mg/dL, salivary creatinine: 1.10 ± 0.83 mg/dL) as compared to the control group (salivary urea: 33.62 ± 23.84 mg/dL, salivary creatinine: 0.15±0.12 mg/dL, p value: <0.001). There was a statistically significant reduction in the mean value of salivary urea and creatinine in the post-dialysis sample (salivary urea: 45.06 ± 30.37 mg/dL, salivary creatinine: 0.43±0.44 mg/dL) compared to the pre-dialysis sample (salivary urea: 99.56 ± 43.28 mg/dL, salivary creatinine: 1.10 ± 0.83 mg/dL; p value: <0.001) in the case group. The salivary urea is significantly positively correlated with serum urea (r value: 0.366, p value: 0.009). But there is no significant correlation seen between salivary and serum creatinine. We have created a cut-off for salivary urea (52.5 mg/dL) to diagnose CKD which has a good sensitivity (84%) and specificity (78%). Conclusion The results of our study suggest that the estimation of salivary urea and creatinine could serve as a non-invasive, alternative marker for the diagnosis of CKD, and benefit in risk-free monitoring of their progress before and after hemodialysis.